Fifty Shades Of Grey Is Subtle Promotion of Paedophilia - Dr. Judith Reisman article - 16/8/13 bovvered84 2013-09-16 | The Kinsey Syndrome - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVwbVRNwm6sArticle - http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2013/03/50_shades_of_gr.htmlFull broadcast - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2XgR2sSqlQAlan Watt's website - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.comAlan Watt Videos playlist - http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL57D0C090AE7870EA
The B-org Collective - The Queen bovvered84 2009-09-02 | The Queen Bee, the quintessential psychopathic control freak.
Predictive Programming - The B-org Collective: Unimatrix One (Part 2 of 2) bovvered84 2009-09-01 | Marina Sirtis (Troi): "The interesting thing about them is that they're joined mentally. So actually, it's like a hive of bees." Levar Burton (Geordi La Forge): "I think ultimately for human beings losing our individuality is our biggest fear, and the Borg represent this all-engulfing presence." Gates McFadden (Beverly Crusher): "They're something that you can actually see. Metaphorically speaking technology becoming in our lives, people having such strong relationships with their computers that they forget how to interact socially and they lose humanity. And that we so demand so many things of ourselves and our children that we actually just forget how to have the full range of emotions and be compassionate and build a community." Jan. 2, 2009 Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" on RBN: Dr. WHO Hyping Incredible-Inevitable mp3 - http://cuttingthroughthematrix.net/CTTM2009/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_226_Dr_WHO_Hyping_Incredible-Inevitable_Jan022009.mp3 transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_226_Dr_WHO_Hyping_Incredible-Inevitable_Jan022009.html Topics of show covered in following links: CBC Flu Archive - http://www.archive.org/details/CBC_Flu_Archive The Age of Transitions - http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=26320 Horror Emergency Laws Set To Kill - http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=736 - by Gabriel O'Hara - Jan. 2, 2008 Environment minister Sammy Wilson: I still think man-made climate change is a con - http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/environment/environment-minister-sammy-wilson-i-still-think-manmade-climate-change-is-a-con-14123972.html - Dec. 31, 2008 Taken from the transcript: "Amber: I want to just mention something about Star Trek ... I noticed that every time there's food, every time they eat or there's food, it's always just vegetables and fruit! Alan: That's right, except for the Klingons, the Klingons like some sort of protein manufactured things, they're like worms, they moved, because they were clinging on to the past, the old warrior types. That's what that meant, the Klingons. Amber: Oh really? Alan: But everyone else, you're right, they're all vegetarians. Amber: It's bright green and very blue and stuff, could that be the genetically-modified stuff? Alan: Well, I've no doubt, totally synthetic as well, on the Enterprise. It's interesting that that whole series was predictive programming though; because, as I say, they gave you a setting to do with the world but they put the setting in space, because it was about multiculturalism, all the different aliens they'd meet and all of the worlds, which were just countries, would come in under this big UN agenda. That's really what it was showing you: it was the future and the types that all joined for international / interstellar space free trade that were the good guys, but anyone who said 'no we don't want to join you' were always portrayed as bad and evil and primitive. Amber: Right, the united federation of planets. Alan: That's right. In one of the shows too, they also showed you a planet where no one died, they'd conquered the death; and, so the whole idea was to get Kirk in there so as he could infect one of them, who were so bored at living forever, with a disease. They showed you all these people crowding outside the Star Trek, just millions of faces pressing in with overpopulation. You were getting all these messages from fiction, that now affect us today because that's what the programming was for, our own age group growing up to where we are today. Amber: Pretty much every episode I watch, I'm like I totally know what you're talking about, with the predictive programming because I can relate it to what's really happening. Alan: It is and the Red Berry you know, Gene Roddenberry, he was a member of NASA, and, of course, he was getting the stuff from NASA, who helped plan the scientific future they're going to bring in and he was told to go home and write stories around them and that's how they could put that into his episodes. Amber: Really? So, it wasn't just completely his imagination? Alan: No, never, these guys have no better imaginations than anyone else. They're always given - same with the sci-fi writers, they all belong to the Futurist Association and the big Foundations, they will fund you to write stories around particular topics and make them sound interesting; but, they'll tell you the main details to write around. Amber: So, they'll have meetings and stuff and then they'll just draw their material from that? Alan: Yes." ----- The Microchip Agenda http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9689.0 The Borg Agenda http://lenonhonorfilms.com/BorgAgendaPart1A.html (This documentary can be downloaded from here - http://lenonhonorfilms.com/videodownloadpage.html )
Predictive Programming - The B-org Collective: Unimatrix One (Part 1 of 2) bovvered84 2009-09-01 | Borg Queen: "Human, we used to be exactly like them; flawed, weak, organic. But we evolved to include the synthetic. Now we use both to attain perfection." This idea of perfection is also mentioned in The Stepford Wives - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81Kyc2HsaJI Jan. 2, 2009 Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" on RBN: Dr. WHO Hyping Incredible-Inevitable mp3 - http://cuttingthroughthematrix.net/CTTM2009/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_226_Dr_WHO_Hyping_Incredible-Inevitable_Jan022009.mp3 transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_CTTM_LIVEonRBN_226_Dr_WHO_Hyping_Incredible-Inevitable_Jan022009.html Topics of show covered in following links: CBC Flu Archive - http://www.archive.org/details/CBC_Flu_Archive The Age of Transitions - http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=26320 Horror Emergency Laws Set To Kill - http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=736 - by Gabriel O'Hara - Jan. 2, 2008. Environment minister Sammy Wilson: I still think man-made climate change is a con - http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/environment/environment-minister-sammy-wilson-i-still-think-manmade-climate-change-is-a-con-14123972.html - Dec. 31, 2008. Taken from the transcript: "Amber: I want to just mention something about Star Trek. I've been watching the original, I don't have cable but every once in a while, Ill just download something and watch it and I heard you talk about it and I always got a kick out of the original ones so I thought I'd watch them again, to see what you were talking about. But, I noticed that every time there's food, every time they eat or there's food, it's always just vegetables and fruit! Alan: That's right, except for the Klingons, the Klingons like some sort of protein manufactured things, they're like worms, they moved, because they were clinging on to the past, the old warrior types. That's what that meant, the Klingons. Amber: Oh really? Alan: But everyone else, you're right, they're all vegetarians. Amber: It's bright green and very blue and stuff, could that be the genetically-modified stuff? Alan: Well, I've no doubt, totally synthetic as well, on the Enterprise. It's interesting that that whole series was predictive programming though; because, as I say, they gave you a setting to do with the world but they put the setting in space, because it was about multiculturalism, all the different aliens they'd meet and all of the worlds, which were just countries, would come in under this big UN agenda. That's really what it was showing you: it was the future and the types that all joined for international / interstellar space free trade that were the good guys, but anyone who said 'no we don't want to join you' were always portrayed as bad and evil and primitive. Amber: Right, the united federation of planets. Alan: That's right. In one of the shows too, they also showed you a planet where no one died, they'd conquered the death; and, so the whole idea was to get Kirk in there so as he could infect one of them, who were so bored at living forever, with a disease. They showed you all these people crowding outside the Star Trek, just millions of faces pressing in with overpopulation. You were getting all these messages from fiction, that now affect us today because that's what the programming was for, our own age group growing up to where we are today. Amber: Pretty much every episode I watch, I'm like I totally know what you're talking about, with the predictive programming because I can relate it to what's really happening. Alan: It is and the Red Berry you know, Gene Roddenberry, he was a member of NASA, and, of course, he was getting the stuff from NASA, who helped plan the scientific future they're going to bring in and he was told to go home and write stories around them and that's how they could put that into his episodes. Amber: Really? So, it wasn't just completely his imagination? Alan: No, never, these guys have no better imaginations than anyone else. They're always given - same with the sci-fi writers, they all belong to the Futurist Association and the big Foundations, they will fund you to write stories around particular topics and make them sound interesting; but, they'll tell you the main details to write around. Amber: So, they'll have meetings and stuff and then they'll just draw their material from that? Alan: Yes." ----- The Microchip Agenda http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9689.0 The Borg Agenda http://lenonhonorfilms.com/BorgAgendaPart1A.html (This documentary can be downloaded from here - http://lenonhonorfilms.com/videodownloadpage.html )
Teilhard De Chardin Predicted A Kind Of World Mind bovvered84 2009-08-31 | Regan MacNeil: "Father, do priests believe in ESP?" Father Philip Lamont: "Some do. In fact a French [Jesuit] priest [Pierre] Teilhard de Chardin thought that we'd all come together eventually in some sort of mental telepathy. A kind of world mind in which everybody would share. Regan MacNeil: "When's that supposed to happen?" Father Philip Lamont: "I don't know. Father Merrin himself believed that with modern scientific research it could happen quite soon - I mean the kind of research that Dr Tuskin is doing. But if it happens before we're ready, we may find ourselves pointing in the wrong direction, towards Satan." ----- Teilhard de Chardin is a suspect in the Piltdown Man hoax, something which had supported Darwinism. A belief, or faith in Darwinian evolution is a prerequisite for being shephered into the next stage of "evolution" - transhumanism, or post-humanism. Is Teilhard de Chardin's world mind simply the hive mind of a brainchipped population, discussed and planned at world science meetings? The Microchip Agenda http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9689.0 The Borg Agenda http://lenonhonorfilms.com/BorgAgendaPart1A.html (This documentary can be downloaded from here - http://lenonhonorfilms.com/videodownloadpage.html ) The Age Of Transitions http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2615496775977574586 "Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance" NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE National Science Foundation / Department Of Commerce - sponsored report - June 2002 PDF file (7MB) - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/NBIC_pre_publication.pdf - NBIC 405-page report "Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology" NSET Workshop Report - National Science Foundation - March 2001 Logistical, Editing and Management Assistance by: International Technology Research Institute, World Technology (WTEC) Division, Loyola College PDF file (3MB) - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/March2001NSF_Societal_Implications_of_Nanoscience_and_Nanotechnology.pdf - NSET 280-page report
Back to Reality - Waking Up From The Game bovvered84 2009-08-08 | Conditioning through comedy. In this episode of Red Dwarf series 5 called Back to Reality, which originally aired in March 1992, the crew is attacked by a giant "despair squid". This results in a group hallucination which convinces the crew that what they had thought was reality was actually a computer game they had been playing for the last four years - à la The Matrix. There was an episode of Red Dwarf series 2 called Better Than Life - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ2nprWlciA - which originally aired in September 1988, which also featured an artificial reality game - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094535/episodes There was also an episode of Red Dwarf series 6 called Gunmen of the Apocalypse, originally aired in October 1993, which involved an artificial reality computer simulation game - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fljPZ3J8tgI In the 9th and probably final series, Back to Earth, the crew of Red Dwarf finds out that they are fictional characters, which also happens in the movie spin-off of the dark British sitcom The League of Gentleman. The crew go back to earth and meet Craig Charles (the actor who plays Dave Lister) on the set of the longest running soap opera in the world - Tavistock Institute creation and behaviour modification tool, Coronation Street, in which Craig Charles plays a taxi driver. They also meet their "creator", who makes references to Blade Runner, and also points out that "nothing lasts forever, NOT EVEN BANKS." But it turns out that it was all another collective hallucination caused by another despair squid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmEEaNYkFbs This seems to be a deliberate confusion of reality, artificial reality and fiction.
Whos A Bad Robot? bovvered84 2009-08-06 | Who? Why? ----- This is what is shown to us at the end of the credits every time we watch hit tel-levi-sion PROGRAMMES such as Lost, or Fringe.
Frontman Kevin Warwick Promotes The Dehumanization Of Humanity bovvered84 2009-04-07 | There's also a clip of Kevin Warwick in the documentary film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586Warwick shamelessly exploits the fears of a young mother to promote microchip implants.The transhumanist agenda is out in the open today. Kevin Warwick has spent the last few years promoting himself, and his "pioneering" work i.e. pretending that his own microchip implant was the first one of its kind. In reality, this was all done decades ago.Now he is trying to persuade the public that we want a brain chip.There have been international science meetings on the brainchip since 2001 - the first one was held at Loyola University, Louisiana.Scientists at these meetings explained that the brainchips are ready now, and all that is necessary is to condition the public to accept them. They said that this would be done (not could be) by promoting them in movies, TV programmes, novels, cartoons for children, etc. This propaganda started years ago, and it will snowball in the near future.Kevin Warwick is obviously part of this conditioning process, telling us that our brains are not good enough, and that because of obesity, our bodies are pretty worthless too.Warwick hints at the end result of the brainchips, but he never openly explains what scientists at the Loyola Unversity meeting have admitted i.e. once there are enough people chipped, they will hear the buzzing of thoughts going back and forth between people's chips and the regional supercomputers (which are already set up) and this will be indistinguishable from their own thoughts. They admitted that it will be impossible to perceive of oneself as a separate distinct individual - just like the Borg, or the Cybermen.In the following mp3 Alan Watt discusses Warwick and the agenda he is pushing:Dec 20, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb "Brain Implant Familiarization and the Front-Men Who Plug-It"mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_Blurb_BrainImplant_Dec202006.mp3transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Brain_Implant_Familarization_Dec20_06.htmlWarwick also appears in this documentary, pushing the same transhumanist agenda:Building Gods Rough Cut - http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1079797626827646234In this lecture, Warwick calls the human brain "pathetic":LIFT Conference || Kevin Warwick (2008) - http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=4476913308646425612Warwick also appeared in this Times article from May, 2007: Would an implanted chip help to keep my child safe? - http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article1788169.eceIn the wake of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, every type of child monitoring device is in demandAnd this Toronto Star article from December 2006: One generation is all they need - http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/136744The above article is discussed by Alan Watt in the following blurb:Dec 13, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb"A Chip Off the Ashlar or the Old Masonic Block"mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_MasonicChip_Dec1306.mp3transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_A_Chip_off_the_Old_Masonic_Block.htmlThe brainchip is a threat to human sentience. Unfortunately, many superficial people who live to "keep up with the Joneses" will unquestioningly accept one, having never valued their own individuality in the first place. They will swallow all the propaganda and fall for the marketing campaigns, because such people are extremely easy to manipulate.The rest of us must refuse to become the Borg/Cybermen.-----See also The Age of Transitions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdzepK-LVtUhttp://www.theageoftransitions.comThe Microchip Agenda - http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9689.0The Borg Agenda - http://lenonhonor.com/the-borg-agenda-series(This documentary can be downloaded from here - http://www.lenonhonorfilms.com/videodownloadpage.html )"Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance"NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/NBIC_pre_publication.pdf"Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology"NSET Workshop Report - National Science Foundation - March 2001 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/March2001NSF_Societal_Implications_of_Nanoscience_and_Nanotechnology.pdf
Frontman Kevin Warwick Promotes The Elimination Of Human Individuality bovvered84 2009-04-03 | There's also a clip of Kevin Warwick in the documentary film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586Warwick shamelessly exploits the fears of a young mother to promote microchip implants.The transhumanist agenda is out in the open today. Kevin Warwick has spent the last few years promoting himself, and his "pioneering" work i.e. pretending that his own microchip implant was the first one of its kind. In reality, this was all done decades ago.Now he is trying to persuade the public that we want a brain chip.There have been international science meetings on the brainchip since 2001 - the first one was held at Loyola University, Louisiana.Scientists at these meetings explained that the brainchips are ready now, and all that is necessary is to condition the public to accept them. They said that this would be done (not could be) by promoting them in movies, TV programmes, novels, cartoons for children, etc. This propaganda started years ago, and it will snowball in the near future.Kevin Warwick is obviously part of this conditioning process, telling us that our brains are not good enough, and that because of obesity, our bodies are pretty worthless too.Warwick hints at the end result of the brainchips, but he never openly explains what scientists at the Loyola Unversity meeting have admitted i.e. once there are enough people chipped, they will hear the buzzing of thoughts going back and forth between people's chips and the regional supercomputers (which are already set up) and this will be indistinguishable from their own thoughts. They admitted that it will be impossible to perceive of oneself as a separate distinct individual - just like the Borg, or the Cybermen.In the following mp3 Alan Watt discusses Warwick and the agenda he is pushing:Dec 20, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb "Brain Implant Familiarization and the Front-Men Who Plug-It"mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_Blurb_BrainImplant_Dec202006.mp3transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_Brain_Implant_Familarization_Dec20_06.htmlWarwick also appears in this documentary, pushing the same transhumanist agenda:Building Gods Rough Cut - http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=1079797626827646234In this lecture, Warwick calls the human brain "pathetic":LIFT Conference || Kevin Warwick (2008) - http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=4476913308646425612Warwick also appeared in this Times article from May, 2007: Would an implanted chip help to keep my child safe? - http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article1788169.eceIn the wake of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, every type of child monitoring device is in demandAnd this Toronto Star article from December 2006: One generation is all they need - http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/136744The above article is discussed by Alan Watt in the following blurb:Dec 13, 2006 Alan Watt Blurb"A Chip Off the Ashlar or the Old Masonic Block"mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/audio/Alan_Watt_MasonicChip_Dec1306.mp3transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_A_Chip_off_the_Old_Masonic_Block.htmlThe brainchip is a threat to human sentience. Unfortunately, many superficial people who live to "keep up with the Joneses" will unquestioningly accept one, having never valued their own individuality in the first place. They will swallow all the propaganda and fall for the marketing campaigns, because such people are extremely easy to manipulate.The rest of us must refuse to become the Borg/Cybermen.-----See also The Age of Transitions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdzepK-LVtUhttp://www.theageoftransitions.comThe Microchip Agenda - http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=9689.0The Borg Agenda - http://lenonhonor.com/the-borg-agenda-series(This documentary can be downloaded from here - http://www.lenonhonorfilms.com/videodownloadpage.html )"Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance"NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/NBIC_pre_publication.pdf"Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology"NSET Workshop Report - National Science Foundation - March 2001 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/March2001NSF_Societal_Implications_of_Nanoscience_and_Nanotechnology.pdf
So You Can Keep An Eye On Me? bovvered84 2008-12-14 | Part of this clip is used in the documentary film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586Ian Fleming's psychopathic secret agent, 007 (Tubal-cain, Sir John Dee) is microchipped so that his boss, M, can keep an all-seeing-eye on him.This is one of dozens of examples of microchip implants being shown in movies and television PROGRAMMEs to predictively programme the public to accept them as inevitable i.e. movies/TV are used as propaganda tools with which to condition the public to think and feel in ways required of them by the ruling elite. James Bond is a particularly powerful character to utilise this technique with due to the scale of his ongoing popularity amongst men and women alike, in various age groups.Scientists at the international meetings on the brain chip, held at Loyola University, said that the brain chip is completely ready to go. All that is necessary, they said, is to condition the public to accept the brain chip, which would be (not could be) done by promoting them through movies, novels, TV programmes and cartoons for children.How long will it be before internationally recognised hero Mr Bond has a brain chip to add to the RFID chip he was given in 2006?Bond's psychopathy is alluded to at the end of the clip.M: I would ask you if you could remain emotionally detached, but I don't think that's your problem is it Bond.Bond: No.Then M reminds the viewer of the purpose of RFID chips - "Don't worry about keeping in touch; we'll know where you are."Also note the thinly veiled fictionalised reference to the 9/11 "put options", which were essentially dismissed as irrelevant by the farcical 9/11 Commission Report whitewash.
Eventually It Will Become Universal bovvered84 2008-12-10 | This clip is included in the film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586This clip attempts to predictively programme the audience to accept the introduction of ID cards and microchip implants. Predictive programming is explained by Alan Watt in this video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rR4TwMiZq0Set in the near future, Stephen Ezard (played by Benedict Cumberbatch*) returns to London for the funeral of his brother, (played by Max Beesley who also stars in Survivors, another BBC vehicle for predictive programming) and finds a world that has changed subtly but significantly from the one he left - biometric ID cards are compulsory, passenger profiling at all major transport hubs is common practice, public spaces are monitored 24/7 by digital cameras and armed police patrol the streets.http://www.bbc.co.uk/drama/lastenemy/welcome.shtmlIn this clip, Stephen is physically stopped by the police while he is minding his own business, and the police ask for his ID card.Stephen: "I don't have any."Police: "Can you put your right index finger on here please."Stephen: "I don't want to do that."Police: "Then we can iris scan you."Stephen: "I haven't broken any law. I know who I am and I don't have to prove that to anyone."It turns out Ezard, who had previously helped the government with their new "Total Information Awareness" (as opposed to Total Information Network) database in exchange for funding for his mathematical research, had been microchipped without his knowledge.Stephen then discusses "Operation Tag Me" with the Home Secretary. She described it as "the trial of a harmless tag that ceases to function after two years. The body then flushes it out - no side effects whatsoever."Stephen: "But the guinea pigs weren't told."Home Secretary: (laughs) "These trials go on all the time Stephen, all over the world."Stephen: "It killed a thousand people and you burnt the bodies. You destroyed the evidence."The Home Secretary then excuses these criminal actions by explaining that it would have been a criminal act not to have covered it up.Stephen: "That's what happens when you view a human as less than sacred, when you treat someone as a piece of data, a barcode. When you violate them with internal tags they become less than human and you start to imagine the impossible, and then you find yourself doing it."Home Secretary: "This is a good government."Stephen: "What happens when it isn't?"Obviously, this government is not a good government, given what has just been admitted. And given that such trials go on all the time all over the world, where and when is there ever a "good government"?The Home Secretary then reveals her own microchip implant, arguing that she (someone who is willing to deceive and to cover up mass murder for the government) doesn't feel violated, or less human. She then gives the standard spiel we have heard so often from Verichip, before announcing that "eventually it'll become universal, starting at school age - a tag for life."She even goes on to say that "it'll give back to the honest ordinary citizen, freedom of movement. I thought it would be a price worth paying."The price she is talking about is the constant monitoring of anything and everything you do, at all times.This is what is planned for us, if we go along with it.Our minds are being prepared to accept this as inevitable. But resistance is NOT futile.-----* Benedict Cumberbatch is the son of actors Timothy Carlton (birth name Timothy Carlton Cumberbatch) and Wanda Ventham - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_CumberbatchHe recently played Sherlock Holmes in the BBC adaptation Sherlock (originally shown on the BBC in July/August 2010).
Meat-Eater Used As An Insult bovvered84 2008-11-13 | This clip is included in the film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586This is one example of predictive programming - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rR4TwMiZq0 - involving microchip implants.WARNer Bros show us that in the future an "organically bio-engineered microchip is sewn into the skin. Sensors all over the city can zero in on anyone at any time."The police officer can't conceive of police work before it was developed, but the old-fashioned hero sees it for what it is; "this fascist crap makes me want to puke".Then he is called a "meat-eater" - by the guy who played the warden in The Shawshank Redemption - as though in the future someone who eats meat is looked down upon.
Predictive Programming - Attack on London in 2012? bovvered84 2008-11-04 | A nuclear attack on London leads to "controversial new security measures". Are we being predictively programmed? Alan Watt on Predictive Programming - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rR4TwMiZq0
Evil: God knows nothing of the potential of the microchip. bovvered84 2008-09-29 | This clip is included in the film Predictive Programming and the Human Microchipping Agenda - http://vimeo.com/26487586Here we see a representation of evil talking about gaining knowledge and becoming a God. And he goes on to suggest that the microchip can (and will) be used for evil purposes.The evil one is talking to his minions:"I let him keep me here [in the fortress of ultimate darkness] in order to lull him into a false sense of security. When I have the map I will be free. And the world will be different because I have understanding."Horned minion: "Understanding of what master?""Digital watches. And soon I shall have understanding of video cassette recorders and car telephones. And when I have understanding of them, I shall have understanding of computers. And when I have understanding of computers, I shall be the supreme being.God isn't interested in technology. He knows nothing of the potential of the microchip and the silicon revolution."Then evil demonstrates mind control as he possesses one of the dwarves who have stolen the map from God, just as Randall was talking about using the map to find ancient Babylon.At the end of the movie, evil talks of "no less a work than the overthrowing of creation itself. We will remake man in our image, not his."Is this about the Great Work?Then he tells one of his minions "we must plan a new world together. This time we'll start it properly.Tell me about computers."Time Bandits - Part 10/12 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn5e7pn5DNAWhen the evil one gets the map back from Kevin, his eyes start to glow red, but he is interrupted by the cavalry.Similar demon eyes can be seen in this advert put out by the Conservative Party - http://www.britishcouncil.org/upfront/gfx/01_newdanger_small.jpg - just before Tony Blair came to power on May 1st, or Beltane - former Labour Party leader John Smith died of a heart attack, having given a speech the night before during which he said: "The opportunity to serve our country - that is all we ask."Incidentally, Robin Cook MP also died of heart failure, weeks after having written this article - http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jul/08/july7.developmentWhen God turns up at the end of the movie to save the day, he brings one of the dwarves back to life. And he explains that he gave the map to the dwarves to test his handiwork.Kevin asks why God could allow those people to die, and why we have to have evil. God says "I think it's something to do with free will."Time Bandits - Part 11/12 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tGFKoYbu3EGod encourages the dwarves to hurry up and not waste any more time:"They'll think I've lost control again and put it all down to evolution."And Kevin isn't allowed to go back with them:"He's got to stay here to carry on the fight."When he returns home again Kevin finds that the piece of concentrated evil which the dwarves missed has caused his parents' house to burn down. He shouts to them "Mum, Dad, it's evil. Don't touch it."But their minds are distracted by the loss of their material possessions, so they do.Time Bandits - Part 12/12 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUOzxEZ44pc
A World Congress And Human Rights For Robots - Part 2 of 2 bovvered84 2008-09-27 | This is conditioning for the transhumanist agenda, blurring the line between humans and machines, as the elite prepare to merge the two in reality. In the movie the robot is an individual who gradually becomes more like a human being. First he opens a bank account (is that the most human trait?) then he has an upgrade which allows human-like movement of his facial features, then he starts wearing clothes. Later he is given a human-like outer appearance and then he designs himself a central nervous system, and various artificial organs which allow him to become more human-like - and they also allow humans to become more robot-like. Then he falls in love with Portia - the descendant of his original "masters". (It was suggested earlier on that Portia's grandmother actually fell in love with the far less human-like "Andrew".) And finally he alters himself to allow him to age, and to die, as seen in this clip. In trying to acquire the right to call himself a human being, and to marry another human being, he is told that "society can tolerate an immortal robot but we will never tolerate an immortal human. It arouses too much jealousy, too much anger." Jumping further into the future, just seconds after "Andrew" dies he succeeds in acquiring human rights for himself, by being categorised as a human being. Society did not therefore have to tolerate an immortal human being. The President of the World Congress refers to "Andrew" first as a robot, and then as the oldest living human being in recorded history (other than Methuselah and other Biblical figures) although he actually dies as she is saying it. This blurs the distinction between humans and robots, and actually suggests that the new classification means that "Andrew" was human from the moment he was first switched on - 5:15pm on April 3, 2005 - when he was unambiguously a robot. There is also a hint that the nurse is an upgrade of the female robot with personality that featured earlier in the movie, which "Andrew" actually attacks with a drill, although it is presented as being a light-hearted moment. The robot nurse actually breaks the law about not harming a human, by assisting Portia in dying. Perhaps this is because at that moment the 3 laws of robotics no longer apply. (Andrew also breaks the third law, by bringing about his own death.) The existence of a world congress in the future is also a piece of predictive programming i.e. conditioning us to accept the idea of a one world government. Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XU788bYTg60
A World Congress And Human Rights For Robots - Part 1 of 2 bovvered84 2008-09-27 | This is conditioning for the transhumanist agenda, blurring the line between humans and machines, as the elite prepare to merge the two in reality. In the movie the robot is an individual who gradually becomes more like a human being. First he opens a bank account (is that the most human trait?) then he has an upgrade which allows human-like movement of his facial features, then he starts wearing clothes. Later he is given a human-like outer appearance and then he designs himself a central nervous system, and various artificial organs which allow him to become more human-like - and they also allow humans to become more robot-like. Then he falls in love with Portia - the descendant of his original "masters". (It was suggested earlier on that Portia's grandmother actually fell in love with the far less human-like "Andrew".) And finally he alters himself to allow him to age, and to die, as seen in part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyUajSJe3fM In trying to acquire the right to call himself a human being, and to marry another human being, he is told that "society can tolerate an immortal robot but we will never tolerate an immortal human. It arouses too much jealousy, too much anger." Jumping further into the future (see part 2) just seconds after "Andrew" dies, he succeeds in acquiring human rights for himself, by being categorised as a human being. Society did not therefore have to tolerate an immortal human being. The President of the World Congress refers to "Andrew" first as a robot, and then as the oldest living human being in recorded history (other than Methuselah and other Biblical figures) although he actually dies as she is saying it. This blurs the distinction between humans and robots, and actually suggests that the new classification means that "Andrew" was human from the moment he was first switched on - 5:15pm on April 3, 2005 - when he was unambiguously a robot. There is also a hint that the nurse is an upgrade of the female robot with personality that featured earlier in the movie, which "Andrew" actually attacks with a drill, although it is presented as being a light-hearted moment. The robot nurse actually breaks the law about not harming a human, by assisting Portia in dying. Perhaps this is because at that moment the 3 laws of robotics no longer apply. (Andrew also breaks the third law, by bringing about his own death.) The existence of a world congress in the future is also a piece of predictive programming i.e. conditioning us to accept the idea of a one world government.
Blurring The Line Between Humans And Robots bovvered84 2008-09-27 | "Andrew" wants to become more human-like so he comes up with "a profound transition from the mechanical to the biological." In the process, he ends up making prosthetic devices and artificial organs which can be used by humans, ultimately blurring the distinction between the two. This is a piece of conditioning for the transhumanist agenda.
