4:1 Contraction Flow: Stress Tensor vs. Log-Conformation Formulation Stability @flow3d
4:1 Contraction Flow: Stress Tensor vs. Log-Conformation Formulation Stability  @flow3d
Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
This FLOW-3D simulation shows a classic 4:1 contraction flow featuring a sharp corner, a standard benchmark case in computational rheology. Using the standard stress tensor formulation, the simulation becomes unstable after 3 seconds of flow time due to exponential growth of the elastic stress. The log-conformation tensor formulation remains stable throughout, enabling robust simulation of the same flow.

Learn more about the Viscoelastic Flow Model: flow3d.com/modeling-capabilities/viscoelastic-flow-model
4:1 Contraction Flow: Stress Tensor vs. Log-Conformation Formulation StabilityHairpin Laser Welding Simulation | FLOW-3D WELDGarrison Dam Spillway Rendering | FLOW-3D HYDROVertical Slot Fishway at a Weir | FLOW-3D HYDROBridge Pier Skew Angle Comparison in FLOW-3D HYDROHigh Viscosity Fluid | FLOW-3DMaterial Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Metal | FLOW-3D AMLeveraging AM Simulation for Strategic Process Development - Summary | FLOW-3D AMOptimizing Ingate Shape on a HPDC Structural Component | FLOW-3D CASTItuango Dam Spillway | FLOW-3D HYDROSewer Junction Box SFDPW | FLOW-3D HYDROIN718 LPBF Validation | FLOW-3D AM
FLOW-3D |

4:1 Contraction Flow: Stress Tensor vs. Log-Conformation Formulation Stability

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER