@rosserobertolli
  @rosserobertolli
Rossero Bertolli | A BETTER static Divide by 4 for the MMX @rosserobertolli | Uploaded 3 years ago | Updated 9 hours ago
Yeah, I know...

It is less exciting than the rolling marble counter weight, but from a mechanical standpoint: static is better.

This is my proposal for an improved divide-by-4 system that reliably only tops over at four marbles and only tips back when completely empty. The placement of the weight is critical: not only is the horizontal arm important for topping over, but the vertical placement determines the reduction in moment arm when in unloading position, needing just one marble to stay down.

This is where Martins current divider comes short: The counterweight is a compromise, it may tip over at 3 marbles and tip back before fully unloaded. Another problem martin faced whas that the que wasn't held back in the unloading position. With better path constrainment this is solved as well.

Advantages as I see it:
Marble
- Aesthetically more pleasing
- More stable tipping action
- Faster

Static
- "Easy" adjustment
- Less physics involved during design
- Keep It Stupid Simple

Prototyped on a Dutchy 3D printer
www.dutchy3d.nl
A BETTER static Divide by 4 for the MMXInnofil3D strength contest entry (Nutcracker) Please vote!Newtons cradle Marble energy dissipationFirecracker experiment in beer bottle filled with waterA better divide by 4 for the MMXEerste start van mijn Citroen AZ1e start nieuw chassisAdjustable hight modules MMXCanadair greenscreen MAYACurved marble track testMini DV d001 mounted on bike, going shopping, testvideo part1

A BETTER static Divide by 4 for the MMX @rosserobertolli

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER