Audit the Court
When Corrupt Cops Get DESTROYED in Court!
updated
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: youtube.com/watch?v=-Pt-D9_Bk2Y
Our Tallahassee’s channel: youtube.com/@ourtallahassee
Court records (Case No. 2023 CT 000845 A001, 2023 CT 000845 A002)- http://bit.ly/42kPvxi
Sources:
Articles-
http://bit.ly/46wpvS7
http://bit.ly/3KwzNZQ
TPD General Order 42- http://bit.ly/46y5JFZ
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.23- http://bit.ly/46CCd0x
Tex. Transp. Code § 545.421- http://bit.ly/4gKAtqA
Ford v. State- http://bit.ly/4nnglNV
Tex. Penal Code § 71.02- http://bit.ly/4mwik17
Tex. Penal Code § 71.01- http://bit.ly/428YUrQ
Munoz v. State- http://bit.ly/3Kegch4
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video 1: youtube.com/watch?v=7DnU4j_gqGY
Original video 2: youtube.com/watch?v=WhhaFpEYsAc
Sources:
Indictment: http://bit.ly/4pxzJJu
Re-indictment: http://bit.ly/420moPD
Georgia Code Of Judicial Conduct- http://bit.ly/3VXS2cY
Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct- http://bit.ly/42tlUBK
Scudder v. Georgia- http://bit.ly/41Wg5N9
Articles-
http://bit.ly/3Viixd4
http://bit.ly/4gD8ucj
http://bit.ly/48kvw5u
http://bit.ly/4gyPUCi
http://bit.ly/4gqzKuq
http://bit.ly/46lPGJN
http://bit.ly/3IrGBas
http://bit.ly/3K4VsIp
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Dusky v. United States- http://bit.ly/42ohk7Q
Pate v. Robinson- http://bit.ly/46jl8Zd
Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.2026- http://bit.ly/47CSogq
Mich. Comp. Laws § 330.2028- http://bit.ly/47IXA2o
Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct- http://bit.ly/47Jqgbt
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1701- http://bit.ly/4pjKajL
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1711- http://bit.ly/46ykyYV
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video 1: youtube.com/watch?v=rNjxw4VWNvc
Vikky's Court Watch’s channel: youtube.com/@Vikkyscourtwatch
Court records: http://bit.ly/47ydCMy
Original video 2: youtube.com/watch?v=mq2WR3REBKw
Crimes & Courtrooms’s channel: youtube.com/@CrimesAndCourtrooms
Court records: http://bit.ly/4m6pJ6U
Sources:
Mich. Comp. Laws § 769.11b- http://bit.ly/4pqLAZQ
Miranda v. Arizona- bit.ly/3xGP9yR
MI R CJC- http://bit.ly/4n2UdrC
Duncan v. Louisiana- http://bit.ly/4m7LumZ
Baldwin v. New York- http://bit.ly/4gdCaN4
MI CONST Art. 1, § 20- http://bit.ly/4mOEpZr
Mich. Comp. Laws § 763.3- http://bit.ly/4pdw6Z0
MCR 4.201- http://bit.ly/3VaEpXQ
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Harris County Pretrial Services- http://bit.ly/3Jl4Ver
Immigration Detainers (ICE)- bit.ly/3UGJEOK
8 C.F.R. § 287.7- http://bit.ly/3JtAfYk
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Harris County Local Rules: http://bit.ly/3UIOqv2
ODonnell v. Harris County Consent Decree: http://bit.ly/4fZK9gE
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.441- http://bit.ly/3HR7btj
Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.40- http://bit.ly/4n0MiuM
Ex parte Buks- http://bit.ly/4 Id2z1
Tex. Transp. Code § 524.012- http://bit.ly/463vr4B
Tex. Transp. Code § 521.242- http://bit.ly/47Iq2kI
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
36th District Court Traffic Violations FAQs- http://bit.ly/45ErTof
Michigan Court Rule 6.615- http://bit.ly/4oAjmv9
36th District Court Dress Code- http://bit.ly/4mLpXkQ
Bank v. Katz- http://bit.ly/4mGXzzZ
Michigan Court Rule 2.407- http://bit.ly/4mgYeZq
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.1701- http://bit.ly/45Qdw1i
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: / @johnlang6593
Patreon: / audittheaudit
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Sources:
Michigan Rules of Evidence- http://bit.ly/4m4RjSP
Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.602a- http://bit.ly/3J0CJxh
Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.81d- http://bit.ly/45puBxx
Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com
Second Channel: youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings.
DISCLAIMER
The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.


