Noah StewartSiskel and Ebert reviews an American animated direct-to-video romantic musical film from Disney, "The Lion King II: Simba's Pride". Starring the voices of Matthew Broderick, Neve Campbell, and others in October 27, 1998. It is a sequel to Disney's 1994 animated feature film "The Lion King", four years ago. Both of them really enjoyed it a lot for the animation, the characters, the new songs, and the storytelling. I agree both of them, too. I really loved it a lot more. I also agreed what Gene said that this movie is not originally released in movie theaters, but directly into video stores. This was the final draft gradually became a variation and it was influenced by William Shakespeare's "Romeo & Juliet." Though, it's not as good as the original, but it does follow the story very well, and I loved the love romance between Kiara and Kovu. Anyway, I really loved this movie a lot, probably my favorite sequel. A marginal thumbs up for me on "The Lion King II: Simba's Pride".
Siskel & Ebert - The Lion King II: Simbas Pride (1998)Noah Stewart2019-09-16 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American animated direct-to-video romantic musical film from Disney, "The Lion King II: Simba's Pride". Starring the voices of Matthew Broderick, Neve Campbell, and others in October 27, 1998. It is a sequel to Disney's 1994 animated feature film "The Lion King", four years ago. Both of them really enjoyed it a lot for the animation, the characters, the new songs, and the storytelling. I agree both of them, too. I really loved it a lot more. I also agreed what Gene said that this movie is not originally released in movie theaters, but directly into video stores. This was the final draft gradually became a variation and it was influenced by William Shakespeare's "Romeo & Juliet." Though, it's not as good as the original, but it does follow the story very well, and I loved the love romance between Kiara and Kovu. Anyway, I really loved this movie a lot, probably my favorite sequel. A marginal thumbs up for me on "The Lion King II: Simba's Pride".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Blue Steel (1990)Noah Stewart2024-02-28 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action thriller film called "Blue Steel" in March 16, 1990. It stars Jamie Lee Curtis, Ron Silver and Clancy Brown. It tells a story a NYPD female police officer, who shoots and kills a robbery suspect on her first day of duty and then becomes involved with a witness of the shooting.
Both Gene and Roger made a split-vote on the movie, with Roger enjoyed it and noting that it is a sophisticated update of John Carpenter's "Halloween", the movie that first made Jamie Lee Curtis a star. What makes it more interesting than yet another sequel to Halloween is the way the filmmakers have fleshed out the formula with intriguing characters and a few angry ideas. Whereas Gene, unfortunately, didn't think it works as he felt that the the plot evolves the serial killer is utterly preposterous.
To me, I agreed with Roger, as I really liked this movie. It was scary, but so exciting. Jamie Lee Curtis is good in the role, and Ron Silver is a really interesting killer. The character of Megan Turner is tough, and smart. But I felt sympathy with her. She had a rough life when she was accused of killing an unarmed man and is subsequently suspended, then she begins dating Hunt, who has become obsessed with her. It's a really good thrilling, dark, and psychological film that the premise does feel like a sophisticated update of "Halloween" rather than another sequel of "Halloween". Though, its increasingly over-the-top story beggars disbelief, but this cop drama is elevated by an appealing cast and Kathryn Bigelow's stylish direction. Thumbs up for me on "Blue Steel".
Blue Steel (1990) 3/4 👍👍Siskel & Ebert - A Bronx Tale (1993)Noah Stewart2023-07-10 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American coming-of-age crime drama film called "A Bronx Tale" in September 29, 1993. It stars Robert De Niro in his directorial debut, and Lillo Brancato. It is adaptation of the 1989 play of the same name by an actor named Chazz Palminteri, who wrote the film based on his childhood experiences in the 60s. It tells the coming-of-age story of an Italian-American boy, Calogero, who, after encountering a local Mafia boss, is torn between the temptations of organized crime and the values of his honest, hardworking father, as well as racial tensions in his community.
Both Gene and Roger generally praised the movie a lot, for who the performances of the leads, and launched Palminteri's acting career, while also helping De Niro gain acceptance as a director. I totally agree with Gene and Roger. I love the film a lot. It was so dramatic. The direction is incredibly shot, the music and songs gives me chills, and the characters are interesting. But the story is definitely well-told, about C's father, Lorenzo who always support their family, and the mobster, Sonny, who is torn between the temptations of organized crime and the values of his honest, hardworking father, as well as racial tensions in his community. It's a very funny and very touching film, filled with life and colorful characters and great lines of dialogue, and De Niro, in his debut as a director, finds the right notes as he moves from laughter to anger to tears while retaining its values. And it was almost 30 years ago. Thumbs way up for me on "A Bronx Tale".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Born on the Fourth of July (1989)Noah Stewart2023-07-05 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American biographical anti-war drama film "Born on the Fourth of July" in December 20, 1989. It stars Tom Cruise, Kyra Sedgwick, Raymond J. Barry, Jerry Levine, Frank Whaley, and Willem Dafoe. It is based on the 1976 autobiography of Ron Kovic. The film depicts the life of Kovic (Cruise) over a 20-year period, detailing his childhood, his military service and paralysis during the Vietnam War, and his transition to anti-war activism. It is the second installment in Oliver Stone's trilogy of films about the Vietnam War, following "Platoon" and preceding "Heaven & Earth".
Both Gene and Roger really loved this film for Tom Cruise's performance that grow on his career, Stone's direction and screenplay by Kovic himself.
I totally agree with Gene and Roger, I absolutely love this movie. It was truly powerful and really dramatic. The direction is nicely shot, but I will definitely give credit to Tom Cruise. Not only he portrays the role of Kovic and looks the part, but this is one of his best performances. I was so moved by his anger, frustration, trouble and sad. He goes through a lot in his life. Being crippled in a wheelchair is depressing after being wounded. Anyway, it's a very good moving film as my favorite Oliver Stone war film with a great story about a man whose hatred for the war and the government for abandoning the American people. A strongly recommendation for me on "Born on the Fourth of July", Happy Independence Day, and to Ron Kovic, Happy Birthday!!
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Heat (1995)Noah Stewart2023-05-21 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American crime film "Heat" in December 15, 1995. It features an ensemble cast led by Al Pacino and Robert De Niro, with Tom Sizemore, Jon Voight, Amy Brenneman, Ashley Judd, Wes Studi and Val Kilmer in supporting roles. It follows the conflict between an LAPD detective (Pacino) and a career criminal (De Niro) while also depicting its effect on their professional relationships and personal lives. The film marks Pacino and De Niro's first on-screen appearance together following a period of acclaimed performances from both.
Both Gene and Roger really liked the film a lot, and praised Michael Mann's direction and screenplay, action sequences, sound mixing, and the performances of Pacino and De Niro. Although it did not receive any major award nominations, Heat is regarded as one of the most influential films of its genre and has inspired several other works.
I totally agree with Gene and Roger. I really liked this movie a lot. It was so entertaining and exciting. Al Pacino and Robert De Niro are really great as a LAPD cop and a professional crook. Their performances are really good. Although, they had never started in a movie together, but this is their first on-screen appearance and became friends. But anyway, It's a really good action crime film and regarded as one of the most influential films of its genre and has inspired several other works. A marginal thumbs up for me on "Heat".
Heat (1995) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
#heat #alpacino #robertdeniro #valkilmer
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Jungle Fever (1991)Noah Stewart2023-04-29 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American romantic drama film "Jungle Fever" on June 7, 1991. It is written, produced and directed by Spike Lee. It stars Lee, Wesley Snipes, Annabella Sciorra, Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, Samuel L. Jackson, Lonette McKee, John Turturro, Frank Vincent, Halle Berry (in her film debut), Tim Robbins, Brad Dourif, Queen Latifah, Michael Imperioli, and Anthony Quinn, and is Lee's fifth feature-length film.
It explores the beginning and end of an extramarital interracial relationship against the urban backdrop of the streets of New York City in the early 1990s.
Both Gene and Roger really liked the film a lot, for finding finding Spike Lee tackling timely sociopolitical themes in typically provocative style, even if the result is sometimes ambitious to a fault. They praised the casting, particularly Samuel L. Jackson's performance as crack addict Gator, which is often considered to be his breakout role.
I actually agreed with Gene and Roger, and I really liked it a lot. I thought it was emotional and heartwarming. I like the love story Flipper and Angie, as they do so of like each other and fall in love. But unfortunately, things got messed up when Flipper is fed to be mixed with whites. Though, he still likes her and became friends. It's really a very good dramatic film that contains two sequences: the girl talk and the crackhouse visit - of amazing power. It also contains humor and insight and canny psychology, strong performances, and the fearless discussion of things both races would rather not face. We still struggle in a segregation world of present day, but we could be used to together. A marginal thumbs up for me on "Jungle Fever".
Jungle Fever (1991) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Braveheart (1995)Noah Stewart2023-04-26 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American epic historical drama film "Braveheart" in May 24, 1995. It is directed, produced by, and starring Mel Gibson. It also stars Sophie Marceau, Patrick McGoohan and Catherine McCormack. Gibson portrays Sir William Wallace, a late-13th century Scottish warrior who led the Scots in the First War of Scottish Independence against King Edward I of England.
The story is inspired by Blind Harry's 15th century epic poem The Actes and Deidis of the Illustre and Vallyeant Campioun Schir William Wallace and was adapted for the screen by Randall Wallace.
Both Gene and Roger really liked the movie a lot, for its action, drama, and romance. They also appreciate Mel Gibson's art direction by showing dirty and brutal. Roger commented on an action epic with the spirit of the Hollywood swordplay classics and the grungy ferocity of The Road Warrior. Whereas Gene also stated that in addition to staging battle scenes well, Gibson also manages to recreate the filth and mood of 700 years ago.
I totally agree with Gene and Roger. I love this movie a lot. It was incredibly epic. The battle sequences are great, the music score by James Horner is really memorable, the love story is so romantic, and Mel Gibson's direction is nicely shot. Although it is distractingly violent and historically dodgy, it really justifies its epic length by delivering enough sweeping action, drama, and romance to match its ambition. Thumbs way up for me on "Braveheart".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Reservoir Dogs (1992)Noah Stewart2023-02-23 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American crime film "Reservoir Dogs" in October 9, 1992. It stars Harvey Keitel, Tim Roth, Chris Penn, Steve Buscemi, Lawrence Tierney, Michael Madsen, Quentin Tarantino, and Edward Bunker, as diamond thieves whose heist of a jewelry store goes terribly wrong. Kirk Baltz, Randy Brooks, and Steven Wright also play supporting roles. The movie is Tarantino's first feature-length debut. It incorporates many motifs that have become his hallmarks: violent crime, pop culture references, profanity, and nonlinear storytelling.
Both Gene and Roger gave the film thumbs down, because, although they praised its stylish look of crime movies, they felt that its depictions of violence and heavy use of profanity is predictable with just action, and the dialogue, namely the F-bombs is too rough. They also felt that they got that very quickly within 15 mins, and the movie doesn't have anything more to say.
However, I disagree with Gene and Roger, and being too harsh on this movie. I respected their opinions, but I absolutely loved this movie a whole lot. The cast are really great together in their roles, the writing is so funny, and Tarantino's direction is perfectly shot-by-shot, and I really do appreciate it. Of course its depictions of violence and heavy use of profanity is propostous, but so what? It is meant to be so realistic. Anyway, it is a very crazy, over-the-top crime movie, as regarded as a classic of independent film and a cult film. Thrumming with intelligence and energy, it opens Tarantino's filmmaking career with a hard-hitting style. Sorry, Gene and Roger, but you totally missed the boat on this one. Thumbs way up for me on "Reservoir Dogs".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Air Force One (1997)Noah Stewart2023-02-21 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American political action thriller film "Air Force One" in July 25, 1997. It stars Harrison Ford, Gary Oldman, Glenn Close, Wendy Crewson, Xander Berkeley, William H. Macy, Dean Stockwell, and Paul Guilfoyle. It tells the story of a group of terrorists who hijack Air Force One and the President's attempt to rescue everyone on board by retaking his plane.
Both of them made a split decision when Roger gave a marginal thumbs down and found it flawed and cliché-ridden yet well-served by the quality of the performances ... Air Force One is a fairly competent recycling of familiar ingredients, given an additional interest because of Harrison Ford's personal appeal. He also said that it's not a very fresh or a very original action picture. Whereas Gene gave a thumbs up and liked the setup of the film, but felt the third act is predictable and felt disappointed.
I really liked this movie a lot. It was incredibly entertaining. The action scenes are intense but exciting, the visual effects are different but very impressive, the music is amazing, and the performances, particularly Harrison Ford and Gary Oldman, are great. It's an American political action thriller film about the U.S. President/Vietnam War and Medal of Honor who must stop the terrorists by taking risks and saves his family. It may seem cliché, but it was truly awesome. Thumbs up for me on "Air Force One".
siskelebert.orgRoger Ebert & the Movies - X-Men (2000)Noah Stewart2022-12-06 | Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper reviews an American superhero film "X-Men" in July 14, 2000. Starring Patrick Stewart as Charles Xavier, Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, Ian McKellen as Magneto, Halle Berry as Storm, Famke Janssen as Jean Grey, James Marsden as Cyclops, Bruce Davison as Senator Kelly, Rebecca Romijn-Stamos as Mystique, Ray Park as Toad, Tyler Mane as Sabretooth, and Anna Paquin as Rogue.
It is based on the Marvel Comics superhero team of the same name by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby, and it is the first installment of the X-Men franchise to be produced by Marvel Enterprises and distributed by 20th Century Fox.
Both of them gave a marginal thumbs down, because although they praised the action scenes, special effects and the performances, (particularly Stewart and McKellen), they felt that there wasn't enough plot, too many characters, and the climax was so anti-climax.
However, I disagree with Roger and Richard. I enjoyed this movie very much. I thought it was awesome. The action scenes were cool, the story was well-told, the effects were so impressive, and the characters were very likeable. Although, I do agree the climax was gets a little too much. Anyway, it was a X-spectacular good film, as a first cinematic blockbuster. Thumbs up for me on "X-Men".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Vampires (1998)Noah Stewart2022-10-04 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American independent neo-Western horror film John Carpenter's "Vampires" in October 30, 1998. It stars James Woods, Daniel Baldwin, Sheryl Lee, Tim Guinee, and Thomas Ian Griffith, best known for the role of Terry Silver from "The Karate Kid Part III". It is a film adaptation of the novel "Vampire$" by John Steakley, and it tells a story about a company called Vampire$, Inc. which treats vampire-hunting as a commercial enterprise, funded by large payments from the vampires' potential victims and secretly supported from the highest levels of the Roman Catholic Church.
Both Gene and Roger made a split decision on the film, when Gene really liked it and calling it "a high-action homage to westerns and classic horror that actually has a unique story and masterful cinematography" and "a film that should put John Carpenter back on the map as a horror director and a film director in general." He also expressed his fondness in the fact that the film starred an all-adult cast without any teenagers and portrayed both vampires and vampire hunters in an original way. At the end of the year, he placed James Woods as his pick for his "Best Actor" and his performance suggestion to the Oscars. Whereas Roger, unfortunately, disliked it and noted that it "has a certain mordant humor and charm", but was ultimately "not scary, and the plot is just one gory showdown after another."
To me, I actually liked the film... pretty much. It was scary enough. The fight scenes are decent, the vampires are menacing, the music by Carpenter was good, James Wood is really awesome, even though he ad-libbed some of those cheesy one-liners, and of course, Thomas Ian Griffith is incredibly great as this type of Count Dracula. Although, I'm a little mixed that the gore seems to be too much blood-fest and very disgusting. But nevertheless, it is an American independent neo-Western horror film that probably goes too horrifying and over-the-top, but still an enjoyably fun carefree vibe. Thumbs up for me on "Vampires".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Top Gun (1986)Noah Stewart2022-09-19 | Siskel and Ebert reviews American action film "Top Gun" in May 16, 1986. Directed by Tony Scott, and produced by Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer, in association with Paramount Pictures. It stars Tom Cruise and Kelly McGillis, with Val Kilmer, Anthony Edwards, and Tom Skerritt in supporting roles. Cruise plays Lieutenant Pete "Maverick" Mitchell, a young naval aviator aboard the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise.
Both Gene and Roger made a split decision on "Top Gun". Roger gave it a marginal thumbs down, although, they were good stuff and bad stuff in the film. The good stuff: The action sequences, particularly the flying scenes, are spectacular. The bad stuff: The plot is weak, the characters are mere stereotypes, and of course, the love story. He thought the chemistry between Tom Cruise and Kelly McGillis is pointless and predictable. Gene, on the other hand, gave thumbs up and praised the action sequences, but had mixed feelings and felt the same way, as he too thought the romantic subplot is ridiculous, and said that it belongs in a teenage sex-fantasy film and not in a movie that deserves the genuine romantic value of "An Officer and a Gentleman".
However, I actually enjoyed "Top Gun" very much. I thought it was surprisingly entertaining. The action sequences, the effects, and the aerial stunts were very impressive, the characters were funny at times, and the acting performances, plus the chemistry between Tom Cruise and Kelly McGillis, which I disagree with Gene and Roger, were really sweet. Although, the script and the dialogue were too cheesy, and redundant. But nevertheless, it was a fun, action drama, popcorn film that features some of the most memorable and electrifying aerial footage shot with an expert eye for excitement specticle. Thumbs up for me on "Top Gun".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - In the Line of Fire (1993)Noah Stewart2022-02-26 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an 1993 American political action thriller film "In the Line of Fire" in July 9, 1993. Starring Clint Eastwood, John Malkovich and Rene Russo. The film is about a disillusioned and obsessed former CIA agent who attempts to assassinate the President of the United States and the Secret Service agent who tracks him. Eastwood's character, Frank Horrigan, is the sole active-duty Secret Service agent who is still remaining from the detail that had guarded John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, at the time of his assassination in 1963. Both of them really liked it a lot, for the cast particularly Eastwood's performance and Malkovich was a terrific villain. I totally agree with Gene and Roger, too. I thought it was truly intelligent and entertaining. Clint Eastwood was a really good actor with his superb performance as a sole active-duty, veteran agent who felt blames himself for the assassination of JFK, then he finds a ruthless killer by arrest hm or excecute him, and he finally retires. Anyway, it was a really suspenseful, exciting, ingenious, action thriller film. A marginal thumbs up for me on "In the Line of Fire".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Negotiator (1998)Noah Stewart2022-01-10 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action thriller film "The Negotiator" in July 29, 1998. Starring Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey as two expert hostage negotiators and Chicago police lieutenants, Danny Roman and Chris Sabian. Both of them really liked the movie, for a incredible performance of Jackson and Spacey as chess players, a triumph of style over story, and of acting over characters, much of the movie simply consists of closeups of the two of them talking, but it's not simply dialogue because the actors make it more invest it with conviction and urgency. I agreed with Gene and Roger. I liked this film, too. It was a fun, dramatic, thriller film, as a good cliché. And Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey Teaming for the first time, arguably the two best actors of their generation, in perfectly fitting roles is a shrewd move and the best element of this fact-inspired but overwrought thriller. Thumbs up for me on "The Negotiator".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Nadine (1987)Noah Stewart2021-11-22 | Sickle and Ebert reviews an American crime comedy film "Nadine". Starring Jeff Bridges and Kim Basinger as the two divorced characters, Vernon and Nadine Hightower in August 7, 1987.
Both of the gave thumbs down because they felt that the film wasn't funny, the script was phony, and the ridiculous plot.
But however, I kind of liked this movie a little bit. I thought it was pretty decent. The acting was cheesy, there were some little action scenes, and Jeff Bridges and Kim Basinger were fine with their Texas accent. But the plot was ridiculous and so complicated. Anyway, it was a really watchable comedy film. A flawed film so sure, but enjoyable. Thumbs up for me on "Nadine".
Nadine (1987) 3/4 👍
#siskelandebert #nadine #jeffbridges #kimbasinger
siskelebert.orgEbert & Roeper - Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone (2001)Noah Stewart2021-11-01 | Ebert and Roeper reviews a fantasy film "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", or in the UK, "The Philosopher's Stone" in November 16, 2001. Starring Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter, Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley, and Emma Watson as Hermione Granger.
It is based on J.K. Rowling's 1997 novel of the same name, and it is the first instalment of the Harry Potter film series, as I refer to it as the first chapter of the franchise. Both of them loved the film for the set pieces, visual effects, such as the Quidditch Stadium, music score, and great performances. Although, they pointed out that it might be a little scary for children.
I totally agree with Roger and Richard. I really loved this movie a whole lot when I had a amazing birthday as I turned 5 years old, after I did read a book as well. I praised Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, and Emma Watson more. Though, I thought the action sequences was a incredible, in my opinion. Anyway, it was a terrific and fascinating film. A strongest recommendation for me on "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", and Happy 20th Anniversary!!!!
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) 4/4 👍👍👍👍
siskelebert.orgEbert & Roeper - The Mummy Returns (2001)Noah Stewart2021-10-19 | Ebert and Roeper reviews an American adventure horror film "The Mummy Returns" in May 4, 2001. Starring Brendan Fraser, Rachel Weisz, John Hannah, Arnold Vosloo, Oded Fehr, Patricia Velásquez, Freddie Boath, Alun Armstrong, and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. It is a sequel to the 1999 film "The Mummy". This was also The Rock's first film debut.
Both of them gave thumbs up because they felt that it didn't have frightening moments of the original film, instead it just filled with assembly line clichés, kinetic action, and elaborate special effects.
But I really disagreed with Roger and Richard and being too harsh on it. I actually liked this movie better. I thought it was really exciting. The action scenes were still cool, the effects doesn't necessarily age well, but it looks pretty solid, the music was extraordinary, and the cast were incredible. And it constant plot turns, and cheeky sensibility. I also disagreed what Roger said about The Rock as the Scorpion King. I thought he was just a pain in the butt, and as in a scorpion form, I also thought he looks okay. Anyway, it was a fun, action, entertaining film. It doesn't have the scary and dark elements of the original film, but it was an truly adventurous. Thumbs up for me on "The Mummy Returns".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Dennis the Menace (1993)Noah Stewart2021-09-07 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American family comedy film "Dennis the Menace". Starring Walter Matthau, Mason Gamble, Christopher Lloyd, and Lea Thompson in June 25, 1993. It is based on the comic strip of the same name by Hank Ketcham, published in 1951. It is also based on a TV sitcom (1959-1963) as well. Although Gene and Roger enjoyed the relationship between Dennis and Mr. Wilson, both of them didn't like the film because they felt that it feels like a "Home Alone" wannabe, and Switchblade Sam was so scary as an unnecessary clichés villain. However, I personally disagreed with Gene and Roger and being too harsh on it. I enjoyed this movie. I thought it was pretty funny, and heart. Walter Matthau does a nice job as Mr. Wilson, Mason Gamble was actually good as Dennis Mitchell, and I also thought Switchblade Sam was pretty hilarious. Anyway, it was really decent film adaptation film. Sorry, Gene and Roger, but it was really enjoyable. Thumbs up for me on "Dennis the Menace".
siskekebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Twins (1988)Noah Stewart2021-08-26 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American buddy comedy film "Twins". Starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Danny DeVito, and the others in December 9, 1988. Both of them liked the film for offers a few modest pleasures for undemanding viewers, engaging entertainment with some big laughs and a sort of warm goofiness. Although, the comedy runs downhill, as they felt that it had action scenes were unnecessary. I agreed with Gene and Roger, too. I enjoyed this film as well, even though I had mixed feelings about the shootout in the chase and it had too heavily on the wackiness of its premise to overcome its narrative shortcomings. Anyway, it was very cheesy, comedy film, and it offers a few modest pleasures for undemanding viewers. Thumbs up for me on "Twins".
siskekebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Forrest Gump (1994)Noah Stewart2021-08-03 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American drama film "Forrest Gump". Starring Tom Hanks as a titular character, Robin Wright, Gary Sinise, and the others in July 6, 1994. It is based on the 1986 novel of the same name by Winston Groom. Both of them loved the film for Zemeckis's direction, performances (particularly that of Hanks), visual effects, music, and screenplay. I totally agreed with Gene and Roger. I loved this film a lot. Tom Hanks was so spot on and very marvelous. His performance was really greatness. And Forrest was a nice careful person, who always do the right thing, and all he really cares about is Jenny, who sometimes falls in love with him, but she does misses him so much from Vietnam. Anyway, it was a terrific magical movie with comedy and sadness, in a story full of big laughs and quiet truths. Thumbs way up for me on "Forrest Gump".
Forest Gump (1994) 4/4 👍👍👍👍
#siskelandebert #forrestgump #tomhanks
siskekebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Independence Day (1996)Noah Stewart2021-07-04 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American science fiction action film "Independence Day". Starring Jeff Goldblum, Will Smith, Bill Pullman, Mary McDonnell, Judd Hirsch, Margaret Colin, Randy Quaid, Robert Loggia, James Rebhorn, and Harvey Fierstein in July 3, 1996. Both of them didn't like the film because they criticized that the characters were goofy, the story was really stupid, and the script was cheesy, but praised the performances and visuals. They felt that the aliens had recycled from other sci-fi movies such as the "Star Wars" trilogy. Roger also stated that it lacks the imagination in the spaceship and creature designs. However, I strongly disagreed with Gene and Roger and really being too hard on it because I literally loved this movie a whole lot than these two. I found it to be extremely exciting, action-packed, fully energized, and a lot of fun. The characters were very interesting and funny, particularly Will Smith, Jeff Goldblum and Bill Pullman, the flying saucers were great detailed. I thought the aliens were truly threatening. And I also thought that it really does feels like "Star Wars" wannabe. It's way better than "Stargate", in my opinion. My favorite scene is where President Thomas J. Whitmore saying his famous speech to all the military to celebrate born on the Fourth of July. Sorry, Gene and Roger, but the movie is incredibly awesome, as a great celebrated independent film. A strongly recommendation and big thumbs way up for me on the 25th Anniversary of "Independence Day" and Happy Fourth of July!
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Uncle Buck (1989)Noah Stewart2021-06-12 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American comedy film "Uncle Buck", written and directed by John Hughes. Starring John Candy, Jean Louisa Kelly, and introducing young Macaulay Culkin in August 16, 1989. Both of them disliked the film because they found it to be unusually bitter and angry for a Hughes movie, and also felt that it has a darker undercurrent, which the scenes was too scary. Although, Gene liked the darker material more than the sweet namby pamby stuff, while Roger really didn't like it very much. However, I personally disagreed with Gene and Roger. I actually liked this movie. I thought it was sweet, charming, and heart. John Candy was hilarious as Buck, even the little Macaulay Culkin. Although, I had mixed about the amount of swearing, and that would be inappropriate for children. I felt bad for Buck, for no wife and no kids. But he's the only family they had. Yes, he's soft of scary, but he's likeable, and I do care about him. Anyway, it was a pretty good comedy film. Thumbs up for me on "Uncle Buck".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Quick and the Dead (1995)Noah Stewart2021-05-31 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American revisionist Western film "The Quick and the Dead", directed by Sam Raimi. Starring Sharon Stone, Gene Hackman, Russell Crowe, and Leonardo Dicaprio in February 10, 1995. Both of them gave the movie thumbs down because they felt that the story was predictable, the characters were not interesting, and criticized for being overtly cliché. Although, they praised Raimi's direction and Dante Spinotti's cinematography. To me, I disagreed with Gene and Roger. I thought it was pretty entertaining. Sharon Stone, Gene Hackman, Russell Crowe, and Leonardo DiCaprio were good with their performances. Though, the script was kind of dated and underrated. But nevertheless, it was a really enjoyable film. Thumbs up for me on "The Quick and the Dead".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Dumb and Dumber (1994)Noah Stewart2021-04-30 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American comedy film "Dumb and Dumber". Starring Jim Carrey, Jeff Daniels, Lauren Holly, and the others in December 16, 1994. Both of them made a split-vote when Gene enjoyed the goofy slapstick humor and praised the performances of Carrey and Daniels, as Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne. But Roger, on the other hand, didn't like the film, as he thought it had hit or miss comedic elements, since they really hated "Ace Ventura: Pet Detective", but really liked "The Mask". I agreed with Gene. I really enjoyed the film, and Roger really have to admit. Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels were actually hilarious, and Lauren Holly was so glamorous. Although, the flatulence jokes does get too much, except the other jokes were good. Anyway, it was a really goofy, wisecracking film. Thumbs up for me on "Dumb and Dumber".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Peter Pan (1953)Noah Stewart2021-04-22 | Siskel and Ebert reviews a re-release of an American animated adventure fantasy film from Disney, "Peter Pan" in 1989, when it was originally released in February 5, 1953, 36 years ago. It is based on the 1904 play "Peter Pan", or "The Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up" by J. M. Barrie. Both of them enjoyed the film for the animation, the songs, and the characters. I totally agreed with Gene and Roger. I loved this movie a lot. It was so charming, as it was Make-Believe for your imagination, and the songs were quite memorable. Although, Roger said that it's not one of the greatest animated films. He also said that he didn't like the way that ratio aspects to be cropped the widescreen and make a full-screen. But nevertheless, it was a very heartwarming and imaginative film as a classic in my opinion. Thumbs way up for me on "Peter Pan".
Peter Pan (1953) 4/4 👍👍👍👍
#siskelandebert #disney #peterpan #peterpan1953
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Super Mario Bros. (1993)Noah Stewart2021-04-19 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American adventure comedy film "Super Mario Bros.", starring Bob Hoskins, John Leguizamo, Dennis Hopper, and Samantha Mathis in May 28, 1993. It is loosely based on the Mario video game series by Nintendo. And it is the first feature-length live-action film to be based on a video game. Both of them gave thumbs down because it didn't have the colorful world like the video game of the source material, citing tonal inconsistency and lack of narrative, and they named this film for one of the worst films of 1993. But for me, to be honest, I actually liked this film a little bit. I thought it was kind of decent and enjoyable. I know it was a financial flop, but it was a fine film. Thumbs up for me on "Super Mario Bros.".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Over the Top (1987)Noah Stewart2021-03-09 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American sports drama film "Over the Top". Starring Sylvester Stallone, David Mendenhall, and the others in February 12, 1987. Both of them really didn't like the movie, because they felt thought it always recycled the old formulas from the "Rocky" trilogy, the arm-wrestling wasn't thrilling, and it was predictable, including Stallone himself was not interesting. Gene criticized Mendenhall that he was obnoxious. Gene also added his list for worst movies of 1987. Although, Roger said that the championship matches was more exciting than the movie itself. But I really disagreed with Gene and Roger. I actually thought it was very decent, as I do care about the characters of Lincoln Hawks and Michael Hawks, and it's not as bad as they thought it was, it's just a guilty pleasure. Thumbs up for me on "Over the Top".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Fugitive (1993)Noah Stewart2021-03-07 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action thriller film "The Fugitive". Starring Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones in August 6, 1993. It is based on the popular television series of the same name (1963-1967) created by Roy Huggins, almost 30 years later. Both of them really loved this movie a lot for action sequences, the chase scenes, and the performances of Ford as Dr. Richard Kimble and Jones as Deputy U.S. Marshal Samuel Gerard. Both considered it was one of the greatest action thriller films of the 1990s, as Gene and Roger added their lists for best movies of 1993. I totally agreed Gene and Roger, too. I really loved this movie a whole lot, as I thought was very entertaining, exciting, and it never gets old. Definitely my favorite action chase film. Big Thumbs way up for me on "The Fugitive".
siskelebert.orgRoger Ebert & The Movies - The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas (2000)Noah Stewart2021-02-21 | Roger Ebert and Joyce Kulhawik reviews an American romantic comedy film "The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas". Starring Mark Addy, Stephen Baldwin, Kristen Johnston, and Jane Krakowski took the roles of Fred Flintstone, Barney Rubble, Wilma Slaghoople, and Betty O'Shale in April 28, 2000. It is the prequel to 1994 success film "The Flintstones", six years ago. And it is also based on the 1960–1966 animated television series of the same name. Both of them really did not like the film at all, because they felt that it was unfunny, and it had so many puns, bad jokes, stupid gags, and the replacements of the original cast. Roger also felt that why does it need to be live-action, made out of rocks, and called it "a one joke movie", since he didn't like the first "Flintstones" film. But for me, I kind of liked it a little bit, as I disagree. I thought it was pretty decent. I liked the new cast, and I do care about the characters in this story and their moments. So as much as I loved the original film as a kid, I simply still recommend this one slightly. Thumbs up for me on "The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas".
siskelebert.orgEbert & Roeper - Recess: Schools Out (2001)Noah Stewart2021-02-09 | Ebert & Roeper reviews an American animated comedy film from Disney, "Recess: School's Out", featuring the voices of Andrew Lawrence, Rickey D'Shon Collins, Jason Davis, Ashley Johnson, Courtland Mead, Pamela Adlon, and the others in February 16, 2001. It is based on the Disney television series "Recess" from 1997-2001. Both ot them made a split decision when Richard liked the film for the characters, the hip-hop songs from the 1960s, said "a real delight", and gave thumbs up. Roger kind of liked it a little bit, although, he actually compared it to "Rugrats in Paris" as a cultural "Rugrats" reference, and gave a marginal thumbs down. I totally agreed with Richard, I really enjoyed this movie a lot. It was my favorite Disney animated feature film from my childhood. A big marginal thumbs up for me on "Recess: School's Out", and Happy 20th Anniversary!!!!!!
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Supergirl (1984)Noah Stewart2021-01-20 | Siskel and Ebert reviews a superhero film "Supergirl", starring Helen Slater, Peter O'Toole and Faye Dunaway in November 21, 1984. It is based on the DC Comics character of the same name, and it is a spin-off to the first three "Superman" movies. Both of them hated this movie because they found it to be a Superman rip-off with mediocre special effects, a ridiculous plot holes, and terrible acting. They considered in as one of the worst superhero movies in history. But I really disagreed with Gene and Roger, and I think they were really too hard on it. I really liked it a whole lot. I thought it was so entertaining and a lot of fun. The special effects was improvement, the story was well-told, the love interest was sweet, the music score by Jerry Goldsmith was extraordinary, and I actually adore Helen Slater with her performance of Supergirl. It was a huge failure, but it was a very exciting film. Sorry, Gene and Roger, but it was very great film. A marginal thumbs up for me "Supergirl".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Rescuers Down Under (1990)Noah Stewart2020-11-21 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American animated adventure film from Disney "The Rescuers Down Under", featuring the voices of Bob Newhart as Bernard, Eva Gabor as Miss Bianca Eva Gabor, and John Candy as Wilbur in November 16, 1990. It is the 29th Disney animated feature film, it is the sequel to the 1977 film "The Rescuers", 13 years ago. And it was based on the novels by Margery Sharp. It is also the first animated feature film to be made in the 90s. Both of them enjoyed the film for adventure and excitement better than the original. Though, they criticized a villian, Percival C. McLeach, to be too scary and too evill, and the film itself was too intense for children. Secondly, they also reviews a 22 min. long cartoon called "The Prince and the Pauper", also featured Mickey Mouse. They also liked it as well. I actually agreed with Gene and Roger, I really enjoyed this movie, too, also better than the first one. I did laughed at some funny moments, and I felt very impressed. And like they said, it's not at that league with 1989's "The Little Mermaid", but it was a really enjoyable and an adventurous film, as the the first time I saw it. Thumbs up for me on "The Rescuers Down Under", and Happy late 30th Anniversary.
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Edward Scissorhands (1990)Noah Stewart2020-10-12 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American fantasy romance film, Tim Burton's "Edward Scissorhands", starring Johnny Depp, Winona Ryder, and the others in December 7, 1990. Both of them didn't like the film because they found to be depressing, disturbing, and self-indulgent for kids. Roger also criticized the ending where a character of Jim, Kim's boyfriend, developing a huge grudge against Edward. To me, I actually liked this film better than Gene and Roger. I thought it was okay. I really disagree and I think they were a little harsh on it. I do like the chemistry between Johnny Depp and Winona Ryder, and I really think it was a nice romantic film. Thumbs up for me on "Edward Scissorhands".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Road House (1989)Noah Stewart2020-09-23 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action film “Road House”, starring Patrick Swayze, Sam Elliott, Kelly Lynch, and Ben Gazzara in May 19, 1989. Both of them gave the film thumbs down because they said that it was a parody. Roger also said that it’s not a good movie, but viewed in the right frame of mind, it is not a boring one, except recycled clichés. I actually agreed with Gene and Roger, I didn’t like this movie, either. Although, it’s quite less entertaining than more exciting. A marginal thumbs down for me on “Road House”.
Road House (1989) 2.5/4 👎
#siskelandebert #roadhouse #ppatrickswayze
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Karate Kid Part III (1989)Noah Stewart2020-09-09 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American martial-arts drama film, "The Karate Kid Part III", starring Ralph Macchio, Pat Morita, Robyn Lively, and Thomas Ian Griffith in June 30, 1989. It is a third installment to the first two films, "The Karate Kid", and "The Karate Kid Part II". Both of them gave the movie thumbs down and found it to be rehashing of elements in the former two movies, including a tournament against Cobra Kai and a romance side-story, a surprising amount of violence, and criticized the character of Daniel LaRusso as a downer. Though, Gene liked the performance of Thomas Ian Griffith as Terry Silver, which he thought was nearly enough to save it. But to me, to be honest, I kind of liked this movie a little bit. I actually do care about Daniel. It's not as bad as they said it was, it's just an enjoyable as a guilty pleasure. Thumbs up for me on "The Karate Kid Part III".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Karate Kid Part II (1986)Noah Stewart2020-08-22 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American martial-arts drama film, "The Karate Kid Part II", starring Ralph Macchio, Pat Morita, Tamlyn Tomita, and the others in June 20, 1986. It is a sequel to 1984's big successful hit, "The Karate Kid". Both of them made a split decision when Gene criticized the story, the villains, and the ending. Roger liked the movie a little more than him. To me, I thought it was okay, as I liked it better, and I disagree with Gene. Thumbs up for me on "The Karate Kid Part II".
The Karate Kid Part II (1986) 3/4 👍👍
#siskelandebert #thekaratekidpart2
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Karate Kid (1984)Noah Stewart2020-08-05 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American American martial-arts drama film, "The Karate Kid", starring Ralph Macchio, Noriyuki "Pat" Morita, and Elisabeth Shue in June 22, 1984. Both of them enjoyed the film a lot for the characters, and their performances. Gene gave 3.5/4 stars but criticized the story. Roger gave 4/4 stars and named it as one of the best summer movies of 1984 since 1976's "Rocky". I totally agreed with them, too. I really loved this movie A whole lot. Except I think Gene was a little harsh on its story, I thought it was perfect. And I liked the main characters, Daniel LaRusso and Mr. Miyagi. Thumbs way up for me on "The Karate Kid".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Dead Presidents (1995)Noah Stewart2020-07-03 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American crime thriller film "Dead Presidents", starring Larenz Tate, Keith David, and Chris Tucker in October 4, 1995. It is based partly on the real-life experiences of Haywood T. Kirkland (aka Ari S. Merretazon), whose true story was detailed in the book Bloods: An Oral History of the Vietnam War by Black Veterans by Wallace Terry. Both Gene and Roger didn't like the film because they found it to be disappointing and criticism the Vietnam veterans treatment. I agreed with them, too. I felt depressed and stunned by the amount of foul-language, and really didn't enjoy it that much. Thumbs down for me to "Dead Presidents".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Stargate (1994)Noah Stewart2020-07-01 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American science fiction adventure film, "Stargate", starring Kurt Russell and James Spader in October 28, 1994. Both of them gave a big thumbs down because they thought it was clichés, a rip-off of the "Star Wars" movies, and it was very expensive. I actually agreed with Gene and Roger, I didn't enjoy this movie that much. I never found it to be exciting, and it didn't entertain me. Although, I liked it a little bit than they did. Kurt Russell and James Spader did well-acted each other through the film. But other than that, it was a really average popcorn blockbuster. A marginal thumbs down for me on "Stargate".
siskelebert.orgRoger Ebert & The Movies - Dinosaur (2000)Noah Stewart2020-05-28 | Roger Ebert and Michaela Pereira reviews an American computer-animated adventure film Disney's "Dinosaur", starring the voices of D.B. Sweeney as Aladar, and the others in May 19, 2000. Both of them like the film for the special effects, action, and the animation. But Roger said that the story wasn't originality, and he was disappointed that the dinosaurs were actually human-like with no modern sensibilities and personalities. For me, I thought it was okay. As I agreed with Roger and Michaela. I enjoyed this movie a lot. A marginal thumbs up for me on "Dinosaur" and Happy 20th Anniversary!!!!!!!!
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Untouchables (1987)Noah Stewart2020-05-04 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American biological crime drama film, "The Untouchables". Starring Kevin Costner, Sean Connery, Robert DeNiro, and the others in June 3, 1987. It is based on the book of the same name published in 1957, and also based on the TV series (1959-1963) as well. Both of them made a split-vote when Gene really enjoyed the film a whole lot, especially Connery's performance, and he considered it as one of the best movies of 1987. Roger didn't like it that much, and thought it was a disappointment and found a character of Ness seems lacking, as well as Robert De Niro as Al Capone was very routine. Gene, on the other hand, found him to be sweet and touching. I totally agreed with Gene, I really enjoyed the movie as well. It's probably my favorite detective 80s film. Thumbs way up for me on "The Untouchables".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Darkman (1990)Noah Stewart2020-04-05 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American superhero film, Sam Raimi's "Darkman". Starring Liam Neeson, Frances McDormand, and Larry Drake in August 24, 1990. It is based on a short story Raimi wrote that paid homage to Universal's horror films of the 1930s. Both of them really loved the film more than I did, and gave thumbs way up for the action scenes, the screenplay, the makeup effects, and a great performance by Neeson, as considered one of the best action flims of 1990 and as a cult film. Though, Gene said that a character of Darkman is more interesting than Dick Tracy, which I disagree, and Roger said that it was almost like a filmed version of a comic book like Batman or Dick Tracy, which he was right. I enjoyed this movie a lot, too, but I really Ioved "Dick Tracy" more. Except I can't recommend it that highly, but it is still a truly great superhero film. So a marginal thumbs up for me on "Darkman".
Darkman (1990) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
#siskelandebert #darkman #liamneeson #larrydrake
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Clerks (1994)Noah Stewart2020-03-22 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American independent black-and-white buddy comedy film "Clerks", starring Brian O'Halloran, Jeff Anderson, Marilyn Ghigliotti, and the others in October 19, 1994. It is the first of Smith's View Askewnivere films, and introduces several recurring characters, notably Jay and Silent Bob. Both of them enjoyed the film for its quirky characters and clever, quotable dialogue, and it is considered to be a cult classic. Roger praised the film for interestingly depicting a full day of "utterly authentic" middle-class life, adding: "Within the limitations of his bare-bones production, Smith shows great invention, a natural feel for human comedy, and a knack for writing weird, sometimes brilliant, dialogue. I agree with Gene and Roger, I really enjoyed this film a lot more. A marginal thumbs up for me on "Clerks".
Clerks (1994) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
#siskelandebert #clerks #kevinsmith
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - National Lampoons Loaded Weapon 1 (1993)Noah Stewart2020-02-25 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American parody film "National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1" in February 5, 1993. It stars Emilio Estevez, Samuel L. Jackson, William Shatner, and Kathy Ireland. The film mainly spoofs the first three "Lethal Weapon" films, as well as several others including "Basic Instinct", "Die Hard", "Dirty Harry", "Rambo", "The Silence of the Lambs", "Wayne's World", "48 Hrs.", and TV series such as CHiPs.
Both of them gave big thumbs down because they found it to be a main failure that the "Lethal Weapon" movies already contained sly spoofs of the police film genre and was not funny. they also felt that it hits all the routine targets with soft squibs, yielding a tired parody that cycles through its laundry list of references with little comedic verve.
However, I really disagree with Gene and Roger, because I found this to be very a hilarious as a comedy film and it did made me laugh. Thumbs up for me on "National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1".
