When and Why Might We ‘Cancel’ Lawyers? @UCLLaws
When and Why Might We ‘Cancel’ Lawyers?  @UCLLaws
Uploaded October 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
When And Why Might We 'Cancel' Lawyers? Brad Wendel, in conversation with Julie Norris and Steven Vaughan

This event was kindly co-sponsored by Kingsley Napley and the Centre for Ethics and Law at UCL Laws.

About this event

Lawyers take pride in a professional tradition of representing unpopular clients, understanding it as a contribution to the rule of law and the practice of toleration in a polarized society. This does not mean, however, that lawyers are fully insulated from criticism for the clients they represent. Much of the frustration experienced by lawyers who are criticized for representing unpopular clients arises from what lawyers see as the public's inability to understand the rule of law and the function of the legal system in resolving conflicts over rights and justice.

In his new book, Canceling Lawyers, Brad Wendel (Edwin H. Woodruff Professor of Law at Cornell Law School) draws on a series of case studies to argue that there is genuine value in a system of formal law that aims at settling social disagreement, but that is not the whole story. Public criticism of lawyers may reflect the sense that the legal system has fallen short of ideals of fairness and inclusiveness. Accepting a certain amount of public criticism is necessary to avoid a dangerous isolation of the legal profession from accountability to the broader political community, or from the humanity of lawyers being submerged by their professional role.

This ‘In Conversation’ event will see Brad discuss a number of the ideas and arguments in his book with Julie Norris (Partner in the Regulatory Team at Kingsley Napley) and Steven Vaughan (Professor of Law and Professional Ethics at University College London).

About the speaker

Professor W. Bradley Wendel is one of the world’s leading legal ethics’ scholars, trained as both a lawyer and a philosopher. He has a B.A. from Rice University, a J.D. from Duke Law School, and an LL.M. and J.S.D. from Columbia Law School, in legal philosophy.

Before entering academia, Professor Wendel clerked for Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Fairbanks, Alaska, and practiced as a products liability litigator in Seattle. He started his academic career at Washington and Lee Law School and moved to Cornell Law School in 2014.

Find out more
kingsleynapley.co.uk
ucl.ac.uk/ethics-law
When and Why Might We ‘Cancel’ Lawyers?Corporate BordersUK Trade Marks Act 1994 at 30: Going Forward, Looking BackwardsOn EcocideHow (not) to Argue Against MeritocracyNo Mediation Privilege as yet. Why not?LAWS0296: Economic Analysis of Law: Corporations and MarketsAccessibility and the Limits of UK Equality Law: Time for a UK Accessibility Act?Reforming Article 102 TFEU: A European Social Contract Approach?The Public ConstitutionThe Future of the ECHR - In Europe and UK‘Can Law Stop Criminals Misusing AI?’ – UCL Master of Laws (LLM) online open event
UCL Laws |

When and Why Might We ‘Cancel’ Lawyers?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER