A special thanks to snap2objects for providing some of the Creative Commons 3.0 licensed vectors for the figures in this video. All other borrowed images used in this video are copyright-free through Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons and so I would like to thank those organizations as well.
--
NOTE 1: "In God We Trust" first started to appear on a few US coins during the Civil War. However, the motives for these inclusions were entirely different in nature. At that time, there were, to my knowledge, no active atheists in American culture. The inclusion of "In God We Trust" on US coins was gradual and met with resistance by prominent American theists, such as Theodore Roosevelt, as being sacrilegious.
By comparison, the 1957 changes were drastic, sweeping, and specifically invoked to combat the atheism of the Soviet Union. Before, some coins were allowed to not have the phrase and no paper bills had it; after, ALL American money, both coin and paper were REQUIRED to contain the slogan. Further, the changes in the pledge and the motto happened almost simultaneously with this change.
These changes were overtly anti-atheist in nature: "In these days when imperialistic and materialistic Communism seeks to attack and destroy freedom, it is proper" to "remind all of us of this self-evident truth" that "as long as this country trusts in God, it will prevail."
--
NOTE 2: "annuit cœptis" ["He (God) has favored our undertakings"] first appeared on the US seal in 1782. Again, there were, to my knowledge, no active atheists in American culture at that time. The inclusion appears to be largely impersonal and deistic in nature. Given its historical meaning and lack of anti-atheist sentiment, I personally would not necessarily be opposed to its continued inclusion. It does however, appear to be arrogant and supportive of the American imperialism that fueled such atrocities as the Indian Massacres.
--
NOTE 3: The origins of references to God in the federal government are largely irrelevant to the points made in the video starting at 1:23. No matter where these references came from, they exclude the identities of a large population of contributing Americans from the national identity. A government that we all create together should not include language that explicitly excludes any of us.
A special thanks to snap2objects for providing some of the Creative Commons 3.0 licensed vectors for the figures in this video. All other borrowed images used in this video are copyright-free through Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons and so I would like to thank those organizations as well.
--
NOTE 1: "In God We Trust" first started to appear on a few US coins during the Civil War. However, the motives for these inclusions were entirely different in nature. At that time, there were, to my knowledge, no active atheists in American culture. The inclusion of "In God We Trust" on US coins was gradual and met with resistance by prominent American theists, such as Theodore Roosevelt, as being sacrilegious.
By comparison, the 1957 changes were drastic, sweeping, and specifically invoked to combat the atheism of the Soviet Union. Before, some coins were allowed to not have the phrase and no paper bills had it; after, ALL American money, both coin and paper were REQUIRED to contain the slogan. Further, the changes in the pledge and the motto happened almost simultaneously with this change.
These changes were overtly anti-atheist in nature: "In these days when imperialistic and materialistic Communism seeks to attack and destroy freedom, it is proper" to "remind all of us of this self-evident truth" that "as long as this country trusts in God, it will prevail."
--
NOTE 2: "annuit cœptis" ["He (God) has favored our undertakings"] first appeared on the US seal in 1782. Again, there were, to my knowledge, no active atheists in American culture at that time. The inclusion appears to be largely impersonal and deistic in nature. Given its historical meaning and lack of anti-atheist sentiment, I personally would not necessarily be opposed to its continued inclusion. It does however, appear to be arrogant and supportive of the American imperialism that fueled such atrocities as the Indian Massacres.
--
NOTE 3: The origins of references to God in the federal government are largely irrelevant to the points made in the video starting at 1:23. No matter where these references came from, they exclude the identities of a large population of contributing Americans from the national identity. A government that we all create together should not include language that explicitly excludes any of us.
.Where I Have Been and WhyEvid3nc32024-03-20 | ...PatreonEvid3nc32016-02-10 | Note: you only pay when I make a new video for the series. If I don't make anything, you don't pay anything.
I respond to objections to Evidentialism regarding the use of provisional hypotheses, the alleged self-refuting properties of Evidentialism, the evidential bases of mathematics and logic, and the relation of Evidentialism to Logical Positivism.
Evidentialism References: Conee, E., & Feldman, R., 2004, Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Clarendon Press. Poston, T., 2007, Foundational Evidentialism and the Problem of Scatter. Abstracta, 3 (2), 89-106. Wampler-Doty, M., 2010, Evidentialist Logic. MSc Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved from ILLC Publications (Accession Order No. MoL-2010-15).
--
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC, including:
Apparently, the :F has been used for "vampire" or a "snake sticking its tongue out" and |:-| has been used for "a serious guy with a unibrow".
However, as Kabitu insightfully points out in the comments, I think usability and emotional recognizability come into play in emoticon creation. I.e. when are you really going to need emoticons for a snake sticking its tongue out, a vampire, or a serious guy with a unibrow unless you are flooding your conversation with needless emoticons?
I think a good emoticon captures an emotion in a way that accentuates pure text and makes a statement more expressive.
This concludes my official argument for why people should use these emoticons for the purposes portrayed in the video :) May the public decide their fate |:-|
--
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC
I lay the philosophical groundwork for my epistemological position of Evidentialist Foundationalism by contrasting it with the First Principles journey of the Rationalist Descartes.
Music: "Just Like You Imagined" by Nine Inch Nails
.My Reconversion (April Fools Fundraiser)Evid3nc32011-04-01 | A tongue-in-cheek critique of C.S. Lewis's book "Mere Christianity". (That successfully horrified many of my atheist subscribers on April 1st, when it was presented as a "reconversion" video as the end result of a fundraiser for the Society of Open-Minded Atheists and Agnostics [SOMA] at KU ;)
I explain why I stopped using the word "God" to describe anything correlated with a reality outside of our own minds, pending evidence that would persuade me to do so.
Music: "Marrakech" by Hybrid "Any Other Name" by Thomas Newman "174 BPM" by Klute
.Its Not a ControversyEvid3nc32011-01-11 | My entry for the Project Reason 2011 video contest. Why evolution is not a controversy among scientists and why it shouldn't be taught as if it is.
I explain how I learned from A History of God that the evidence indicates that the Jewish concept of monotheism evolved from the syncretism of various polytheistic sources like Canaanite and Babylonian polytheism.
I explain how I learned from A History of God by Karen Armstrong that the evidence indicates that the Jewish concept of monotheism evolved from the syncretism of various polytheistic sources like Canaanite and Babylonian polytheism.
I relate the insights of reading Spong for the first time, solidifying the displacement of theism by the insights of science, seeing how we had created the theistic God in our own image, learning about the first images of Jesus from the letters of Paul, and trying to extract concepts from my Christian experience that were still meaningful in a non-theistic universe.
I relate the inspiring experiences of reading Ingersoll for the first time, observing the successful application of reductio ad absurdum to religion, perceiving the growth and maturing of my own mind, and encountering the concept of different Jesus movements from Mack.
Note: In case it is not obvious, the voice in the pseudo-Ingersoll recordings is my own.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
Thank you to Pioneer Press and Spencer Research Library for pictures of their copy of "Mistakes of Moses".
A note to the curators of Spencer Research Library: the book I took photos of in 2010 (published 1941) appears to be a different version than the one I read in 2004 (published ~1898).
Music (in order of appearance): "Welcome to the Real World" by Don Davis "Song For Bob" by Nick Cave & Warren Ellis "One-Winged Angel (Orchestra Version)" by Nobuo Uematsu "Returns a King" by Tyler Bates "Canis Lupus" by Alexandre Desplat
.Thank YouEvid3nc32010-03-24 | Thank you everyone!
I explain the end of my confident faith in God and the beginning of what became irreparable doubts about God's existence, given the current lack of motivating evidence for believing in Him.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
I explain how I was raised to see God in everything, how I came to believe I had a personal relationship with him, and how I began to enter a personal crisis in college when that relationship started failing and feeling distant and confused.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
I explain how, through my own personal readings, I came to see the Bible from a less literal and more liberal perspective.
Verses Mentioned: Matthew 7:6 (Pearls to pigs) Proverbs 3:5 (Your own understanding) Romans 1:22 (Wise but fools) Genesis 12:11-20 (Lying Sarah) Exodus 9:12 & 10:20 (Hardening Pharaoh's heart) Leviticus 2 (Mundane flour rituals) Numbers 2 (Counting Hebrews) Romans 2:14-15 (Written on our hearts) Acts 1:18 v Matthew 27:5 (Judas's death)
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
Music: "Mass for Four Voices: Agnus Dei" by The Sixteen1.4 Deconversion: Other Christians (B)Evid3nc32009-09-21 | patreon.com/evid3nc3
I explain how I came to meet a true Christian who had deconverted and how I came to believe that I was at a different rational stage of development than some believers.
Books Mentioned: Some Mistakes of Moses by Robert Ingersoll (written in 1880)
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
A special thanks to snap2objects for providing the Creative Commons 3.0 licensed vectors used for the figures representing myself and the professor in this video.
I explain how I came to see science and the Bible as compatible and started sharing this argument with atheists and non-believers through the Internet.
Books Mentioned: The Science of God by Gerald Schroeder A History of God by Karen Armstrong Who Wrote the New Testament? by Burton Mack
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
A special thanks to snap2objects for providing the Creative Commons 3.0 licensed vectors used for the figures representing myself and the professor in this video.
I explain how, through the study of Ethics, I came to believe that morality was something separate from God that He wanted us to discover using reason, evidence, and experience.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
A special thanks to snap2objects for providing the Creative Commons 3.0 licensed vectors used for the figures representing myself and my teacher in this video.
Another thank you to http://graphicssoft.about.com for providing the Christian dove brush used to represent the guidance of the Holy Spirit in my videos.
I explain why, for theological reasons, I stopped believing in the validity of intercessory prayer as a Christian.
