Study Is KeyRecently, a Roman Catholic channel called “How To Be Christian” put out a video on the topic of what it means to eat Jesus’ flesh. In this video, he makes it a point to critique common Protestant appeals to verse 63, and does so rightly. In my video, I offer a more robust understanding of verse 63 in hopes that Protestants will stop appealing to it the way they often do, and then I seek to establish a stronger case for the metaphorical view.
Eating Jesus’ Flesh: A Response to @HowToBeChristianStudy Is Key2024-04-18 | Recently, a Roman Catholic channel called “How To Be Christian” put out a video on the topic of what it means to eat Jesus’ flesh. In this video, he makes it a point to critique common Protestant appeals to verse 63, and does so rightly. In my video, I offer a more robust understanding of verse 63 in hopes that Protestants will stop appealing to it the way they often do, and then I seek to establish a stronger case for the metaphorical view.
Link to my response to How To Be Christian on works of the law: youtu.be/lE8myyR8IWg?si=3Gw7KI1yLqhlbZ2tEO Canon Endorses “Fringe View” - @CleavetoAntiquityStudy Is Key2025-09-17 | In this video, I address Ben’s conversion from a different angle.No Conscious Afterlife in 2 Maccabees: Refuting @WilliamAlbrecht and @JimmyAkinStudy Is Key2025-09-14 | In this video, I make the case that 2 Maccabees 12—contra Roman Catholic claims—teaches that there is no conscious afterlife.Soul Sleep in Sirach: A Problem for Roman CatholicsStudy Is Key2025-09-05 | In this video, I challenge Roman Catholics to contend with Sirach 17:27-28, which unambiguously teaches that there is no conscious afterlife.Hebrews 6:4-6: IMPOSSIBLE to Restore Them to Repentance?Study Is Key2025-08-07 | What does Hebrews 6:4-6 mean when it speaks of restoration to repentance being impossible for certain people? In this video, I concisely address this common source of confusion.Refuting @JimmyAkin’s Take on Matthew 10:28 (Hell)Study Is Key2025-02-21 | In this video, I rebut Jimmy Akin's attempt at interpreting Matthew 10:28 in a way that is consistent with the idea that the wicked will be made immortal and experience an eternity of torment.
Link to article containing an extra segment on Ignatius: rethinkinghell.com/2024/08/14/yes-trent-horn-hell-is-real-and-it-is-eternal-part-2-3CORRECTING @CapturingChristianity on History and the Bible (Specifically the Eucharist)Study Is Key2025-01-17 | In this video, in accordance with Wes Huff's claim, I show that Cameron Bertuzzi, a Roman Catholic, reads the Roman Catholic conception of the Eucharist into the writings of Ignatius and Justin Martyr.The Catholic Church Is False: Addressing @VoiceOfReason_Study Is Key2024-10-13 | In this video, I address a clip from a Catholic YouTuber, Alex, over at the Voice of Reason channel. In the clip, he candidly admits that if the Catholic magisterium is shown to be wrong in even a single instance where it is supposed to be protected from error by the charism of infallibility, then the Catholic church is false.
My article: rethinkinghell.com/2024/08/14/yes-trent-horn-hell-is-real-and-it-is-eternal-part-1-3Eating Jesus Flesh (Part II): A Response to @HowToBeChristianStudy Is Key2024-09-25 | And we're baaack! In this video, I continue to respond to How To Be Christian on the topic of whether John 6 and the Last Supper narrative teach that the Eucharist involves a bread and wine literally turning into flesh and blood, or whether the relationship is symbolic.@HowToBeChristian REFUTED on “Works of the Law”Study Is Key2023-12-22 | In this video, I refute Roman Catholic YouTuber, "How To Be Christian," on the meaning of the phrase "works of the law."A Provisionist Response to @TheCynicogue on John 12:32Study Is Key2023-10-01 | In this somewhat all-over-the-place response, I offer CJ my Provisionist reading of John 12:32 and of some verses in John 6 before reaching that point, and I also steel-man Leighton Flowers' use of John 12:32 (with which I disagree) in the face of CJ's critique. His critique was not aimed solely at Provisionists, though Provisionists were specifically mentioned by name in the video.Hebrews 10:26-29: A Careful StudyStudy Is Key2023-09-14 | In this video, I devote my attention to properly interpreting a controversial passage of Scripture: Hebrews 10:26-29. If you desire to know whether this passage is compatible with the doctrine of OSAS (Once saved, Always Saved), eternal security, and the Perseverance of the Saints, and whether this passage teaches that salvation is partly dependent upon works, this video is for you.Can believers be cut off? Romans 11:20-23Study Is Key2023-09-08 | In this video, I cover another passage of Scripture that refutes the doctrines of Once Saved, Always Saved (OSAS), Eternal Security, and the Perseverance of the Saints.This ONE verse refutes the P in TULIPStudy Is Key2023-08-31 | In this video, I go over the verse that was most influential in getting me to abandon the doctrine of the Perseverance of the saints (the only point of TULIP I've ever held to).Provisionism vs Calvinism: Chris Date is Back for Round 2!Study Is Key2023-01-10 | After many months of anticipation, Chris Date finally makes his return to the channel to revisit the issue of pre- or post-faith regeneration, and John 8. Unfortunately, we, once again, had too much to talk about and did not get the opportunity to address John 6. Ugh! This calls for round 3, so subscribe so that you do not miss out on that!
Chris’ new channel with bite-sized videos on English expression 👇🏼
youtube.com/@whaddaya-sayThe Bible SUPPORTS Protestantism: A Response to How To Be Christian - Part 2Study Is Key2022-12-23 | In this video, I tackle "part 2" of the series, "The Bible DESTROYS Protestantism" produced by the increasingly popular Roman Catholic channel, "How To Be Christian."Defending Faith Alone: Galatians 5:19-21Study Is Key2022-12-15 | In this third episode of the "Defending Faith Alone" series, we look at the reason for Paul's warning to the Galatians in verses 19-21 of the fifth chapter. Hint: the reason lines up with the theme of the letter.Defending Faith Alone: Galatians 6:7-9Study Is Key2022-12-12 | In this second episode of the "Defending Faith Alone" series, we lay the necessary groundwork in Galatians to properly understand what Paul means in Galatians 6:7-9, and we look at similar language he uses elsewhere to solidify the point.Defending Faith Alone: Matthew 19:16-19Study Is Key2022-12-03 | This is the first episode of my new series, "Defending Faith Alone," in which I defend the fact that the sole requirement to be justified and saved is faith in Jesus Christ on account of what He accomplished through His death and resurrection.Coming to life is through faith and all who are drawn by the Father come to Christ! — Ft. Chris DateStudy Is Key2022-09-02 | In this episode, Chris Date and I were scheduled to discuss regeneration, John 6 and Ephesians 1:4. The whole conversation was engaging and fun. We both had each other on the ropes, we both made important concessions, and the tone all throughout was honest and friendly. After discussing the issue of regeneration and scraping the surface of John 6, the discussion got sidetracked and John 8 became a subject of discussion for half an hour and... whew! Chris had me on the ropes and I was struggling to properly articulate my position under the pressure. After the show ended, I took 10-15 minutes to read the passage, analyze it and flesh it all out in my mind. Now, I'm prepared to properly articulate and defend the Provisionist reading of John 8 next time Chris comes on, so subscribe and stay tuned for that and more! Round 2 will be good!Is Provisionism Compatible With John 6:44?Study Is Key2022-05-31 | In this video, I seek to demonstrate that Provisionism is compatible with John 6:44 and other disputed texts such as John 6:45, 65 and 12:32.What are works of the Law? Are they different than good works?: Addressing Catholics on the topicStudy Is Key2022-03-15 | In this video, we diligently examine key passages in Scripture to help us discern which aspects of the Law Paul had in mind when using the term "works of the Law." Did he only have ceremonial and dietary laws in mind? Or did he have the moral laws in mind as well. Watch until the end and consider the content of this video to know!The Bible SUPPORTS Protestantism: A Response To How To Be Christian - Part 1Study Is Key2022-03-08 | In this video, I offer a Protestant interpretation of the text covered by Catholic YouTube-apologist, "How To Be Christian" in his video entitled, "The Bible DESTROYS Protestantism (001): Romans 1:1-32 through Romans 2:1-11"