Undoing the imposition #efilism #promortalism #collapse #extinction Efil blaise 2022-11-10 | Live and die for the truth. Best:youtu.be/bAuU-MAZ18Yyoutu.be/45M9sv4dmFEyoutu.be/Hdn1YEZM9rwyoutu.be/ZjgmlIfxXew
Promortalism #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-11-02 | “Sleep is good,death is better but of course the best thing would to have never been born at all.” Heinrich Heine. Ceasing to exist sooner is always better than ceasing to exist inevitably later. The longer sentience persists the more the suffering will be experienced by sentient beings. Starting life and continuing life will always be an imposition. Imposition of harm just by being alive. It’s a no win game. Sentience runs a deficit. There’s no profit as it’s just a pointless struggle of survival accomplishing nothing. This applies to not just sentience as a whole but also for an individual sentient being. Why is a later inevitable cessation better than a sooner one? Response to : youtu.be/5OhtqB4l2jw
Efil studio with Oldphan#efilism #promortalism #extinction #antinatalism Efil blaise 2022-10-29 | Anti natal wolf youtube.com/channel/UCZrRegIYlkF-x5Fc9RzgeNwThe exploring antinatalism podcast youtube.com/c/TheExploringAntinatalismPodcast
Efil Studio with Kevin and Danny. #efilism #righttodie #collapse #extinction #promortalism #doomer Efil blaise 2022-10-19 | The Right to no longer existyoutube.com/c/TheRightToNoLongerExistConversation with TRTNLE:youtu.be/pX7JiT4Pf3k Kevin’s channel: youtube.com/c/EyeDoubtItDanny’s channel: youtube.com/channel/UCcaz_CCNWEwFq8qxrM_vxYg
Defense of the Red button 2 ( undoing the imposition)#efilism #extinction #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-10-13 | No life no problem. Response to : youtu.be/uT9TuAAqa34Further viewing: youtu.be/Tgne73EF7zY
Defense of the RED button 1. #efilism #promortalism #extinction Efil blaise 2022-10-10 | Response to : youtu.be/uT9TuAAqa34Benatar vs promortalism : youtu.be/BwqQj8zEBrc
In conversation with Rita McCloud#efilism Efil blaise 2022-10-03 | youtu.be/xqOOGn68t2M@RitaMcCloud http://Twitch.tv/ritamccloud
Pro life and anti natalist how’s that even flucking possible, Gnosticism crap #efilism #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-09-29 | Response to : youtu.be/yvbd0usRq8cCollapsing with Casey:youtube.com/user/practicetrackMy interviews with collapsing with Casey :youtu.be/ANs-taIBKRUyoutu.be/OxyiZENqhWcWould really appreciate any help for my checkoutPayPal: blaise.ak97@gmail.com paypal.me/blaiseAk
Fluck off trolls. Nature needs to be stopped. #efilism #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-09-08 | “Sentience consuming sentience should end”If anyone can help me out for my checkout I would really appreciate it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank youPayPal: blaise.ak97@gmail.com
2+2 logic(don’t create the problem then you won’t have to solve the problem) #efilism #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-08-15 | ...
Response to don’t give up you’re enough crap. #righttodie Efil blaise 2022-08-11 | Response to youtu.be/Xc5WM9YcTw4
Efilism/promortalism vs nihilism(bonus cat in the background)#efilism #nihilism Efil blaise 2022-07-30 | ...
Response to multilingual_kdog vegantinatalism #veganism#antinatalism Efil blaise 2022-06-16 | Response to youtu.be/zzpJWJfAGes
Response to Anti natalism on trial open panel and some comments#efilism #antinatalism Efil blaise 2022-06-08 | youtube.com/watch?v=GAkOamUv81I&t=11443s
Perpetuating life is perpetuating violence 2 ending life is ending violence#efilism #extinction Efil blaise 2022-05-24 | ...
Perpetuating life is violence 1 #efilism #extinction #promortalism Efil blaise 2022-05-24 | As graceful as possible extinction is the ideal solution for sentient life on earth.
Against Efilism tripe #efilism Efil blaise 2022-04-30 | Mushroom Kaiyoti youtube.com/channel/UC62o5s74cRjbFfkxjxHG81A
Veganism reconsidered. Why shouldn’t we stop the perpetuation of suffering on earth Efil blaise 2022-04-24 | youtu.be/PRk1Bws3d5gIf you think it’s okay for animals( human non human both) to breed then I would argue you’re voting for unnecessary exploitation. The most ”vegan” thing we as a collective can do is to accelerate the cessation of life on earth. If you don’t create the meat eaters you won’t have to create the vegans to change the meat eaters or convert them to vegan. It’s unarguably the efficient solution. Don’t make the mess you won’t have to clean it up. Continued existence will create mess. Cessation of existence will end and prevent all the future mess. You win when you prevent. Red button the planet while we have the opportunity to work on making a red button. The more we delay the more this suffering perpetuates. Just going vegan won’t solve this problem. It’s very minuscule. Pro mortalism wins. Either you are pro mortalist or you’re an idiot. Fact
Inconsistent anti natalists #efilism #Promortalism Efil blaise 2022-04-20 | The circumstance of reality gives us two options. Either we end sentient life on earth or we let it perpetuate. If we end life then we prevent all the future suffering and rights violations and consent violations that will happen in the future if life continues. We also prevent some (could be) beings who might enjoy living. If we take the second option of letting life perpetuate then we allow the beings who enjoy living and prevent their Deprivation but we don’t prevent the horrific suffering that will be imposed by the continuation of life. Now logically which prevention is more valuable? Recognizing the uncertainties and risky nature of life and the fact that we have so little control of it should make us be risk averse and accept that we have to End this cycle of suffering on earth as soon as we can while we have the opportunity to prevent the worst from happening. Death is the ultimate escape from life. How is an instantaneous death not the best outcome for a living sentient being?
Preventing a worse(grotesque suffering) is more valuable than preventing a bad(unfulfilled desire). Efil blaise 2022-04-20 | ...
Why pro mortalism wins, euthanasia for all sentient beings#efilism #Promortalism Efil blaise 2022-04-15 | ...
Euthanasia or sanctuary for the animals #efilism #veganism Efil blaise 2022-04-13 | I argue that an instant death is the best outcome for a living being. Because it ends and prevents the suffering that they will cause and experience themselves. If you have a cow and now either you euthanize it or put it in a sanctuary or back in the wild. I would argue putting the animal back in the wild is very cruel. And if you would put the animal in the sanctuary you’ll have to sterilize it which is the right thing to do. My question is why does the animal need to wake up once it’s unconscious? It doesn’t need to exist. So euthanasia for the animal is the rational option I argue.
Part 3 vs earthling ed Efil blaise 2022-04-13 | Response to youtu.be/Hb4u3OoOT8wThe vegan blind spotyoutu.be/XjCp6bUp__MEfilism youtu.be/jXjUB5A0n58Pro mortalismpapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3184600
Vs earthling Ed part 2 Efil blaise 2022-04-13 | Response to youtu.be/Hb4u3OoOT8wVegan blind spot youtu.be/XjCp6bUp__MEfilism youtu.be/jXjUB5A0n58Pro mortalism papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3184600
Ignorance of the perpetrator doesn’t undo the suffering of the victim. (Vegan vs efilist) part 1 Efil blaise 2022-04-13 | Response to youtu.be/Hb4u3OoOT8wThe vegan blind spotyoutu.be/XjCp6bUp__MEfilism youtu.be/jXjUB5A0n58Pro mortalism papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3184600I argue that animals being exploited by nature in the wild are just as valuable in terms of their suffering experiences and just as we should stop the exploitation of the animals in our factory farms we should stop the exploitation of the animals in the wild which I would argue is achieved only by working to a most graceful as possible extinction of all sentient life on this planet. It will prevent all of the future suffering and end all the current suffering that’s going on this very moment. The most vegan thing one can do is stop people from having children. If there won’t be no meat eaters you won’t have to fix them by converting them to veganism. “ you don’t make a mess you won’t have to clean it up”. It’s that simple logic. Ceasing to exist solves the problem. Letting it carry on just creates suffering. Focusing on prevention is ethically preferable then reduction.I can also make the argument that if person A lives a vegan lifestyle( not vegan activist) till his or her old age(50 years)and person B kills himself or herself at 25 years( not vegan), the net suffering caused by the vegan is more than the net suffering caused( to animals) by the meat eater in this case.
