Apologies for the video, I just grabbed my camera, and it's not easy to illustrate with a normal lens; I intended to film more later with a wide angle lens, but it's been overcast ever since!
White Horse
I was out when I noticed the Moon's shadow seemed to be at the wrong angle relative to the Sun. Assuming that the Moon phase is caused by it blocking the sun light from the rearside of the moon, the line of the shadow doesn't seem to match to the direction of the sun.
Apologies for the video, I just grabbed my camera, and it's not easy to illustrate with a normal lens; I intended to film more later with a wide angle lens, but it's been overcast ever since!
Apologies for the video, I just grabbed my camera, and it's not easy to illustrate with a normal lens; I intended to film more later with a wide angle lens, but it's been overcast ever since!
updated 9 years ago
Apologies for the video, I just grabbed my camera, and it's not easy to illustrate with a normal lens; I intended to film more later with a wide angle lens, but it's been overcast ever since!
The ridiculously bandaged woman led from the scene by a WPC. It has all the hallmarks of a media production, and this image will no doubt be one of the 'poster images' for this 'event'.
The confusing thing about the MSM approach is that even real events are covered with fakery. I do not know if that is part of a 'control issue' or whether it is systematic of them lying to us about everything just to keep us away from the truth, no matter what that is, big truths and little truths.
Companies like Apple, pillars of the globalist elites, seem to revel in rubbing our noses in just how dumbed down things really are.
Apple are calling the iPhone X a game changer, like the original iPhone. Talking emojis is their game changer.
There were no comments on this article, but it is pleasing to see so many people calling NASA and other Space Agency fakery out all over the internet now.
Is this what passes for 'journalism' at the Huffington Post? It's little more than a personal polemic tirade by a contributor. So effectively it's someone's blogpost. Why is this high on Google News feed relating to the solar eclipse?
These 'men' are only men in 'legal' terms. They have both given birth to children after natural insemination. (Albeit one of them used a syringe)
What is interesting is that the press are perfectly fine with calling them Mr while describing how they have had children in a way that ONLY a woman can. They go on to say that after having children, they will continue to have irreversible gender reassignment surgery.
I have, and it's blowing my mind. In my investigations into the Zapruder film it was based on the suspicion that the driver and/or passenger had turned and fired. But now, there are two more people sat in between them and the Kennedys.
What is going on?
* * *
Royalty free music used courtesy of:
http://www.reverbnation.com/teknoaxe
More NASA fiction and fantasy, cartoons and pseudo technology.
I will need to think this over and come back to it there has to be a practical solution.
I suspect that there have always been 6 people in the car. A modified version of the Zapruda film with the middle seats removed by CGI was released onto the internet where all us researchers used that version as the basis of our analysis.
Otherwise, the Mandela Effect is 100% true and I am starting to really get worried!
There are a lot of difficulties with this approach, and this is only a quick over view. It is not a proof or a rebuttal. When I saw the 'Missing/Faked History' videos I obviously thought of my own work I did on this article about 20 years ago. To investigate and establish the fundamental truth behind the solar eclipse entries, it would require a doctorate level of investigation. I will aim to do a follow up video on this as soon as I have more time and resource, but I had to just rush this one out!
I went back out as the sun was going down, and was DEFINITIVELY below the moon relative to the horizon, yet the shadow was clearly facing upwards at a slight angle.There is absolutely no doubt, as the sun was setting around the horizon while this was being filmed.
If the sun is at the level of the horizon in the process of setting, how is it causing the shadow of the moon, which is clearly pointing upwards?
For me, this is personally 100% absolute EMPIRICAL proof that the Sun does not cause the moon phases. Explain to me how the sun's light IS NOT lighting the underside of the moon?
Once again I spotted the moon out with the sun and grabbed my camera to try to see if I can work out the angle of the moon phase shadow. I tried to use two lampposts to 'calibrate' and provide a reference point. It very much looks like the sun is lower in the sky than the moon. I am currently trying to get some screen shots to compare. However, perspective and angles are not easy! I shall have to return with another camera another day.
Apologies for the bad audio, it was a very busy main road.
In this book from 1981 when describing Skylab technology it clearly states that the fecal matter was bag and tagged each and every time for storage and return to Earth for medical study.
I take a look at the technical drawing of the Skylab fecal and urine collection unit. And it makes me wonder how it compares with the current ISS procedures.
Notice this is a pictorial book. This is typical of NASA. Their major resource seems to be in presentation. There is not a lot of technical information, but plenty of technical looking photographs and technical 'presentation'. But what are we seeing in those photographs? A real document of events? Or a real document of staged and fake events passed off as real, and woven into a narrative along with fictional elements.
It turned into a lengthy video so had to chop it into two parts.
I will be taking a look at other Space/NASA related books, looking at their general presentation, and also looking for some specific technical insights. Some of these books I have owned for years (one has been with me for every year of my life so far!), and some I have been recently buying with a heavy broken heart for 'academic' research.
Notice this is a pictorial book. This is typical of NASA. Their major resource seems to be in presentation. There is not a lot of technical information, but plenty of technical looking photographs and technical 'presentation'. But what are we seeing in those photographs? A real document of events? Or a real document of staged and fake events passed off as real, and woven into a narrative along with fictional elements.
It turned into a lengthy video so had to chop it into two parts.
I will be taking a look at other Space/NASA related books, looking at their general presentation, and also looking for some specific technical insights. Some of these books I have owned for years (one has been with me for every year of my life so far!), and some I have been recently buying with a heavy broken heart for 'academic' research.
March for Science. I don't know what that means, but it seems to be part of the paradigm's efforts at protecting itself from 'Science Deniers' - or those who need more evidence than just emotions and affirmative language.
Science is a process identified as having the properties 'Observable, Repeatable, Measurable' - Whereas what we seem to have instead in the name of science is 'Science' as a manifestation of Scientism and all it's adherents. Even though it has a canon of data, it's foot soldiers protect the name of science without examining any baseline data or engaging in any scientific principles at all. The behaviour of 'Science' and 'Scientism' in this way is political behaviour, not scientific behaviour, and aligns 'Science' with a cult rather than a process.
I tried to take a look into Coriolis Effect. The resulting video was a bit of a mess, it was a lot more convoluted than I expected. I found it very difficult to find clear and precise descriptions and explanations for Coriolis Effect and it's causes, and they don't really exist. They seem to 'hand-wave' the reasons for Coriolis, with maths that doesn't translate to the full effect, and gravity that seems to come and go as convenient.
Is Coriolis effect like Gravity, Evolution and Relativity? Incomplete and vague theories that are based on a philosophical standpoint but that are regarded as technical fact.
A response to Jeranisms video "Saudi Cleric Was Right: USA Faked Moon Landing - Coriolis Effect Fraud"
youtube.com/watch?v=oCSvx5ONIB8
I also take a look at The Andromeda Strain movie (1971) and remake (2008) for some parallels.
(There appear to be some audio issues, I'll take a look at that and see if I can fix it!!)
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER -
FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted (© ) material or videos the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode
This film has been uploaded to YouTube / Google for non-profit educational purposes only as aloud per sections 107 through 118 of US copyright law (Title 17 US Code) and is not meant in any form to infringe on anyone's copyright.
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html
Capricorn One and the Fakery of Flat Rock.
A review/analysis of the 1977 movie Capricorn One.
Including also a look at The Andromeda Strain (both 1971 and 2008 versions), and the 'live' CBS broadcast of the Apollo 11 moon landing.
In Part One I take a closer look at The Lego Movie and the startlingly blatant imagery, and some of the more subtle memes that are contained.
Part Two to come soon, as well as videos on other movies and Hollywod symbolism!


