107. Grahams Number & Number Sense | THUNK @THUNKShow
107. Grahams Number & Number Sense | THUNK  @THUNKShow
Uploaded December 2016 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
NOTE: My description of parsing up-arrow notation is incorrect; please see my correction here! youtube.com/watch?v=xN-MpWNsXw0

Graham's number is...really really big. But our brains start throwing errors at much smaller quantities.

-Links for the Curious-

Numberphile's fantastic video of Ron Graham explaining Graham's number - youtube.com/watch?v=HX8bihEe3nA

“Two Systems of Non-Symbolic Numerical Cognition” by D. Hyde, a review of research on the two psychological systems for cognitive representation of number - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228256

A summary of some landmark studies regarding the cognitive representation of number - https://software.rc.fas.harvard.edu/lds/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/feigenson2004.pdf

A great Wikipedia summary of some of the creatures which have demonstrated some capacity for number sense - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_sense_in_animals

A study showing the gradual “linearization” of the approximate number system’s logarithmic error allowance during childhood - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12741747

An analysis of possible evolutionary reasons the approximate number system is mapped logarithmically - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26755188

The 2014 paper which improved on Graham's upper limit to his Ramsey theorem question - sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195669814000936
107. Grahams Number & Number Sense | THUNK97. Autonomous Vehicle Ethics...? | THUNK83. CRISPR & Genetic Engineering | THUNK213. Techno-Optimism155. Combinatorial Explosion & Flu Shots | THUNK196. Burnout is Abuse | THUNK75. The Problem of Evil | THUNK239. How to Read a Book191. Refactoring the Real World | THUNK229. Deep Work189. The Reference Class Problem | THUNK184. Disaster Preparedness | THUNK
THUNK |

107. Graham's Number & Number Sense | THUNK

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER