The atheists have one thing half-right NephilimFree 2026-09-21 | The atheists have one thing half-right
Evolution is Incompatible With God and Scripture NephilimFree 2025-05-17 | Some Christians try to merge evolution theory and scripture, claiming that evolution is not incompatible with either God or the scriptures. This idea is empirically false.
Still Kicking NephilimFree 2025-04-12 | Ive been quite a while but still kicking. Hoping to come back strong. Praying for it. God bless all.
Debate Challenge to StandingForTruth NephilimFree 2024-11-11 | Donny learned that YEC is true from Kent Hovind, myself, and "a couple of other people". We now need to help him get his doctrines straightened out about other matters. Hence, I challenge him to a moderated debate on the subject of "Annihilationism vs Eternal Torment: What does scripture teach?". I feel fairly confident he will not accept a challenge from one of his former mentors.
Coolguyjeff Runs Endlessly From His Junk DNA Claim NephilimFree 2024-11-04 | Evolutionists often make claims then run from supporting them endlessly. One of their favorite tactics for doing this is to try to change the subject endlessly, or try to make your demand for evidence of their claim into a claim on your behalf so that they can squiggle out of having to provide evidence that supports their claim. I don't let them get away with it.
Myth Busting - they all fall down NephilimFree 2024-10-26 | Busting myths of religion, science, and human experience. Link to join the discussion: streamyard.com/mzdushcarq
Designed or not? What does science confirm? NephilimFree 2024-10-13 | There are categories of evidence which demonstrate very conclusively that creation is how it all got here.
Can you meet the challenge? Christianity, creation, evolution, atheism... NephilimFree 2024-09-29 | Truth exists. It is not relative. Those who challenge established truth cannot meet the challenge of demonstrating their beliefs are well founded.
The Trinity, Christian Theology, Epistomology, Truth NephilimFree 2024-09-28 | How much of what you believe is the philosophy of men and how much of it is Christian theology as expressed in scripture? What is the Trinity? Who is Jesus Christ? What is correct Christian theology? What truth can we know about these things from scripture?
Does God have 3 minds? Is He 3 expressed as 1, or 1 expressed as 3? NephilimFree 2024-09-22 | Has God had three minds eternally or one? Is He three persons or one?"Sometimes popular antitrinitarian literature paints “the” doctrine as strongly influenced by, or even illicitly poached from some non-Christian religious or philosophical tradition. Divine threesomes abound in the religious writings and art of ancient Europe, Egypt, the near east, and Asia. These include various threesomes of male deities, of female deities, of Father-Mother-Son groups, or of one body with three heads, or three faces on one head (Griffiths 1996). However, similarity alone doesn’t prove Christian copying or even indirect influence, and many of these examples are, because of their time and place, unlikely to have influenced the development of the Christian doctrine of the Trinity.A direct influence on second century Christian theology is the Jewish philosopher and theologian Philo of Alexandria (a.k.a. Philo Judaeus) (ca. 20 BCE–ca. 50 CE), the product of Alexandrian Middle Platonism (with elements of Stoicism and Pythagoreanism). Inspired by the Timaeus of Plato, Philo read the Jewish Bible as teaching that God created the cosmos by his Word (logos), the first-born son of God. ...Another influence may have been the Neopythagorean Middle Platonist Numenius (fl. 150), who posited a triad of gods, calling them, alternately, “Father, creator and creature; fore-father, offspring and descendant; and Father, maker and made” ...Justin Martyr (d. ca. 165) describes the origin of the logos (= the pre-human Jesus) from God using three metaphors (light from the sun, fire from fire, speaker and his speech), each of which is found in either Philo or Numenius (Gaston 2007, 53). ...Justin and later second century Christians influenced by Platonism take over a concept of divine transcendence from Platonism, in light of which "no one with even the slightest intelligence would dare to assert that the Creator of all things left his super-celestial realms to make himself visible in a little spot on earth." (Justin, Dialogue, 92 [ch. 60])Another influence may have been the Neoplatonist Plotinus’ (204–70 CE) triad of the One, Intellect, and Soul, in which the latter two mysteriously emanate from the One, and “are the One and not the One; they are the one because they are from it; they are not the One, because it endowed them with what they have while remaining by itself” ...Many thinkers influential in the development of trinitarian doctrines were steeped in the thought not only of Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism, but also the Stoics, Aristotle, and other currents in Greek philosophy (Hanson 1988, 856–869). ... - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Base Theorys errors and more - open mic NephilimFree 2024-02-03 | In my recent debate with Grayson (Based Theory), my opponent contradicted himself twice regarding fossils and the sedimentary strata in which they are found. He made it clear that he does not have sufficient knowledge of this subject to debate it. Other subjects of discussion are welcome.
Greyson (Based Theory) Makes a Typical Evolutionist Logical Error NephilimFree 2023-12-24 | Evolutionists often cite science papers in which researchers employ tedious, diligently controlled environments which typically fail repeatedly, until they produce the precise conditions they need to show that intelligent agents (researchers) can do in the laboratory setting something which could not have occurred because of natural chemistry and/or in the alleged pre-biotic environment of the earth. The following errors were made by Greyson in citing this paper:1. He relies upon intelligent agents as the procurators of all that takes place2. He relies upon an alleged pre-biotic environment for the earth which would not have existed and which researchers have not been able to show ever existed on the earth (the granites of the earth have considerable oxygen and water).3. He relies upon molecular machinery borrowed from bacteria cells to do the work prescribed by the researchers, which would not have existed during the time the RNA was allegedly evolving into something able to produce proteins4. He relies on these same molecular machines which are made of large, astonishingly complex and specific proteins, which themselves require large strands of protein-coding RNA to exist - strands much larger than those replicated or produced by the researchers.5. He ignores the fact that these molecular machines are dependent upon A. long protein-coding RNA's to exist, the prior existence of DNA B. Large proteins which make up the protein and RNA manipulating machinery C. the existence of chaparonins to prevent misfolding of proteins during stressful situations such as high heat, by assisting protein folding D. the existence of ribosome to translate the amino acid chains into the proteins which make up the molecular machinery E. the existence of chaparones to finish the protein folding processEvolutionists make these kind of glaring mistakes because they have no true science to support their ideas, and thus must rely upon true science and real biology to attempt to make an argument. It is the equivalent of pointing to an automobile as an argument that bicycles could have come into being my undirected evolution.William A. Dembski, mathermatician, founder of the Discovery Institute predicted in 1998 that science would discover that what is called "junk DNA" would be discovered to be functional. "The molecular taxonomists. who have been drawing up evolutionary histories (phylogeny) for nearly every kind of life, are going to have to undo all of their years of "Junk DNA"-based historical reconstructions and wait for the full implications to emerge before they try again." - Williams, A., Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism, Journal of Creation 21(3):111–118, 2007; p. 113."Should we be retiring the phrase “junk DNA” now? Yes, I really think this phrase does need to be totally expunged from the lexicon. It was a slightly throwaway phrase to describe very interesting phenomena that were discovered in the 1970s. I am now convinced that it’s just not a very useful way of describing what’s going on." - Ewan Birney of the European Bioinformatics Institute in CambridgeAccording to Dr. John Greally of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, ‘It would now take a very brave person to call non-coding DNA junk."“Almost every nucleotide is associated with a function of some sort or another, and we now know where they are, what binds to them, what their associations are, and more.” - Tom Gingeras, one of the senior scientists on the ENCODE project PhD Organic Chemistry"Much non-protein-coding DNA (formerly called junk DNA) consists of a wide variety of regulatory elements for both transcription and translation, many classes of regulatory RNAs, critical regulatory pseudogene code, and various nuclear matrix determining features." - Wells, J., The Myth of Junk DNA, Discovery Institute Press, Seattle, WA, 2011."Recent research from the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project has shown most noncoding DNA (greater than 80%) is transcribed into RNA. The noncoding RNA has been found to have many regulatory and other functions including repairing DNA, assisting in DNA replication, regulating DNA transcription, aiding in folding and maintenance of chromosomes, controlling RNA editing and splicing, helping fight disease, regulating embryological development, and communication between cells." - Dan Reynolds PhD Organic Chemistry“ … the high extent of sequence homology between human and chimpanzee proteins supports the longstanding hypothesis that many phenotypic differences between the species reflect differences in the regulation of gene expression, in addition to differences in amino acid sequences.” - Oldham, M.C., Horvath, S. and Geschwind, D.H., Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains
Refuting Matt Slicks Calvinism Propaganda NephilimFree 2022-05-29 | Matt Slick is a preacher of calvinism. Like most calvinists, he cares more about indoctrinating others into calvinism than he does about defending the Christian worldview or sharing the gospel message. Calvinism is a perverted cult withing Christendom which feeds upon the pride of people who like the idea of feeling "special" and superior because they believe God pre-saved them before they heard the gospel and believed it.
Can Aliens Fit in the Christian View - Sentinel Apologetics vs NephilimFree NephilimFree 2021-10-01 | ...
Atheists claiming proteins form in the natural environment NephilimFree 2021-09-04 | This video is a recording of me debating evolutionists. It was made without my knowledge.
