CMI Video
Updated 2 hours ago.
updated
Watch the entire episode here: https://youtu.be/5K77Z4zwwZM
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/5K77Z4zwwZM
For more discussion about abortion watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
Watch the entire episode here: https://youtu.be/5K77Z4zwwZM
For more information see: https://www.youtu.be/dzlz8OFBSVc
Related articles:
The four dimensional human genome defies naturalistic explanations (https://creation.com/four-dimensional-genome)
Splicing and dicing the human genome (https://creation.com/splicing-and-dicing-the-human-genome)
Life’s irreducible structure—Part 1: autopoiesis (https://creation.com/lifes-irreducible-structure-part-1-autopoiesis)
Related resources:
The High-Tech Cell (https://creation.com/s/35-6-624)
Chapters
0:00 Intro
1:09 DNA compared with software
2:02 Darwin's theory destroyed
5:43 DNA needs to be translated
8:38 Miller-Urey experiment: evidence against abiogenesis
10:17 The impossibility of ape to human evolution
11:00 Haldane's Dilemma
13:24 'Junk DNA' to the rescue?
17:28 DNA: way more complex than software
18:05 1st dimension of the human genome
18:18 2nd dimension of the human genome
20:03 3rd dimension of the human genome
22:27 4th dimension of the human genome
24:16 Results of 10-year "Genotype Expression Project"
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
However, far from supporting microbes-to-man evolution, these mutant fish have actually devolved, not evolved! That's because the fish have become resistant through a loss of genetic information.
Non-resistant fish have special proteins in their cells that allow the poisons to bind. However, due to a genetic mutation, the proteins of resistant fish cannot bind the poisons as readily. So, 'corrupted' proteins have made the fish resistant. And in the poison-rich environment of the Hudson River, it's no wonder that the mutated gene facilitating resistance has quickly spread through the tomcod population. It is misleading to call these changes 'evolution', because evolution requires the addition of new genetic information, but these resistant fish have only demonstrated information loss. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website CREATION.com
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
Watch the full episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
This has significant implications for the dating of rocks using radioactive decay. That’s because helium is formed when some radioisotopes decay, and therefore lots of helium suggests lots of decay has occurred. Moreover, if lots of decay has occurred, it also suggests that the rock is very old. However, Nuclear Physicist Dr Russell Humphreys realised that lots of helium trapped in the rock crystals that had not had time to diffuse out means that the rocks were actually young. Dr Humphreys concluded that nuclear decay rates must have been dramatically faster in the recent past, and that is why rocks that are actually only thousands of years old are commonly wrongly dated using radioisotope decay as millions or billions of years old. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website CREATION.com
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
The Grand Canyon, with its distinctive layers exposed in the canyon walls, has been carved through a high plateau. However, if we follow the layers into the eastern part of Arizona, we see the same rock units about a mile lower in elevation. In this area, we see significant folding of the layers.
According to conventional geology, this uplift and folding occurred long after the sediments had hardened into rock, so it should have caused significant fracturing of the rocks. But this is not what we find. Instead, it appears that the layers—which supposedly represent 300 million years of earth history—have undergone plastic deformation, without fracturing. This suggests the sediments were soft and unconsolidated when they bent. This contradicts evolutionary earth history, but it fits nicely with the layers forming during the Biblical Flood and being bent before they had become hard rock. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website CREATION.com
Related Articles:
Grand Canyon strata show geologic time is imaginary http://creation.com/grand-canyon-strata-show-geologic-time-is-imaginary
How old is Grand Canyon? http://creation.com/grand-canyon-age
Related Products:
Christianity for Skeptics http://creation.com/s/10-2-585
Genesis Account http://creation.com/s/10-2-606
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-505
Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag
What the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
To find out more from Creation Ministries International, visit our website CREATION.com
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
Related Articles:
The Geologic Column: Does it exist? http://creation.com/does-geologic-column-exist
Are fossils ever found in the wrong place? http://creation.com/fossils-wrong-place
Order in the fossil record - How can Noah’s Flood explain it? http://creation.com/order-in-the-fossil-record
Related Products:
Evolution’s Achilles Heels Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-540
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-505
Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag
This video features clips from 1 hour of content on climate change from these 4 videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1NL09ZLuIc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvFTk42bPYg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adixnVHjafw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnn1bC_Lw4s
0:00 CO2 levels are increasing
0:49 Temperature increase not due entirely to CO2 levels
1:47 Human CO2 contributions are small
2:23 Focus in biggest CO2 contributors?
