proto57
The Roman Dodecahedron: An Oil Lamp Stand?
updated
proto57.wordpress.com/2015/09/11/the-1665-marci-letter-a-forgery
There are, to me, many problems with this letter which strongly question its authenticity. These problems are outlined in the above linked post. But the video demonstrates how the supposed fold lines and seals on the letter, and more, make no sense whatsoever. They make no sense when compare to other letters in the Kircher Carteggio, but also in a general context.
I believe it most probable that Wilfrid Voynich created, or had created for him, this letter as an attempt to validate a forged Voynich Manuscript. But even if the Voynich were real, which I doubt BTW, the letter may have been created to build a false provenance for it, by attaching it to the mentions of some other mysterious herbal which was mentioned in Kircher's letters.
For an overview of my Modern Forgery Theory: proto57.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/the-modern-forgery-hypothesis
For the supposed provenance which this Marci letter points to: proto57.wordpress.com/2020/04/19/the-voynich-has-no-provenance
As always, comments and criticism are welcome.
I have no idea who the singer is, and wanted to put this up on Youtube to see if anyone has an idea.
Dick Charles Recording Studio recorded many well known singers and groups, but I suspect the singer here may not be famous. Perhaps they were buying a demo record to try and break into the industry. But I have no way of knowing, and can't recognize the singer, myself.
Many different people have recorded these songs, and I've listened to a few of them on Youtube. Some are close I think, like Ed Ames, and Robert Goule, but not close enough to be them. And I am unsure if this is from the 50's, 60's, or 70's. What does the Hive Mind think?
The record was pretty dirty, and had some mold on it which was pretty bad. I cleaned it as well as I could, but there is still lot of pop and hiss. I recorded it using a Technics SL-B101 turntable, which has no pre-amp. I amplified and digitized the signal with a Behringer U-Phono UFO202 USB amplifier and digitizer, recording it with Audacity. I then removed as much pop as I could without distorting the base recording too much. But obviously I'm no expert... this is the proof!
This is especially the case with new tires, because the beads are close together, and not out where they will seat on your rim. Once you have that first bead seated, you can use several methods... even just pushing the wheel in to the remaining bead... to easily finish the job.
The ramps are made from 1 1/2" PVC schedule 40 pipe, with 1 1/2" x 3/4" "furring" strips slipped inside for stiffness and added strength.
The ramps can be capped at the bottom. The angle of the elbow at the top will determine the steepness of your ramp of course. If one didn't have the Thule rectangular bar system that I use, they could notch the upper PVC pipe to make a hook. But there could be many ways to attach the the ramps to the roof rack.
The shelves are of 2" PVC pipe, which is just the size to fold down over the ramps.
The whole idea here is that you don't ever have to lift more than half the weight of your kayak, and the ramps place the boat high enough so you can get under it and slide it up to the roof very easily.
Tubeless tires are a bit more problematic of course, as the bead of the tire has to make complete contact around both sides of the wheel rim, or all the air gets out before the bead is snapped up on that rim. But it often works pretty well to put a rope or strap around the tire, and turn it with a stick (Spanish Windless). This is best with used tires, as they have already been under pressure on a rim, and so have a "memory" which places the bead closer to the rim.
But new tires are often a real problem, as they usually come out of the mold with the bead too far from where the rim is. I admit I have mounted some tires in the past, and then needed to cry "uncle", and take the tire down to a garage, and have it beaded for me. That sort of defeats the purpose of doing this at home in the first place (well, maybe not considering the stupid tire mounting laws, and liabilities, which sometimes restrict the mounting of single, used tires on existing rims. Coming in for a bead seating has, so far, been possible though).
There are many other methods of seating a bead, such as the air tank blaster thingy... but they cost like $60, and I don't do this all that much. So then I have another cumbersome tool to deal with, mostly sitting around. Others have had luck using an explosive gas... I think starter fluid... sprayed in and lit. That seems very dangerous, and I just never wanted to try it.
There seem to be other gizmos which pull the bead up, and so on. I had wondered, though, at different things that might fill the air gap temporarily, to allow air to stay in the tire and seat the bead, and wondered if wrapping a bicycle tube around the rim would work. So I did a youtube search, and lo-and-behold that is a tried and proven method. Wish I thought of it first! No matter... at least I wanted to add my own, first experience with this method, to help get the word out...
As you can see, it is simple, cheap, and very easy to do. I intend on keeping a small selection of bike tubes with my tire irons. I'll remove them from discarded bikes, so that I don't have to buy them. And "damn"... I'm a recovering hoarder, and now I think of all those bikes and wheels I tossed into dumpsters the last few years....
Every morning there is an array of new carcasses, and the web is all torn up. She seems to be pretty inactive all day, but after sundown, rebuilds the entire web from scratch.
How does her little brain have such a skill in it, from birth? Such a complex set of instructions are needed to create the structure, along with the plan to lay it all out. And in a brain the size of what? a bit larger than a poppy seed? And at birth, the knowledge is pre-programmed to create all this?
I just find it stunning. But we do have to duck when we go in and out...
I also found the ideas and adaptations of Nathan Broman very good and helpful, too. You can see his work on Youtube at youtube.com/watch?v=Fltz36ncIs4 and youtube.com/watch?v=t4FOMOiRISE
But there are many great ideas out there, and many different concepts in ROV design and construction, from the fine professors at Youtube and Google Universities.
Thanks to my friends Berj Ensanian / KI3U, and Greg Stachowski, both of whom gave me great advice along the way.
Probably the only addition I will make is to mount a small "ball" compass to a stalk, so that I can see it in the video. This will give me some orientation while the ROV is underwater. It was suggested I add protection for the props, either in the form of screening, or tubing to better direct the thrust water flow, and make it more efficient. I still may do this, too. I did blow one fuse when a prop tangled in fishing line... and so one change will be to replace the spade fuses with automatic resetting 5 amp fuses. Then I won't have to dig in the wax to replace a fuse.
Specs:
3 1,100 GPH, 3 AMP Bilge Pump motors by Amarine (stripped of centrifugal impellers and impeller housings in lieu of propellers)
Frame is 1/2" PVC: @ 12"Lx5"Hx6"W
Float tubes are @12" long, 2" I.D. PVC
Weight tubes are 1" I.D. PVC
Power cable is solid copper strand, 16 gauge speaker wire
Control cable is Ethernet (8 leads, 6 needed)
Weight of ROV without ballast approximately 6.5 pounds
Length of tether: 50'
Propellers, RC boat 3 blade, D45mm x 1.7 Pitch
Remotely powered (no batteries on board), 12v
Fuses:
Each motor, 5 amp spade type, on board ROV (in electrical box)
One 20 AMP in control box for all ROV power
One 10 AMP in control box for ROV solenoid control leads
6 Solenoids, OEG OMI-SS-212L DPDT, 12VDC, 5A
Cost: My cost list is only an estimate, and from what I remember I paid for the parts. But it is a good rough estimate, I think:
PVC:
Tubing and fittings for frame: $12
Tubing and fittings for floats and weights: $14
Electronics & electric:
6 solenoids: $32 (I had to replace these after ruining the first set with wax)
Speaker (power) wire: $14
Ethernet wire: $18
Switches: @ $22
Pilot light: $5
Battery clips: $8
Motors: $21
Video camera kit: $113 with shipping
Other:
Propellers: $18
Cord: $6
Bolts: $3
PVC glue: $6
Tie wraps- on hand, but about $6 worth
Tether sheathing: $11
Foam for tether floatation: $4
Weights: found lead, free
Total: @ $283
Hours: I have no idea... an hour here, a couple there... really not that hard to build though. Simple plumbing and wiring, etc.
I might have made it the whole way, but I was alone. If I got hung up on a rock, or broke something it would have been a problem. And the LR2 is obviously not a dedicated off road vehicle. But I think it did pretty well... with its 8" of ground clearance, and with the "mud and ruts" setting in first gear, it crawled nicely over some fairly rough stuff.
The slides are the same as presented, but there may be small differences in the narration, as I recorded the video's narration from memory, after the event.
