Examining the Debate: Is the KJV the Best Translation of the Bible? - James White vs Doug Levesque Revolution 2025-04-05 | Nick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.html#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsMusic by Udio🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
The Comma Conference is over! What now? Revolution 2026-09-19 | THE COMMA CONFERENCE IS OVER — BUT THE NEXT BATTLE BEGINS!The 1 John 5:7 / Johannine Comma Conference has come to an end, and in this video I look back at what happened, introduce the speakers who took part, and discuss some of the major issues examined during the conference.I also explain why I have changed plans for the next conference. Rather than proceeding with a conference devoted to the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11), I am now planning something much broader for December 2026:THE SKEPTICS CONFERENCE — BIBLE CONTRADICTIONS EXAMINEDThis new conference will examine some of the most common arguments used against the reliability, consistency and historical credibility of the Bible.We will be looking at claims associated with prominent skeptical and critical voices including Bart Ehrman, Dan McClellan, C. J. Cornthwaite, Derek Lambert / MythVision, and many others.Possible subjects include alleged contradictions involving Genesis, Noah, David, Saul, Judas, the genealogies of Jesus, the resurrection accounts, Paul's conversion, the chronology of Jesus' ministry, textual variants, Gospel authorship, the canon, the historical Jesus, the resurrection, Old Testament history, biblical manuscripts and many more.The goal is simple: take the actual claims, examine the biblical text, investigate the historical and textual evidence, and see what the evidence actually shows.I also discuss the kind of speakers and researchers needed for this conference and present a long list of possible subjects and "case files" that could be examined.If you are interested in the Johannine Comma, Textus Receptus, King James Bible, biblical preservation, textual criticism, Bible contradictions, Christian apologetics, skeptical arguments or the historical reliability of Scripture, this is the beginning of a new series of investigations.DECEMBER 2026 — THE SKEPTICS CONFERENCESubscribe and follow the channel as we begin putting the speakers, topics and presentations together.#Bible #BartEhrman #BibleContradictions #JohannineComma #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #DanMcClellan #CJCornthwaite #MythVision #DerekLambert #BibleCriticism #ChristianApologetics #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Bible contradictions, Bible contradictions explained, alleged Bible contradictions, Bible errors, Bible mistakes, Bible skepticism, skeptics conference, Bible skeptics, Bart Ehrman, Bart Ehrman contradictions, Bart Ehrman Bible, Dan McClellan, Dan McClellan Bible, C J Cornthwaite, CJ Cornthwaite, C.J. Cornthwaite, Derek Lambert, Derek Lambert MythVision, MythVision, MythVision Bible, Bible criticism, biblical criticism, Christian apologetics, Bible apologetics, Bible reliability, biblical reliability, Bible accuracy, Bible inerrancy, Bible preservation, preservation of Scripture, biblical contradictions, alleged contradictions in the Bible, answering skeptics, answering Bible critics, Bible critics, skeptical arguments, Bible objections, objections to Christianity, Christian responses, biblical scholarship, New Testament scholarship, Old Testament scholarship, textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Bible textual variants, New Testament manuscripts, Bible manuscripts, Gospel contradictions, Gospel reliability, Gospel accounts, Gospel harmonization, historical Jesus, resurrection evidence, resurrection of Jesus, Jesus contradictions, Paul contradictions, Paul conversion, Judas death, Jesus genealogies, Genesis contradictions, Noah flood, David census, Saul death, Bible history, biblical history, ancient manuscripts, Greek New Testament, Hebrew Bible, Textus Receptus, TR, King James Version, KJV, KJV 1611, King James Bible defense, Byzantine Text, Byzantine text type, Majority Text, Johannine Comma, 1 John 5 7, 1 John 5:7, Comma Johanneum, Comma Conference, Johannine Comma Conference, Textus Receptus conference, Christian conference, Bible conference, December 2026 Bible conference🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Peter Van Kleek Sr | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-13 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Peter Van Kleek SrPeter Van Kleek Sr's website: standardsacredtext.comPeter Van Kleek Sr's Youtube: youtube.com/@providencebaptistchurchman1226?si=0uIqd2TvnOH8EcPsIn this conference, Peter Van Kleek Sr and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Peter Van Kleek Sr’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #PeterVanKleekSr #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Peter Van Kleek Sr 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Steven Avery | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Steven AverySteven Avery's website: purebibleforum.com/index.phpIn this conference, Steven Avery and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Steven Avery’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #StevenAvery #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Steven Avery, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Peter Van Kleek Jr | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Peter Van Kleek JrPeter Van Kleek Jr's website: standardsacredtext.comIn this conference, Peter Van Kleek Jr and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Peter Van Kleek Jr’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #PeterVanKleekJr #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Peter Van Kleek Jr, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Nick Sayers | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Nick SayersNick Sayers' YouTube youtube.com/@NickSayersRevolution?si=CU-vOFfzNu-TXaPENick Sayers' Website textus-receptus.comIn this conference, Nick Sayers and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Nick Sayers’ presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #NickSayers #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Nick Sayers, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Mike Hollner | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Mike Hollner Mike Hollner's YouTube youtube.com/@writethevisionministry3050?si=G6CvkFsa5fQlqY7cMike Hollner's Website kjvdebate.comIn this conference, Mike Hollner and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Mike Hollner’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #MikeHollner #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Mike Hollner, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Phil Stringer | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Phil Stringer Phil Stringer's YouTube KJBRC youtube.com/@wordmagazine?si=QuGXyoosl9SeMc07 Phil Stringer's Website KJBRC kjbrc.orgIn this conference, Phil Stringer and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Phil Stringer ’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #PhilStringer #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Phil Stringer , 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Jeff Riddle | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Jeff Riddle Jeff's YouTube youtube.com/@wordmagazine?si=QuGXyoosl9SeMc07 Jeff's Blog jeffriddle.netWelcome to the first presentation of the 1 John 5:7-8 Johannine Comma Conference.In this conference, Jeff Riddle and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Jeff Riddle’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #JeffRiddle #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Jeff Riddle, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense
Jonathan Sheffield | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-12 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Jonathan SheffieldJonathan's YouTube: youtube.com/@The_Anglican_Autodidact?si=cKjpGhNmHz5fzKULWelcome to the first presentation of the 1 John 5:7-8 Johannine Comma Conference.In this conference, Jonathan Sheffield and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.Jonathan Sheffield’s presentation begins the conference by drawing attention to the evidence that must be considered when evaluating the Comma Johanneum.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Jonathan Sheffield’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #JonathanSheffield #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Jonathan Sheffield, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Mike Ferrando | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 Revolution 2026-09-11 | Comma Conference - 1 John 5:7-8 | Mike Ferrando Mike's Academia Page: https://independent.academia.edu/MidusItisWelcome to the first presentation of the 1 John 5:7-8 Johannine Comma Conference.In this conference, Mike Ferrando and eight others, will examine the historical, textual, grammatical, and theological evidence surrounding one of the most debated passages in the New Testament.The Johannine Comma has been at the centre of controversy for centuries. Is it a genuine part of the text of 1 John? Was it known in the early Church? Does the grammatical structure of 1 John 5:7–8 provide evidence for the longer reading? What did early Christian writers actually know and believe? And how should we evaluate the Greek, Latin, patristic, manuscript, and historical evidence?This conference brings together nine speakers examining these questions from a variety of angles.The question is not simply whether a modern critical edition prints the passage.The real question is:WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE?The discussion surrounding 1 John 5:7 involves far more than a handful of Greek manuscripts. The evidence includes Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, early Christian writers, quotations and allusions, grammatical considerations, theological context, textual transmission, historical witnesses, and the history of the printed Greek New Testament.The Comma has frequently been dismissed with statements such as “the earliest Greek manuscripts do not contain it.” But that statement alone does not settle the question. Textual criticism requires examination of the entire body of evidence, including the history and character of the witnesses that survive.This conference therefore examines the Johannine Comma historically rather than merely assuming the conclusions of modern critical editions.Among the important issues surrounding the passage are the testimony of early Christian writers, the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and 1 John 5:8, the grammatical structure of the Greek text, the Latin tradition, the history of the Comma in the Western Church, and the arguments made by scholars on both sides.One particularly important question concerns the relationship between verses 7 and 8.The two verses possess a striking parallel structure:IN HEAVEN:The FatherThe WordThe Holy Spirit“These three are one.”ON EARTH:The SpiritThe WaterThe Blood“And these three agree in one.”This parallelism has been an important part of the grammatical discussion surrounding the passage. The question is whether the masculine forms used in verse 8 make better sense when understood in relation to the corresponding construction in verse 7.The historical question therefore becomes much larger than simply asking whether a particular fourth-century Greek manuscript contains the passage.The Johannine Comma Conference brings together historical research, manuscript evidence, patristic testimony, Greek grammar, Latin textual history, and the history of textual criticism in order to examine the passage from multiple perspectives.Whether you are a KJV defender, a Textus Receptus advocate, a Byzantine-text supporter, a critical-text advocate, a Greek student, a textual critic, a church historian, or simply interested in the history of the Bible, this conference is designed to put the evidence on the table.The goal is not to avoid difficult evidence.The goal is to examine it.Watch Mike Ferrando’s presentation and consider the evidence for yourself.This is the beginning of the Johannine Comma Conference.Subscribe to follow the remaining presentations and the continuing examination of the evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7.#JohannineComma #1John57 #TextusReceptus #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleTextualCriticism #NewTestament #GreekNewTestament #ByzantineText #CommaJohanneum #Mike Ferrando #TR #KJVOnly #BiblicalTextualCriticism #BibleHistoryTAGS:Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5 7, Comma Johanneum, Mike Ferrando, 1 John 5:7 conference, Johannine Comma conference, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Textus Receptus, Textus Receptus 1 John 5:7, KJV, King James Bible, KJV 1 John 5:7, KJV textual criticism, Bible textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Greek New Testament, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Greek, Cyprian, Cyprian 1 John 5:7, Fulgentius, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, Scrivener, Johannine Comma debate, 1 John 5 7 debate, Bible manuscripts, early church, church fathers, biblical manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Textual Criticism, TR, KJV defense🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining TurretinFans Blog on the Johannine Comma 1 John 5:7-8 by Nick Sayers Part 3 Revolution 2026-09-06 | TITLE:460 Bishops Witnessed 1 John 5:7? | Examining TurretinFan — Part 3DESCRIPTION:In Part 3 of this series, I continue my examination of TurretinFan's articles on the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7–8).This episode focuses on Victor of Vita, the fifth-century North African bishop and historian, and the evidence surrounding the Carthage assembly of AD 484.A major question is the claim that “460 bishops” witnessed the Johannine Comma as Scripture.But where did the number 460 come from?What does Victor of Vita actually say?Who wrote the “Book of the Catholic Faith”?And what does this source actually tell us about 1 John 5:7?We examine Victor of Vita's History of the Vandal Persecution, the Book of the Catholic Faith, the writings of Dom Ruinart and Edward Gibbon, and the modern claims surrounding this evidence.We then turn to Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles and the fascinating textual issue surrounding the Latin reading committentes.Does Jerome's Prologue speak of translators OMITTING the heavenly witnesses, or of JOINING the testimony of the Father, Word and Holy Spirit with the earthly witnesses?We examine important Latin manuscript evidence, including Codex Fuldensis and other witnesses, and consider how this evidence has been used in the debate over the Johannine Comma.The central question is simple:Are we following the evidence wherever it leads — or are assumptions being used to eliminate inconvenient evidence?This is a source-based investigation into 1 John 5:7, Victor of Vita, Carthage AD 484, Jerome's Prologue, Latin manuscripts, and the history of the Textus Receptus.Check the sources. Examine the manuscripts. Read the evidence.FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE. DISCOVER THE TRUTH.──────────────────────────────SUPPORT THE MINISTRYDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comKJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────META TAGS:1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:8, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, TurretinFan, TurretinFan Johannine Comma, Victor of Vita, Victor of Vita 1 John 5:7, 460 bishops, Carthage 484, Book of the Catholic Faith, Johannine Comma evidence, Johannine Comma debate, Jerome Prologue, Pseudo Jerome Prologue, committentes, omittentes, Codex Fuldensis, Latin manuscripts, Latin evidence, Textus Receptus, Textual Criticism, KJV, King James Bible, Bible manuscripts, Church History, Mike Ferrando, Gibbon, Ruinart, Brownlee, Nick Sayers──────────────────────────────HASHTAGS:#1John57 #JohannineComma #TurretinFan #VictorOfVita #TextusReceptus #TextualCriticism #KJV #KingJamesBible #BibleManuscripts #Jerome #ChurchHistory #CommaJohanneum🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 8 Revolution 2026-08-30 | ## DESCRIPTION**The Witness of God is Greater — Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 Part 8 | Frisingensia, Arius & Eusebius**In Part 8 of my examination of Mike Ferrando’s **The Witness of God is Greater**, we continue looking at the historical evidence for the **Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7)**.This episode focuses particularly on the **Frisingensia Fragment**, an early Latin manuscript preserving an ante-Hieronymian form of 1 John containing the reading:**“There are three that bear testimony in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one.”**We then move into the **Arian controversy** and examine the arguments of **John William Burgess** concerning the relationship between 1 John 5:7 and the fourth-century debates over the deity of Christ, the Trinity, and the *homoousios*.We also examine **Constantine’s commission to Eusebius** to prepare fifty copies of Scripture, along with **Frederick Nolan’s** arguments concerning the possible influence of Eusebius on the transmission of the Greek New Testament.Other topics include:• Frisingensia / Freising Fragment• Pre-Hieronymian Latin evidence• 1 John 5:7-8• Arius and Arianism• The Trinity and deity of Christ• Homoousios• John William Burgess• Constantine and Eusebius• Eusebian textual influence• Vaticanus and Alexandrinus• Eastern and Western textual traditions• Homoeoteleuton• Greek and Latin manuscript evidence• Early Church and patristic evidence• Textual transmission and preservationThe central question is:**Which explanation best accounts for all of the surviving evidence surrounding 1 John 5:7?****The Father. The Word. And the Holy Spirit.****These Three Are One.**──────────────────────────────### DONATEtextus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j### NICK SAYERStextus-receptus.com### KJV 2023 EDITIONwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition-New-Testament/16209516866#MikeFerrando #WitnessOfGodIsGreater #JohannineComma #CommaJohanneum #1John57 #Frisingensia #FreisingFragment #OldLatin #Arius #ArianControversy #Eusebius #Constantine #TextusReceptus #KingJamesBible #KJV #BibleManuscripts #TextualCriticism #ChurchHistory #BiblePreservation #NickSayers## YOUTUBE TAGSMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, The Witness of God is Greater Part 8, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, Johannine Comma evidence, evidence for 1 John 5:7, Frisingensia Fragment, Freising Fragment, Old Latin, ante-Hieronymian, Jerome, Arius, Arian controversy, Trinity, deity of Christ, homoousios, John William Burgess, Constantine, Eusebius, Eusebius of Caesarea, Eusebian text, Vaticanus, Alexandrinus, homoeoteleuton, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Bible manuscripts, textual criticism, patristic evidence, Church Fathers, Textus Receptus, Received Text, King James Bible, KJV, Bible preservation, Church history, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining TurretinFans Blog on the Johannine Comma 1 John 5:7-8 by Nick Sayers Part 2 Revolution 2026-08-23 | In Part 2 of this series, I continue my detailed examination of TurretinFan's blog articles on the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7–8).This episode moves deeper into the manuscript evidence and the arguments commonly used against the Comma. We examine claims concerning the Greek manuscripts of 1 John 5:7, frequently cited manuscript lists, and the importance of verifying individual witnesses rather than simply repeating secondary sources.We also examine the early Greek manuscript evidence, including Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Alexandrinus, and other Greek witnesses, and ask an important question:How much early manuscript evidence actually exists for 1 John 5:7–8?I also discuss Jerome's testimony concerning the omission of the Father, Word, and Spirit, and how this testimony has been understood by Erasmus and Richard Simon.Another major issue is TurretinFan's claim that the Johannine Comma, in the form recognized in the Textus Receptus, did not exist in Greek before Erasmus' fourth edition.We examine the criteria being used to determine what qualifies as a Greek witness to the Comma, including differences in definite articles, word order, grammatical forms, and textual variation.We also examine the argument that Greek witnesses such as Codex Ottobonianus and the Greek text of the Complutensian Polyglot are simply the result of back-translation from the Latin.The central question throughout this investigation is simple:Are these conclusions demonstrated by the evidence, or are assumptions being used to eliminate inconvenient evidence?This is not a personal attack. It is a source-based examination of historical claims.The goal is to examine the evidence carefully—from the Greek manuscripts and Latin manuscripts to Jerome, Erasmus, the Complutensian Polyglot, and the history of the Textus Receptus.──────────────────────────────SUPPORT THE MINISTRYDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#1John57#JohannineComma#TurretinFan#TextusReceptus#TextualCriticism#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleManuscripts#Erasmus#JeromeMETA TAGS:1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:8, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, Johannine Comma debate, Johannine Comma evidence, TurretinFan, TurretinFan blog, TurretinFan 1 John 5:7, TurretinFan Johannine Comma, Examining TurretinFan, response to TurretinFan, TurretinFan critique, 1 John 5:7 debate, 1 John 5:7 manuscripts, Greek manuscripts 1 John 5:7, Greek evidence Johannine Comma, Latin evidence Johannine Comma, manuscript evidence, Bible manuscript evidence, biblical textual criticism, textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Textus Receptus, Received Text, Byzantine Text, Majority Text, Traditional Text, King James Version, King James Bible, KJV, KJB, KJVO, King James Only, KJV 2023, Bible preservation, Bible corruption, Bible history, Church history, Church Fathers, patristics, early Christianity, Latin Vulgate, Erasmus, Desiderius Erasmus, Erasmus annotations, Novum Instrumentum, Novum Testamentum, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Jerome's Prologue, Prologue to the Canonical Epistles, Codex Fuldensis, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Ottobonianus, Complutensian Polyglot, Complutensian Greek New Testament, Aldine Greek New Testament, Stephanus, Robert Estienne, Theodore Beza, F H Scrivener, Dean Burgon, John William Burgon, Herman Hoskier, Edward F Hills, Frederick Nolan, Edward Miller, Richard Simon, Bruce Metzger, Elijah Hixson, Mike Ferrando, Mike Hollner, Greek New Testament, Latin manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Erasmus fourth edition, Erasmus 1527, Erasmus 1519, Erasmus 1522, Greek textual variants, textual variants, definite articles Greek, Greek grammar Johannine Comma, back translation from Latin, Latin back translation, Complutensian Polyglot Comma, Codex Britannicus, Codex Montfortianus, Codex Montfortianus Johannine Comma, manuscript criticism, Bible textual evidence, Scripture preservation, traditional text, critical text, Critical Text, Nestle Aland, NA28, UBS5, CBGM, Coherence Based Genealogical Method, Editio Critica Maior, Bible versions, modern Bible versions, Bible debate, Bible scholarship, historical theology, Trinity, heavenly witnesses, Father Word Holy Spirit, three bear record in heaven, three are one, For there are three that bear record in heaven, Textus-Receptus.com, Nick Sayers, Comma Conference, King James debate, Bible history documentary, textual criticism documentary, evidence examined, scholarly investigation, manuscript investigation, biblical scholarship, Bible preservation debate, Greek versus Latin, KJV versus Critical Text🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 7 Revolution 2026-08-22 | ## DESCRIPTION**The Witness of God is Greater — Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7-8 Part 7 | Jerome’s Prologue**In Part 7 of our detailed examination of Mike Ferrando’s **The Witness of God is Greater**, we turn our attention to one of the most important and controversial pieces of historical evidence surrounding **1 John 5:7-8: Jerome’s Prologue to the Canonical Epistles**.The Prologue contains a remarkable warning about translators who allegedly omitted the testimony concerning the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit from their Greek copies.The question is whether this Prologue is genuinely Jerome’s—and what its authenticity, historical setting, and textual claims mean for the history of the **Johannine Comma**.In this episode we examine the evidence surrounding:• Jerome’s Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• The authenticity of the Prologue• Jerome and the Latin Vulgate• Jerome’s knowledge of the Johannine Comma• 1 John 5:7 and the Three Heavenly Witnesses• The Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit• The relationship between the Greek and Latin textual traditions• Early Latin Christianity and the Comma• Patristic and historical evidence• Manuscript transmission of 1 John• The history of the Prologue and its reception• Arguments against Jerome’s PrologueThe deeper question is:If Jerome really wrote the Prologue, then it becomes an important historical witness in the story of the Johannine Comma.**1 John 5:7-8.****The Father. The Word. And the Holy Spirit.****The Witness of God is Greater.**──────────────────────────────Donate:[Textus Receptus — Donate](textus-receptus.com/donate.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com)[Buy Me a Coffee](buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j?utm_source=chatgpt.com)──────────────────────────────### NICK SAYERSWebsite:[Textus Receptus](textus-receptus.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)──────────────────────────────### THE KJV 2023 EDITIONKing James Version 2023 Edition — New Testament:[KJV 2023 Edition — New Testament](walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition-New-Testament/16209516866?utm_source=chatgpt.com)──────────────────────────────### TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, The Witness of God is Greater Part 7, Jerome, Jerome’s Prologue, Jerome Prologue, Prologue to the Canonical Epistles, Jerome and the Johannine Comma, Jerome and 1 John 5:7, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Three Witnesses in Heaven, Father Word Holy Spirit, These Three Are One, Trinity, Jerome Vulgate, Latin Vulgate, Vulgate Bible, Latin Bible, Old Latin, Latin Fathers, Greek Fathers, Church Fathers, Patristics, Early Church, Early Christianity, Ancient Christianity, Latin Manuscripts, Greek Manuscripts, Bible Manuscripts, Manuscript Evidence, Historical Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Primary Sources, Textual Criticism, New Testament Textual Criticism, Johannine Comma Evidence, Johannine Comma Defense, Evidence for 1 John 5:7, Jerome Manuscript Evidence, Bible Preservation, Preservation of Scripture, Textus Receptus, Received Text, King James Bible, KJV, KJB, KJV 2023, Bible History, Church History, Historical Theology, Christian Apologetics, Greek New Testament, Koine Greek, New Testament Manuscripts, Ancient Manuscripts, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates.#MikeFerrando #Jerome #JeromesPrologue #JohannineComma #CommaJohanneum #1John57 #1John578 #TextusReceptus #KingJamesBible #KJV #ChurchFathers #Patristics #LatinVulgate #BibleManuscripts #TextualCriticism #BiblePreservation #ChurchHistory #ChristianApologetics #NickSayers## YOUTUBE TAGSMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, The Witness of God is Greater Part 7, Mike Ferrando book, Jerome, Jerome's Prologue, Jerome Prologue, Prologue to the Canonical Epistles, Jerome Johannine Comma, Jerome 1 John 5:7, Jerome and 1 John 5:7, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, 1 John 5 7, 1 John 5 7 8, three heavenly witnesses, three witnesses in heaven, Father Word Holy Spirit, these three are one, Trinity, Jerome Vulgate, Latin Vulgate, Vulgate, Latin Bible, Old Latin, Latin Fathers, Greek Fathers, Church Fathers, patristic evidence, Jerome evidence, Johannine Comma evidence, evidence for 1 John 5:7, Johannine Comma defense, historical evidence 1 John 5:7, manuscript evidence 1 John 5:7, Bible manuscripts, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, New Testament manuscripts, textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Textus Receptus, Received Text, TR, King James Bible, KJV, KJB, KJV 2023, Bible preservation, preservation of Scripture, Bible history, Church history, Christian apologetics, historical theology, primary sources, ancient manuscripts, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 6 Revolution 2026-08-16 | ## DESCRIPTION**The Witness of God is Greater — Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7-8 Part 6 | The Case Is Winning**The evidence keeps getting stronger.In Part 6 of our detailed reading of Mike Ferrando’s monumental work, **The Witness of God is Greater**, we continue examining the historical, manuscript, patristic, and textual evidence surrounding the **Johannine Comma — 1 John 5:7-8**.Ferrando's work brings together hundreds of pages of historical documentation defending the reading:**“There are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit: and these three are one.”