I also comment on the famous 2006 study on intercessory prayer[1] and present GIIVideo's argument against the validity of the "Yes", "No", and "Wait" heuristic that many theists use to justify the practice of intercessory prayer.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
Music: "Ave Maria" by The Sixteen "Jaracanda" from the iLife Sound Effects library
1. "Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP) in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and certainty of receiving intercessory prayer." Benson, Dusek
The concept of God, while having the appearance of being a single, coherent belief is often actually supported by multiple pillars of intertwined sub-beliefs. I give an overview of some of the most important sub-beliefs for my personal conception of God here. I will detail how at least most of these sub-beliefs fell for me, under the weight of logic and evidence, in later videos.
All excerpts used in this video are either copyright-free or covered under "fair use" in Title 17 § 107 of the USC.
A short but comprehensive look into my life as a Christian (which spanned 15 years) to prove to Christians that I was a genuine born-again, Holy Spirit baptised, and deeply committed Christian who had a strong relationship with Jesus Christ.
Music: "La Mujer de Mi Hermano Theme" by Angelo Milli
.VenomFangX Leaves!Evid3nc32009-05-11 | Thoughts on the costs and benefits of VFX leaving as well as how he ironically probably contributed to his own censorship through his acts of censorship.0 OverviewEvid3nc32009-05-03 | Abridged overview of the "Why I am no longer a Christian" series for the purpose of brevity to newcomers.The Truth about the Dead Sea ScrollsEvid3nc32009-05-02 | Calling VFX's bullsh*t on the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The Wikipedia article he apparently hasn't read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_ScrollsWhy I am no longer a Christian (Part 0: Introduction)Evid3nc32009-04-30 | Overview to a series in which I plan to explain how I went from being a born-again Christian to an atheist.
Part 0: Introduction
Part 1: Christian Life
Part 2: Deconversion
Part 3: Atheist LifeAn Alternative to ReligionEvid3nc32009-04-29 | Finding the right religion may be less important than finding the alternative to having one. (better in HQ)Positive AtheismEvid3nc32009-04-18 | Why we want you to join us and what we have to offer. (Better in HQ).
(Re: Dear Subscribers and Supporters by VenomFangX)
.On Tony48219: How I think we should reactEvid3nc32009-04-15 | Sometimes emotional reactions, while unavoidable, destroy the evidence we need to try to prevent tragedies like this from happening again.
For example, killing psychotics who could be studied via the death penalty for the sake of vengeance. Or flooding out all the comments relevant to the tragedy from Asia McGowen's page by leaving R.I.P. comments.
.Street Preaching: Repetition, Repetition, RepetitionEvid3nc32009-04-14 | As with all religion, VFX is repeating the same ideas. On the plus side his repetition in his latest video gives a good index of my refutation of his ideas (which I link to in the video).
(VenomFangX Street Preaching: Thank you + Donations).Where does morality come from? (VFX Street Preaching Week #2)Evid3nc32009-04-10 | (VenomFangX Street Preaching Week #2)
Addresses the idea of morals being written on our hearts by God (or, more likely, by something else..)
.Tree Hugger? (VenomFangX Street Preaching Week #2)Evid3nc32009-04-10 | An environmentalist smacks down VFX with enormous practical relevance and the only way VFX can respond is by posting tree hugger photos while he is talking.
.iMovie 09 TestEvid3nc32009-04-10 | Okay, I figured it out. But this video was fun so I'm leaving it up :)
For anyone using iMovie and having problems with this, just uncheck "Make this movie personal" before exporting to YouTube. For some goddamn reason, it is checked by default...
2. No conflict resolution strategy for verse contradictions. Often, this ironically results in a de facto moral relativism between different Christian denominations and individuals.
3. Doesn't address modern moral issues (like immigration, stem-cell research, pornography, or terrorism), resulting in even more de facto moral relativism between denominations and individuals as they all develop arbitrary ways of dealing with modern conflicts.
-Three Secular Theories of Morality that Don't have these Problems-
.Prophecy of IsraelEvid3nc32009-04-05 | In short, Zionists believed what VFX believes about Israel and they made the prophecy happen.
Background for Israeli history (which VFX apparently hasn't read):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel#Zionism_and_the_British_MandateVenomFang is Street Preaching!Evid3nc32009-04-04 | Important non-theists mentioned: Karen Armstrong John Shelby SpongRe: Refuting Atheistic Naturalism (part 2)Evid3nc32009-03-24 | More on uranium-lead dating:
http://geology.about.com/od/geotime_dating/a/uraniumlead.htmRe: Refuting Atheistic NaturalismEvid3nc32009-03-24 | ...Re: The Intelligence is Rationally ConceivableEvid3nc32007-11-10 | What is "intelligible"? How is the universe intelligible?Re: Logic of God, Islam & Evidence for Rational TheistsEvid3nc32007-11-09 | Questions about the premisesRe: Proof God is RealEvid3nc32007-11-09 | Refuting the Candy Bar argument.