Proving the Law of Non-Contradiction Through Contradiction Michael Moreno 2020-01-12 | I prove the law of non-contradiction by assuming that it doesn't exist and then showing that this leads to external and internal contradictions which necessitate it's existence. Syllogism translated:1. Premises can contradict.2. 1 is a premise.3. 1 can contradict4. (Premises can contradict) and (Premises cannot contradict)This internal contradiction produces a double bind in which allowing contradiction prevents contradiction, and the only way to prevent this is to also prevent contradictionTriggering internal contradiction through external contradiction:5. 4 is a premise6. (4 can contradict) and (4 cannot contradict.)7. {It is true that [it is true that (Premises can contradict) and (Premises cannot contradict)] and not true that [(Premises can contradict) and (Premises cannot contradict)]} and it is not true that [it is true that (Premises can contradict) and (Premises cannot contradict)] and not true that [(Premises can contradict) and (Premises cannot contradict)]} This will continue in an infinite regression unless contradiction is rejected, collapsing the entire argument and proving that premises cannot contradict.Email: contact.michaelmoreno@gmail.com Twitter: twitter.com/michaelmoreno2kInstagram: instagram.com/michaelmoreno2k