**In this session we continue working through the evidence rather than simply repeating modern textual-critical conclusions.We examine historical testimony, early Christian writers, manuscript evidence, the transmission of 1 John, the history of the Latin and Greek traditions, and the broader question of whether the Comma can really be dismissed as a late medieval addition.The central question is simple:**If 1 John 5:7 was not originally part of the New Testament, why does the historical evidence surrounding the passage become so complicated?**And conversely:**If the Comma is genuine, what evidence has survived to demonstrate it?**This series is a careful reading and examination of Ferrando's research, with particular attention to primary sources, ancient witnesses, Church Fathers, manuscripts, historical testimony, and the history of the biblical text.We will continue examining evidence connected with:Whether you believe **1 John 5:7 is genuine, doubtful, or spurious**, the evidence deserves to be examined carefully.This is not a quick overview.This is a detailed investigation of the historical record.**The Witness of God is Greater.**──────────────────────────────### SUPPORT THE WORKDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j──────────────────────────────### NICK SAYERSWebsite:textus-receptus.com──────────────────────────────### THE KJV 2023 EDITIONKing James Version 2023 Edition — New Testament:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition-New-Testament/16209516866──────────────────────────────### TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Three Witnesses in Heaven, Father Word Holy Spirit, These Three Are One, Trinity, Church Fathers, Patristics, Early Church, Early Christianity, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Nicene Christianity, Greek Fathers, Latin Fathers, Old Latin, Latin Vulgate, Jerome, Greek New Testament, Koine Greek, Greek Manuscripts, Latin Manuscripts, Bible Manuscripts, Ancient Manuscripts, Manuscript Evidence, Historical Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Primary Sources, Bible Preservation, Preservation of Scripture, Textus Receptus, Received Text, King James Bible, King James Version, KJV, KJB, KJV 2023, Bible Translation, Textual Criticism, New Testament Textual Criticism, Historical Theology, Christian Apologetics, Church History, History of the Bible, History of the New Testament, Forensic Bible Study, Johannine Comma Debate, Bible Manuscripts, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates.#MikeFerrando #JohannineComma #CommaJohanneum #1John57 #1John578 #TextusReceptus #KingJamesBible #KJV #ChurchFathers #Patristics #BibleManuscripts #TextualCriticism #BiblePreservation #ChurchHistory #ChristianApologetics #NickSayersMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, The Witness of God is Greater Part 6, Mike Ferrando book, Mike Ferrando Johannine Comma, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, 1 John 5 7, 1 John 5 7 8, three heavenly witnesses, three witnesses in heaven, Father Word Holy Spirit, these three are one, Trinity, Trinity Bible, Bible Trinity, Johannine Comma debate, Johannine Comma evidence, Johannine Comma defense, evidence for 1 John 5:7, evidence for the Johannine Comma, historical evidence 1 John 5:7, manuscript evidence 1 John 5:7, Church Fathers 1 John 5:7, patristic evidence, early church fathers, early church evidence, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Old Latin, Latin Vulgate, Jerome, Jerome Johannine Comma, Greek New Testament, New Testament manuscripts, Bible manuscripts, Bible textual criticism, textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Textus Receptus, Received Text, TR, King James Bible, KJV, KJB, KJV 2023, Bible preservation, preservation of Scripture, Bible history, church history, Christian apologetics, historical theology, primary sources, manuscript evidence, documentary evidence, ancient manuscripts, early Christianity, Greek Fathers, Latin Fathers, Comma Johanneum evidence, 1 John 5 7 debate, 1 John 5 7 controversy, Bible evidence, Bible manuscript evidence, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers 6 Revolution 2026-08-14 | Welcome to the FINAL episode of my examination of the debate:**1 John 5:7 | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan – Is the Johannine Comma Original?**After examining the opening statements, manuscript arguments, historical claims, cross-examination, Jerome’s Prologue, Codex Fuldensis, Cyprian, the Latin witnesses, and the Greek manuscript tradition, we now bring the entire case together.This is the **FINAL VERDICT**.What does the evidence actually demonstrate?In this episode we step back and evaluate the cumulative evidence surrounding the Johannine Comma and the arguments presented in the debate.We examine:• The Greek manuscript evidence• The Latin manuscript tradition• Jerome’s Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Cyprian and the early patristic witnesses• Priscillian, Fulgentius and other Latin witnesses• Codex Fuldensis• Erasmus and his annotations• The historical development of 1 John 5:7• The burden of proof in textual criticism• Historical testimony versus surviving Greek manuscripts• Absence of evidence versus evidence of absence• The importance of cumulative evidence• Whether the arguments against the Comma actually establish that it was not originalThe central question throughout this series has never simply been:**“How many Greek manuscripts contain 1 John 5:7?”**The deeper historical question is:**What does the entire surviving body of evidence tell us about the history of this reading?**Manuscripts are evidence.The writings of the Church Fathers are evidence.Latin witnesses are evidence.Jerome’s testimony is evidence.The history of transmission is evidence.Erasmus’ annotations are evidence.Codex Fuldensis is evidence.The question is not whether every individual witness is decisive. The question is whether the evidence, considered cumulatively, supports or undermines the traditional reading.Did TurretinFan successfully answer the historical evidence presented by C. Jay Cox?Did the arguments against the Johannine Comma actually establish that it was a later addition?Or does the historical evidence present a more complicated picture?Does the burden of proof fall where it has traditionally been placed?And ultimately:**Is the Johannine Comma guilty as charged—or has the evidence been misunderstood?**This final episode brings together the major arguments from the entire series and asks whether the case against 1 John 5:7 actually holds up under forensic examination.**THE EVIDENCE. THE ANSWER. THE FINAL WORD.**Whether you support the Critical Text, Byzantine Text, Majority Text, Textus Receptus, King James Version, or are simply interested in the history and transmission of the New Testament, examine the primary sources and draw your own conclusions.────────────────────────────**SUPPORT THE MINISTRY**Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition────────────────────────────#JohannineComma #1John57 #TurretinFan #CJCox #TextualCriticism #TextusReceptus #BibleManuscripts #Jerome #CodexFuldensis #KingJamesBible1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7 debate, 1 John 5:7 original, 1 John 5:7 evidence, Johannine Comma, Johannine Comma debate, Johannine Comma evidence, Johannine Comma original, Comma Johanneum, Heavenly Witnesses, TurretinFan, TurretinFan debate, TurretinFan 1 John 5:7, TurretinFan Johannine Comma, TurretinFan cross examination, TurretinFan exposed, CJ Cox, CJ Cox debate, CJ Cox TurretinFan, CJ Cox 1 John 5:7, final verdict, forensic examination, historical evidence, historical testimony, documentary evidence, primary sources, burden of proof, cumulative evidence, manuscript evidence, Greek evidence, Latin evidence, patristic evidence, Jerome Prologue, Jerome 1 John 5:7, Cyprian Johannine Comma, Codex Fuldensis, Codex Fuldensis 1 John 5:7, Codex Montfortianus, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Church Fathers, New Testament textual criticism, biblical textual criticism, textual variants, original text, original reading, Textus Receptus, Received Text, Traditional Text, Byzantine Text, Majority Text, Critical Text, Textus Receptus vs Critical Text, King James Bible, KJV, KJV 2023, Bible preservation, Erasmus, Erasmus Annotations, Theodore Beza, Scrivener, Dean Burgon, Herman Hoskier, Edward F Hills, Johannine Comma history, Johannine Comma defense, Johannine Comma authenticity, Bible apologetics, Christian apologetics, Bible history, Nick Sayers, Textus-Receptus.com🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers 5 Revolution 2026-08-09 | Welcome to Part 5 of my examination of the debate: **1 John 5:7 | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan – Is the Johannine Comma Original?**As we continue examining TurretinFan's cross-examination of CJ Cox, we move beyond the surface-level exchange of questions and examine the historical assumptions that drive both sides of the discussion.Did TurretinFan actually answer the historical evidence for the Johannine Comma?Or did he simply assume the surviving Greek manuscript tradition represents the original text?In this episode we examine some of the central issues surrounding the debate, including:• The burden of proof in textual criticism• Jerome's Prologue and its historical significance• Cyprian and the earliest witnesses to the Johannine Comma• Codex Fuldensis and the Latin tradition• The relationship between evidence and historical reconstruction• Greek manuscripts versus historical testimony• Why cumulative evidence matters• Whether difficult questions actually constitute evidenceOne of the recurring themes throughout this series is that textual criticism should be built upon documentary evidence—not assumptions.The surviving manuscripts are evidence.The writings of the Church Fathers are evidence.Jerome's testimony is evidence.The history of the Latin Church is evidence.The question is not whether every witness is perfect.The question is whether all of the surviving evidence is being weighed fairly.Throughout this series we continue asking the same simple question:**What does the historical evidence actually demonstrate?**Whether you support the Critical Text, the Byzantine Text, the Majority Text, the Textus Receptus, or are simply interested in the history of the New Testament, I invite you to examine the primary sources with me and draw your own conclusions.Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#JohannineComma#1John57#TurretinFan#CJCox#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#Jerome#Cyprian#BibleManuscripts#KingJamesBible1 John 5:71 John 5:7-81 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumHeavenly WitnessesThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese Three Are OneTurretinFanTurretinFan debateTurretinFan cross examinationTurretinFan responseTurretinFan critiqueTurretinFan exposedCJ CoxCJ Cox debateDebate reviewDebate analysisCross examinationForensic investigationHistorical investigationHistorical evidenceHistorical reconstructionHistorical methodologyDocumentary evidencePrimary sourcesSource criticismBurden of proofCumulative evidenceLogicReasoningCritical thinkingTextual criticismBiblical textual criticismNew Testament textual criticismBible manuscriptsGreek manuscriptsLatin manuscriptsGreek evidenceLatin evidencePatristic evidenceChurch FathersGreek FathersLatin FathersBible historyChurch historyTransmission of ScripturePreservation of ScriptureBible preservationGreek New TestamentLatin VulgateOld LatinTextus ReceptusReceived TextTraditional TextByzantine TextMajority TextCritical TextNestle AlandNA28UBS5CBGMKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJV 2023Bible translationsVariant readingsDesiderius ErasmusErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentStephanusTheodore BezaScrivenerDean BurgonEdward MillerFrederick NolanHerman HoskierEdward F. HillsJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesPseudo-JeromeCyprianPriscillianFulgentiusVictor VitensisCassiodorusCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusCodex MontfortianusCodex 61Codex 629Bruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDaniel WallaceJames WhiteMike FerrandoGrantly McDonaldJan KransJeff RiddleWill KinneyBryan RossStephen BoyceChris ThomasConfessional BibliologyMaurice RobinsonTimothy BergElijah HixsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comJohannine Comma ConferenceComma ConferenceTrinityChristian apologeticsBible doctrineAcademic researchOriginal textOriginal readingGreek New TestamentLatin witnessesJerome PrologueCodex FuldensisManuscript evidenceHistorical methodologyJohannine Comma debateBible variantsTextual variants1 John debateEvidence mattersTruth mattersHistory matters🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 5 Revolution 2026-08-08 | The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7-8 Part 5 | The Forensic Details ContinueThis livestream continues our detailed reading of Mike Ferrando's monumental work, The Witness of God is Greater, one of the most comprehensive modern defenses of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).In Part 5 we examine the historical testimony surrounding the Heavenly Witnesses by working through Ferrando's research alongside the surviving documentary evidence and early Christian sources.This session explores evidence from the early Church, including the writings of Caius of Rome, Dionysius of Alexandria, Epiphanius, Socrates Scholasticus, and St. Niphon, together with discussions concerning heretics corrupting Scripture, the transmission of the text of 1 John, manuscript preservation, the destruction of biblical manuscripts during the Diocletian persecution, and the historical case for the Johannine Comma.Rather than relying on modern summaries, this series works carefully through the evidence, comparing Ferrando's arguments with primary historical sources, ancient manuscripts, and the broader field of New Testament textual criticism.Whether you agree or disagree with the authenticity of 1 John 5:7-8, this series is intended to encourage thoughtful discussion and careful examination of one of the most debated textual variants in the New Testament.Join us as we continue exploring one of the most significant modern books written on the Johannine Comma.