Talking Points: Voting is invalid because I can't convince anyone... @NoToPseudoscience

Uploaded August 2012 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago

Yes... Someone really did make this particular argument.

My response follows.

Talking Points: Voting is invalid because I cant convince anyone...

Cult murders a baby - Why I have no respect...

RE: RE: Educating NephilimFree - Part 1 (3/4)

Creationist Name & Shame Series - NephilimFree revisited (2/2)

Talking Points: Police and Law Enforcement

RE: RE: Educating NephilimFree - Part 1 (2/4)

Not-So-Critical analysis of NephilimFrees Educating The Dodo

$Creationist Name & Shame Series - True.Origin 3 of 3 PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. Im citing Fair Use under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA. http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf Also Fair Dealing under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4 Censorship is NOT a valid argument. This is a video series that does not try to explain Evolution, does not try to refute peoples arguments, and does not attempt to engage people in debate about the provisions involved in Evolutionary Biology or the other, unrelated sciences that Creationists try to use. The sad and simple truth is that you cannot reach many of these Creationists with facts and evidence as they are too closed minded to accept it. In addition, many of them are so inured and hopelessly dependant on their belief system and have been convinced by their Evangelical ministers (or Rabbis or Imams) that they will fight dirty to protect their belief even if that belief is not under attack by science. The only recourse for these people is ridicule. Thunderf00t has his video series on why people laugh at Creationists and this is designed to complement that. He has more scientific knowledge than I do (Im not a scientist) and can explain the science behind his refutations of creationists. The purpose of my video series is to out Creationists whereve I come across them and show other people, using their own words, just how stupid, fanatical, unreasoning and vile these creationists really are. Each video in the series will address a single Creationist, their infractions, and the evidence that they have committed these infractions. Never again will a Creationist be able to make the claim that they havent taken anything out of context, because I will show them for the liars that they are. Never will they be able to make a claim that has been refuted, because I will point them to the countless sources, references, websites and videos that disprove their arguments. Never again will Creationists be able to sit there with a strawman representation of Evolution, such as assigning Cosmology, Physics, Gravity, Abiogenesis, Random Chance, Something from nothing or any other claim that has nothing to do with Evolution, because I will respond with proper scientific definitions and point out where theyre making claims that have no basis in reality. Never again will Creationists be able to shift the burden of proof, because each and every time they do, I will provide the Onus Probandi explanation and why the Burden of Proof rests with them to prove that their God exists, and never again will Creationists tell me Im being a hypocrite by insisting they have the burden of proof, because I will point out that Evolution has met and continues to meet the burden of proof on a daily basis as new discoveries are made. I will expose claims made based on hoaxes, I will point out the errors in their arguments, and I will, ultimately, name and shame these Creationists. This video continues a response to an Essay by Jorge Fernandez entitled Talk Origins: Deception by Omission, as responded to by Mike Dunford.$