@stevesclocks
  @stevesclocks
Steve Peterson | 3D Printed Clock Arbor Test @stevesclocks | Uploaded December 2020 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
Quick experiment to compare friction of various arbor types used in my 3D printed clocks.

The options include:
1. Stainless steel bushings with 1/16" music wire arbors
2. Small printed holes with 1/16" music wire arbors
3. Large printed holes with 1/8" music wire arbors

Stainless steel bushings are used in my first clock at myminifactory.com/object/3d-print-136608 They have low friction, but are a lot of additional effort.

The small printed holes turned out to have nearly the same friction as the stainless steel bushings without the additional machining. They are used in my other clocks at myminifactory.com/object/3d-print-137009 and myminifactory.com/object/3d-print-142460

Large diameter printed holes had larger friction, as expected. They might still be used in a few places where extra strength is required and the additional friction is allowable.
3D Printed Clock Arbor TestMy Latest 3D Printed Clock DesignsSticky Clock Gear SolutionWhich Clock Should You Build?EZ Build Clock Debug ProcessClocks at Bay Area Maker Faire 2023

3D Printed Clock Arbor Test @stevesclocks

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER