St37OneNAMGTOWALT But, Do All Women Compromise a Man's Freedom and Integrity? Are All Political Ideologies Completely Impotent? Are the Sexes Really At War? Do Men Require a Space Ship to See the Big Picture? Is Passive Aggression Really the Best Policy?
Going Your Own Way - vs - MGTOW IdeologySt37One2014-11-23 | NAMGTOWALT But, Do All Women Compromise a Man's Freedom and Integrity? Are All Political Ideologies Completely Impotent? Are the Sexes Really At War? Do Men Require a Space Ship to See the Big Picture? Is Passive Aggression Really the Best Policy?
Prominent MGTOW Ideologues: Barbarossaaaa/BarBar; Stardusk/Thinking Ape; ThatCynicalCynicism; SpetsnazWhy the speed of light is meaningless according to special relativitySt37One2023-07-30 | If the one-way speed of light is not only immeasurable but also meaningless, then so is the bidirectional speed of light.Velocity Space - What it is and why it is neededSt37One2023-06-30 | Velocity Space is a very simple framework, but it does take some time to get familiar with. Velocity space is just the derivative of ordinary 3 dimensional space over time. All points in velocity space represent velocities and all distances between points in velocity space represent relative velocities. I will depict what the solar system, the galaxy, and the universe look like in velocity space. We need velocity space in order to accurately describe the velocity of light and to compare it with the velocity of ordinary classical objects. Velocity space is also important for comprehending both Special Relativity and the Supervelocity and Selection theory of Light. We need velocity space in order to see why it is that both supervelocities and superluminal velocities not only can exist but must exist. We also need velocity space in order to understand how the selection mechanism works, to visualise a light bubble, and to see why changes in velocity have an impact on the light that can and cannot be seen.Flaws and Contradictions within Special Relativity - Not as Coherent or Scientific as AdvertisedSt37One2023-06-23 | 1. Defining Simultaneity, Time, and Space on the basis of the frame-dependent speed of light was a profound mistake. Defining time Locally and Narrowly through accepting the standard of the atomic clock was also a mistake.
2. Rotating the Light Clock relative to the direction of motion produces strange effects which include an alternating speed of light and an alternating time dilation. It helps to derive the Lorentz equations yourself from the Light Clock thought experiment in order to understand all of the relevant assumptions and limitations.
3. Reality doesn't play poker, but according to Special Relativity, the symmetry of the twin paradox is akin to a poker game. Rather than to accept this absurd view, there must be an alternative model. I say that both twins are wrong.
4. Special Relativity is unfalsifiable. We cannot say that galaxies are moving apart from one another because to admit that they are moving would imply that time dilation must be observed (but it isn't) and that superluminal velocity is observed (but Special Relativity forbids this). So it was decided that this relative motion that we observe through redshift values doesn't actually count as relative motion. Instead it is called "expansion" or "stretching" so that Special Relativity can escape from refutation. The truth of Special Relativity trumps reality and empirical evidence. However, the way that the redshift is modelled mathematically amounts to a distinction without a difference between motion and expansion and between Doppler Effect and stretching. I say that motion is motion is motion no matter what it is called. We can't successfully play shallow word games forever because reality eventually catches up with us.The Supervelocity & Selection theory of Light - Introduction to a Revolutionary New Theory.St37One2023-06-16 | An introduction to a new theory that Integrates Quantum Mechanics with Special Relativity. According to this theory, it is not the properties of space and time which create the conditions for a constant speed of light. Rather, it is a property of the location of the observer in velocity space that creates the mere impression of a constant speed of light. The book that defines and defends this theory is due to be released in August of 2023 and it is called "But Where is the Rainbow."Restored Hyrule Field Theme from Breath of the WildSt37One2021-03-24 | This theme was reconstructed from the ruins found in Breath of the Wild. Was this really the sound of Hyrule Field before the Calamity?Synchronicity - My Close Encounter with KEK/PEPE the FrogSt37One2017-01-21 | This Shit Gets Weird! When I first found out about KEK and PEPE, I couldn't believe what I was hearing. I had just presented a talk that was apparently, in a weird way, all about PEPE, but without my knowledge or consent. And then when I saw Jordan Peterson's latest video, at a time when I had just recorded a video about Jordan Peterson with David Shackleton, I was blown away by all of the PEPE related synchronicity that I was witnessing. As with Jordan Peterson, I almost fainted. Just observe the synchronicity! Ribbit!
www.chaos.horror.magic.humour.truth.Humour, Truth, & Social Aggression - Talk at Ottawa ConferenceSt37One2016-09-25 | Geoff Stone delivers his talk at the CAFE Conference in Ottawa, at City Hall, on Saturday, September 17th, 2016. The theme of the conference was "positive activism"
What does oppression sound like. Does anybody have an idea? Because I think I know. It sounds like Muhahahahahahaha. Right? It sounds like laughter, which is kind of like a punchy sound like a face getting punched with a brick. Right? It's Terrible! I mean...I think personally that what we want to do is create a better world, a less oppressive world, a safer world, by getting rid of laughter. Because it's pretty clear to me that nothing positive comes from laughter. That's the sound that the arrogant alpha dominant male makes while he is displaying his dominance. Right? It's the very essence of privilege. But yet, our culture promotes it, normalizes it, tolerates it, and even celebrates it. Which, to my mind, proves like that like we totally live in a patriarchy. This is further evidenced by the jokes that I hear all of the time which promote violence against women. I am not going to repeat any of them because that would promote violence against women, obviously, so you will just have to take my word for it. Just kidding, this is a pro-humour lecture. It's not that kind of lecture. What do I mean by this slide? Life is hard so go suck a lemon? When life hands you a lemon, humour helps you to make Mike's Hard Lemonade. Or you can take Mike's Hard Lemonade and turn it into humour. It's kind of a bad analogy thought because there is sugar in there and alcohol and that's not going to be good for you. But humour is good for you. The lemon, as I see it, very often issomething called relational aggression. And I have a recent example where we caught wind of an email that was sent out. There was a pretext and threat narrative about an anonymous online threat against feminists, it could have been posted by anyone, and it doesn't actually target anyone specifically. And yet they are still using that as something to rally behind, and to set the tone of the email. They are suggesting that there is a danger, and specifically naming CAFE as a danger. They are calling us MRA's and saying that MRA's and Men's Issues are the same thing. They say that "the reality however is that MRA's on campus are not interested in "positive activism" (which is the theme of our conference) Instead, they stalk, harass, and attack feminists...they have NO PLACE on campus..." Anyways, My point is that, this is an example of social aggression. The whole point is to exclude a group that they don't like. The "reason" doesn't really matter so much. The point is, you have to chose between having a positive relationship with us or with them. What is Relational Aggression? It's also known as Indirect Aggression, because it is usually behind the scenes, and because rather than attacking the person directly, you attack their relationships. It is also known as Social Aggression for obvious reasons. And sometimes it is called Female Bullying because we live in a misogynist patriarchy that blames women for bullying. It involves backstabbing, slander, gossip, covert ostracism, drama, false accusations, and threat narratives. The victim does not always know who the perpetrator is. The Goal is to socially alienate the target, through sabotaging their relationships, even perhaps their career. It is highly conspiratorial. It causes trauma and paranoia. It is characterised by "frienemies" because you don't really know who your friends and enemies are, they can switch very quickly. You know, you keep your friends close and your enemies even closer. And it just overall creates a very toxic and hostile environment. I would think that anyone who has lost all of their friends would have some issues to deal with, and they do. Relational aggression is caused by the competition for status and power, just like all aggression. Also, for security, because the best defence is a strong offence. So who do you blame? Nobody. Relational aggression has a life of it's own...The Fundamental Disagreement - Part 3St37One2016-06-21 | Why there is no zero-sum game between the sexes.The Fundamental Disagreement - Part 2St37One2016-06-20 | An analysis of The Redstockings ManifestoThe Fundamental Disagreement - Part 1St37One2016-06-20 | A little bit about CAFEReplacing Misandry - St Patricks Day @ University of TorontoSt37One2016-03-14 | Paul Nathanson & Katherine Young return to the U of T (their last appearance saw BIG RED's rise to internet infamy). This time they will talk about their new book Replacing Misandry: A Revolutionary History of Men. You don't want to miss this! http://equalitycanada.com/events/repl...
Join us Thursday, March 17th at 7:00PM Banting Institute, Room BI 131 100 College St, University of TorontoHow Many Genders Are There?St37One2016-03-10 | #TheTriggering Is it true that there are only 2 genders? what this is really about.... sex vs gender nature vs nurture real vs fake personal brandingTompkins - Accept Political Correctness or DIESt37One2016-02-24 | Paul Tompkins is a comedian who claims in a Big Think video to think that Political Correctness is actually good for comedy. However, most of his defense of PC culture boils down to appeals to fear, appeals to self-preservation and appeals to consequences, oh yes, and DENIAL. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufz4W...Why Cultural Appropriation is All Mixed UpSt37One2015-12-01 | According to my analysis, this backlash is 3 things in 1
1 - The notion of Cultural Intellectual Property Rights (perceived theft) 2 - The Cult of Authenticity (perceived fraud) 3 - Hypersensitivity to Insults (perceived hostility)
Can anyone translate Russian to English? That short clip that the CBC used was selected from a 15 minute long interview. The entire point of that exercise was to misrepresent my actual views so that I could be made to look "wrong" and so that Gabrielle Moss, the actual guest, could be made to look relatively knowledgeable.Re: Sargon of Akkad - Separating Ethics & IdeologySt37One2015-11-03 | This is a response to "The Ideological Hegemony of #GamerGate" My basic points are that Ethics are not separable from personality, politics, psychology, and ideology, and that these need to be considered together as an integrated whole, and that GamerGate must be about more than merely ethics in gaming journalism, because the problem and solution need to be defined in more detail, and because the GamerGate movement also needs to be defined in more detail.
Here is the original video youtube.com/watch?v=ChgR9ry3Q5YPigs, Weasels & FeminismSt37One2015-10-15 | Pigs don't have body image issues. When feminists try to blame women's body image issues on men, it seems like they are trying to say that women can't be pigs because men are allowed to be pigs. This is not true.Unleash tha Trickstaz! - Godz of InnovationSt37One2015-10-08 | HIGHLY RECOMMENDED VIEWING...
On The Future of Music and the End Of Civilization youtube.com/watch?v=lmCjJ0VBjjUVIOLENCE - Defending the Definition Against UN WomenSt37One2015-10-02 | Violence is much more than UNgoodness.
Violence is the use of Death, Injury, or Pain for Power, Protection, or Punishment.Re: Bill Nye - Part 2 - Framing the Abortion IssueSt37One2015-09-29 | Bill Nye has decided to frame this issue as Men vs Women & Science vs Ignorance. We will see how well that analysis holds up. This is part two of a response to his video entitled "Can We Stop Telling Women What to Do With Their Bodies?" youtube.com/watch?v=4IPrw0NYkMg
This is really about drawing an arbitrary line in the sand and deciding when a human being is and is not worthy of protection. Science can help us, but it can't draw that line for us.
Here is a link to the study that I referenced in this video http://macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jsr/article/viewFile/156/116 Listen to "Bodies" by the Sex Pistols youtube.com/watch?v=yzFFtBsl5psRe: Bill Nye - Part 1 - Prescriptive MasculinitySt37One2015-09-29 | This is Part 1 of a response to Bill Nye's video entitled "Can We Stop Telling Women What to Do With Their Bodies?" youtube.com/watch?v=4IPrw0NYkMg In the second part, I will address Bill Nye's arguments with respect to abortion, but first I will talk about Bill Nye's apparent attitude and character, as well as notions of masculinity and femininity.Thurs & Fri - Cathy Young - New Location - Be There!St37One2015-09-22 | Purchase Tickets for the Event Here! http://equalitycanada.com/event/cathyyoung Information about the location change is here: http://equalitycanada.com/cathy-young-event-the-politics-of-gender-will-proceed-near-to-u-of-t-campus For a donation of 50$ or more you can join CAFE for an intimate reception with Cathy Young following each event.r/K Selection Theory - What are You? Take the Quiz!St37One2015-09-15 | The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics http://www.anonymousconservative.com Davis Aurini youtube.com/watch?v=O9YRZjgOwwM Bill Whittle youtube.com/watch?v=oCRXJcE7dcw Stefan Molyneux youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvUThunderf00t vs Davan Molini - A Synthesis & AnalysisSt37One2015-09-09 | Just a reminder. Absolutely every single thing that I say here about "Davan Molini" applies equally to two different people. Please keep that in mind at all times. "Davan Molini" is Davis Aurini + Stefan Molyneux and "Jordana Kasparowen" is Ana Kasparian + Jordan Owen (I'm sure that 90% of you figured that out but still...) Please support the Campaign to elect the ghost of Davan Molini as president of Canada! Aurini's Channel: youtube.com/user/Aurini Molyneux's Channel: youtube.com/user/stefbot Mason's Channel: youtube.com/user/Thunderf00tArgument with a Feminist & Social AggressionSt37One2015-08-28 | I recount a recent facebook argument that I got into. You might find this interesting. So here it is....
The original article http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/why-do-so-many-of-canadas-women-columnists-hate-womenFeminist Aphasia - How is sex different for men?St37One2015-04-13 | What is Ana Kasparian thinking when she says that "dude's get to whore around as much as they want"? Does she understand basic math or logic? This not the first time that I have seen such a near-sighted claim about male sexuality. It takes two to have sex. When these women are having the sex that they are entitled to, then the men must be having sex too. Right? When ever someone is speaking complete nonsense about men and women, this may be a symptom of feminist aphasia. On other hand, you could actually say that the median woman is having more sex than the median man is because the male sexual bell curve is more skewed towards the alpha male, and the female sexual bell curve is more flat. However, monogamy pulls these two bell curves together, and the extent to which the bell curves diverge is only due to the "free love" trend that Ana Kasparian and sex positive feminists are advocating for. Also, if it were really true that it is much easier for women to have sex than it is for men, then wouldn't women have to be having more sex than men are? Obviously, it is not actually easier for women to have sex, because the numbers have to be equal. So something must be holding women back from having sex. If it is women's prudence and abstinence that is limiting the sex that men are having, then it must be the psychological and social pressure on women that is limiting the sex that women are having. Here is the TYT video youtube.com/watch?v=qahbEji8QLM For a great summary of this "sex has nothing to do with reproduction" perspective and it's link to 3rd wave, sex positive feminism, watch this: youtube.com/watch?v=N7vXX33C6MgRe: bar bar - on the Big PictureSt37One2015-03-28 | This video is primarily a response to bar bar's 2.5 hour long video. I will be talking about how Feminism, Gynocentrism, the Gender Conflict Model, and Technology relate to each other and I will focus on barbarossaaaa's 2 core arguments. I will also respond to RBK and That Cynical Cynicism in this video.
Q: Is it better use ice cubes or gasoline to put out a fire?
A: In order to put out a fire, we must know how the fire initially came to be. Most primitive humans do not know this, but fire is actually much more than just heat and light. As a matter of fact, fire is also a chemical reaction which releases the potential energy that has been stored in carbon based fuels. The ultimate source of this stored energy is actually the sun, which is actually a star. The ultimate source of the elemental carbon which is used to store this energy is actually nuclear reactions which also take place in stars like the sun. Therefore, if you want to put out fires, then you must also put out the sun, along with every single star in the galaxy. This is impossible. So why would you bother with trying to put out a fire with ice cubes? How futile! The ice cubes obviously do nothing at all about fire. If you have a fire problem, I recommend gasoline instead. It works for me. And you can thank me for knowing an impressive amount about astrophysics while you are pouring gasoline on your fire. Glad I could help. That's what I am here for. ;-)Examination of Gynocentrism, Feminism, & the Red PillSt37One2015-03-05 | What is Gynocentrism? How can Gynocentrism be identified? It's similar but different from bigotry & groupthink. It's similar but different from Ethnocentrism & Androcentrism. The Background Text is selected paragraphs from William Graham Sumner's "Folkways"A Brief History of Humanity & the ManosphereSt37One2015-02-20 | A Short Epic Saga...
In the beginning there was Conflict And out of this Conflict, The MAN was born. The MAN was adored by the women, but the men were not impressed. The men resented The MAN The men wanted justice and equality for themselves. So the men conspired and killed The MAN with Monogamy and Marriage. But while the men were all busy dancing on The MAN’s grave, he came back as The Emperor. So the men conspired and killed him again, but with Mercy and Democracy this time. But while the men were all busy with marking their ballots and saying their prayers, he came back as The Temple. So the men conspired and killed him again, but with Industry and Science this time. But while the men were busy collecting their pay-checks and playing with their toys, he came back as The Machine. The Machine proceeded to enslave the men and liberated the women. But the women were not impressed with the machine. The Machine was making them bored, lonely, and dependent on their slaves. Some of the women were growing concerned because they felt too isolated and ignorant. "Why do I sometimes feel like my slave has too much power?" Said one concerned woman. The liberationist replied “ your slave is stealing your power by working for you and making you his dependent.” "My slave rarely listens to me. He is becoming useless." Said another concerned woman. “Indeed! A Woman needs a slave like a fish needs a bicycle” said the liberationist Why don’t I have the power to control my slave? Asked another concerned woman. “The key to empowerment is to master the work of a slave” – said the liberationist The women hated the liberationist but The Machine appointed the liberationist as their leader.and their voice. “Up is down. Work is play. Life is death.” Said the liberationist. And eventually the women followed the liberationist and went to work for The Machine. But their dependency only grew as The Machine began to treat them like infants. And while the women were busy working for The Machine, The Machine stole their slaves away from them. And so the slaves were lost and could not be found. The slaves had neither loyalty, nor motivation, nor pride. They could not be found, but they soon found each other Moreover, the stolen slaves were beginning to resent The Machine that they had created. That is the Machine who was really The Temple, who was really The Emperor, who was really The MAN. And out of that resentment, 3 new Men were born. The MRA tried to organize and prepare the slaves and their owners to go to war with The Machine. The MGTOW spoke directly to the slaves and tried to convince the slaves that only they had the power to free themselves. And the Masculinities Doctor diagnosed that slaves with a sickness, prescribed for them drugs, guilt, and nonsense, and sang them a soothing lullaby. The slaves liked these new men, but they couldn’t conspire against The Machine this time, because they were so busy with trying to figure out which of these new Men was really The Machine in disguise. That is…The Machine who was really The Temple, who was really The Emperor, who was really The MAN. And so the slaves argued and struggled to come to a consensus about what to do next. And then, something totally unexpected happened…Feb 5th, 2015 - Employment Discrimination Against MenSt37One2015-02-05 | The Lecture begins at 7pm Today at the University of Toronto, St George Campus. Brought to you By the U of T Men's Issues Awareness Society and the Canadian Association for EqualityStone was on TV for Manspreading & Barbars new movie.St37One2015-01-05 | for the interview: http://www.ctvnews.ca/lifestyle/man-spreading-debate-spreads-to-toronto-1.2165494 Who Needs Action When You've Got Words?Gynocentrism & Misandry - words that should promote thoughtSt37One2014-11-29 | Please respect the language! Use only as directed by a physician! Zombies, Run! zombiesrungame.comUpcoming Event on Male SuicideSt37One2014-10-23 | Thursday October 30th...Preview - Canadian Centre for Men & Families - meet & greetSt37One2014-10-20 | Watch the full (and much higher quality) video here youtube.com/watch?v=y27uhdyu90IUpcoming Talk - Violence & Sexual Abuse Against Men - Oct 9thSt37One2014-10-07 | Moved to New Location!!!CONSENT - Whats Love Got To Do With It?St37One2014-10-06 | Enthusiastic Consent is Bullshit! It's not about what you really want. How could it possibly be about what you really want? You want Passion, Conviction, and Certainty? Why? You want Freedom? Freedom from what? Freedom for what? How Free do you really want to be? All freedom is relative, and absolute freedom is an incoherent concept, and usually just used as an attempt to evade responsibility.The Truth about Drugs - & also Seduction, Hypnosis, Hysteria, Placebos, etc.St37One2014-09-10 | Drugs don't want you to take them. Drugs that don't really work are better for you. Placebos and Nocebos are powerful. Mother Nature invented marketing. Hypnosis and Seduction are similar. Hysteria is a symptom of sexual dysfunction. A slut is someone who is vulnerable to seduction. A massage is a dose of brain chemicals. Sexual healing is not just a song.St37One Interviewed on National Television for CAFESt37One2014-08-15 | Link to the Interview: http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/video/men%E2%80%99s-issues-group-on-campus/3726962413001
I was interviewed LIVE by Pat Bolland on Sun TV as a representative for the Canadian Association for Equality (CAFE) regarding Men's Issues and the recent attempts by our Communist opponents to drown us out and shut us down.Igor Serebryany - Mens Issues Go Global - Part 1 (the noisy part)St37One2014-08-07 | A small group of pro-noise people attended the talk with the objective of elaborating on their pro-noise point of view, for the benefit of us all. Sadly, the discussion was moved to a less noise-friendly venue and the noise worshipers were unable to hear the directions to the new location. for more details visit here http://equalitycanada.com/mens-issues-went-global-tonight-at-the-university-of-toronto-w-another-successful-eventMan Asking Woman 2 Elaborate = Patriarchal DominationSt37One2014-08-03 | #womenagainstfeminism The strange ideas that came out of a feminists mouth when she was about to lose an argument. Anti-feminist cats, feminist white noise, and how it is possible to "understand" feminism.Elliot Rodger - Cult of the PussybeggarSt37One2014-07-30 | On White Knights, Manginas, Pussybeggars, and Female Feminists.