Uploaded August 2021 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
NEW YORK — In a few days it would have been 20 years since the 9/11 attacks killed thousands of people and brought down two of the world’s tallest office towers. Here is the official theory on how and why the towers collapsed:
The structural integrity of the World Trade Center depended on two connected systems of vertical pillars.
A central core of reinforced concrete conveyed vertical loads, while steel pillars were arranged around the perimeter. In combination with horizontal trusses, the outer pillars formed a system for absorption of horizontal loads, caused mainly by wind.
The horizontal trusses also supported 10 centimeter-thick cement slabs in each floor while connecting the two vertical systems, preventing the pillars around the perimeter from falling outwards.
In September of 2005, America’s National Institute of Standards and Technology released its report on why the buildings collapsed. It stated that when the planes struck the towers, the rupturing of their fuel tanks started a fire that buckled and weakened the buildings’ structural steel.
With time, the buckling caused the outer walls to deform, which caused the sudden collapse of the floors above the impact zones.
The report states that the floors below provided little resistance to the tremendous energy of the falling building, allowing the structures to disintegrate very quickly.
A senior materials scientist at independent Norwegian research organization SINTEF later said that it’s much more likely that the final blow was struck by molten aluminum from the fragments of the two planes.
Christian Simensen said such molten aluminum would have seeped into the building’s structure, where it would have made contact with pools of water from the building’s sprinkler system.
Such contact would have caused the aluminum to explode with enough force to greatly weaken the building’s structure.
He said this theory would also explain the many explosions that witnesses heard during the horrifying event.
NEW YORK — In a few days it would have been 20 years since the 9/11 attacks killed thousands of people and brought down two of the world’s tallest office towers. Here is the official theory on how and why the towers collapsed:
The structural integrity of the World Trade Center depended on two connected systems of vertical pillars.
A central core of reinforced concrete conveyed vertical loads, while steel pillars were arranged around the perimeter. In combination with horizontal trusses, the outer pillars formed a system for absorption of horizontal loads, caused mainly by wind.
The horizontal trusses also supported 10 centimeter-thick cement slabs in each floor while connecting the two vertical systems, preventing the pillars around the perimeter from falling outwards.
In September of 2005, America’s National Institute of Standards and Technology released its report on why the buildings collapsed. It stated that when the planes struck the towers, the rupturing of their fuel tanks started a fire that buckled and weakened the buildings’ structural steel.
With time, the buckling caused the outer walls to deform, which caused the sudden collapse of the floors above the impact zones.
The report states that the floors below provided little resistance to the tremendous energy of the falling building, allowing the structures to disintegrate very quickly.
A senior materials scientist at independent Norwegian research organization SINTEF later said that it’s much more likely that the final blow was struck by molten aluminum from the fragments of the two planes.
Christian Simensen said such molten aluminum would have seeped into the building’s structure, where it would have made contact with pools of water from the building’s sprinkler system.
Such contact would have caused the aluminum to explode with enough force to greatly weaken the building’s structure.
He said this theory would also explain the many explosions that witnesses heard during the horrifying event.






![Myocarditis (Enlarged Heart) and COVID Vaccines: Rare Side Effects of Pfizer & Moderna
ATLANTA — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has updated its advice to say males between 12 and 39 might consider waiting eight weeks between first and second doses of Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines to reduce still-rare risk of heart inflammation.
The increase on the minimum approved interval of three and four weeks respectively comes in the wake of several studies linking those vaccines to increases in rates of pericarditis, inflammation of the outer lining of the heart, and myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle.
While incidence of COVID-19-associated cardiac injury or myocarditis are estimated to be 100 times higher than those related to vaccines, and the latters’ symptoms are usually far milder and resolved within weeks, a Nature Reviews Cardiology study suggests one possible mechanism behind the issue is that the immune system might detect the messenger RNA in the vaccines as an antigen, resulting in “the activation of pro-inflammatory cascades and immunological pathways in the heart.[c]”
As so-called mRNA vaccines, both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines package messenger RNA, or the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus, into a lipid nanoparticle carrier in order to program cells to reproduce the coronavirus spike protein so that it can later be recognized by the body’s immune system should it come into contact with the actual virus.
For now, though, there are several active theories about how this process could trigger heart inflammation, with the increased incidence among male patients also suggesting hormone signaling might be involved. Myocarditis (Enlarged Heart) and COVID Vaccines: Rare Side Effects of Pfizer & Moderna](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/f0cLP1a9rBQ/mqdefault.jpg)