National Lampoon's Loaded Weapon 1 (1993) 3/4 👍👍
#siskelandebert #nationallampoonsloadedweapon1
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Jungle Book (1967)Noah Stewart2020-02-17 | Siskel and Ebert reviews a re-release of an American animated musical comedy film from Disney, "The Jungle Book" in 1990, starring the voices of Phil Harris, Sebastian Cabot, and Bruce Reitherman when it was originally released in October 18, 1967, 23 years ago. It is based on Rudyard Kipling's book of the same name published in 1894, and it is the 19th Disney animated feature film. It was also the last film to be produced by Walt Disney, who died during its production in 1966. Both of them liked the film, though they said it's not one of the best of the Disney animated feature movies and not a classic. I agree with Gene and Roger, but to me, it certainly is a classic movie. I do think that the drawing are good, the characters as the animals were memorable, the jungle as the background looks well-drawn, the songs as musical numbers were also memorable, and Mowgli is likeable, and charming character in my opinion, as I enjoyed the film a lot more than those two. A marginal thumbs up for me on "The Jungle Book".
The Jungle Book (1967) 3.5/4 👍👍👍
#siskelandebert #thejunglebook
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Godzilla (1998)Noah Stewart2020-02-15 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American monster film "Godzilla". Starring Matthew Broderick, Jean Reno, Maria Pitillo, Hank Azaria, and the others cast in May 20, 1998. It is the 23rd film in the franchise and the first Godzilla film to be completely produced by a Hollywood studio. Both of them hated the film because the script, acting, and directing were a mess, while fans targeted the film's reinvention of Godzilla, which included its redesign and departure from the source material. They also said that there was no 'terror' in it, instead it had action. They also didn't like the idea of the spoofs as Mayor Ebert and this sidekick, Gene. Gene added his list for one of the worst movies of 1998, ever since he, Roger and I didn't like Roland Emmerich's previous films, "Stargate" and "Independence Day", which I really loved. But I personally disagree with Gene and Roger, I kind of liked the film, the action sequences, and I liked the redesign of Godzilla, as well as the characters. It's definitely not as bad as everyone think it is, it's basically a guilty pleasure entertaining film. Sorry, Gene and Roger, but you're really missed the point. Thumbs up for me on "Godzilla".
Godzilla (1998) 3/4 👍👍
#siskelandebert #godzilla #matthewbroderick
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - A Life Less Ordinary (1997)Noah Stewart2020-01-23 | Siskel and Ebert reviews a British-American romantic black comedy film "A Life Less Ordinary", starring Ewan McGregor, Cameron Diaz, Holly Hunter, Delroy Lindo, and the others in October 24, 1997. Both gave thumbs down because the story, premise were a mess, the characters were unbelievable, and they're not enough to overcome the story's fatally misjudged tonal mishmash. But I might disagree with Gene and Roger. I kind of liked the film a little bit, and I thought it was okay. Thumbs up for me on "A Life Less Ordinary".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Dick Tracy (1990)Noah Stewart2020-01-17 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American action-crime comedy film "Dick Tracy", starring Warren Beatty, Al Pacino, Madonna, and the others in June 15, 1990. It is based on the 1930s comic strip character same name created by Chester Gould. Both of them really like the movie for the makeup, the costumes, the special effects, and the art direction. I agreed, too. I really enjoyed it a lot as well. Although, Gene didn't like Beatty's portrayal of Dick Tracy, and Roger felt it, too, but he really like it a lot more, as he put it on his list of the best movies of 1990. I disagree what Gene said about Beatty's portrayal of Dick Tracy, as I thought he a very interesting character. And I agreed with Roger also. Thumbs way up for me on "Dick Tracy".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - Jetsons: The Movie (1990)Noah Stewart2020-01-02 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American animated science fiction comedy film "Jetsons: The Movie" in July 6, 1990. It is based on the animated television series "The Jetsons", produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions and distributed by Universal Pictures.
It stars the voices of George O'Hanlon, Penny Singleton, Don Messick and Mel Blanc, all series veterans, alongside teen pop singer, Tiffany as Judy Jetson. It is only the last theatrical film to be directed by William Hanna and Joseph Barbera, before they died in 2001 and 2006 respectively. It was also the final "Jetsons" production for 27 years until the release of "The Jetsons & WWE: Robo-WrestleMania!" in 2017.
Both of them gave this film two thumbs way down for citing both the story and the animation as having "no imagination whatsoever", and Roger would later named it number 2 as one of the ten worst films of 1990.
But I personally disagree with Gene and Roger, and being too hard it, because I actually liked this movie a little bit. I thought the characters as the Jetsons were okay memorable, even it was enjoyable, goofy, and pretty hilarious. Even though, the writing was atrocious. Anyway, a marginal thumbs up for me on "Jetsons: The Movie".
Jetsons: The Movie (1990) 3/4 👍
#siskelandebert #thejetsons #jetsonsthemovie
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Flintstones (1994)Noah Stewart2020-01-01 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American family comedy film "The Flintstones" in May 27, 1994. It stars John Goodman, Rick Moranis, Elizabeth Perkins, and Rosie O'Donnell plays the iconic roles of Fred Flintstone, Barney Rubble, Wilma Flintstone and Betty Rubble, including Kyle MacLachlan, Halle Berry, and Elizabeth Taylor (in her final theatrical film appearance), as Pearl Slagoople, Wilma's mother. It is a based on the 1960-1966 animated television series of the same name produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions, and distributed by Universal Pictures.
Both of them gave the film thumbs down and really disliked it because they felt that the script is all over the place, such as the storyline is incredibly boring and lackluster, along with the character development, the puns, marketing campaign, and it deemed too adult and mature for family audiences, though some children actually might like it. Although, they do praised its production design, the visual effects, the costume design, the art direction, and Goodman's performance as Fred. Gene gave 1.5/4 stars, and Roger gave 2.5/4 stars.
However, I really personally disagree with Gene and Roger and being way too hard in it, because I actually loved the movie a whole lot as a kid. I enjoyed those moments, the music score by David Newman is great, namely the theme song, the songs are very very classy. I thought it was colorful, funny, bright, good heart, lots of fun, and I also thought the four actors were great portrayals as Fred, Barney, Wilma, and Betty. Yes, the storyline is mediocre, but it didn't bother me. Sorry, Gene and Roger, I totally respected your opinion, but this movie is awesome. Thumbs way up for me on "The Flintstones".
siskelebert.orgSiskel & Ebert - The Cable Guy (1996)Noah Stewart2019-11-26 | Siskel and Ebert reviews an American satirical black comedy thriller film "The Cable Guy", starring Jim Carrey and Matthew Broderick. It receives mixed review when Gene actually liked it since "The Mask", but Roger found it to be depressing, bizarre, and creepy that it undermined the entire story, as he put on his list one of the worst comedy movies of 1996. I personally disagree with Roger, I actually like the film. Thumbs up for me on "The Cable Guy".