──────────────────────────────Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j──────────────────────────────Nick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.com──────────────────────────────The KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition-New-Testament/16209516866──────────────────────────────TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike Ferrando, The Witness of God is Greater, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, Three Heavenly Witnesses, Three Witnesses in Heaven, These Three Are One, Father Son Holy Spirit, Trinity, Church Fathers, Patristics, Early Church, Early Christianity, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Nicene Christianity, St. Niphon, Niphon of Cyprus, Caius of Rome, Gaius of Rome, Dionysius of Alexandria, Socrates Scholasticus, Epiphanius, Eusebius, Alogi, Artemon, Paul of Samosata, Nestorius, Greek Fathers, Latin Fathers, Old Latin, Latin Vulgate, Jerome, Greek New Testament, Koine Greek, Greek Manuscripts, Latin Manuscripts, Bible Manuscripts, Ancient Manuscripts, Historical Evidence, Manuscript Evidence, Bible Preservation, Preservation of Scripture, Textus Receptus, Received Text, King James Bible, King James Version, KJV, KJB, KJV 2023, Bible Translation, Textual Criticism, New Testament Textual Criticism, Historical Theology, Christian Apologetics, Church History, Documentary Evidence, Primary Sources, Forensic Bible Study, History of the Bible, History of the New Testament, Revolution Debates, Nick Sayers.#MikeFerrando #JohannineComma #CommaJohanneum #1John57 #1John578 #ChurchFathers #Patristics #TextusReceptus #KingJamesBible #KJV #BibleStudy #ChurchHistory #BibleManuscripts #TextualCriticism #GreekManuscripts #LatinManuscripts #Trinity #BiblePreservation #Christianity #NickSayers🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers 4 Revolution 2026-08-06 | **Welcome to Part 4 of my examination of the debate: *1 John 5:7 | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is the Johannine Comma Original?***Having examined the opening statements and CJ Cox's cross-examination of TurretinFan, we now arrive at the reverse cross-examination.In this episode we carefully examine TurretinFan's questioning of CJ Cox, exposing the assumptions, historical reconstructions, logical weaknesses, and unanswered questions that lie beneath the surface.Throughout this video we ask a simple question:**Did TurretinFan actually present evidence... or did he merely ask difficult questions?**There is an enormous difference.One of the recurring themes throughout this series is the distinction between **historical evidence** and **historical reconstruction**.These are not the same thing.This episode also examines several important issues that received little attention during the debate, including:• Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Cyprian and the earliest patristic evidence• Codex Fuldensis• The Latin tradition• The burden of historical proof• The dependence of the ancient versions upon Greek exemplars• The difference between manuscript evidence and historical assumptionsWhether you support the Critical Text, the Byzantine Text, the Majority Text, the Textus Receptus, or are simply interested in the history of the New Testament, I invite you to examine the primary sources with me and draw your own conclusions.Bring your Bible.Bring your Greek New Testament.Bring your Latin sources.Bring Jerome.Bring Cyprian.Bring the manuscripts.Bring the evidence.Because truth has nothing to fear from careful investigation.──────────────────────────────Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#JohannineComma#1John57#TurretinFan#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#Jerome#Cyprian#GreekManuscripts#LatinManuscripts#KingJamesBible1 John 5:71 John 5:7-81 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumHeavenly WitnessesThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese three are oneTurretinFanTurretinFan debateTurretinFan cross examinationTurretinFan exposedTurretinFan critiqueTurretinFan responseCJ CoxCJ Cox debateCross examinationDebate analysisDebate reviewForensic analysisForensic investigationHistorical investigationHistorical evidenceHistorical reconstructionHistorical methodologyEvidence examinedDocumentary evidencePrimary sourcesSource criticismBurden of proofLogicReasoningCritical thinkingTextual criticismBiblical textual criticismNew Testament textual criticismBible manuscriptsGreek manuscriptsLatin manuscriptsGreek evidenceLatin evidencePatristic evidenceChurch FathersGreek FathersLatin FathersBible historyChurch historyTransmission of ScripturePreservation of ScriptureBible preservationGreek New TestamentLatin VulgateOld LatinTextus ReceptusReceived TextTraditional TextByzantine TextMajority TextCritical TextNestle AlandNA28UBS5CBGMKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJV 2023Bible translationsVariant readingsDesiderius ErasmusErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentStephanusTheodore BezaScrivenerDean BurgonEdward MillerFrederick NolanHerman HoskierEdward F HillsJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesPseudo-JeromeCyprianPriscillianFulgentiusVictor VitensisCassiodorusCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusCodex MontfortianusCodex 61Codex 629Bruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDaniel WallaceJames WhiteMike FerrandoGrantly McDonaldJan KransJeff RiddleWill KinneyBryan RossStephen BoyceChris ThomasConfessional BibliologyMaurice RobinsonTimothy BergElijah HixsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comJohannine Comma ConferenceComma ConferenceTrinityChristian apologeticsBible doctrineAcademic researchOriginal textOriginal readingHistory mattersTruth matters🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers 3 Revolution 2026-08-02 | Welcome to **Part 3** of **Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? **After examining both opening statements, we now arrive at what many consider the most revealing part of any formal debate:**The Cross-Examination.**In this episode we carefully examine CJ Cox's questioning of TurretinFan regarding Greek manuscripts, the Latin tradition, early Church Fathers, Cyprian, Priscillian, manuscript reconstruction, historical methodology, and the standards of evidence used throughout modern textual criticism.Rather than responding with sound bites or personalities, we'll continue asking one simple question throughout this series:**What does the evidence actually demonstrate?**One of the major themes throughout this investigation is the distinction between **historical observation** and **historical reconstruction**.Those are not the same thing.For example...Observing that a manuscript omits a passage is evidence.Explaining *why* it omits that passage is historical reconstruction.Observing that the Latin tradition contains the Comma is evidence.Explaining *how* it entered the Latin tradition is historical reconstruction.Observing that Greek manuscripts differ is evidence.Explaining *why* they differ is historical reconstruction.Throughout this series we'll continue asking whether the conclusions being presented are actually demonstrated by the surviving documentary evidence, or whether they represent one possible reconstruction among several.Whether you support the Critical Text, the Byzantine Text, the Majority Text, the Textus Receptus, or are simply interested in biblical history, I invite you to examine the primary sources with me and draw your own conclusions.Bring your Bible.Bring your Greek New Testament.Bring your Latin sources.Bring your questions.Let's examine the evidence together.Because truth has nothing to fear from careful investigation.──────────────────────────────Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#JohannineComma#1John57#TurretinFan#CrossExamination#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#GreekManuscripts#LatinManuscripts#KingJamesBible#ChristianApologetics1 John 5:71 John 5:7-81 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumHeavenly WitnessesThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese three are oneTurretinFanTurretinFan debateTurretinFan cross examinationTurretinFan critiqueTurretinFan responseTurretinFan exposedCJ CoxCJ Cox debateThe TurretinFan ExposéForensic investigationForensic examinationHistorical investigationDebate analysisDebate reviewCross examinationTextual criticismBiblical textual criticismNew Testament textual criticismBible manuscriptsGreek manuscriptsLatin manuscriptsGreek evidenceLatin evidencePatristic evidenceChurch FathersGreek FathersLatin FathersBible historyChurch historyHistorical methodologyHistorical reconstructionDocumentary evidencePrimary sourcesSource criticismEvidence evaluationInternal evidenceExternal evidenceCumulative evidenceTransmission of ScriptureBible preservationPreservation of ScriptureGreek New TestamentLatin VulgateOld LatinTextus ReceptusReceived TextTraditional TextByzantine TextMajority TextCritical TextNestle AlandNA28UBS5CBGMKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023Bible versionsModern Bible versionsBible translationVariant readingsDesiderius ErasmusErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentStephanusTheodore BezaScrivenerDean BurgonEdward MillerFrederick NolanHerman HoskierEdward F. HillsJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesCyprianPriscillianFulgentiusVictor VitensisCassiodorusCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusCodex MontfortianusCodex 61Codex 629Bruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDan WallaceJames WhiteMike FerrandoGrantly McDonaldJan KransJeff RiddleWill KinneyBryan RossStephen BoyceChris ThomasConfessional BibliologyMaurice RobinsonTimothy BergElijah HixsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comComma ConferenceJohannine Comma ConferenceTrinityChristian apologeticsAcademic researchDocumentaryEvidence examinedTruth mattersHistory mattersOriginal 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers 2 Revolution 2026-08-01 | Did TurretinFan's opening statement actually prove that the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8) is a late Latin interpolation?Or did it simply present one possible reconstruction of history?In Part 2 of this forensic investigation, we begin a careful examination of TurretinFan's opening arguments from his debate with CJ Cox. Rather than responding with sound bites or rhetoric, we'll slow everything down and evaluate each claim using the historical evidence.One of the central themes of this episode is an important distinction that is often overlooked in modern textual criticism:What does the evidence actually prove?And what conclusions are merely inferred from that evidence?We'll examine whether surviving Greek manuscript evidence is sufficient by itself to establish the origin of a textual variant, whether manuscript absence automatically proves non-existence, and whether historical reconstruction is sometimes presented with more certainty than the evidence allows.Topics discussed include:• TurretinFan's debate methodology• Greek manuscript evidence• Late Greek witnesses• Codex 629• Codex 61 (Codex Montfortianus)• Back-translations from Latin• Internal vs external evidence• Historical reconstruction• Burden of proof• Textual methodology• Patristic evidence• Latin evidence• The cumulative case for authenticity• How historians evaluate ancient evidenceThroughout this series, every major claim will be examined individually.Nothing will be accepted merely because it has been repeated for decades.Our goal is not to defend traditions.Our goal is not to defend personalities.Our goal is to discover what the historical evidence actually demonstrates.Whether you defend the Critical Text, the Byzantine Text, the Majority Text, or the Textus Receptus, I invite you to examine the primary sources with me and draw your own conclusions.Bring your Bible.Bring your Greek New Testament.Bring your Latin sources.Bring your questions.Truth has nothing to fear from careful investigation.