5.89 3x3 ao5 w/ reconstructions @KyleSantucci
5.89 3x3 ao5 w/ reconstructions  @KyleSantucci
Uploaded January 2021 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
A good average especially considering all the solves were fullstep, reconstructions below.

Cube: WRM 2020

Generated By csTimer on 2021-01-11
avg of 5: 5.89

Time List:
1. 5.38 L2 B' R2 F' L2 B' F2 U2 R2 U2 L2 D' L2 B R U2 F' D U2 R'
2. (7.92) L' B2 L' B2 L' D2 F2 D2 R' D2 L' B L' U B L F' D R2
3. (5.29) R2 D2 B L2 B L2 U2 R2 F' R U L U' L R B2 U B'
4. 6.25 R2 F2 L2 D2 L' U R2 L2 F' L2 B2 U F2 L2 U D2 R2 D B2 D' L2
5. 6.05 U2 F' R' D R U' F' D' L B2 U' B2 U R2 U' D L2 F2 U2 R2 L2


5.38 seconds
L2 B' R2 F' L2 B' F2 U2 R2 U2 L2 D' L2 B R U2 F' D U2 R'
z2 y // inspection
D' R' F D2 U' r U' r' // cross
R U R2' U2' R // 1st pair
y' U R' U R // 2nd pair
R U R' U R U' R' L' U L // 3rd pair
U2 R U2' R' U2 R U' R' // 4th pair
U' F U R U2' R' U' R U R' F' // OLL
U' l' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 B' // PLL

57 moves in 5.38 seconds = 10.59 TPS

This solve had an 8 move cross, but it's able to be executed very fast, in this solve I finished cross around 0.70. After that I did my planned first pair, and that set up my second pair nicely. While inserting my second pair I saw my third pair, and I did a very TPS-heavy solution for it, I could have rotated and done it more efficiently and the last pair would be around the same speed, but I think my execution did the job well. For OLL instead of doing my normal alg
(F U R U' R2' F' R U R U' R') I did F U R U2' R' U' R U R' F' to avoid the N perm.


7.92 seconds
L' B2 L' B2 L' D2 F2 D2 R' D2 L' B L' U B L F' D R2
y x' // inspection
R r' F' D' R D' R // cross
d' L U2 L' U' L U L' // 1st pair
U2' R U R' d R' U' R // 2nd pair
R U' R' U' R U' R' L U2 L' // 3rd pair
U2 R U' R' U R U' R' U2 R U' R' U // 4th pair
U R' U' F U R U' R' F' R // OLL
U U l' U R' D2 R U' R' D2 R2 B' // PLL

68 moves in 7.92 seconds = 8.58 TPS

This solve had a mediocre cross solution, the cross was very locky and took around 1.7 to finish, it was then followed by decent F2L, not the most efficient cases or solutions but good execution nonetheless. One thing to note about the F2L is that on the third pair if I had inserted it with U' L U' L' instead of L U2 L' then I would have gotten a better last pair into a PLL skip, which would have made this solve a high 5. OLL and PLL were locky and should have been much faster, but it's fine because it's a 7.9.


5.29 seconds
R2 D2 B L2 B L2 U2 R2 F' R U L U' L R B2 U B'
z2 y // inspection
U R F D' R' L U2 R' D2 // cross
L U L' // 1st pair
d U R U R2' U' R // 2nd pair
U' U R U' R' U' L U L' // 3rd pair
U R U' R' d R' U' R // 4th pair
U r U R' U' r' F R F' // OLL
R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R U // PLL

59 moves in 5.29 seconds = 11.15 TPS

This solve had a good cross +1 solution with nice fingertricks, allowing me to be done the first pair at about 1.2. Immediately after the first pair I should have done the orange and green pair, as it would have given me a rotationless solve and a 3 mover for the third pair into an easy 1LLL. After my solution for the second pair, I did an unnecessary U' U, which would
have been prevented with better look-ahead. After those unnecessary moves my solve was perfect though, I am really happy with how fluid the end was.


6.25 seconds
R2 F2 L2 D2 L' U R2 L2 F' L2 B2 U F2 L2 U D2 R2 D B2 D' L2
z2 y // inspection
D R2 D' R2' D2 F' D2 // cross
y U' R U' R' L' U L // 1st pair
U' R U' R' L U' L' // 2nd pair
U2 R U' R' U2 R U' R' // 3rd pair
y U R U2' R' U' R U R' // 4th pair
r U R' U' L' L r' R U R U' R' // OLL(CP)
U' R' U R' U' R' U' R' U R U R2' // PLL

61 moves in 6.25 seconds = 9.76 TPS

This solve had a fairly inefficient cross, I did predict my first pair, and I knew that after I was done the cross that my fingers would be in the perfect position to do a quick rotation and solve the pair. The execution was quick, but I still should have done the cross like y' U R2' D' R2 D' R' D2, and then it would have been really easy to lookahead into my first two pairs. The rest of the F2L was good. Then I had an easy last layer case, but I messed up the OLL and then had a really chunky PLL execution. I should have done the really easy ELL (U M U' M' U2 M U' M') but I wasn't sure if I would know the ELL.

6.05 seconds
U2 F' R' D R U' F' D' L B2 U' B2 U R2 U' D L2 F2 U2 R2 L2
z y // inspection
U' D' l U R D R' F R D2 // cross
R' U2' R d R U R' // 1st pair
y' d L' U L // 2nd pair
U' R U' R2' U2' R d' L' U L // 3rd pair
U' R U' R' U R U R' // 4th pair
U' r U r' R U R' U' r U' r' // OLL
U' R U' R' U' R U R D R' U' R D' R' U2 R' U // PLL

67 moves in 6.05 seconds = 11.07 TPS


10 move cross isn't good at all, I really don't know why I didn't do (red top white front) U' D' x' L2' D' r U' r', as it is much better. The first pair was good, but I should have inserted it lefty to avoid the
extra rotations. The last 2 pairs aren't the best cases, and what I did wasn't the best, but still good considering my TPS was high and I didn't pause at all. What I should have done for the last 2 pairs was y U R U' R u' R U R' d’ L' U L D.
5.89 3x3 ao5 w/ reconstructionsRubiks Cube solved in 2.99 seconds7.48 Official 3x3 AveragecsTimer virtual cube in 3.76. Reconstruction :(7.58 3x3 Best on Cam Single17.703 3x3 Solve6.64 Official 3x3 single9.86 CsTimer Virtual Rubiks Cube SolveCollin Burns OLL: Time Attack Challenge in 3.416 seconds (Frame counted, 17.56 TPS)9.87 3x3 Solve! (Former Best On Cam)19.28 PLL Time Attack UWR2!4.03 single
Kyle Santucci |

5.89 3x3 ao5 w/ reconstructions

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER