Dutch airline pilot makes plea for flat earth ( subtitles 9 languages ) Gibson225 2020-01-26 | English subtitles : Settings- Subtitles - English united kingdomDeutsch Untertitelung : Einstellungen - Untertitelung- DeutschSottotitolo Italiano : Impostazioni - Sottotitolo- ItalianoSubtitolos Espagnol : Ajustes- Subtitolos - EspagnolSous-titres Francais : Reglages- Sous-titres - Francais Legendas Portugues : Configuracoes - Legendas- PortuguesSubtitrari Romanesc : Setari- Subtitrari - RomanescTeks Bahasa Indonesia : Pengaturan- Subtitle- Bahasa IndonesiaSvenska undertexter- Installingnar -Undertexter- Svenska
Vraag aan ondernemer en wereldreiziger Roelof de Zwart : Is de aarde plat of rond ? Gibson225 2024-09-15 | ...
The moon is at 240 thousand miles distance and not self luminous ...ARE YOU SURE ? Gibson225 2023-02-11 | ...
Flat water shows the real shape of the earth ( English subtitles ) Gibson225 2022-07-15 | Settings - Subtitles- English Met dank aan Youtube kanaal Arakiel de Hoop voor de productie en het editen van deze korte educatiefilm .
Oerknaltheorie gaat het gezond Gronings verstand van Frans Heslinga te boven Gibson225 2022-06-03 | ...
Practice session for upcoming lasertests. 14 km distance . Urk , Netherlands Gibson225 2022-05-19 | ...
Frans Heslinga - The Earthly Truth , short fragment ( english subtitles ) Gibson225 2022-04-27 | For english subtitles please check 'settings' - 'subtitles' -'english '
The moon is close and self luminous Gibson225 2022-04-19 | Watch the moon shining and the craters easily seen with a zoom camera . It can never be as far as they tell us ..
Top dutch astrologer confronted with the flat earth theory ( english subtitles ) Gibson225 2022-04-16 | ...
Windmills flat water proof. See description below vid for more details . Gibson225 2022-03-07 | Camera distance to first windmill : 3.5 kilometers . Distance camera to last windmill : 10.5 kilometers . Camera at 0.5 meters above the water line that means the horizon is at 2.5 kilometers . The first windmill is at 3.5 kilometers , so the horizon as being the alleged curvature of earth starts 1 kilometer before the first windmill . The last windmill is 7 kilometers apart from the first one , that makes a total of 8 ( 7 plus 1) kilometers of curvature we should take into account . 8 kilometers of distance equals 5 meters of curvature . Nice coincident is that the whole yellow bottom part measures exactly 5 meters so none of the yellow part of the last 2 windmills should have remained visible here but should instead have been blocked by the 5 meters of curved water entirely . You notice , however , that the yellow parts are more and more obscured but still you can see they are there. The cause of this optical phenomenon should therefore be sought for in others causes , such as the limitations of the human eye and the atmospheric conditions .
Hitting the red lighthouse of ijmuiden from Egmond aan zee ( 18.2 kilometers ) part 2 Gibson225 2021-06-11 | ...
Lasertest : aiming at the lighthouse of Ijmuiden. ( 18.2 kilometers ) part 1 Gibson225 2021-06-11 | ...
Ijmuiden lighthouses seen from Egmond aan Zee ( 18 kilometers ) Gibson225 2021-06-08 | Ijmuiden pier with the red and green lighthouses at the end . The green lighthouse is 18.8 kilometers from the camera . The red one is 18.2 kilometers .
lasertest 13.7 kilometer Gibson225 2021-03-07 | Testing our red laser : Lighthouse at 13 kilometers .
First try-out with our new (red) laser . Lighthouse at 7.3 kilometers. Gibson225 2020-10-18 | I search of a laser with better divergence we just got this one - a red laser with divergence of 0.3 mRad . Using the beam expander we should get a divergence of under 0.1 mrad . Probably 0.05 even.
Dutch lasertests summer 2020 ( prologue) Gibson225 2020-07-26 | Follow us on this channel to witness our upcoming lasertests this summer of 2020 in order to find the supposed curvature of the earth .
Air is not transparent enough to look through forever! Gibson225 2019-07-06 | And when the air is more clear , perspective causes objects to appear smaller and smaller until the eye or even a telescope can no longer bring it into view. Bottom parts will vanish first because of angular resolution limits of the human eye .
About horizons and objects being blocked ( see description below vid) Gibson225 2019-06-24 | Instead of the alleged curvature of earth being the reason objects on sea getting obscured bottom first , the real reasons for this phenomenon are different than being told . In the first place mainstream science ignores the fact that humans observe the world around us in perspective: parallel lines converge to our eye level just like looking down a long hallway - the walls left and right as well as the ceiling and floor converge to eyelevel , causing us to see what we normally refer to us as 'the horizon'. Lets call this the perspective- horizon . However , the earth is almost never totally flat and the perspective-horizon will almost always get ( partially) blocked by this second ( real ) horizon . In the case above the waves on the water form our first horizon and are higher than the perspective horizon. This causes the windmills that are farther away from this 'real 'horizon to partially get obscured bottom first more and more until they finally have gone totally out of sight. Even if there was no 'real' horizon at all to block our perspective horizon objects would finally still vanish from view bottom first because our eyes are limited - they cannot see angles that are smaller than a certain degree , and the bottom of ships (or in the above case the windmills) will reach this angular resolution limitation earlier than the parts that are higher and therefore will be longer visible than their lower parts.
Inner planets like Venus should not be visible at night in the heliocentric model . Gibson225 2018-04-20 | Questions - how come we see the craters so distinctively from a distance equal to flying around the earth 10 times -387000 km? And what about Venus - how come it is clearly visible at night when the face of earth is pointing to the outer planets?
Our ears cannot HEAR infinitely far , just like our eyes cannot SEE infinitely far Gibson225 2018-03-03 | The boat got out of view due to our limited sight , no 'curvature ' needed .
Dutch lighthouse defies earths curvature Gibson225 2017-11-24 | Lighthouse of Vlieland- one of the islands of the Netherlands -(53.2955149, 5.0585262) seen from the Afsluitdijk , Breezanddijk ( 53°01'16.4"N 5°12'08.3") This Island should remain invisible because of the distance of 32 km and the camera height of 2 meters. We would expect a hidden part of 57 meters . Island (40 mtr) plus lighthouse ( 17 mtr) are together 57 also. Calculation: Camera height : 3 meters so horizon at 6 km . distance to lighthouse 33 km . 33 - 6 = 27 km . 27 x 27 x 00784 = 57 meters of curvature drop Therefore the island and the entire lighthouse should have remained invisible on the 'ball' we supposedly live on.
The moon .. much closer than were told . Gibson225 2017-11-12 | Zooming in on the moon , one clearly sees all details like its craters despite its alleged distance of 384.400 kilometers. That means we are supposed to believe that we can see details on an object that is almost 10 times the distance of going around the earth presuming it were a ball with circumference of 40.000 kilometers .
Jupiter - just a light in the sky , not a planet 675 billion kilometers away . Gibson225 2017-09-17 | Anyone who has done some research with a Nikon p900 or a telescope knows its not possible to see an object like a mountain or any other large object infinately. In fact however , objects disappaer rather quickly out of view because of perspective and any kind of things in the air that block the view. Do some research and find out for yourself that the idea of being able to see Jupiter from a distance that goes beyond imagination is a rather ridiculous statement. We dont know what these 'stars'and 'planets in fact are , but they must be rather close to us and probably a lot smaller than we are being told. They might not even be 'planets 'at all , but rather just lights in our firmament.
Boat out of view .. Earth must be a ball!! Gibson225 2017-07-05 | Boats out of view due to 'earth's curvature' easily pop up again using a good telescope or a Nikon p900 .
40 kilometers lighthouse nikon P900 . Gibson225 2017-04-29 | If me and the lighthouse are both on a ball , the lighthouse should be way below eyelevel at this distance. My eye level is at 35 mtrs , roughly the same as the foot of the lighthouse which stands on a dune of 40 mtrs high. When zoomed in , we clearly see that the lighthouse is right in front of my eyes and there is no noticable drop ; its still at eye level. But the top of it should be 100 meters below eyelevel by now. Calculation: distance to lighthouse 40,2 km = 126 meters curvature drop on a ball 25000 miles in circumference. My eye level : 35 mtrs. Height Island including lighthouse 42 meters plus lighthouse = 60 meters . So if standing on a ball the top of lighthouse should have been approximately 100 meters below eyelevel by now.
The unsolved mystery of the spinning ballearth : where is the drop ? Gibson225 2017-04-08 | The top of this lighthouse ( 33 kilometers) should be 30 meters below my eyelevel due to the alleged curvature . That means i would be sligthly looking down on it by now. But as you can see nothing of that happens and it's still ABOVE my level of sight , showing the fact that we are living on a flat plane inste ad of on a ball.
Mars seen through Nikon p900. Not a planet far away , but just a light in our atmosphere. Gibson225 2017-03-28 | ...
Holland -The Afsluitdijk . Longest ( and flattest ) dam in Europe Gibson225 2017-03-25 | The afsluitdijk in Holland , one of the longest dikes ( actually it is a dam) of the world dividing the North Sea (salt water) from the IJsselmeer ( sweet water) . 20 miles long . This dike has the same height above the water everwhere and therefore should be a reflection of the curving water itself . The main question is : does it curve along with the water or not .. Because no curving dike = no curving water and no curving water = no curving earth !
Impossible on a globe! Lighthouse 32 km , cameraheight 2mtrs above sealevel . Gibson225 2017-03-10 | The debunking of the globe goes on and on. We would expect a hidden part of 57 meter due to the supposed curvature. The top of the lighthouse reaches a height of 58 mtrs including the dune where it stands on. We should therefore only see 1 mtr of the top of it and the Island itself would have remained totally invisible.
Living on a ball with no detectable curvature Gibson225 2016-10-03 | This lighthouse , like all objects far away from us, remains at eyelevel as you can clearly see. If earth would be curved the ground including the lighthouse would be drop 65 meters from my point of perspective, and my eyelevel would be considerably higher than its top, causing me to look down on it. Since that is not the case , this means earth does not curve . Or..... she is waaaaay bigger ; ) !
Challenging the Ball: lighthouse Netherlands 36,5 km Nikon P900 Gibson225 2016-08-01 | Lighthouse of Vlieland ( Netherlands ) seen from the afsluitdijk ( Den Oever) next to the statue of Dr Ir Cornelis Lely ( engineer of this project ) Distance from camera to lighthouse : 36,5 km . Camera height 9 mtrs ( dike is 7.5 meters plus the camera lens at 1.5 mtrs = 9 meters) , so the horizon is at 10,7 km. We will calculate the curvature of the earth over a distance of (36,5 minus 10,7 ) 25,8 km. Wiki says: sqrt(radius^2 + distance^2)-radius so the expected hidden part due to the curvature of the earth would be 52 mtrs. Wikipedia also states that the light itself( the part above the white 'ring') is at a height of 51 mtrs above sealevel. And this is where the problem begin : why do we still see the whole lighthouse of 17 meters while we would only have been able to see only the upper 5 meters of it , the part above the white 'ring 'where the actual light is? The whole lighthouse including the tower is 17 meters long and it stands on a high dune of 40 mtrs . A total of 57 meters of which 52 meters would have been invisible because of the alleged curvature of the earth. This vid is no direct proof of a flat earth , but it does show that this would be impossible on a ball earth with circumference of 40.000 km .