This presentation focuses on the characteristics of the Voynich which imply it is a forgery. But there are other aspects to my theory, many of which can be found on my Wordpress blog. An outline of the theory is at: proto57.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/the-modern-forgery-hypothesis
Problems with the bases used to form the current Voynich paradigm are here: proto57.wordpress.com/2015/05/08/modern-voynich-myths
Despite what you will read, and have been told, the Voynich has not been solved, we have few answers, and it may be many things other than a genuine 15th century cipher herbal. Keep an open mind, and question everything you are told, and think you know about it.
The radio also receives broadcast and the old "marine" band, which is about 1.6 to 4 megacycles. But the navigation would only be used on the broadcast and beacon bands, which received through the built in ferrite bar antenna. When the radio was switched to "nav", the antenna became more "directional".
This radio uses a red indicator lamp to show signal strength. It actually determines this through the audio circuit. Most other RDF's used a needle metering readout. I think they used this light so that a person could visualize the morse code pulses of the transmitting beacon... which identified it... from across a cockpit or whatever.
When I received this radio it had almost no volume. So I replaced the 11 electrolytic capacitors. I soldered them to the back of the board, and left the original caps in... only clipping their leads... so that the chassis would retain an authentic look. Check out my RDF collection at: http://www.angelfire.com/space/proto57/rdf.html
We have almost $7,000 in this Volvo XC70, starting with the $5,000 initial cost, then the $1,400 for the rebuilt transmission I put in last year, the exhaust, brake rotors and pads, tires, and more. I could not see abandoning all that time and money, so I wanted to give this a shot.
Having a body shop straighten the frame, and rebuild this was out of the question, as it would cost more than the car is worth. But for under $800, I was able to do a reasonable job of rebuilding it, and at home, on my schedule. And also, $250 of that is tools that I can either resell, or use for other fun stuff.
My friends Anne DeAngelis on harmonica, Mark Hitt on guitar. With Steve "Budgie" Warner on drums, Joe Coz lead vocal, J.T. Toglia on bass, and Pete Gallinari.
http://www.ernestborel.ch/en/index.php
This particular watch was my grandfathers. He and my grandmother had matching Ernest Borel Cocktail watches... I also have my grandmother's, but the a lug is broken off of the case. I restored his watch, and will figure out a way to fix the lug, and restore hers.
The original Perpetuums... of which Drebbel may have built as many as 18, in different forms... drove a clockwork mechanism. They are not perpetual motion as we understand it today. They were powered by changes in air pressure and temperature, which caused a differential between the pressure of the air trapped in the sphere, and the atmosphere. As such, they were what is known as a 'thermoscope"... a bit thermometer, a bit barometer. But to a 17th century philosopher, the fact that these were driven by unseen forces, continuously, made them perpetual machines. They were promoted by Drebbel as being tapped into the driving force of the universe... the "Primium Mobile", whatever they conceived that to be. But Drebbel knew hydraulics, and the expansion of heated gases... he was of course quite aware of what drove his machines. But this was the time when magic held sway, and the proper presentation of your inventions, while holding back the reason they worked, kept you in great demand. Drebbel was favored by the patronage of two kings... and was famous for this, and other inventions. Not the least of these was the submarine. He also invented the thermostat, which was roughly based on the principles seen in this device.
Drebbel was also the inventor of the twin convex lens microscope, and he was a fine engraver, and much more. Visit http://www.drebbel.net for much information, images, articles and videos of all things Drebbel.
http://www.voynich.nu/100.html
This particular talk was one of several. It deals with three aspects of my personal theory about the Voynich Manuscript, but the ideas I presented were not necessarily "theory specific", but ones that I thought might be of interest to the Voynich community as a whole. To see my entire theory, you can either view my website:
http://www.santa-coloma.net/voynich_drebbel/voynich.html
Or blog- for some more up to date, or more detailed, additional thoughts:
http://proto57.wordpress.com
For a great overview of the known history of the Voynich, visit this site:
http://www.voynich.nu/
Keep an open mind, don't get hurt, and have fun. Rich SantaColoma
I recently sent pictures to my friends Berj, Greg, Dennis, Dana and Robert, who have delved in all sorts of technologies over the years... but we could not figure it out. Among the guesses we had were: audio track to be synced to a film, test data to be input into a radar or guidance system, tones or speech for the telephone system, organ music, musak player... and so on. But the truth is a bit different than all of these... Berj suggested that the audio was "crying to be heard", and suggested I listen to it, if I could. So I pulled out the nice old Bell and Howell projector my friend Lars gave me, hoping the optical track could be read on the projector's sound pickup and amp... the results of the experiment are in the video. After watching it, check out the link below. Don't peek until you watch it though:
http://www.thegeekticket.com/features/bell-telephone-1964-worlds-fair
And:
http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/days-of-future-past-the-treknywf-connection
"Fairgoers ascended a ramp to a platform to reach the seats on the continuously moving 1,000 chair ride, that journeyed the the communication presentation."... this may be the soundtrack, and maybe the controller or syncing data, for that ride. Perhaps the additional tracks controlled the lights, the speed of the ride, and so on. It is an eerie feeling I get, having been on that ride at age 7; I actually heard these words, on this tape, twice... 47 years apart. And the best for last: From Bill Young's wonderful site on the 1964 World's Fair, an recording of this actual tape, made by a Ray Dashner, while on the actual ride:
http://www.nywf64.com/bell07.shtml
This was the final confirmation that this controller/player is the one used in the Fair, because you can hear the same words being spoken on it.
The car in this scene is missing some side trim, and the some letters from the "Triumph" on the hood. I don't think that was intentional to hide the make, because the character does refer to the car as a "TR-4" earlier in the scene.
However, since the time I proposed this theory, I've come to believe that the Voynich is simply a modern hoax, made about 1908 to 1910. I still believe that many of the objects shown in this video were meant to be what they look like... and that, even, there may be some Francis Bacon influences thrown in there, too... as there are, many items used as models to create the work.
For more information go to the main site:
http://www.santa-coloma.net/voynich_d...
And the blog, which covers other topics relating to the Voynich in history, optics and otherwise:
http://proto57.wordpress.com
http://www.angelfire.com/space/proto57/rdf.html
For more information about RDF's, and to see all the radios in my collection:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/proto57/rdf.html
The compass is a high quality Sestral bearing compass, which is suitable for taking visual bearings for piloting... in addition to showing the direction to the beacon antennas.
In this video you will note that there is not much difference between the null and the full signal strength. I think this is because I was so near the beacon... the signal strength was just too strong, and all around me. But there is a bit of a difference. However I was not about to roam around the back areas of the airport with an odd looking device such as this... I realized afterwards that going up there might have been a problem as it was... and would not recommend it.
For more information, and to see my entire collection, visit:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/proto57/rdf.html
My intention in creating this video is not to favor one theory over any other... only to attempt to visualize the rosettes page as the artist originally envisioned it. The skewed perspective of the drawings are certainly inaccurate, but they do represent 3D objects and relationships. I have done my best to look at the relationships between the objects, and their relative size and placement, and recreate the scene in 3D... as it would have been imagined by the artist. Where I was unsure, I left simple shapes... such as the cylinders on which the actual rosettes rest. Some detail I added, such as the thickness of the castle walls. And also, by necessity, much detail is left out. Not everything is open to any interpretation, or there are too many variables, so I left those points as simple drawings. And lastly, do not use this image or video as any sort of study guide... I have not exactly recreated all the detail or textures, and have made simplified versions of some textured areas for clarity. So if you are interested in the manuscript, research it carefully, and download the high quality SID images from the Beinecke Library at Yale University.
That being said, I hope this video is of interest, and gives some idea of the wonderful nature of the Voynich, and the amazing imagination of it's creator(s)... wherever and whomever they were.
A direct link to my blog page, with still images of this model: http://proto57.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/a-trip-to-the-rosettes
My blog can be found at: http://proto57.wordpress.com
My website is at: http://www.santa-coloma.net/voynich_drebbel/voynich.html
H. Richard SantaColoma
This was a "from the factory" Town Sedan. The car had original twin sidemounts (twin spare mounts and fender wells), and the original cowl lights, arm rest, and rear pull curtain. Unfortunately it did not have a matching engine number. Knowing what I learned in the years after buying this car, I should have bought privately through Hemmings Motor News... I remember seeing a 1930 Model A Two Door, all original and running, for only $500.
*********************************
Drebbel may have created his own oxygen in the sub, to replenish the air, by heating potassium nitrate, because we know he was aware of this process. Some believe he may have used a snorkel. As for the submarine itself, there are no reliable, consistent descriptions. For this reason, interpretations of the machine in art and literature vary.
*********************************
This may be the only "prop" Drebbel submarine shown in a feature movie. It is from the 1974 film, "The Four Musketeers". The machine used here is very imaginative, and probably very inaccurate in many details. While Drebbel may have made a small, two person version of his machine, it is not known. It looks to me as though this one is fiberglass, with a faux stitched-leather covering. Drebbel's machines were covered in greased leather. But I doubt the hatch arrangement from this movie would have actually worked at any depth. Of course this was not intended to be a real machine. I give the producers and prop designers credit for what they did accomplish, in a scene really intended to be comedic, and not historical. If he were alive today, perhaps Drebbel would have appreciated the effort, as he is suspected as having been a prop designer himself, among many other things. He built a perpetual motion clock, invented the thermostat, was the first person known to artificially cool a room, identified oxygen, was a fine engraver for Goltzius and on his own, made the first twin convex lensed microscopes (of fine quality, by 1619), and developed the tin salt process to produce the famous "Scarlett Red", or "Bow Dye"... a brilliant cocineal permanent dye.
*************************************** Drebbel also greatly influenced Francis Bacon's New Atlantis, which further influenced the Royal Society... and so, had a part in the the flowering of modern science.
**************************************By the way, he should have a Dutch accent, not British.
***************************************I cannot find the name of the actor who played Drebbel, but the Duke of Buckingham is played by Simon Ward.
I transferred this from a fragmentary 16mm film. It is all I have, and in bad condition. I did not cut out all the skipping (caused by torn sprocket holes), but this section is short. Despite the fact it is incomplete, and damaged, I thought it would be of interest. I especially love the amphibians, running into the water on a test...
CAMA does great work in preserving and restoring the fabulous machinery of the past. For information about the museum and it's hours:
http://www.ctamachinery.com
Located in Kent, Connecticut.
The boat is a 1973 22 foot O'Day. It has a 700 pound fixed keel, shoal draft of an inch shy of two feet, and a displacement of 2,086 pounds. It is easily trailerable behind my 1988 Volvo 240 wagon, sleeps four, has a sink, stove, and enclosed head. The boat is self-righting, and with sufficient built-in floatation to be unsinkable if holed. They say... I haven't tried it!
The outboard is a 1980 Seagull 5 H.P. Silver Century long-shaft, which weighs 44 pounds.
Bob Berry wrote this song, "It's Who You Know". Most of the Long Shots songs were written by Bob, with some by Rob Wojtowicz and Paul Galenopoulis.
The video is of poor quality... from my ancient video bin again... but mostly because it is about fourth generation. The original went to Star Search, the copies of that I never saw, this is a copy of a third generation made 20+ years ago.
http://www.santa-coloma.net/bivalve/Bivalve.html
This was filmed on Super-8 sound, and then transferred to video in the early 1980's. There is obviously some degradation from the process, and time. I transferred this to digital for upload, using a JVC Everio's input.
If you note some similarity to the (2004?) Jaguar commercial using the same music, I do, too. Although certainly a coincidence, I will note that this video was used for a year or more in the late 1980's as a demo in a Mount Kisco, NY camera store... and shown to hundreds of customers. Many of these customers worked in film and advertising. If anyone has the Jaguar commercial, could you post it as a video response? Thanks...
http://www.ctamachinery.com
Located in Kent, Connecticut.
Mills Mansion site: http://www.staatsburgh.org
To go to the main site, and download a time-limited demo, free boats, check out the forums, go to:
http://www.hangsim.com/vs
To see clips from the 2007 show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udfOH4KoocU