──────────────────────────────Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#JohannineComma#1John57#TurretinFan#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#GreekManuscripts#LatinManuscripts#KingJamesBible#BibleManuscripts#ChristianApologetics1 John 5:71 John 5:7-81 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumHeavenly WitnessesThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese three are oneTurretinFanTurretinFan debateTurretinFan opening statementTurretinFan critiqueTurretinFan responseTurretinFan exposedExamining TurretinFanThe TurretinFan ExposeForensic investigationForensic examinationHistorical investigationScholarly investigationTextual criticismBiblical textual criticismNew Testament textual criticismBible manuscriptsGreek manuscriptsLatin manuscriptsGreek evidenceLatin evidenceGreek witnessesLatin witnessesGreek New TestamentPatristic evidenceChurch FathersPatristicsEarly ChristianityBible historyChurch historyHistorical methodologyHistorical reconstructionBurden of proofPrimary sourcesSource criticismEvidence evaluationInternal evidenceExternal evidenceCumulative evidenceTransmission of ScriptureBible preservationPreservation of ScriptureHistory of the BibleTextus ReceptusReceived TextTraditional TextByzantine TextMajority TextCritical TextNestle-AlandNA28UBS5CBGMCoherence Based Genealogical MethodKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible versionsModern Bible versionsBible translationVariant readingsInterpolationHomoeoteleutonParablepsisDesiderius ErasmusErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentRobert EstienneStephanusTheodore BezaScrivenerF. H. A. ScrivenerDean BurgonJohn William BurgonEdward MillerFrederick NolanHerman HoskierEdward F. HillsJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesCyprianPriscillianFulgentiusVictor VitensisCassiodorusCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusCodex MontfortianusCodex OttobonianusCodex 629Codex 61Bruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDan WallaceJames WhiteMike FerrandoGrantly McDonaldJan KransJeff RiddleWill KinneyBryan RossStephen BoyceChris ThomasConfessional BibliologyMaurice RobinsonTimothy BergElijah HixsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanMythVisionNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comComma ConferenceJohannine Comma conferenceTrinityChristian apologeticsAcademic researchDocumentary🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: 1 John 5:7 Debate | C. Jay Cox vs. TurretinFan - Is This Text Original? by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-07-29 | Welcome to Part 1 of a brand-new investigative series examining TurretinFan's case against the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).For years, TurretinFan has been one of the most widely cited opponents of the authenticity of 1 John 5:7. His articles, debates, and videos are regularly referenced throughout modern textual criticism circles. But how well do his arguments actually stand up when examined carefully?In this series, we are slowing everything down.Every quotation.Every manuscript.Every Church Father.Every historical claim.Every grammatical argument.Every citation.Nothing will be accepted simply because a respected scholar said it.Instead, we will return to the original evidence.This is a forensic investigation into the historical evidence surrounding one of the most controversial verses in the New Testament.We'll examine:• Greek manuscript evidence• Latin manuscript evidence• Erasmus and the Textus Receptus• Jerome's Prologue• Cyprian• Priscillian• Fulgentius• Codex Fuldensis• Codex Vaticanus• Codex Sinaiticus• Complutensian Polyglot• Aldine Greek New Testament• Early printed editions• Internal grammatical evidence• Masculine participles• Scribal habits• Patristic citations• Historical methodology• Preservation of ScriptureRather than repeating modern assumptions, we'll ask a far more important question:What does the historical evidence actually demonstrate?Whether you defend the Critical Text, the Byzantine Text, the Majority Text, the Textus Receptus, or are simply interested in biblical history, this series is intended to encourage careful thinking and serious engagement with the evidence.Bring your Bible.Bring your Greek New Testament.Bring your Latin sources.Bring your questions.Let's examine the evidence together.Because truth has nothing to fear from investigation.──────────────────────────────Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jWebsite:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Edition:walmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#JohannineComma#1John57#TurretinFan#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#KingJamesBible#BibleManuscripts#GreekManuscripts#LatinManuscripts#BiblicalScholarship1 John 5:71 John 5:7-81 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumHeavenly WitnessesFor there are three that bear record in heavenThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese three are oneTurretinFanTurretinFan debateTurretinFan blogTurretinFan exposedTurretinFan critiqueTurretinFan responseExamining TurretinFanForensic examinationForensic investigationScholarly investigationHistorical investigationTextual criticismBiblical textual criticismNew Testament textual criticismBible manuscriptsGreek manuscriptsLatin manuscriptsGreek evidenceLatin evidencePatristic evidenceChurch FathersPatristicsEarly ChristianityEarly ChurchBible historyChurch historyScripture preservationPreservation of ScriptureBible preservationBible corruptionTransmission of ScriptureHistory of the BibleGreek New TestamentLatin VulgateOld LatinTextus ReceptusReceived TextTraditional TextByzantine TextMajority TextCritical TextNestle-AlandNA28UBS5Editio Critica MaiorCBGMCoherence Based Genealogical MethodKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible versionsModern Bible versionsBible translationGreek grammarMasculine participlesInternal evidenceExternal evidenceScribal habitsHomoeoteleutonParablepsisInterpolationVariant readingsDesiderius ErasmusErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentRobert EstienneStephanusTheodore BezaScrivenerF. H. A. ScrivenerDean BurgonJohn William BurgonEdward MillerFrederick NolanHerman HoskierEdward F. HillsJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesPseudo-JeromeCyprianPriscillianFulgentiusVictor VitensisCassiodorusIsidore of SevilleCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusCodex MontfortianusCodex OttobonianusRichard SimonRichard PorsonBruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDan WallaceJames WhiteMike FerrandoGrantly McDonaldJan KransPeter van KleeckJeff RiddleBryan RossWill KinneyStephen BoyceChris ThomasConfessional BibliologyMaurice RobinsonTimothy BergElijah HixsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanMythVisionNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comComma ConferenceJohannine Comma conferenceTrinityBiblical doctrineChristian apologeticsEvidence examinedTruth mattersHistory mattersDocumentaryAcademic researchSource criticismPrimary sourcesOriginal sources🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 4 Revolution 2026-07-26 | The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando - 1 John 5:7-8 Part 4This livestream continues our detailed study of Mike Ferrando's monumental work The Witness of God is Greater, one of the most comprehensive modern defenses of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).As we continue reading through Ferrando's research, we carefully examine the historical evidence, the biblical text, the original Greek and Latin sources, and the arguments that have shaped the Johannine Comma debate for centuries.Rather than rushing to conclusions, this series works through the book line by line, allowing the evidence to speak for itself while comparing Ferrando's claims with the primary historical sources and the wider field of New Testament textual criticism.Whether you agree or disagree with the authenticity of 1 John 5:7-8, this series is intended to encourage careful examination of the evidence and thoughtful discussion of one of the most debated textual variants in the New Testament.Join us as we continue our journey through one of the most significant modern books written on the Johannine Comma.──────────────────────────────Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j──────────────────────────────Nick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.com──────────────────────────────The KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition-New-Testament/16209516866──────────────────────────────THE WITNESS OF GOD IS GREATERMike Ferrando and the Historical Case for the Johannine CommaIn this livestream we continue examining topics such as:• Mike Ferrando's The Witness of God is Greater• The Johannine Comma• Comma Johanneum• 1 John 5:7-8• The Heavenly Witnesses• Church Fathers• Patristic quotations• Early Christian writers• Ancient Greek sources• Ancient Latin sources• Greek manuscripts• Latin manuscripts• Historical theology• Church history• The Trinity• Jerome• The Latin Vulgate• The Old Latin• Textus Receptus• King James Bible• KJV 2023• Bible preservation• Manuscript evidence• Historical evidence• New Testament textual criticism• Confessional Bibliology• The history of 1 John 5:7• The Johannine Comma debateThroughout this series we compare Ferrando's arguments with the surviving documentary evidence and the testimony of historians, textual critics, translators, and theologians who have contributed to this discussion over the last five centuries.---TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike FerrandoThe Witness of God is GreaterJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Heavenly WitnessesThree Heavenly WitnessesThree WitnessesThese Three Are OneChurch FathersPatristicsEarly ChurchAnte-Nicene FathersNicene ChristianityFather Son Holy SpiritThe TrinityGreek FathersLatin FathersOld LatinLatin BibleLatin VulgateJeromeGreek New TestamentKoine GreekTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationBiblical LanguagesGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismChurch HistoryHistorical TheologyChristian TheologyChristian ApologeticsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentBiblical ScholarshipConfessional BibliologyReformationEarly ChristianityHistorical EvidenceForensic Bible StudyDocumentary EvidencePrimary SourcesRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#MikeFerrando#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#ChurchFathers#TextusReceptus#KingJamesBible#KJV#BibleStudy#ChurchHistory#Patristics#BibleManuscripts#TextualCriticism#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining TurretinFans Blog on the Johannine Comma 1 John 5:7-8 by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-07-25 | In this episode I begin a detailed, source-based examination of TurretinFan's blog articles on the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8). Rather than relying on modern summaries, we'll go directly to the historical evidence, original sources, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Erasmus' annotations, Jerome's Prologue, early printed editions, and the claims made throughout TurretinFan's research.This is not a personal attack—it is a scholarly examination of the evidence. Every major claim deserves to be tested.Whether you support the Critical Text, the Textus Receptus, or are simply interested in biblical history, this series is designed to examine the evidence carefully.Bring your Bible.Bring your Greek New Testament.Bring your questions.The goal isn't to win arguments.The goal is to find the truth.──────────────────────────────Support the MinistryDonate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlBuy Me A Coffee:buymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-2023-Edition──────────────────────────────#1John57#JohannineComma#TurretinFan#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus1 John 5:71 John 5Johannine CommaComma JohanneumTurretinFanTurretinFan blogTurretinFan 1 John 5:7Examining TurretinFanTurretinFan critiqueResponse to TurretinFanTextual CriticismBiblical Textual CriticismBible ManuscriptsGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsGreek New TestamentTextus ReceptusReceived TextByzantine TextMajority TextKing James VersionKing James BibleKJVKJBKJVOKing James OnlyKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationBible CorruptionBible DebateBible HistoryChurch HistoryChurch FathersPatristicsEarly ChristianityLatin VulgateErasmusDesiderius ErasmusErasmus AnnotationsNovum InstrumentumNovum TestamentumJeromeJerome's ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesCodex FuldensisCodex VaticanusCodex SinaiticusCodex AlexandrinusComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentRobert EstienneStephanusTheodore BezaF. H. A. ScrivenerDean BurgonJohn William BurgonHerman HoskierEdward F. HillsFrederick NolanEdward MillerRichard SimonRichard PorsonBruce MetzgerBart EhrmanDan WallaceJames WhiteCBGMCoherence Based Genealogical MethodEditio Critica MaiorNestle AlandNA28UBS5Critical TextTraditional TextScripture PreservationBiblical ScholarshipChristian ApologeticsTrinityHeavenly WitnessesFor there are three that bear record in heavenThe Father the Word and the Holy GhostThese three are oneComma ConferenceNick SayersTextus-Receptus.comMike FerrandoMike HollnerJeff RiddleWill KinneyBryan RossStephen BoyceMark WardTimothy BergElijah HixsonMaurice RobinsonSean McDowellWes HuffDan McClellanMythVisionKing James DebateBible VersionsModern Bible VersionsBible TranslationManuscript EvidenceGreek EvidenceLatin EvidenceHistorical TheologyDocumentaryInvestigationScholarly InvestigationUnder the MicroscopeEvidence ExaminedTruth Matters🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining TurretinFans - 1 John 5:7 Debate Review of Nick Sayers Opening Argument - Part 2 Revolution 2026-07-23 | TurretinFan recently reviewed my debate on 1 John 5:7, and in this first response I begin examining his claims against the historical record.This series is not about personalities—it's about evidence.We'll be looking at the primary sources behind the Johannine Comma, including Erasmus, Beza, Jerome, the Textus Receptus, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, and the history of 1 John 5:7–8.In Part 2 we begin evaluating TurretinFan's review and compare his conclusions with the historical evidence.This is Part 2 of the response series.📖 Textus Receptus Wikitextus-receptus.com/wiki 📚 KJV 2023 Editiontextus-receptus.com 👍 If you enjoy evidence-based discussions on biblical textual criticism, consider subscribing, liking this video, and sharing it with others.────────────────────────────────────────META TAGSTurretinFan, Nick Sayers, Caleb Percher, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7 debate, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, TurretinFan review, TurretinFan response, Nick Sayers response, Erasmus, Desiderius Erasmus, Theodore Beza, Beza, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Prologue to the Canonical Epistles, Textus Receptus, TR, King James Bible, KJV, KJV 2023, Bible textual criticism, textual criticism, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Codex Montfortianus, Codex Britannicus, Byzantine Text, Majority Text, Scrivener, Stephanus, Novum Testamentum, Trinity, Biblical Trinity, Bible manuscripts, New Testament manuscripts, Christian apologetics, Bible debate, Church history, Reformation, Erasmus Annotation, 1 John 5 7, 1 John 5:7 response, Confessional Bibliology, King James Only, KJV Only, Byzantine manuscripts, Latin Vulgate, Vulgate, Jerome Vulgate, Erasmus Greek New Testament, Novum Instrumentum, Beza 1598, Stephanus 1550, Scrivener 1881, Comma Johanneum debate, Trinity proof text, Bible preservation, Scripture preservation, Authenticity of 1 John 5:7, Greek New Testament, New Testament textual criticism, Early Church Fathers, Patristic evidence, Biblical history, Christian debate, Debate response, Textual criticism debate────────────────────────────────────────KEYWORDSTurretinFan Reviews Nick SayersTurretinFan Response1 John 5:7Johannine CommaComma JohanneumErasmusDesiderius ErasmusTheodore BezaJeromeJerome's PrologueTextus ReceptusKing James BibleKJV 2023KJV OnlyBible Textual CriticismGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsHistory of 1 John 5:7Codex BritannicusCodex MontfortianusByzantine TextMajority TextScrivenerStephanusConfessional BibliologyBiblical TrinityChristian ApologeticsBible DebateTurretinFan ReviewNick SayersCaleb Percher🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining TurretinFans - 1 John 5:7 Debate Review of Nick Sayers Opening Argument - Part 1 Revolution 2026-07-15 | TurretinFan recently reviewed my debate on 1 John 5:7, and in this first response I begin examining his claims against the historical record.This series is not about personalities—it's about evidence.We'll be looking at the primary sources behind the Johannine Comma, including Erasmus, Beza, Jerome, the Textus Receptus, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, and the history of 1 John 5:7–8.In Part 1 we begin evaluating TurretinFan's review and compare his conclusions with the historical evidence.This is Part 1 of the response series.📖 Textus Receptus Wikitextus-receptus.com/wiki📚 KJV 2023 Editiontextus-receptus.com👍 If you enjoy evidence-based discussions on biblical textual criticism, consider subscribing, liking this video, and sharing it with others.────────────────────────────────────────META TAGSTurretinFan, Nick Sayers, Caleb Percher, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7 debate, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, TurretinFan review, TurretinFan response, Nick Sayers response, Erasmus, Desiderius Erasmus, Theodore Beza, Beza, Jerome, Jerome Prologue, Prologue to the Canonical Epistles, Textus Receptus, TR, King James Bible, KJV, KJV 2023, Bible textual criticism, textual criticism, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Codex Montfortianus, Codex Britannicus, Byzantine Text, Majority Text, Scrivener, Stephanus, Novum Testamentum, Trinity, Biblical Trinity, Bible manuscripts, New Testament manuscripts, Christian apologetics, Bible debate, Church history, Reformation, Erasmus Annotation, 1 John 5 7, 1 John 5:7 response, Confessional Bibliology, King James Only, KJV Only, Byzantine manuscripts, Latin Vulgate, Vulgate, Jerome Vulgate, Erasmus Greek New Testament, Novum Instrumentum, Beza 1598, Stephanus 1550, Scrivener 1881, Comma Johanneum debate, Trinity proof text, Bible preservation, Scripture preservation, Authenticity of 1 John 5:7, Greek New Testament, New Testament textual criticism, Early Church Fathers, Patristic evidence, Biblical history, Christian debate, Debate response, Textual criticism debate────────────────────────────────────────KEYWORDSTurretinFan Reviews Nick SayersTurretinFan Response1 John 5:7Johannine CommaComma JohanneumErasmusDesiderius ErasmusTheodore BezaJeromeJerome's PrologueTextus ReceptusKing James BibleKJV 2023KJV OnlyBible Textual CriticismGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsHistory of 1 John 5:7Codex BritannicusCodex MontfortianusByzantine TextMajority TextScrivenerStephanusConfessional BibliologyBiblical TrinityChristian ApologeticsBible DebateTurretinFan ReviewNick SayersCaleb Percher🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7 | What He REALLY Wrote (Part 4) Revolution 2026-07-12 | CASE CLOSED: What Erasmus REALLY Wrote About 1 John 5:7 | Part 4DESCRIPTIONFor over 500 years, the story of Erasmus and the Johannine Comma has been repeated in books, seminaries, debates, documentaries, and on YouTube.But how many people have actually read Erasmus' own annotations?After spending many hours examining Erasmus' Latin annotations line by line, comparing translations, studying the manuscript evidence, and tracing the historical sources, we finally reach the conclusion of this investigation.This is Part 4 — the final episode.In this concluding study we examine what Erasmus actually wrote, what manuscripts he personally consulted, how he evaluated the Greek and Latin evidence, and whether the popular story repeated today truly reflects the historical record.Rather than relying on centuries of repeated anecdotes, we return to the primary sources.This is the conclusion of my in-depth series examining Erasmus' annotations on 1 John 5:7 and the Johannine Comma.Topics Covered• The biggest myths about Erasmus• What Erasmus actually believed• Erasmus' manuscript method• The Johannine Comma• 1 John 5:7• Codex Britannicus• Codex Montfortianus• Codex Vaticanus• Paulus Bombasius• Edward Lee• Stunica (Diego López de Zúñiga)• Jerome's Prologue• The Complutensian Polyglot• Aldine Greek New Testament• Greek manuscript evidence• Latin manuscript evidence• Erasmus' editorial principles• Textual criticism before modern textual criticism• Why this debate still matters after 500 yearsKEYWORDSErasmus, Desiderius Erasmus, Erasmus annotations, Erasmus annotation, Erasmus 1 John 5:7, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, 1 John 5:7, 1 John 5:7-8, Heavenly Witnesses, Father Word Holy Ghost, These Three Are One, Codex Britannicus, Codex Montfortianus, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Ravianus, Paulus Bombasius, Edward Lee, Stunica, Diego López de Zúñiga, Complutensian Polyglot, Aldine Greek New Testament, Greek New Testament, Greek manuscripts, Latin manuscripts, Bible manuscripts, manuscript evidence, primary sources, textual criticism, New Testament textual criticism, Textus Receptus, Received Text, King James Bible, King James Version, KJV, KJB, Jerome, Jerome's Prologue, Latin Vulgate, Trinity, Trinitarian Theology, Church Fathers, Patristics, Bible Preservation, Historical Theology, Church History, Renaissance Humanism, Biblical Humanism, Christian Apologetics, History of the Bible, History of the New Testament, Nick Sayers, Revolution DebatesHASHTAGS#Erasmus #JohannineComma #CommaJohanneum #1John57 #TextualCriticism #TextusReceptus #KingJamesBible #KJV #GreekNewTestament #GreekManuscripts #LatinManuscripts #BibleManuscripts #ChurchHistory #Jerome #BibleHistory #Trinity #BibleStudy #ConfessionalBibliology #Reformation #RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 3 Revolution 2026-07-05 | The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando - 1 John 5:7-8 Part 3This livestream continues our detailed study of Mike Ferrando's monumental work The Witness of God is Greater, one of the most comprehensive modern defenses of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).In Part 3 we move beyond the introduction and begin examining some of the earliest historical evidence for the Heavenly Witnesses.How did the earliest Christians speak about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit?Why do so many early writers repeatedly use expressions like:"These three are one.""Three witnesses.""Father, Son, and Holy Spirit."Are these merely theological expressions......or do they preserve echoes of an older biblical text?Together we carefully examine Mike Ferrando's research on Clement of Alexandria, Dionysius of Alexandria, Dionysius of Rome, Cyprian of Carthage, Hippolytus of Rome, and Tertullian while comparing the historical evidence, the original Greek and Latin sources, and the testimony of later scholars who argued that these writers knew the Johannine Comma long before the medieval period.This series is not merely about manuscripts.It is about following the historical evidence wherever it leads.If the earliest Christians repeatedly quote language remarkably similar to 1 John 5:7, what are we to make of it?Join us as we continue reading Ferrando's work line by line.──────────────────────────────Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5j──────────────────────────────Nick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.com──────────────────────────────The KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...──────────────────────────────THE WITNESS OF GOD IS GREATERMike Ferrando and the Historical Case for the Johannine CommaIn this livestream we examine:• Mike Ferrando's The Witness of God is Greater• Clement of Alexandria• Dionysius of Alexandria• Dionysius of Rome• Cyprian of Carthage• Hippolytus of Rome• Tertullian• Early Christian witnesses• The Heavenly Witnesses• 1 John 5:7-8• Father, Son, and Holy Spirit• "These Three Are One"• Three Witnesses• Ancient Greek sources• Ancient Latin sources• Patristic quotations• Church Fathers• Ante-Nicene Christianity• Early Trinitarian language• Historical theology• The Old Latin Bible• Latin Christianity• Greek Christianity• Jerome• The Latin Vulgate• Textus Receptus• King James Bible• KJV 2023• Bible preservation• Manuscript evidence• Historical evidence• Forensic textual analysis• Greek manuscripts• Latin manuscripts• New Testament textual criticism• Confessional Bibliology• The history of 1 John 5:7• The Johannine Comma debate• The Trinity in the Early ChurchA central question will guide today's study:Did the earliest Church Fathers preserve the language of 1 John 5:7 centuries before most surviving Greek manuscripts?Or have modern textual critics underestimated the cumulative force of the historical evidence?---TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike FerrandoThe Witness of God is GreaterJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Clement of AlexandriaDionysius of AlexandriaDionysius of RomeCyprianCyprian of CarthageHippolytusHippolytus of RomeTertullianChurch FathersPatristicsEarly ChurchAnte-Nicene FathersFather Son Holy SpiritThree WitnessesThese Three Are OneThe TrinityGreek FathersLatin FathersOld LatinLatin BibleVulgateJeromeGreek New TestamentTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationBiblical LanguagesGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismChurch HistoryHistorical TheologyChristian TheologyChristian ApologeticsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentConfessional BibliologyReformationEarly ChristianityNicene ChristianityEarly Church FathersTrinity DoctrineHistorical EvidenceForensic Bible StudyRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#MikeFerrando#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#ChurchFathers#Cyprian#Tertullian#Hippolytus#ClementOfAlexandria#TextusReceptus#KingJamesBible#KJV#BibleStudy#ChurchHistory#Patristics#BibleManuscripts#TextualCriticism#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
I Double Checked Every Claim Dan McClellan Made About the King James Bible Revolution 2026-06-28 | **Is Dan McClellan correct about the King James Bible?**In this video I carefully examine every major claim made in Dan McClellan's recent video about the King James Version. He argues that the KJV is based on inferior manuscripts, contains outdated English, is overly literal, and is not a high-quality translation.Do the historical facts support those conclusions?Rather than responding with opinions, we examine the original historical evidence, including Erasmus, Stephanus, Beza, the Textus Receptus, the Byzantine manuscript tradition, the King James translators themselves, and the documentary record surrounding the production of the Authorized Version.Topics covered include:• Is the Textus Receptus based on poor manuscripts?• Are earlier manuscripts always better?• Were verses added to the Bible?• Is the King James Bible really outdated?• Is the KJV too literal?• Was the KJV simply copied from the Bishops' Bible?• Why did the King James Bible become the world's most influential English Bible?This is not a response based on tradition or emotion. It is a detailed examination of the historical evidence.If you enjoy serious research into Biblical manuscripts, church history, the King James Bible, the Textus Receptus, and New Testament textual criticism, consider subscribing.——————————————————————📖 Textus Receptus Wikitextus-receptus.com📚 KJV 2023 Edition(Add your Amazon link)🎥 Revolution Debates——————————————————————#KingJamesBible #DanMcClellan #KJV #TextusReceptus #BibleManuscripts #BibleTranslation #TextualCriticism #BiblicalScholarship #ChristianApologeticsDan McClellan, Dan McClellan KJV, Dan McClellan King James Bible, Dan McClellan Textual Criticism, Dan McClellan Bible Translation, King James Bible, King James Version, KJV, Authorized Version, AV1611, KJV Only, Textus Receptus, TR, Byzantine Text, Byzantine Manuscripts, Majority Text, Received Text, Erasmus, Desiderius Erasmus, Robert Estienne, Stephanus, Theodore Beza, Scrivener, F.H.A. Scrivener, King James Translators, Translators to the Reader, Bishops Bible, Geneva Bible, Tyndale Bible, Coverdale Bible, Matthew Bible, Great Bible, Textual Criticism, New Testament Textual Criticism, Biblical Scholarship, Bible Manuscripts, Ancient Manuscripts, Greek New Testament, Nestle Aland, UBS Greek New Testament, Critical Text, Alexandrian Text, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Alexandrinus, Papyri, Bible Translation Debate, Modern Bible Versions, Bible Corruption, Bible Preservation, Scripture Preservation, Preservation of Scripture, History of the King James Bible, English Bible History, Biblical History, Christian Apologetics, Christian Debate, Bible Evidence, Is the King James Bible Reliable, Is the KJV Accurate, Is the King James Bible Outdated, Is the Textus Receptus Reliable, Is the Critical Text Better, Modern Bible Debate, King James Bible Documentary, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates, Textus-Receptus.com🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7 | The Manuscripts Erasmus Actually Examined (Part 3) Revolution 2026-06-27 | For five hundred years people have repeated stories about Erasmus and the Johannine Comma.But what manuscripts did Erasmus actually examine?In this episode we reach one of the most important sections of the Annotation, where Erasmus lists the manuscripts he personally consulted, compares Latin and Greek witnesses, discusses the famous Codex Britannicus, evaluates the Vatican manuscript, examines the Aldine edition, and gives his first assessment of the Complutensian Polyglot.Rather than relying on modern summaries, we read Erasmus himself.This section overturns many popular assumptions about Erasmus' method and demonstrates that he carefully weighed every witness available to him.Topics include:• Bruges manuscripts• Codex Britannicus• Basel manuscript• Vatican manuscript• Paulus Bombasius• Aldine Greek New Testament• Complutensian Polyglot• Erasmus' manuscript method• Textual criticism before modern textual criticism• Greek evidence• Latin evidenceErasmusDesiderius ErasmusJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Heavenly WitnessesFather Word Holy SpiritThese Three Are OneCodex BritannicusCodex MontfortianusCodex VaticanusPaulus BombasiusVatican LibraryBasel ManuscriptBruges ManuscriptsConstance ManuscriptsComplutensian PolyglotAldine Greek New TestamentGreek New TestamentGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentRenaissance HumanismBiblical HumanismErasmian StudiesEdward LeeStunicaDiego López de ZúñigaTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureConfessional BibliologyChurch FathersPatristicsHistorical TheologyChurch HistoryBiblical TheologyGreek TextLatin VulgateJeromeJerome's PrologueTrinityTrinitarian TheologyNew Testament Textual CriticismTextual CriticismBible StudyChristian ApologeticsReformationProtestant ReformationNick SayersRevolution Debates#Erasmus#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#1John578#TextualCriticism#GreekNewTestament#BibleManuscripts#ChurchHistory#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#Jerome#ComplutensianPolyglot#CodexBritannicus#GreekManuscripts#LatinManuscripts#ConfessionalBibliology#BibleStudy#RevolutionDebatesErasmus 1 John 5:7, Johannine Comma, Comma Johanneum, Erasmus Annotation, Desiderius Erasmus, Textus Receptus, King James Bible, KJV, Greek New Testament, Greek Manuscripts, Latin Manuscripts, Codex Britannicus, Codex Montfortianus, Paulus Bombasius, Vatican Manuscript, Vatican Library, Complutensian Polyglot, Aldine Edition, Jerome, Jerome's Prologue, Trinity, Trinitarian Theology, Church Fathers, Patristics, New Testament Textual Criticism, Biblical Theology, Historical Theology, Church History, Bible Manuscripts, Bible Preservation, Confessional Bibliology, Edward Lee, Stunica, Diego López de Zúñiga, Renaissance Humanism, History of the Bible, History of the New Testament, Nick Sayers, Revolution Debates.🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7 | What Did He Really Believe? (Part 2) by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-06-21 | ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7What Did Erasmus Really Believe?Part 2 – Reading the Annotation ItselfIn Part 2 of this series we finally enter Erasmus' famous annotation on 1 John 5:7–8 and begin examining his own words line by line.For centuries people have repeated stories about Erasmus and the Johannine Comma.But how many have actually read the annotation?What did Erasmus say about Jerome?How did he evaluate the Church Fathers?Why did he discuss Augustine, Cyril, and Bede?What evidence did he consider important?And does the annotation support the popular claim that Erasmus rejected the Comma Johanneum?In this livestream we begin reading the text itself and allow Erasmus to speak for himself.Topics include:• Erasmus and the Johannine Comma• 1 John 5:7–8• Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Augustine of Hippo• Cyril of Alexandria• Bede the Venerable• Trinitarian theology• Historical theology• Church history• Textual criticism• Greek manuscripts• Latin manuscripts• Patristic evidence• The history of the New Testament text• The Textus Receptus• The King James BibleA central question remains:Was Erasmus attempting to remove 1 John 5:7?Or was he attempting to follow the evidence available to him?Tonight we continue the investigation.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jWebsite:textus-receptus.comErasmusDesiderius ErasmusErasmus 1 John 5:7Erasmus Johannine CommaWhat did Erasmus believeComma JohanneumJohannine Comma1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Heavenly WitnessesPatristicJeromeSaint JeromeJerome ProloguePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesAugustineAugustine of HippoCyril of AlexandriaBedeVenerable BedeChurch FathersTextual CriticismTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismGreek New TestamentGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New Testament TextTR / KJV AudienceTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James BibleKing James VersionKJVKJVOKJV 2023Bible PreservationConfessional BibliologyPeople Frequently Searched TogetherJames WhiteDan WallaceBart EhrmanEdward LeeDiego Lopez de ZúñigaStunicaComplutensian PolyglotStephanusTheodore BezaHashtags#Erasmus#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#Jerome#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#KingJamesBible#ChurchHistory#Trinity#BibleManuscripts#ConfessionalBibliology🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Part 2 Revolution 2026-06-17 | The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando - 1 John 5:7-8 Part 2This KJV and Textus Receptus study begins a detailed reading of Mike Ferrando's book The Witness of God is Greater, one of the most ambitious modern defenses of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).In this first installment we examine Ferrando's introduction, his historical methodology, and his opening arguments concerning Walter Thiele, Cyprian of Carthage, the Old Latin Bible, and the historical witnesses to the Heavenly Witnesses.One of the most fascinating admissions in modern Johannine Comma studies comes from Walter Thiele, perhaps the foremost twentieth-century scholar of the Vetus Latina. Although Thiele personally regarded the Comma Johanneum as an interpolation, he nevertheless argued that Cyprian was not merely allegorizing 1 John 5:8 but was actually quoting 1 John 5:7 from a Latin manuscript.Why would one of the world's leading Latin manuscript scholars make such a claim?In this study we begin working through Ferrando's evidence line by line.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionTHE WITNESS OF GOD IS GREATERMike Ferrando and the Historical Case for the Johannine CommaIn this livestream we examine:• Mike Ferrando's The Witness of God is Greater• Walter Thiele and the Vetus Latina Institute• Cyprian and the Johannine Comma• The famous "Ja, aber ich bin allein" statement• The testimony of the Old Latin Bible• 1 John 5:7-8 in the KJV• 1 John 5:7-8 in the Textus Receptus• 1 John 5:7-8 in the Latin Vulgate• Living communities and manuscript preservation• The Eastern Orthodox witness• Mount Athos and textual transmission• Ferrando's "Cloud of Witnesses" argument• Early Church evidence for the Heavenly Witnesses• Clement of Alexandria• Origen• John Chrysostom• Theodore the Studite• Father, Word, and Holy Spirit• "These three are one"• Carthage as a center of learning• North African Christianity• Latin Christianity• The Old Latin New Testament• Augustine and the Latin Bible• Why Cyprian matters• Historical arguments for and against the Johannine Comma• The preservation of Scripture• KJV and Textus Receptus apologeticsA central question will guide today's study:Did Cyprian have 1 John 5:7 in his Bible?Or have modern scholars misunderstood one of the earliest witnesses in Church history?---TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike FerrandoThe Witness of God is GreaterJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Walter ThieleVetus LatinaOld LatinCyprianCyprian of CarthageTertullianAugustineOrigenClement of AlexandriaJohn ChrysostomTheodore the StuditeLatin BibleLatin ChristianityVulgateOld Latin BibleNorth AfricaCarthageChurch FathersPatristicsPatristic EvidenceEarly ChurchTrinityFather Word Holy SpiritThe Three Are OneGreek New TestamentTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationBiblical LanguagesGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismChurch HistoryHistorical TheologyChristian TheologyChristian ApologeticsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentConfessional BibliologyReformationRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#MikeFerrando#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#Cyprian#WalterThiele#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleStudy#ChurchHistory#Patristics#TextualCriticism#BibleManuscripts#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7 | What Did He Really Believe? (Part 1) by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-06-14 | ERASMUS ON 1 JOHN 5:7What Did Erasmus Really Believe?Part 1 – Reading the Annotation Line by LineIn this livestream we begin a detailed examination of Erasmus' famous annotation on 1 John 5:7-8, one of the most controversial textual notes in the history of the New Testament.For over five hundred years people have repeated stories about Erasmus and the Johannine Comma."Erasmus removed the verse.""Erasmus denied the Trinity.""Erasmus was forced to include it.""Erasmus was tricked by a forged manuscript."But what did Erasmus actually say?In this study we read Erasmus' own words, line by line, beginning with the opening sections of his annotation and examining his discussion of Jerome, Cyril of Alexandria, Bede, Augustine, the Arians, and the famous Heavenly Witnesses.One of the most fascinating aspects of the annotation is that Erasmus is not merely discussing manuscripts.He is weighing historical evidence.He is evaluating Church Fathers.He is examining ancient interpretations.He is asking whether the testimony of the Father, Word, and Holy Spirit was known to the earliest Christian writers.And he is doing so decades before modern textual criticism existed.Tonight we begin working through the annotation paragraph by paragraph.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionERASMUS ON THE JOHANNINE COMMAReading the Annotation Line by LineIn this livestream we examine:• Erasmus and 1 John 5:7-8• The history of the Johannine Comma• The Comma Johanneum controversy• Erasmus' 1516 Greek New Testament• Erasmus' later editions• Jerome and the Canonical Epistles• The Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Cyril of Alexandria• Bede the Venerable• Augustine of Hippo• Augustine Against Maximinus• The Arian controversy• Trinitarian proof texts• Early Church evidence• The testimony of the Father, Word, and Holy Spirit• "These three are one"• The Heavenly Witnesses• Erasmus' argument from silence• Why Cyril matters• Why Augustine matters• Why Bede matters• Did Jerome know the Comma?• Did Augustine know the Comma?• Did Bede know the Comma?• Historical theology• Church history• Textual criticism• Greek manuscripts• Latin manuscripts• Patristic evidence• Early Christian writers• Biblical interpretation• The doctrine of the Trinity• Erasmus and the Arians• Humanism and the Renaissance• The history of the New Testament text• The Textus Receptus• The King James Bible• KJV apologetics• Confessional BibliologyA central question will guide today's study:If the Johannine Comma was known throughout the ancient Church,why do Cyril, Augustine, and Bede appear not to use it?And if they did know it,what exactly does Erasmus think happened to the text?Tonight we begin investigating Erasmus' answer.---TOPICS DISCUSSEDErasmusDesiderius ErasmusJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Heavenly WitnessesFather Word Holy SpiritThese Three Are OneJeromeSaint JeromeVulgatePrologue to the Canonical EpistlesCyril of AlexandriaAugustineAugustine of HippoBedeVenerable BedeMaximinusArianismAriansNicene ChristianityTrinityTrinitarian TheologyPatristicsChurch FathersEarly ChurchChurch HistoryHistorical TheologyBiblical TheologyTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismGreek New TestamentGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentRenaissance HumanismBiblical HumanismErasmian StudiesComplutensian PolyglotEdward LeeStunicaTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureConfessional BibliologyReformationProtestant ReformationChristian ApologeticsRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#Erasmus#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#1John578#Jerome#Augustine#Bede#ChurchFathers#Patristics#TextualCriticism#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleStudy#ChurchHistory#Trinity#GreekNewTestament#BibleManuscripts#ConfessionalBibliology#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando | 1 John 5:7 by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-06-12 | The Witness of God is Greater Book by Mike Ferrando - 1 John 5:7-8This KJV and Textus Receptus study begins a detailed reading of Mike Ferrando's book The Witness of God is Greater, one of the most ambitious modern defenses of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7-8).In this first installment we examine Ferrando's introduction, his historical methodology, and his opening arguments concerning Walter Thiele, Cyprian of Carthage, the Old Latin Bible, and the historical witnesses to the Heavenly Witnesses.One of the most fascinating admissions in modern Johannine Comma studies comes from Walter Thiele, perhaps the foremost twentieth-century scholar of the Vetus Latina. Although Thiele personally regarded the Comma Johanneum as an interpolation, he nevertheless argued that Cyprian was not merely allegorizing 1 John 5:8 but was actually quoting 1 John 5:7 from a Latin manuscript.Why would one of the world's leading Latin manuscript scholars make such a claim?In this study we begin working through Ferrando's evidence line by line.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionTHE WITNESS OF GOD IS GREATERMike Ferrando and the Historical Case for the Johannine CommaIn this livestream we examine:• Mike Ferrando's The Witness of God is Greater• Walter Thiele and the Vetus Latina Institute• Cyprian and the Johannine Comma• The famous "Ja, aber ich bin allein" statement• The testimony of the Old Latin Bible• 1 John 5:7-8 in the KJV• 1 John 5:7-8 in the Textus Receptus• 1 John 5:7-8 in the Latin Vulgate• Living communities and manuscript preservation• The Eastern Orthodox witness• Mount Athos and textual transmission• Ferrando's "Cloud of Witnesses" argument• Early Church evidence for the Heavenly Witnesses• Clement of Alexandria• Origen• John Chrysostom• Theodore the Studite• Father, Word, and Holy Spirit• "These three are one"• Carthage as a center of learning• North African Christianity• Latin Christianity• The Old Latin New Testament• Augustine and the Latin Bible• Why Cyprian matters• Historical arguments for and against the Johannine Comma• The preservation of Scripture• KJV and Textus Receptus apologeticsA central question will guide today's study:Did Cyprian have 1 John 5:7 in his Bible?Or have modern scholars misunderstood one of the earliest witnesses in Church history?---TOPICS DISCUSSEDMike FerrandoThe Witness of God is GreaterJohannine CommaComma Johanneum1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Walter ThieleVetus LatinaOld LatinCyprianCyprian of CarthageTertullianAugustineOrigenClement of AlexandriaJohn ChrysostomTheodore the StuditeLatin BibleLatin ChristianityVulgateOld Latin BibleNorth AfricaCarthageChurch FathersPatristicsPatristic EvidenceEarly ChurchTrinityFather Word Holy SpiritThe Three Are OneGreek New TestamentTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationBiblical LanguagesGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismChurch HistoryHistorical TheologyChristian TheologyChristian ApologeticsHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentConfessional BibliologyReformationRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#MikeFerrando#JohannineComma#CommaJohanneum#1John57#Cyprian#WalterThiele#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleStudy#ChurchHistory#Patristics#TextualCriticism#BibleManuscripts#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