3:02 Problems with the 'hockey stick' graph
3:56 Noah's flood and CO2
4:48 CO2 is plant food - more CO2 needed
The global flood recorded in the Bible provides a compelling answer. As the waters rose during Noah’s Flood, various mechanisms—such as tidal movements of the water—caused flood-laid sediments to be briefly exposed. This allowed dinosaurs that had previously been caught up in the currents, to make tracks on the freshly-laid sediments, before the sediments were inundated again.
Thus dinosaurs were experiencing global panic when they made their footprints, and that explains why their track ways are so often straight. The preservation of tracks also requires their rapid burial—as would happen in the Flood. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
Related Articles:
Huge dinosaurs flee rising waters of Noah’s Flood in Australia
http://creation.com/kimberley-dinosaur-footprints
Thousands of Dinosaur footprints found in China http://creation.com/dinosaur-footprints-found-in-china
Geology documents dinosaurs fleeing Noah’s Flood http://creation.com/geology-documents-dinosaurs-fleeing-noahs-flood
Related Products:
Dinosaur Challenges and Mysteries (http://castore.creation.com/catalog/dinosaur-challenges-mysteries-p-1781.html?osCsid=v1ur1v1th5s51hl02b7ikdns20)
Behemoths Buried Alive DVD (http://castore.creation.com/catalog/behemoths-buried-alive-p-2039.html)
Exploring Geology with Mr Hibb (http://castore.creation.com/catalog/exploring-geology-with-hibb-p-1937.html)
Watch the entire episode here: https://youtu.be/ideM20e_NiM
The evidence for these reversals is rock solid, because when molten rock cools, certain mineral grains align with the earth’s magnetic field, thus recording the direction of Earth’s magnetic field at the time, in the solidified rock.
Previously, most geologists thought that a single reversal would take many thousands of years. However, creationist physicist, Dr Russell Humphreys, reasoned they must have happened quickly to fit within the biblical timescale.
So Dr Humphreys made a prediction that quickly-cooling thin lava flows would be found that recorded fast changes in the direction of the magnetic field.
This prediction was later proven correct. Scientists were shocked to find major magnetic field changes had occurred within weeks in a single lava flow. They published this in the regular scientific literature. Thus yet another scientific prediction, based on biblical history, proved to be correct. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
Reference:
‘Fossil’ magnetism reveals rapid reversals of the earth’s magnetic field http://creation.com/fossil-magnetism-reveals-rapid-reversals-of-the-earths-magnetic-field
The earth’s magnetic field: evidence that the earth is young http://creation.com/the-earths-magnetic-field-evidence-that-the-earth-is-young
Mercury’s Magnetic Field is Young! http://creation.com/mercurys-magnetic-field-is-young
Related Products:
Dismantling the Big Bang: God's Universe Rediscovered http://creation.com/s/10-2-188
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-505
Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag
Noah’s flood was a worldwide catastrophe that deposited much of earth’s fossil-bearing rocks. However, within these rocks, we find what appear to be dropstones. This is often interpreted as evidence of previous ice ages. And since you can’t have ice ages occurring during the flood, this has prompted some to claim that dropstones disprove Noah’s flood.
