More confirmation that Lawrence and @AntinatalistAdvocacy are pushing a pronatal agenda as "AN activists" antinatalistadvocacy.org/human-procreation lmao They're so blatantly taking the piss out of anyone who thinks they're AN
00:00 The Credibility Gap 12:43 Animal Supremacy
@THECHILDFREECOUPLE Watch this video from 5:20 . It proves what I told you about Amanda, that she posts content advocating in favor of CSAM.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Amanda Sukenick Oldphan Lawrence Anton Childfree Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм
More confirmation that Lawrence and @AntinatalistAdvocacy are pushing a pronatal agenda as "AN activists" antinatalistadvocacy.org/human-procreation lmao They're so blatantly taking the piss out of anyone who thinks they're AN
00:00 The Credibility Gap 12:43 Animal Supremacy
@THECHILDFREECOUPLE Watch this video from 5:20 . It proves what I told you about Amanda, that she posts content advocating in favor of CSAM.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Amanda Sukenick Oldphan Lawrence Anton Childfree Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизмBoomerangefilism2024-09-21 | Inspired by youtube.com/watch?v=Mznr14Ex4WI @CarnismDebunked @veganequilibrium7866
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist Advocacy Lawrence AntonCirque Du Efilismefilism2024-01-01 | SOURCES - Links to all original source material can be found in the description of each short video: youtube.com/@efilism/shorts - Final clip youtube.com/shorts/8jGSpWPPc0o
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist Advocacy Lawrence AntonHappy New Yearefilism2024-01-01 | ...If Procreation Is Murder...efilism2023-12-31 | Introducing yet another jerkoff efilist, Laith Maleek Reem, proving once again that believing in the absurdity of efilism is but a hair's breadth away from justifying and committing atrocities.
See also youtube.com/watch?v=EfIKinXPz6I where Laith gets creepy with TFA for TFA's stance against CSAM etc advocacy. Another abusive internet tuff guy pos efilist.
#shorts Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist Advocacy Lawrence AntonAm I An Efilist?efilism2023-12-16 | SOURCE youtu.be/qtrqt0kkzFI?t=401
Original video uploaded 2021-12-12 Minor changes have been made to the original.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist Advocacy Lawrence AntonDifferentiating between Antinatalism and not-Antinatalismefilism2023-12-01 | This is a conversation I had with with @BrotherMarkus and @dailynegativity5429 This video is also available on @BrotherMarkus 's channel youtube.com/watch?v=kYIf3O_EKbI Mark's version shows the live chat.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist AdvocacyAnd Now For Something Completely Different...efilism2023-11-29 | SOURCES A lot of these can be found on the Bad Ethics channel @badethics2831 I'll list direct links shortly.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизм Antinatalist AdvocacyWhy Does Antinatalism Exclude Animals?efilism2023-11-27 | NOTES Video originally posted December 21 2021
1:25 NOTE 1: This is poorly articulated. It would have been better if I'd said something like: "I consider antinatalism to be defined/encapsulated by a normative statement, rather than a pessimistic evaluation, such as Benatar's statement".
3:30 NOTE 2: This is where things can get murky. We need to guard against retconning philosophical pessimism with the AN label. When it comes to determining what is and isn't AN I prefer proceeding with caution looking for meaningful definitions with limiting principles, rather than working backwards trying to shoehorn prefabricated ideologies into AN.
6:08 NOTE 3: I don't mean we can jump directly from Benatar's evaluation to a normative claim. Only that Benatar's evaluation can be used as part of an argument to arrive at a normative claim.
9:17 NOTE 4: My point still stands wrt green (AN) gradually turning into red (not-AN), but I'm no longer as certain about the specific example I use here.
15:18 NOTE 5: Lawrence Anton is proving my hunch correct by trying to persuade ANs to prioritze animal suffering, and by becoming a proponent of the Ecological Niche Replacement Argument, a pronatalist agenda. (NB "a pronatalist agenda" refers to the Ecological Niche Replacement Argument)
18:52 NOTE 6: Here are some examples of David Benatar defining antinatalism. 1) He's adamant about it being more than just the pessimistic evaluation that it's harmful to come into existence. He consistently invokes a normative claim. 2) He extends AN to animals that humans cause to come into existence. However if he means a normative proscription, which appears to be the case, I've yet to see step by step reasoning from him or anyone else justifying such a determination. Simply declaring something to be the case doesn't make it so. 3) Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, but it's worth noting he doesn't mention wild animal intervention. He only references a negative duty to refrain from bringing into existence.
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизмAntinatalism and Consent with @PerspectivePhilosophyefilism2023-10-18 | This is a discussion I had with Perspective Philosophy on Feb 28 2020. My sound quality was awful (100% my fault). I've tried to remedy that by adjusting the volume in places. It isn't anywhere near perfect, but I hope it isn't unbearable.
I'm uploading it without listening to it again. I'm curious to find out how much I still agree with.
SOURCES Antinatalism - Defense of a Definition archive[.]md/vFwt0 (This is the essay that led to the discussion)
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизмChallenge Accepted @inmendhamefilism2023-10-16 | SOURCES youtube.com/watch?v=xcBm_XOitZM youtube.com/post/UgkxwmyZz0WdpqAQRvk3vrhOdMgcQ0tqHaQV 13 Reasons Why Efilism Is Vaporware
NB: In these videos I assert every still and video image of CP involves sex trafficked children being sexually violated. This is incorrect. Although it's true that sex trafficking is a significant component of CP, not all CP victims are sex trafficked. Sex trafficking is a subcategory of sexual exploitation which involves compelling or causing a child to engage in a commercial sex act state.gov/what-is-trafficking-in-persons https://archive.md/POzHh. It's therefore more correct to say every still and video image of CP involves sexually exploited children being sexually violated. However, you're rightfully presumed to be advocating for sex trafficking when you advocate for CP, unless you clarify that you're only advocating for sexually exploited children who aren't sex trafficked. Good luck if that's the hill you want to die on.
0:00 Introduction 0:31 March 31 2022 1:22 April 7 2022 4:02 May 11 2022 16:41 May 19 2022 27:12 August 5 2023
Gary Mosher Efilism Inmendham Draft Science Childfree Oldphan Amanda Sukenick Exploring Antinatalism Antinatalism International Stop Having Kids Antinatalism এন্টিন্যাটালিজম प्रजननविरोधी জন্মদানবিরোধী জন্মেরবিরুদ্ধে jonmodanberodhi エフィリズム 反出生主義 антинатализм эфилизмWhat Does Amanda Sukenick Really Believe? @enjoyour24 @SoftWhiteUnderbellyefilism2023-09-22 | My commentary is in the pinned comment.
0:00 Introduction 3:02 The Definition 5:53 Bait And Switch 9:26 Burden Of Proof 15:04 The Motte & Bailey 26:47 Interim Summary 27:46 The Syllogism 31:28 No Connection With Antinatalism 43:19 Conclusion
- GM's Oct 9 video of the Oct 8 telephone conference youtu.be/-XAVc2PPrvo archive:is/dmvHe - GM's Jul 22 video, JUDGE MELINDA HARMON is a-ppealed youtu.be/-JwhaNRY8Qg archive:ph/0M2CI
efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalism nobrainsinheadTake Children Away From Parentsefilism2023-07-01 | Joy (aka NoBrainsInHead) argues for children being taken away from parents to be raised by the state, specifically by people "proven to be able to deal with children and raise them properly". This is meaningless until Joy explains in detail what it means to deal with and raise children properly, and how someone can be proven to be able to do that. She'd then have to dig into broader implications, such as how such a policy might impact things like freedom of thought/movement etc, education, reproductive health, adult wellbeing, etc etc. It sounds like a communist dystopia, with Joy as the dictator.
Joy's ostensible reason for why children should be taken away from parents is because some parents abuse their children (Which could be projection more than anything else given the abuse she claims to have suffered at the hands of her mother youtu.be/Z_pSTyRhWzQ?t=107 , youtu.be/U_BOBSLoPXk?t=83 ). But look at the full context of her tweets. She's essentially advocating for children to be taken away from people who don't raise children in conformity with her worldview. So the real reasons for taking children away from parents isn't to protect or further the children's interests. Narrow ideology and unresolved trauma are more likely.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismFrighteningly Interestedefilism2023-06-28 | I’ll skip a commentary for this one, suffice to say check out the original source videos linked below and draw your own conclusions.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismDupers Delightefilism2023-03-18 | Amanda Sukenick calls herself The Antinatalism Spokesman. The magnanimous diplomat providing a big tent for one and all to come and break bread.
But don’t be fooled. It’s a charade. Amanda isn’t an antinatalism activist. She's an efilism activist who views antinatalism as nothing more than a disposable exploitable resource.
Riding antinatalism’s coattails is the only way Amanda can launder efilism into legitimacy. Her fundamental strategy is causing confusion by conflating the two. Her goal is to make people believe they’re the same thing. They aren’t: youtu.be/RYWC2xc15zc?t=1986
But it doesn’t take much to find cracks in the facade. Amanda admits to being driven by delusion, ego, and an unhealthy obsession with a psychopathic brute who advocates for being able to indulge in CP and brutalize women to prevent them from having children youtu.be/tKS2k73IH0c?t=1520 . (She's always been obsessed with monsters archive:md/lt6AW#selection-335.453-335.499 )
That's a lot of red flags from someone parading around as The Antinatalism Spokesman.
Full Context Sources youtu.be/r2wGvdhgwmc?t=195 is the only extant source available. The remainder were deleted when Amanda’s Forever Wolf Films channel was banned from youtube.
If @anti-natalwolf4449 reuploads the original videos I will link to them so everyone can see the full context.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismThe Efilists Conceitefilism2023-03-11 | One of the hallmarks of efilism is efilists passing off their personal subjective values as insuperable objective truth. Here's the chain of "logic": Disagreeing with an efilist = disagreeing with objective truth ∴ disagreeing with an efilist is grounded in fallacious reasoning. The intent is to gaslight heretics into believing that disagreeing with efilists is the same as being illogical and irrational, meaning efilists are justified in dismissing objections out of hand. Quite a claim in light of the fact efilism itself is grounded on fallacious reasoning youtube.com/post/UgkxwmyZz0WdpqAQRvk3vrhOdMgcQ0tqHaQV
In this video efilist Danny @efilwv1635 from @TheRightToNoLongerExist showcases this approach by framing opposing personal values as logical fallacies in order to avoid having to grapple with them in good faith.
The problem for efilists is having to maintain the pretense their subjective values are on a par with objective truth. Acknowledging otherwise would force them to concede their subjective worldview is on an equal footing with all other subjective worldviews. That would undermine their claim to supremacy of thought/insight/ethics, which would in turn undermine efilism.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismI Am Afraidefilism2023-02-26 | Amanda admitting she’s had to talk a lot - not one or a few - but A LOT of efilists down from killing and torturing random people is a jaw dropping confession. Sukenick is corroborating what I and others have been saying for far too long, that gratuitous brutality is sewn into the very fabric of the efilism cult.
Amanda says efilists are abusing the idea of efilism. But this is neither here nor there. Either a lot of efilists believe efilism justifies random violence, or efilism attracts a lot of people with violent tendencies who use efilism to justify those tendencies. The problem lies somewhere between having a messaging problem and the message being the problem. Whichever it is, responsibility falls squarely on the shoulders of whoever's responsible for the message and the messaging, viz., Amanda Sukenick and Gary Mosher.
So, for efilists who say nobody has ever committed violence in the name of efilism, it isn’t because they haven’t wanted to. It’s only because Sukenick talked them out of it.
Then there's the matter of Gary's reply. In another video he says, "I've never advocated a violent act ever, unless it's the only choice" youtu.be/WTqwVByycIE?t=2394. Yet here he says he's all for people getting what they deserve. "Getting what they deserve" includes being brutally murdered by a serial killer just because you're rich. Leaving aside the incongruity of his statements, this is dangerously close to stochastic terrorism.
efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismK-ll The Breedersefilism2023-02-19 | Efilism is grounded in a pathological longing to inflict gratuitous brutality to compensate for personal misery. So it isn’t surprising to discover Gary’s videos are replete with him declaring a desire to kill. He even lamented the death penalty being abolished in his home state because that’s how he intends to go out.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismStrongest Efilist Contentefilism2023-02-12 | K-ll-ng everyone isn’t a bad thing… Everybody being dead isn’t a bad thing… I would f—ing shoot that b-tch in the head who’s pregnant… These are the kind of statements Amanda Sukenick categorizes as “some of the strongest efilist content”. In another video (youtu.be/Ts3CAf_RlL4?t=875) Efil Blaise laughs along in agreement with someone saying: "I don't see murder as that much of a bad thing”. But if murder isn’t that much of a bad thing why does he use ‘murderer’ as a pejorative against pregnant women to justify shooting them? The efilist response typically boils down to declaring that an efilist committing an atrocity is a righteous act because efilists have unadulterated insight into objective truth. But how would efilists fare if they came up against people who believed their unadulterated insight into objective truth shows humanity’s destiny is to propagate and prevail? Do they not have the right, according to efilist values, to preemptively annihilate efilists who want to annihilate them? This being the case, for as long as efilists assert efilism as objective truth, efilist success relies on might is right (violence) rather than persuasion by argument (This plays out online in the form of weaponizing harassment and abuse to fight a war of attrition). It also proves that the efilist claim of being uniquely capable of insight into objective truth is voided by others who claim the same but who have different values (Just like competing religious faiths). NB: None of this is advocating for anyone to be harmed. The purpose is demonstrating how efilists talk in circles and fail to comprehend the consequences of being subjected to what they believe they’re entitled to inflict on others.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismBecause Im A Manefilism2023-02-05 | Contempt for women is a recurring theme in efilism. Gary Mosher berates women for not getting sterilized but refuses to have a vasectomy because he's a man... while threatening to kill any women who gets pregnant by him. His vision is a bizarro Handmaid's Tale, where women are disposable sex toys.
#shorts efilism inmendham childfree oldphan Amanda Sukenick exploringantinatalism antinatalisminternational stophavingkids antinatalismPro Tortureefilism2023-01-29 | Underneath all the abuse and bluster, Gary Mosher is a prolife shill who won't hesitate to grant himself exceptions to the dogma he foists upon everyone else. He isn't interested in formulating a coherent ethic. All he's interested in is satisfying his own caprice.