An Entire Generation of Scholars Duped! | Richard Simon, the Paper Pope, & 1 John 5:7 Part 4 Revolution 2026-06-07 | This KJV and Textus Receptus study examines one of the most influential figures in the history of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7): Richard Simon and his attack on Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionTHE MAN WHO TURNED SCHOLARS AGAINST JEROME'S PROLOGUERichard Simon, the Johannine Comma, and the Origins of Modern Textual CriticismFor centuries critics claimed that Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles was not authentic.One of the earliest and most influential voices behind this view was Richard Simon.In his Critical History of the Text of the New Testament, Simon argued that the Prologue was not written by Jerome and questioned its testimony concerning the Heavenly Witnesses of 1 John 5:7.His arguments would influence generations of scholars and help shape the modern discussion surrounding the Johannine Comma.In this livestream we examine:• Richard Simon and the Critical History of the Text of the New Testament• Simon's arguments against Jerome's Prologue• Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Codex Fuldensis (546 AD)• Victor of Capua• The history of the forgery accusation• John Mill, Porson, Scrivener and later critics• The discovery and publication of Codex Fuldensis• Erasmus and Jerome• The Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7)• The testimony of Cyprian• The grammatical solecism argument• Early Latin evidence• Greek manuscript evidence• Why scholars dated the Prologue late• Whether Richard Simon's arguments still work after Codex Fuldensis• Historical arguments for and against Jerome's authorshipA central question will guide today's study:Was Richard Simon correct about Jerome's Prologue?Or did later discoveries undermine one of the most influential arguments in Johannine Comma studies?---TOPICS DISCUSSEDRichard SimonCritical History of the Text of the New TestamentJohannine Comma1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Codex FuldensisVictor of CapuaJeromeSaint JeromeJerome's PrologueVulgate PrologueCanonical EpistlesCatholic EpistlesJohn MillRichard PorsonF. H. A. ScrivenerBruce MetzgerErasmusDesiderius ErasmusCyprianPriscillianVictor VitensisCouncil of CarthageCouncil of NicaeaTrinityTrinitarian ControversyArianismTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationChurch HistoryEarly ChurchPatristicsPatristic EvidenceLatin BibleOld LatinVulgateBiblical LanguagesGreek New TestamentLatin ChristianityReformationConfessional BibliologyTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsChristian ApologeticsChristian TheologyHistorical TheologyHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentJohannine StudiesRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#RichardSimon#JohannineComma#1John57#Jerome#CodexFuldensis#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleStudy#TextualCriticism#ChurchHistory#ChristianApologetics#BibleManuscripts#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
1 John 5:7- How an Overlooked 546 AD Manuscript Changed the Debate | Codex Fuldensis & Jerome Part 3 Revolution 2026-05-31 | This KJV and Textus Receptus study examines one of the most important pieces of evidence in the history of the Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7): Codex Fuldensis and Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionTHIS 546 AD MANUSCRIPT CHANGED THE JOHANNINE COMMA DEBATECodex Fuldensis, Jerome's Prologue, and the Collapse of a Textual MythFor centuries critics claimed that Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles was a late forgery, perhaps dating from the eighth or ninth century.But then Codex Fuldensis entered the discussion.Dated to 546 AD and associated with Victor of Capua, Codex Fuldensis contains the famous Prologue that accuses unfaithful translators of omitting the testimony of the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit in 1 John 5.In this livestream we examine:• Jerome's Prologue to the Canonical Epistles• Codex Fuldensis (546 AD)• Victor of Capua• The history of the forgery accusation• Richard Simon and the rise of modern textual criticism• John Mill, Porson, Scrivener and later critics• The discovery and publication of Codex Fuldensis• Erasmus and Jerome• The Johannine Comma (1 John 5:7)• The testimony of Cyprian• The grammatical solecism argument• Early Latin evidence• Greek manuscript evidence• Why scholars dated the Prologue late• Whether the forgery theory still works after Fuldensis• Historical arguments for and against Jerome's authorshipA central question will guide today's study:If Jerome did not write the Prologue, who did?And why would someone create such a document so close to Jerome's lifetime?---TOPICS DISCUSSEDJohannine Comma1 John 5:71 John 5:7-8Codex FuldensisVictor of CapuaJeromeSaint JeromeJerome's PrologueVulgate PrologueCanonical EpistlesCatholic EpistlesRichard SimonJohn MillRichard PorsonF. H. A. ScrivenerBruce MetzgerErasmusDesiderius ErasmusCyprianPriscillianVictor VitensisCouncil of CarthageCouncil of NicaeaTrinityTrinitarian ControversyArianismTextus ReceptusReceived TextKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBible TranslationChurch HistoryEarly ChurchPatristicsPatristic EvidenceLatin BibleOld LatinVulgateBiblical LanguagesGreek New TestamentLatin ChristianityReformationConfessional BibliologyTextual CriticismNew Testament Textual CriticismBible ManuscriptsAncient ManuscriptsGreek ManuscriptsLatin ManuscriptsChristian ApologeticsChristian TheologyHistorical TheologyHistory of the BibleHistory of the New TestamentJohannine StudiesRevolution DebatesNick Sayers#JohannineComma#1John57#CodexFuldensis#Jerome#TextusReceptus#KJV#KingJamesBible#BibleStudy#TextualCriticism#ChurchHistory#ChristianApologetics#BibleManuscripts#Trinity#Christianity#RevolutionDebates🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
TRUTH IN 2 JOHN 1:1-3 | KJV & TEXTUS RECEPTUS BIBLE STUDY Part 4 by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-05-30 | This KJV and Textus Receptus Bible study examines Truth in 2 John 1:1-3.Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionwalmart.com/ip/King-James-Version-KJV-2023-EditionTRUTH IN 2 JOHN 1:1-3 | PART 4In Part 4 of our study through 2 John, we examine one of the Apostle John's central themes: TRUTH.What did John mean by "the truth" in 2 John 1:1-3? How does the Greek word aletheia relate to the Hebrew word emet? What can the King James Bible, the Textus Receptus, Theodore Beza, and older English Bibles teach us about truth?In this study we examine:• 2 John 1:1-3• "In the Truth" vs "In Truth"• The Spirit of Truth• Christ as Truth• "Thy Word is Truth"• John 14:6• John 17:17• Truth in 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John• Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and English word studies• Aletheia, Emet, Veritas, Truth, Troth and Trust• Textus Receptus and KJV translation issues• Bible preservation and certaintyTruth is not merely an idea. Truth is found in Jesus Christ.---2 JOHN STUDY SERIESPart 1 – Introduction to 2 JohnPart 2 – The Elder, Authorship, and Early Church TestimonyPart 3 – The Elect Lady, Her Children, and the Name TheoryPart 4 – Truth in 2 John 1:1-3---Topics Discussed2 John2 John Bible Study2 John 1:12 John 1:22 John 1:3Truth in 2 JohnThe TruthBiblical TruthJesus ChristI Am The TruthJohn 14:6John 17:17Spirit of TruthTruth and LoveWalking in TruthTruth's SakeAletheiaAlethiaEmetAmenVeritasTruthTrothTrustHebrew Word StudyGreek Word StudyLatin Word StudyBiblical LanguagesTextus ReceptusKing James VersionKJVKJBKJVOKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionTheodore BezaScrivenerDean BurgonBible PreservationPreserved ScriptureBiblical AuthorityBiblical StudiesChurch HistoryReformationBible TranslationTextual CriticismGreek New TestamentReceived TextTR1 John2 John3 JohnGospel of JohnJohannine LiteratureApostle JohnEarly ChristianityChristian ApologeticsChristian TheologyTruthIsChrist#2John#KJV#TextusReceptus#BibleStudy#Truth#KingJamesBible#BiblicalTruth#Christianity#John14v6#Scripture🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
1 John 5:7 - Did Jerome say Unfaithful Translators Are..Omitting Father, Word, and Spirit? Part 2 Revolution 2026-05-24 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)1 John 5:7- 8 Conference🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
1 John 5:7 - Did Jerome say Unfaithful Translators Are...Omitting Father, Word, and Spirit? Revolution 2026-05-23 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)1 John 5:7- 8 Conference🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
1 John 5:7-8 Conference Announcement and Planning Revolution 2026-05-17 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)1 John 5:7- 8 Conference🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining the claims of Wes Huff on Mikhaila Peterson by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-05-10 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Debate: KJV and Received Text vs. KJV-only / Bible Highlighter vs. Matthew Verschuur Revolution 2026-05-09 | Debate: Debate: KJV and Received Text vs. KJV-only Bible Highlighter vs Matthew Verschuur Is Knowledge of the Original Languages Necessary for KJV Believers Who Have Acess to Modern Study Tools?Hosted by Nick Sayers======Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Mark Ward AND Bart Ehrman Get This Wrong: ‘Staff or No Staff?’ – A Textual & Logical Breakdown Revolution 2026-05-02 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial ComplexStaff or Staffs (staves)🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
The Bible Industrial Complex: Who’s REALLY Changing Your Bible? Revolution 2026-04-26 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English VersionBible Industrial Complex🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
The MEV (Modern English Version) Examined Revolution 2026-04-25 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing Modern English Version🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Dan Mclellans attacks on King James Version Examined - by Nick Sayers Revolution 2026-04-19 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: Debate- Did Jesus Rise from the Dead - Bart Ehrman vs Jonathan Sheffield by Nick Sayers 6 Revolution 2026-04-18 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
A Reaction Video: Erasmus And The Manuscripts He Used- Steve Combs King James Bible Research Council Revolution 2026-04-15 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing King James Bible Research Council🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Examining: Debate- Did Jesus Rise from the Dead - Bart Ehrman vs Jonathan Sheffield by Nick Sayers 5 Revolution 2026-04-12 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
Another Response to Thomas Ross on Revelation 16:5 | The KJV has an error? Revolution 2026-04-11 | Donate:textus-receptus.com/donate.htmlbuymeacoffee.com/g5qq5kge5jNick Sayers Website:textus-receptus.comThe KJV 2023 Editionhttps://www.walmart.com/ip/King-James...#atheismBible TranslationTextus ReceptusKing James Version#kjv #kjb #kjvo King James OnlyJames WhiteStephen BoyceMark WardDwayne GreenElijah HixsonTimothy BergNKJVMEVContradictionsBart Ehrman#debate ScrivenerDean BurgonTextual Confidence CollectiveTextual AbsolutismCultishCultMatthew EverhardDr. Sean McDowellAndrew SluderJeff RiddleTurretinFanBryan RossBiblical Studies and ReviewsStephen Hackett#ruckmanite RuckmanRuckmanismToxicGroupthinkAssociation fallacy#unicorns Wild OxAurochsReemDutch BibleStatenvertalingKnust#nrsv New Revised Standard VersionJennifer Knust#easter TabernaclesSabbathThomas RossLegacy Standard BibleLSBKent HovindMatthew 1Matt FurseTexe MarrsStanding For TruthPatrick BoyleAlan KurschnerFalling AwayEthiopicSteven AndersonI AM#jehovah #nifb New IFBPraise the I AMDonny Budinski#newtestament #Westcott & Hort#interview Bible Version ConspiracyGail RiplingerMaurice Robinson#TrumpTimothy DeckerWill KinneyPhil StringerKirk DiVietroKoreaTaylor DesotoMelissa DoughertyiThink BiblicallyCaleb CorneloupAllie Beth StuckeyEditio Critica MaiorAlan StewartMike HollnerMike FerrandoAfter the TribulationLydia McGrewWayman MitchellScott LambGreg MitchellPotter's HousePerthBrisbanePrescottJonathan BurrisPapua New GuineaTrinityPakistanBrick KilnWorshipLeadershipNehemia GordonJehovahI AMSack of RomeBeards1 John 3:16Scott IngramBaptist AnglicanRoman CatholicismPagan RootsDistigmaiCodex Vaticanus BJoe RoganMythVisionMark 16LegalismMosesLawPodcastKevin ThomsonHenry VIII SeptuagintLXXMarching to Zion Alter CallsVirginia MollenkottScott IngramMichael KrugerDan WallaceWes HuffTruthIsChristMike FerrandoMike HollnerJoey FaustAnte PavkovicBrandon PetersonHerman HoskierPapyrusneedgodRyan HemelarDean BurgonUnitarianUnitarianismBible HighlighterKJV 2023King James Version 2023 EditionPredestinationFree WillTyndale MovieCharlie Kirk Ankerberg ShowKeith FoskeyJerome PrologueC. J. Cornthwaite Lorenzo VallaJudas 2 John Jonathan ReyesJohnny ChangResurrectionDan McClellanAnointing 🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5203500022890496