However, dropstones can be formed by mechanisms that don’t involve icebergs. For example, floating tree stumps can have rocks entangled within them, which are then dropped on the ocean floor. Moreover, recent research in the journal “Marine Geology” has shown that a large seaweed known as kelp has a surprising ability to carry and drop sizeable rocks. So dropstones don’t disprove Noah’s flood. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
However, many boundaries don’t show any evidence of elapsed time. The Grand Canyon provides startling examples. One is where the Coconino Sandstone overlies the Hermit Shale. The surface between these rock layers is remarkably flat and smooth—a ‘flat gap’. Yet according to conventional geology, there is a 6 million year gap between these rock layers. The underlying shale is a soft rock, so it should have eroded a lot if exposed for this time. But the Hermit Shale doesn’t show this erosion. This shows that the upper sandstone was deposited on the lower shale so quickly that there was not time for erosion of the shale. Something is obviously wrong with the conventional geological timescale. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
Related Articles:
Abortion ‘choices’ (https://creation.com/abortion-choices)
Abortion: an indispensable right or violence against women? (https://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls)
Roe v Wade in the ash heap of history! (https://creation.com/roe-v-wade-gone)
Refuting contrived pro-abortion arguments: the ‘famous violinist’ of Judith Jarvis Thomson (https://creation.com/refuting-contrived-pro-abortion-arguments)
Human Life Q&A page: (https://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia)
0:00 Intro
2:11 The 2-year-old test
2:43 Humans at different stages from conception
4:17 Secular arguments against abortion
4:46 Biologists: Life begins at conception
6:53 Why murder is wrong
7:47 Newborn less valuable than a pig?
9:11 Feminists against abortion
10:25 Abort disabled babies?
11:34 Roe V Wade overturned
13:52 The Bible on abortion
17:08 'Famous violinist' argument
19:52 Abortion justified in rape cases?
20:57 Abortion to save the mother?
23:00 Pro-life arguments refuted?
27:27 No one has the right to murder babies
Epigenetics poses new problems for evolution. For instance, a group of animals with a camouflaged coat colour might be favoured in a particular environment, but if this coat colour is due to epigenetics and not the actual DNA code, then the non-camouflaged animals would be selected against in vain. When the epigenetic modification is reset by a diet change, natural selection is sent back to square one.
The field of epigenetics, therefore, creates problems for evolution and strongly points to a master programmer who invented the DNA and epigenetic codes.
To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/nlNLoEGu0po
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
However, this argument is far from ‘rock solid’, because true mud cracks are easy to confuse with cracks formed by other mechanisms that don’t involve a period of drying out. For instance, it is well known that structures resembling mud cracks can form underwater. Moreover, research suggests that true mud cracks could develop within hours. So flood sediments, briefly exposed with tidal movements as the waters rose, could shrink and crack very quickly.
Thus cracks in mud don’t disprove the flood! To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
DNA is a fragile molecule, and so it breaks down quickly. Measurements of DNA stability suggest it could last thousands of years, at best, under the likely conditions.
But 80 million years was just too incredible for other skeptical scientists. Eventually, these skeptics were vindicated—as it became apparent that the original researchers had sequenced contaminating human DNA, not dinosaur DNA.
However, in 2012 a different group of researchers published new results supporting the discovery of actual dinosaur DNA. These new results appear much harder to disprove, with the researchers applying multiple checks against contamination from non-dinosaur sources.
The preservation of dinosaur DNA doesn’t make sense from an evolutionary perspective. But it fits biblical history, whereby dinosaurs lived thousands of years ago, not millions of years ago. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/nlNLoEGu0po
So why do we find such a conspicuous absence of plants in rocks containing dinosaur fossils? Take for example the Morrison Formation in Montana, USA. Even though this Formation has yielded many dinosaur fossils, there is a startling scarcity of vegetation preserved.
This phenomenon of ‘missing vegetation’ doesn’t just apply to dinosaurs. The Coconino Sandstone in the Grand Canyon has many animal track-ways, but it is almost devoid of plants.
These rocks tell us something profound about earth history. They suggest that these deposits are not ecosystems buried over eons of time, otherwise we’d find more evidence of the plants that the animals ate. Instead, the evidence fits nicely with the biblical model of earth history, whereby these animals were transported and buried catastrophically, during Noah’s flood. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode here: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
For instance, Carl Linnaeus, the creationist ‘father of taxonomy’ wrote of a ‘struggle for survival’ in nature. Similarly, James Hutton wrote about the concept of natural selection. Probably the most influential character was Edward Blyth, an English chemist and zoologist who wrote major articles on natural selection two decades before Darwin published the Origin of Species.
Darwin differed in trying to use the concept of natural selection to promote the idea of unlimited change. However, modern studies of natural selection have revealed that it is limited. It can only select between variations that already exist—it is incapable of producing the new genetic information required for true evolutionary change to occur, such as growing feathers on a reptile. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
Veterinary researcher Dr Jean Lightner has suggested that God may have created genetic switches to facilitate variation, the switches having been created with a propensity to mutate without negatively affecting other traits. Modifications to genetic switches are not examples of ‘evolution in action’, even though they often are spoken of in that manner. Indeed, these changes don’t involve new information—new genes—arising, and evolutionists cannot explain the existence of the genetic switches in the first place!
The more we learn about the complexity of genomes, the more they point to a super-intelligent master programmer. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the whole episode at: https://youtu.be/OBEXcgwhJrQ
No, this isn’t crackpot science. In 2008, the prestigious journal, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, published research documenting how cows grazing in a field have a tendency to align themselves with the earth’s magnetic field.
And this phenomenon isn’t just limited to cows; many animals including deer, birds, turtles, bats, and even some bacteria, can sense the earth’s magnetic field for alignment or navigation.
The fact that so many living things have this ability is rather ironic, considering that the famous evolutionist J.B.S Haldane once said that evolution couldn’t produce magnets.
Just as man-made magnetic compasses are the product of forethought and design, so, too, the magnetic sensing in animals points to an intelligent designer. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
Yes, speciation happens, but it is not evolution. For more details see the articles here: https://creation.com/speciation
Canadian pastors: Follow this link to get your free Genesis commentary: https://forms.office.com/r/5vbv49N3pd
Take for example the marsupial mouse and the placental mouse. These creatures are remarkably similar, but according to evolutionists they did not inherit this startling similarity from a common ancestor. Instead, we are told, ‘evolution’ achieved the same design in both creatures, independently.
They call this ‘convergence’ because evolution has supposedly converged on, or arrived at, a similar looking outcome. But ‘convergence’ is really just a word used to try to explain away similarities that don’t support evolution.
Indeed, convergences are so common in nature that they cause major problems for evolutionists—but they fit nicely with the proposal that the living world is the handiwork of a single divine designer. The similarities tell us that there is one mind behind it all. He even designed things in a way that thwarts evolutionary story telling. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
Watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
No, it has not been found, and likely will not be.
The object in Turkey is not the Ark. See: https://creation.com/special-report-amazing-ark-expose
Other possible locations for Noah's Ark: https://creation.com/ark-location
For more details about Noah's Ark watch the entire episode here: https://youtu.be/eHPa96RjtEA
However, many people do not associate these rocks and fossils with Noah's Flood because they think there is not enough water to cover the highest mountains. However, they are not considering how the Flood changed the earth's topography.
The mountain ranges formed at the end of the Flood. With vertical earth movements towards the end of the flood, the mountains rose and the water flowed off the continents into the newly formed oceans basins. Indeed, such mountains must have formed quickly and recently, otherwise they would have eroded as quickly as they formed.
That's why we have marine fossils at the tops of high mountains.
To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website Creation.com.
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/OBEXcgwhJrQ
The laboratory results were clear: all of the 10 coal samples contained carbon-14; and similar amounts. This seriously undermines the evolutionary dates for the rock strata containing the coal, because the presence of carbon-14 affirms that the coal samples cannot be millions of years old.
The results fit nicely with the coal forming from vegetation that was buried in Noah’s Flood. To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com
For more details watch the entire episode at: https://youtu.be/7f36GWzieLs