Uploaded November 2022 | Updated September 2026, 14 hours ago
The first solve was not objectively optimal, because of the pause and hesitation on the easy ZBLL. The second solve had a very long N perm, so it could have been a low 6 or even a 5 with a better PLL. The 4th solve was pretty locky but the PLL skip saved it. I was so nervous on the final solve that I incorrectly inspected first pair, which ruined the solve. I can get sub 5.5 quite easily on other solutions, so hopefully I can get it next time!
(5.53) 6.72 5.61 5.76 (7.64) = 6.03
Cube: Tornado v3 M (Pioneer)
Sponsored by SpeedCubeShop! You can use the code 'tpsgod' for 5% off your order at speedcubeshop.com
The first solve was not objectively optimal, because of the pause and hesitation on the easy ZBLL. The second solve had a very long N perm, so it could have been a low 6 or even a 5 with a better PLL. The 4th solve was pretty locky but the PLL skip saved it. I was so nervous on the final solve that I incorrectly inspected first pair, which ruined the solve. I can get sub 5.5 quite easily on other solutions, so hopefully I can get it next time!
(5.53) 6.72 5.61 5.76 (7.64) = 6.03
Cube: Tornado v3 M (Pioneer)
Sponsored by SpeedCubeShop! You can use the code 'tpsgod' for 5% off your order at speedcubeshop.com
