Uploaded July 2010 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
"Barbie Loves Ken" - A Petition For Barbie To Get Back With Ken bit.ly/bKKtT6 PLEASE SIGN
This is the commercial for the 1995 Shaving Fun Ken Doll.
Comes with "Shaving Cream" "shaver" and more! Shave his magic color change beard again and again!
"Barbie Loves Ken" - A Petition For Barbie To Get Back With Ken bit.ly/bKKtT6 PLEASE SIGN
This is the commercial for the 1995 Shaving Fun Ken Doll.
Comes with "Shaving Cream" "shaver" and more! Shave his magic color change beard again and again!










![Mattel Wins Victory Against Bratz Dolls! MSNBC News
No more Bratz dolls.
On December 3rd, Judge Stephen Larson, the United States District Court Judge presiding over ongoing intellectual property litigation between Mattel and MGA Entertainment, Inc., granted Mattels motion for a permanent injunction barring MGA from manufacturing, distributing or selling Bratz fashion dolls, or using the Bratz name for any goods or services. He ordered MGA to transfer all trademark rights in the Bratz name to Mattel. The Court also held that MGA and its CEO, Isaac Larian, had engaged in unfair competition against Mattel.
Were extremely pleased that the Court granted Mattels motions for an injunction and ordered MGA to stop selling Bratz products, said Robert A. Eckert, chairman and chief executive officer of Mattel, Inc. The Courts rulings underscore what Mattel has said all along that MGA should not be allowed to profit from its wrongdoing.
Judge Larson confirmed yesterday that Mattel owns all right, title and interest, including any and all copyrights, in and to the Bratz-related works ... The Court further ruled that hundreds of the MGA parties products including all the currently available core female fashion dolls Mattel was able to locate in the marketplace infringe [Mattels] rights. As part of the permanent injunction, the Court also ordered MGA to recall all infringing Bratz products from store shelves and to reimburse retailers for the recall.
Mattels request for a permanent injunction came on the heels of a $100 million jury verdict this past summer in Mattels favor and against MGA, its Hong Kong subsidiary and Larian. At trial, the jury found that Carter Bryant, a Mattel doll designer, had created Bratz doll designs and the Bratz name while he was working at Mattel. The jury further found MGA, MGA Hong Kong and Larian had infringed Mattels copyrights in Bratz and had acted unlawfully in aiding and abetting Bryants wrongdoing.
The Court noted in its ruling yesterday that the jury had found that the MGA parties wrongfully acquired the idea for the name Bratz.... As a result, the Court stated, California law requires, in this instance, that a constructive trust be imposed as to [the Bratz trademarks]. Mattel is the beneficiary of the constructive trust and MGAs trademarks in Bratz ... inure to Mattels benefit. As a result, the Court ordered that all trademark registrations for Bratz be transferred to Mattel.
The Courts Orders will not take full effect until the Court rules on the parties post-trial motions, which are currently scheduled to be heard in February. Mattel Wins Victory Against Bratz Dolls! MSNBC News](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/WhASqwjgisg/mqdefault.jpg)