Transhumanism bullshick #efilism Efil blaise 2022-04-08 | I argue that life is unnecessary waste in the form of suffering being endured by sentient beings as experiences and it doesn’t accomplish anything meaningful in the sense that there is no tragedy in the universe because of the non existence of martians. Imposing life is unethical because it will inevitably impose suffering. So we should stop sentient beings from imposing life. This person arguing Transhumanism seems to have a deluded perspective that life will always persist and it will never end. When we have evidence that one day it will at a moment in time the earth will fall into the sun and the uncertainties of a asteroid hitting the earth and wiping it out. It will all go extinct, one thing we know for sure is the later it will happen the more suffering there will be. I argue that logically we should accept the sooner it happens the better. If I have to impose negative outcome today to prevent more than one of the same negative outcome in the future logically I have to impose it today. Also this utopia(crispr shit) where you think beings will never experience any pain or very minimum pain and everyone will be happy having endless orgasm loops in their brains, first of all you are no where near this utopia to make this argument in the first place. And you fail to recognize the fact that you’re pleasures are merely just a relief or immunity from the pain. You can’t make this game playable only way to win is no more players. And how will you achieve immortality? The solution to this problem on earth called life is extinction.The suffering doesn’t need to exist and neither does your “happy” moments. And this argument from multiverse crap that there’s suffering there too so it will just keep happening so we should exist and become “transformers” or something is so bullshit. The multiverse shit is based on no rational evidence whatsoever, it’s just a mathematical contrivance just shit made up. Check out draftphysics.com where you can find how bad this physics is.youtu.be/v01yJVAKyVY
Birth is a worse crime than murder #efilism #antinatalism Efil blaise 2022-04-04 | I argue that imposing life is a ethically worse action than imposing death. Because first of all even if it is a case to be made that imposing death would be the right thing to do in a given circumstance and the philosophical stance that an instant death is the best outcome for a existing sentient being, still the number 1 cause of death is birth. Giving life is giving death. That’s a fact. So to be consistent because we have laws against murder because essentially you’re imposing death by “killing” someone. My argument is you’re imposing death by giving birth. You can’t escape this fact. So we should consider to reduce the deaths which we have laws against in the most efficient and effective manner as we can. That is by preventing births in the first place. That’s a no brainer. And I haven’t even heavily expressed on the all the risk and the potential suffering in terms of brutal , hard intolerable experiences that they might and some percentage will definitely go through. So breeders are the actual “evil”because they not only impose death but all the other horrific experiences before a gruesome death. And for what , for some notion of some “happy”moments which you can’t honestly say are worth all the suffering that goes on this earth. Birth opens all the doors to harm and risks, death ends all the suffering and prevents the future suffering. So be anti pro creation because the worst imposition is imposing inevitable suffering and death. Sentient life doesn’t need to exist and especially when it wastes so much suffering it should be stopped to prevent the future victims and there’s nothing bad about the earth turning into mars.
TRTNLE “the bottle of control” argument ( euthanasia) Efil blaise 2022-04-03 | youtu.be/45M9sv4dmFE (TRTNLE)I argue that the right to end one’s existence should be one of the fundamental right granted to all human beings irrespective if they are suicidal or not. If I give you the assurance that you will die in your sleep, everything thing else is the same you don’t know when you’re going to die but you know you won’t have to die of any other natural horrific ways that you could’ve died. So how much will you be willing to pay for this assurance? And how not granting the access to the peaceful pill because people might harm themselves but granting access to other things that they can harm themselves with even more horrifically( knives and other crap also the addictions we have) make logical sense? It is my right, my personal autonomy to do whatever I want with my body and having the “bottle of control” with me is my right that should be respected. I don’t have to be suicidal I just have to recognize that it’s in my best interest that I choose when and how I should discontinue my existence.( which will happen anyways no one is immune to death)
Anti natalists should be pro mortalist Efil blaise 2022-04-02 | papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3184600_code3011708.pdf?abstractid=3184600&mirid=1(jiwoon Hwang paper why is it always better to cease to exist)youtu.be/z9BU2rPAI3A ( exploring anti natalism podcast 56)
Why shouldn’t we stop life from perpetuating? #efilism Efil blaise 2022-03-27 | youtu.be/jXjUB5A0n58youtu.be/RH9Bl3iZo94youtu.be/oubC1OWWY78
