EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:22 What is free will? 00:08:40 Huemer's proof of free will 00:23:20 Is the proof question-begging? 00:34:51 The mystery objection 00:49:56 The luck objection 01:05:02 Alex O'Connor's objection to free will 01:13:22 The neuroscience objection 01:22:05 Why do most scientists and philosophers deny libertarian free will?
You Have Free Will. Deal With It | #30 Dr. Michael HuemerMiles K. Donahue2025-04-27 | Dr. Michael Huemer, professor of philosophy at U.C. Boulder, returns to the podcast to defend the case for (libertarian) free will.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:22 What is free will? 00:08:40 Huemer's proof of free will 00:23:20 Is the proof question-begging? 00:34:51 The mystery objection 00:49:56 The luck objection 01:05:02 Alex O'Connor's objection to free will 01:13:22 The neuroscience objection 01:22:05 Why do most scientists and philosophers deny libertarian free will?What Christian Apologists Keep Missing | #52 Dr. Randal RauserMiles K. Donahue2025-09-30 | Dr. Randal Rauser, himself a Christian apologist, joins me to critically examine some of the mistakes and excesses of Christian apologetics as it is commonly practiced - on YouTube and within broader academic discourse as well.
Check out Randal's YouTube channel: @Randal_Rauser
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:15 What is apologetics? 00:05:52 What is a 'tentative' apologist? 00:14:25 Mistake #1 - Not giving weight to moral experience. 00:36:09 How do we determine what the Bible teaches? 00:38:02 Mistake #2 - Thinking every question must be answered. 00:45:49 Mistake #3 - Simplifying enormously complicated issues. 00:50:50 If saving souls isn't the right motive for apologetics, what is? 00:57:03 Mistake #4 - Mixing apologetics with politics. 01:01:36 Debating vs. discussing controversial issues.Its Simple - Stop Eating Meat | #51 Dr. Michael HuemerMiles K. Donahue2025-09-23 | Dr. Michael Huemer and I discuss factory farming, the strengths and possible drawbacks of a vegan and vegetarian diet, whether animals have rights, if humans are the pinnacle of intrinsic value, and whether already having severe dietary restrictions justifies eating meat (it doesn't).
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:33 What goes on in factory farms? 00:10:45 Do we have to argue that animals have rights? 00:17:26 Do animals have rights? 00:25:02 Can we hunt animals? 00:27:24 Are all animals sentient? 00:29:01 The Shrimp Welfare Project 00:36:54 Why does it seem normal to eat meat? 00:41:08 Nutritional deficiencies in a vegan diet? 00:47:25 Plant farming kills animals too! 00:55:06 Are we heading for a vegetarian-only world? 01:02:30 The role of ethical intuitions 01:09:04 BONUS CONTENT - The inconsistencies of moral anti-realistsGod Is Time. Literally | #50 Dr. RT MullinsMiles K. Donahue2025-09-17 | Dr. RT Mullins discusses his view that God is literally identical to time. We also discuss and critique William Lane Craig's proposal that God is, in a sense, both temporal and timeless.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:12 What's the point of philosophical theology? 00:11:00 Mullins' definition of time. 00:21:14 An absolutist theory of time. 00:23:39 Is this pantheism? 00:30:49 The idea that God is time. 00:39:35 William Lane Craig's view - God creates time. 00:52:50 Is God's timelessness logically prior to His temporality? 01:04:48 Does time have a beginning? 01:14:07 Do scientists know anything about time?How to Make a Universe Without God | #49 Dr. Daniel RubioMiles K. Donahue2025-09-10 | Dr. Daniel Rubio graciously agreed to come on the channel to discuss and critique a paper I wrote examining four lesser-discussed hypotheses that lie somewhere between theism and atheism: the simulation hypothesis, cosmopsychism, axiarchism, and new laws of nature.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:12:13 Option #1 - We're in a simulation. 00:32:26 Option #2 - The universe designed itself. 01:05:31 Option #3 - Goodness requires that the universe exist. 01:29:01 Option #4 - Laws of nature guide the universe towards life.Some Contradictions Are True. Deal With It. | #48 Dr. Graham PriestMiles K. Donahue2025-09-01 | Dr. Graham Priest explains his views on dialetheism, the view that some contradictions are true, while also discussing the relationship between Buddhism and modern science, the cosmological and fine-tuning arguments, and how Christians can avoid refutation by embracing paradox.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:12 What is dialetheism? 00:06:09 Paradox #1 - The liar 00:14:54 Paradox #2 - The law 00:29:37 Paradox #3 - Theology 00:38:15 Why Christianity can't possibly be true 00:40:46 Does dialetheism support Buddhism? 00:49:01 The relationship between Buddhism and modern science 00:49:25 Support #1 - The impermanence of all things 00:51:54 The cosmological argument for God 00:56:26 The fine-tuning argument for God 01:55:44 Support #2 - The nature of consciousnessYou’re Wrong about the Fine-Tuning Argument - Graham PriestMiles K. Donahue2025-08-31 | Enjoy this clip of a spirited exchange between Dr. Priest and myself on the fine-tuning argument for theism.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDThe Multiverse Supports Belief in God | #47 Dr. Klaas KraayMiles K. Donahue2025-08-26 | Dr. Klaas Kraay explains that the multiverse, rather than serving as an alternative to God, actually supports belief in God by undermining two atheistic arguments: the problem of evil and the problem of no best world.
My paper looking at the relationship between theistic multiverses and modern science, "Does science undermine the theistic multiverse?": philpapers.org/rec/DONTAS-4
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:07 Multiverses in cosmology 00:06:36 The problem of no best world 00:13:15 The wine analogy 00:19:44 Two versions of the problem 00:24:20 Theistic multiverse solution 00:32:10 Objection - Duplication 00:37:27 1st response - Limit the multiverse to kinds 00:43:53 2nd response - More is not always better 00:49:50 What's more valuable, God or the multiverse? 00:58:39 The problem of evil 01:18:30 What got Klaas into philosophy? 01:20:11 Does philosophy make progress?There Were Many Christianities in the Ancient World | #46 Dr. Robyn Faith WalshMiles K. Donahue2025-08-18 | Dr. Robyn Faith Walsh, professor of New Testament at the University of Miami, explains the gnostic gospels, their significance, and their relationship to the canonical gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and whether Jesus' earlies disciples would recognize the theology of the earliest Christian creeds.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:06 What is gnosticism? 00:10:43 The historical value of the gnostic gospels 00:24:12 Are the canonical gospels less legendary than the gnostic ones? 00:31:11 The gospels as literature rather than history 00:35:58 The Gospel of Thomas 00:48:35 Do the gnostic gospels go back to the first century? 00:53:28 Does the Apostles' Creed reflect earliest Christianity? 01:01:55 Would the apostles recognize modern Christianity? 01:07:14 The gospels writers borrowed from Paul 01:14:25 Are evangelical NT scholars taken seriously? 01:25:56 Confirmation bias in NT scholarshipWorlds Leading Panpsychist Explains the View #philosophy #consciousness #panpsychismMiles K. Donahue2025-08-11 | It may seem strange to suggest that atoms are conscious, but Dr. Philip Goff explains this minority view concerning the nature of consciousness and the universe. Check out the full interview with Philip linked here.The Universe Designed Itself - No God Needed | #45 Dr. Philip GoffMiles K. Donahue2025-08-10 | Philip Goff joins me to discuss panpsychism, cosmopsychism, and how these theories of consciousness have the potential to explain one of the most striking discoveries of modern science: the fine-tuning of the universe for intelligent life.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:08 What is panpsychism?' 00:13:49 Panpsychism vs. idealism 00:16:52 Why we should be panpsychists 00:33:38 The combination problem 00:39:15 From panpsychism to cosmopsychism 00:47:43 The fine-tuning of the universe 00:55:31 Cosmopsychism vs. theism 01:09:48 What is the purpose of the universe? 01:15:43 Debating William Lane CraigMy Experience Debating William Lane Craig - Philip GoffMiles K. Donahue2025-08-07 | Dr. Philip Goff shares his experience on debating Christian philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig, as well as his reflections on a more liberal understanding of traditional religion.
Full interview with Dr. Goff dropping Sunday, 9:30am MST.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDContradictions Can Be True - Heres Why | #44 Dr. Jc BeallMiles K. Donahue2025-08-03 | Dr. Jc Beall, professor of philosophy at Notre Dame, explains "glut theory," the view that some contradictory statements can both be true - or, equivalently, that true theories can be inconsistent.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:25 What is dialetheism? 00:15:12 Languages vs. meta-languages 00:23:47 Examples of true contradictions 00:25:02 #1 - The liar paradox 00:31:23 #2 - Contradictions in the law 00:40:11 #3 - Paradoxes of motion 00:45:00 Not every contradiction is true 00:52:40 Why should glut theorists care about consistency? 01:07:13 My argument against dialetheism 01:16:39 Contradictions within Christianity 01:23:30 Can both atheism and Christianity be true? 01:26:34 Is glut theory itself both true and false? 01:32:07 Glut theory and Eastern religions 01:39:49 Things logicians wish everyone would know 01:42:44 Godel's incompleteness theoremsThe Universe Doesnt Care About the Environment | #43 Dr. Neil MansonMiles K. Donahue2025-07-27 | Neil Manson explains the hidden tension between environmental ethics and findings in cosmology over the last thirty years: if life exists throughout the universe, then we lose one main argument for caring what happens to life here on Earth.
Neil Manson's paper, "Anthropocentrism, Exo-Planets, and the Cosmic Perspective": philpapers.org/rec/MANAEA-3
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:45 Cosmological science today 00:10:25 Anthropocentrism, defined 00:15:16 Two kinds of anthropocentrism: biological and personal 00:30:46 Consequentialism 00:32:15 The cosmic perspective and non-anthropocentrism 00:40:47 Objection: Some infinities are better than other infinities. 00:56:59 Why we should reject nonanthropocentrism 01:01:48 Should we seek to preserve nature? 01:18:25 Towards a stewardship model of environmentalismEffective Altruism is Just Common Sense | #42 Matthew AdelsteinMiles K. Donahue2025-07-20 | Matthew Adelstein returns to the podcast to discuss effective altruism and its philosophical underpinnings.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:10 What is effective altruism (EA)? 00:06:14 Is EA consequentialist? 00:15:54 Impartiality and obligations to family first 00:20:07 Do future generations matter more than we do? 00:30:10 Can we ever know the consequences of our choices? 00:42:16 Is EA too broadly defined? 00:48:13 Why do (some people) scorn effective altruists?What Do We Owe the Future? - Matthew AdelsteinMiles K. Donahue2025-07-16 | Matthew Adelstein explains his views on longtermism and why the needs of the (many) future persons outweigh the needs of the (relatively few) current individuals.
Full interview with Matthew dropping on Sunday morning, MST.
@deliberationunderidealcond5105Gods Absence Doesnt Prove Atheism | #41 Dr. Max Baker-HytchMiles K. Donahue2025-07-13 | Dr. Max Baker-Hytch of Oxford University discusses Schellenberg's argument for atheism stemming from nonresistant nonbelief, nonbelief in God that results through no fault of one's own.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 02:04 Do you struggle with divine hiddenness? 05:00 Schellenberg's argument 14:22 Are there nonresistant nonbelievers? 21:05 Would God prevent nonresistant nonbelief? 27:43 Step #1 - God would always be open to relationship 39:32 Step #2 - Openness entails no nonresistant nonbelief 45:28 Relationship without belief. 52:25 Alex O'Connor as a nonresistant nonbeliever 59:52 Related Problem #1 - Demographics of nonbelief 01:09:15 Related Problem #2 - Religious disagreementWhy is God Hidden from Alex OConnor? - Max Baker-HytchMiles K. Donahue2025-07-09 | I ask Max about Alex O'Connor's pointed argument from divine hiddenness, and why it is that Alex may have failed to find God, if God really does exist.
Full interview with Max dropping on Sunday morning, MST.
@CosmicSkepticPhilosophys Newest Argument for God, Defended | #40 Dr. Brian CutterMiles K. Donahue2025-07-06 | Dr. Brian Cutter outlines the argument from psychophysical harmony for theism and responds to Graham Oppy's recent critique.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:22 The argument, summarized. 00:06:10 Does evolution explain harmony? 00:14:42 Probability of harmony on naturalism 00:20:46 Objection #1 - Infinite range of possible laws. 00:24:52 Objection #2 - Principle of indifference. 00:35:08 Probability of harmony on theism. 00:45:08 Replying to Graham Oppy's objections. 00:50:39 What if the mind and brain are identical? 01:14:36 Other explanations for harmony. 01:24:35 The role of historical context.The Historical Case for Jesus Resurrection | #39 Dr. Mike LiconaMiles K. Donahue2025-06-29 | Dr. Mike Licona, professor of New Testament Studies at Houston Christian University, joins me to discuss the philosophy of history, whether a historian can determine if an event like the resurrection of Jesus happened, and then, if they can, whether the evidence is in fact sufficient to conclude that two-thousand years ago, Jesus rose from the dead.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:15 Is the resurrection history or theology? 00:05:29 Methodological naturalism 00:24:46 Shouldn't we always prefer a natural explanation? 00:37:05 Bias in conservative New Testament scholarship 00:42:57 The historical case for the resurrection. 00:47:05 Was Jesus' tomb found empty? 00:49:53 What did the early disciples believe? 00:56:32 Did Paul teach a "spiritual" resurrection? 01:04:55 Alternative #1 - Someone stole the body. 01:08:48 Alternative #2 - The disciples hallucinated. 01:19:23 Alternatives #3 - Aliens raised Jesus from the dead.Reincarnation is True | #38 Dr. Michael HuemerMiles K. Donahue2025-06-22 | Michael Huemer returns to the podcast to discuss his philosophical argument for reincarnation. If time is infinite, then the probability that you have lived multiple times - indeed, an infinite number of times - is 100%. I am not so sure.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:04:25 The argument. 00:06:53 Poincare recurrence theorem. 00:17:42 Arguments for an infinite past. 00:28:10 Objection: infinite space and cosmic clones. 00:46:07 What does it feel like to reincarnate? 00:54:31 Should we look forward to our future lives? 01:08:19 Philosophical problems with Heaven.A Vigorous Debate on the Fine-Tuning Argument | #37 Troy Dana @FrictionMiles K. Donahue2025-06-15 | Troy Dana and I debate the fine-tuning argument for theism, as well as Troy's anti-design fine-tuning argument.
CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction. 00:57 Overview of the FTA. 04:49 Troy's anti-design FTA. 13:40 Likelihood of fine-tuning given bare design. 25:09 Discovering the digits of pi in the cosmic microwave background. 33:11 Double-counting the evidence? 40:37 Bayesianism breaks down in cosmic contexts? 44:43 Return of awesome theistic evidence. 01:00:36 We'll pursue this in writing. 01:01:24 Troy's second anti-design argument. 01:11:10 Prior probability of theism.How Nietzsche Disproved Free Will | #36 Keegan Kjeldson.Miles K. Donahue2025-06-08 | Keegan Kjeldson, YouTuber and musician, joins me to discuss how Nietzsche would have responded to philosopher Michael Huemer's argument for free will.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDIs Philosophy a Waste of Time? | #35 Joe Schmid @MajestyofReasonMiles K. Donahue2025-06-01 | Joe and I take a more personal turn in this video, discussing the importance of philosophy, what got us into the discipline, and whether studying Immanuel Kant your whole life is really worth it.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:02 What's the value of philosophy? 00:03:35 Are some areas of philosophy pointless? 00:15:17 Joe Schmid: A Personal History 00:25:27 Miles Donahue: A Personal History 00:31:25 Why is Joe an agnostic? 00:40:34 The FTA Objection 1 - Epistemically illuminated region 00:49:34 The FTA Objection 2 - Theism's predictive problem 01:03:57 The FTA Objection 3 - The Multiverse 01:10:20 Question Lightning RoundThe Fine-Tuning Argument is Better Than I Thought - Joe SchmidMiles K. Donahue2025-05-28 | Joe discusses objections to the FTA he once thought insurmountable but now sees as far less damning.
Full interview with Joe dropping by the end of the week!
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDDo the Gnostic Gospels Undermine Christianity? | #34 Dr. Darrell L. BockMiles K. Donahue2025-05-25 | Dr. Darrell L. Bock, research professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, discusses the gnostic gospels and their relationship to early Christian belief and the historical Jesus.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00 Introduction 00:18 What makes the gnostic gospels so interesting? 01:41 What is gnosticism? 05:15 What did the gnostics think about Jesus? 13:04 The Gospel of Thomas 17:06 The Gospel of Judas 18:31 The Gospel of Peter 20:22 The Gospel of Phillip 24:00 How did the New Testament books get selected? 29:22 The Niece Creed and its history 37:58 What role did Constantine play? 47:04 Bart Ehrman's views on early ChristianityHow Bart Ehrman Gets Early Christian History Wrong - Darrell BockMiles K. Donahue2025-05-21 | New Testament historian Dr. Darrell Bock explains why he thinks Bart Ehrman's views on early Christianity are misleading.
Full interview with Darrell dropping by the end of the week!
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDChatGPT Could Never Be Conscious | #33 Dr. Ned BlockMiles K. Donahue2025-05-18 | Dr. Ned Block, professor of philosophy and psychology at NYU, joins me to discuss theories of consciousness, functionalism, the difference between access and phenomenal consciousness, the limitations of current Large Language Models, and how far away artificial general intelligence is from our current capacities.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00 Introduction 00:22 Hard vs. easy problems of consciousness 07:39 Reductive vs. non-reductive physicalism 12:19 The Chinese nation thought experiment 19:14 Can ChatGPT fool you into thinking it's a human? The Turing test 28:31 Rules vs. patterns-based reasoning 34:16 Blockhead thought experiment 37:53 Phenomenal vs. access consciousness 44:09 What is artificial intelligence? 46:27 The limits of LLMs 49:48 Does thinking require a brain? 50:34 Narrow vs. general AI 51:57 Is AI about to surpass human intelligence?The Turing Test is a Complete Failure - Ned BlockMiles K. Donahue2025-05-14 | Dr. Ned Block explains the Turing test, a famous proposed method for determining when a machine is conscious, and why he thinks it fails to deliver any philosophically interesting results.
Full interview with Ned dropping by the end of the week!
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDTwo Oxford Students Solve All of Philosophy | #32 Sam ThomasMiles K. Donahue2025-05-11 | Sam Thomas, my philosophy bestie hailing from Oxford, England, joins me to go through the results of the 2020 PhilPapers survey of professional philosophers. We offer our opinions on many major philosophical issues.
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:15 A Priori Knowledge 00:11:22 Aim of Philosophy 00:22:01 Eating Animals 00:32:50 Experience Machine 00:43:17 External World Skepticism 00:52:11 The Trolly Problem 01:06:23 God's Existence 01:29:38 Meaning of Life 01:41:37 Chinese Room 01:48:55 Immortality 02:00:20 Philosophical ProgressIts Probably Wrong to Eat Animals - Sam ThomasMiles K. Donahue2025-05-07 | Sam Thomas, graduate of Oxford and current soon-to-be MPhil student at UCL, explores the ethical implications of meat consumption, factory farming, and unique animal personalities.
Full interview with Sam dropping by the end of the week!
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDPhilosophys Newest Argument for God Fails | #31 Dr. Graham OppyMiles K. Donahue2025-05-04 | Dr. Graham Oppy, perhaps academia's leading atheist philosopher of religion, joins me to analyze a newly proposed argument for God's existence: the argument from psychophysical harmony.
Cutter and Crummett's article, "Psychophysical Harmony: A New Argument for Theism": philarchive.org/rec/CUTPHA
EPISODE CHAPTERS: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:52 Defining psychophysical harmony 00:14:06 The argument 00:14:48 Prior probability of theism and naturalism 00:39:19 Likelihood of harmony on theism and naturalism 00:46:56 Can evolution explain harmony? 00:56:20 What if mind is identical to brain?Psychophysical Harmony, Explained - Graham OppyMiles K. Donahue2025-04-30 | Dr. Oppy and I explore the claimed phenomenon of "psychophysical harmony," that claim that our mental states and brain/body states are correlated in harmonious and fortunate ways. That fact then serves as the basis for a new argument for God's existence, explored in the full interview with Dr. Oppy.
Full interview with Dr. Oppy dropping by the end of the week!
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDA Christianity without Conservative Politics?Miles K. Donahue2025-04-21 | #christianity #conservative #liberal #theologyIs Naturalism Self-Refuting? | #29 Dr. Evan FalesMiles K. Donahue2025-04-20 | Dr. Evan Fales, professor of philosophy at Iowa University, discusses Alvin Plantinga's famous "evolutionary argument against naturalism," and whether Plantinga has successfully shown that naturalism - the view that there is no person such as God or anything like God - cannot be rationally affirmed.
00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:51 What is naturalism? 00:11:18 What is evolution? 00:21:24 Plantinga's central claim 00:38:00 Intentionality of mental states 01:07:11 Defeaters for theismAlzheimers Disease and Consciousness After Death - Josh RasmussenMiles K. Donahue2025-04-16 | Dr. Josh Rasmussen explains why he doesn't think that degenerative brain diseases prove that consciousness resides in the brain, and therefore that we should be open to the existence of an afterlife.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDCan You Split the Mind? Severance Meets Philosophy | #28 Dr. Josh RasmussenMiles K. Donahue2025-04-13 | Dr. Josh Rasmussen, professor of philosophy at Baylor University, discusses the implications of the Apple Original TV show, "Severance", for two philosophical debates: (1) personal identity, and (2) the relationship between mind and body.
00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:16 Topic 1 - Personal identity 00:06:17 Psychological accounts 00:18:17 Animalism accounts 00:41:18 Soul accounts 00:44:28 Primitive identity 00:51:31 Topic 2 - The mind-body problem 01:11:26 Substance monism 01:16:12 Consciousness after death 01:26:25 Is materialism simpler than substance monism? 01:34:20 Derek Parfit's "Split Brain" Thought ExperimentCommonsense Views of Time Make No Sense - Tim MaudlinMiles K. Donahue2025-04-09 | Tim Maudlin explains his views about so-called "common sense" theories of time, like the A-theory or presentist theory of time, according to which only present objects and events exist.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDChristians Must Divorce from Trump | #27 Dr. Randal RauserMiles K. Donahue2025-04-06 | Many have watched with alarm as American evangelicals - a particular sect of Protestant Christianity - have largely embraced President Donald Trump, despite the (seeming) inconsistency between his rhetoric on the one hand, and biblical principles on the other. Dr. Randal Rauser joins me for a third time to discuss the connections between evangelicalism, President Donald Trump, and the Republican party in general - contending, ultimately, that Christians must embrace a different vision of Christianity, one that cannot connect itself with President Trump.
00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:43 Defining "Evangelical" 00:05:00 Evangelicals Vs. Fundamentalists 00:10:07 The Role of Dispensationalism 00:12:33 Statistics about Evangelicals and Trump 00:13:35 Why Evangelicals Support Trump 00:20:40 Three Reasons Evangelicals Don't Take Issue with Trump 00:28:44 "It's what he does that matters, not what he says." 00:37:39 Single-issue voting: abortion 00:54:44 A New Vision of ChristianityA Physicist Explains Fine-TuningMiles K. Donahue2025-04-05 | #cosmology #science #physics #godIs the Fine-Tuning Argument Any Good? - Richard CarrierMiles K. Donahue2025-04-02 | Richard Carrier and I debate the fine-tuning argument for theism, the rarity of life in the cosmos, and whether a multiverse explains the cosmic coincidence that nature's laws allow for life.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDAtheists Can be Moral Realists Too | #26 Dr. Erik WielenbergMiles K. Donahue2025-03-30 | Erik Wielenberg, professor of philosophy at DePauw University, discusses godless normative realism, his attempt to craft an objective morality without appeal to God. We also debate divine command theory, the attempt to do the precise opposite: ground ethics in God's nature, and in His commands.
00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:25 Godless Normative Realism (GNR) 00:06:24 The Metaphysics of GNR 00:15:33 Intrinsic goods and evils 00:20:22 Moral obligations 00:23:00 Is GNR Platonic? 00:27:00 The 'making' relation 00:42:26 The Epistemology of GNR 00:56:20 Divine Command Theory (DCT) 00:58:18 The error with the Euthyphro Dilemma 01:03:47 Objection 1 - Ignores morally relevant features 01:13:00 Objection 2 - Non-believers have no obligations 01:33:28 Objection 3 - No explanation for morally wrong actsIs Unbelief Morally Culpable?Miles K. Donahue2025-03-27 | #atheism #christianity #unbeliefCan Mormons Be Saved? - William Lane CraigMiles K. Donahue2025-03-26 | Dr. William Lane Craig explains, in his view, why Mormons do not worship the same Jesus as Christians and therefore do not possess salvation.
@thoughtfulfaith2020Why Christian Salvation Makes Sense | #25 Dr. William Lane CraigMiles K. Donahue2025-03-23 | William Lane Craig - Christian philosopher, theologian, and apologist - joins me to discuss the Christian doctrine of salvation. I, per usual, throw all my questions at him along the way. Why did God create the world? Could God have saved the world without requiring Jesus to die on the cross? Can a Mormon be saved? Why does salvation require propositional belief? Dr. Craig addresses all these questions and more.
00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:49 Could God have saved us without Jesus? 00:11:20 Whom does God elect to salvation? 00:16:53 Why does God create anything at all? 00:18:28 Does creation increase the value of reality? 00:23:35 Why did Jesus live a full human life? 00:34:48 What beliefs are necessary for salvation? 00:39:10 Why does salvation require belief? 00:41:26 Can Mormons be saved? 00:48:45 What about children who die in infancy? 00:54:12 Why do so many Christians live immoral lives? 00:57:17 Do we become perfect when we die?Evolution Does Not Undermine Morality - Michael HuemerMiles K. Donahue2025-03-19 | Dr. Huemer explains why evolutionary theory does not undermine our justified belief in objective moral principles and values.
Instagram: instagram.com/miles_donahue Twitter: twitter.com/PhilosopherMKDDid the Universe Have a Beginning?Miles K. Donahue2025-03-19 | #cosmology #science #theismRichard Carriers Arguments for Atheism Fail | #24 Matthew AdelsteinMiles K. Donahue2025-03-16 | Matthew Adelstein, YouTuber, philosophy student, and prolific Substacker, sits down to discuss Richard Carrier's arguments for atheism and why they fail to convince.
EPISODE CHAPTERS 00:00:00 Introduction 00:03:03 Cosmology 00:16:04 Fine-Tuning 00:40:26 Consciousness 00:53:08 Reason 01:00:41 Religious Experience 01:24:32 Miracles 01:29:34 Morality 01:34:28 Meaning 01:39:42 SupermanThere Are No Many Worlds of Quantum Mechanics - Tim MaudlinMiles K. Donahue2025-03-12 | Tim Maudlin explains why he rejects the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.