Apologetics SquaredIn this video, I look at the effect that Pascal's Wager has on the question, "Should 'counter-apologists' delete their YouTube channels?"
Here's the argument formalized: 1) If something changes the probability that a person will receive X utility from p_1 to p_2, then the average amount of utility that thing gives them is (p_2-p_1)(X). 2Def) The probability that a Christian will receive infinite utility is p_C. 3Def) The probability that an Atheist will receive infinite utility is p_A. 4) p_C is greater than p_A by a non-infinitesimal amount. 5) Therefore, if something changes a person from a Christian to an Atheist, then the average amount of utility it gives them is negative infinity. 6) Counter-apologetics YouTube channels tend to change people from Christians to Atheists. 7) If a person is able to destroy something which tends to give people an average of negative infinite utility, then they are obligated to destroy it. 8) Counter-apologists can destroy their Counter-apologetics YouTube channels by deleting them. 9) Therefore, counter-apologists are obligated to delete their YouTube channels.
0:00 - Intro 0:27 - Classic Pascal's Wager 1:27 - Objections to Pascal's Wager 2:27 - CORE of the argument 3:31 - Revisiting objections 6:34 - Closing remarks
Should Atheists Delete their Channels?!Apologetics Squared2021-07-04 | In this video, I look at the effect that Pascal's Wager has on the question, "Should 'counter-apologists' delete their YouTube channels?"
Here's the argument formalized: 1) If something changes the probability that a person will receive X utility from p_1 to p_2, then the average amount of utility that thing gives them is (p_2-p_1)(X). 2Def) The probability that a Christian will receive infinite utility is p_C. 3Def) The probability that an Atheist will receive infinite utility is p_A. 4) p_C is greater than p_A by a non-infinitesimal amount. 5) Therefore, if something changes a person from a Christian to an Atheist, then the average amount of utility it gives them is negative infinity. 6) Counter-apologetics YouTube channels tend to change people from Christians to Atheists. 7) If a person is able to destroy something which tends to give people an average of negative infinite utility, then they are obligated to destroy it. 8) Counter-apologists can destroy their Counter-apologetics YouTube channels by deleting them. 9) Therefore, counter-apologists are obligated to delete their YouTube channels.
0:00 - Intro 0:27 - Classic Pascal's Wager 1:27 - Objections to Pascal's Wager 2:27 - CORE of the argument 3:31 - Revisiting objections 6:34 - Closing remarks
Oh, and here's my Patreon if you want to support me: patreon.com/ApologeticsSquaredStuff Happens so God Exists (SCCC pt 10)Apologetics Squared2024-08-19 | In this video, I lay out the argument from Nomological Harmony for God's existence.
0:00 - Intro 1:52 - 1st view 4:37 - 2nd view 5:55 - Multiverse 7:28 - Quick note 7:59 - ScoringA SUBSTANTIVE Response to @JamesFodor on the Fine-Tuning Argument for GodApologetics Squared2024-07-03 | In this video, I respond to some of James Fodor's objections to the fine-tuning argument. 00:00 - Introduction 00:13 - Overview of FTA 5:00 - Alternate Laws/Life 14:00 - Understated Evidence 19:03 - Probability Measures 24:04 - General Explanations 28:07 - Alone World 31:02 - Non-life Goods 33:40 - Simulated Universe 35:22 - Disembodied Agents 37:01 - Electrons in Love 38:32 - Mystery? 38:50 - Multi-Law worlds 44:35 - Nomological Fine-Tuning 47:35 - Divine Psychology 1:02:13 - Summary
Note: Whenever I say a view is "obvious" (e.g., my claim that "it's obvious that credences exist"), this is simply a claim about my own credences, and should not be interpreted as an evaluation of the rationality of those who disagree with me! :)
Also, here's a definition of "mereological nihilism," since I never defined it in the video: It "is the view that there are there are no composite objects (i.e., there are no objects with proper parts—only atoms exist). On this view, there are no statues, animals or any other macroscopic object made up out of smaller parts." (From the SEP article on Material Constitution.)
Fun fact: I sometimes remember arguments that I want to make videos on and completely forget where the argument comes from. Fortunately, I remembered that the stuff about one's existence confirming a multiverse can be found in the linked article. :)
0:00 - The Problem 5:28 - Cardinalities 9:41 - Ordinals 12:54 - Calculus 14:58 - Surreals5K AMA: I answer ALL your questions!Apologetics Squared2023-04-16 | Timestamps: 0:00 - Intro 0:35 - Is mayo an instrument? 1:10 - Minimalist or Maximalist? 3:25 - Is water wet? 3:36 - Best objection to Causal Finitism? 5:36 - How to get started in PoR? 6:48 - Written debates? 7:17 - Is Digital Physics a good arg? 8:22 - Animal suffering video? 8:56 - Water is wet syllogism? 9:13 - Where do storks come from? 9:24 - Book shelf tour? 10:51 - Worst arg for God? 12:25 - Ontological arg any good? 15:47 - Non-resurrection arg for Christianity? 17:22 - Is polytheism possible? 18:50 - Death penalty? 19:35 - Let's go! 19:43 - Are scholastic thinkers coolio? 20:56 - Did the universe begin? 23:31 - Respond to Naturalism Next on PHA? 24:54 - Abstract objects? 25:05 - Why privilege moral realist intuitions? 30:06 - Why did God command the killing of children? 38:54 - What's your denomination? 39:25 - [Something something Bayesianism]? 41:38 - Is Christianity in principle demonstrable? 44:12 - What if someone says P(Christianity) = 0? 47:58 - Do you have a cool testimony? 49:13 - Thoughts on Catholicism? 51:39 - What do you like about being an apologist? 52:10 - Messi or Ronaldo? 53:00 - What arg got you interested in apologetics? 54:07 - What args have you changed your mind on? 55:13 - What about "skeptical atheism"? 58:19 - What's your time management like? 1:02:08 - Why'd you start the channel? 1:02:40 - How would you critique presuppers? 1:06:06 - Ideas that give proofs for theism? 1:07:32 - Why did early Church believe Catholic stuff? 1:10:48 - Strongest arg for atheism? 1:12:18 - Non-Bayesian args for naturalism? 1:14:35 - How does PoR relate to spiritual life? 1:16:24 - Universalism or ECT? 1:17:19 - Fav math equation? 1:18:03 - Channel-themed book recommendations? 1:18:48 - Future plans for the channel? 1:20:11 - Views on free will + defense thereof? 1:20:27 - PoR channel recommendations? 1:21:59 - Are contradictions possible? 1:23:23 - How do I contact you? 1:23:53 - Which religion, if not Christianity? 1:25:04 - Fav theodicy? 1:25:34 - Best/worst arg for/against God? 1:28:12 - "Falsifiable" vs "verifiable"? 1:29:13 - When will SCCC talk about Christianity? 1:30:13 - Definition of religion? 1:33:23 - Video on Divine Hiddenness? 1:33:33 - Figurative interpretations ad hoc? 1:37:02 - How old are you? What started this journey? 1:37:55 - JRPGs? 1:38:17 - Fav cheese? 1:38:26 - Failed apocalyptic prophet response? 1:42:38 - Wanna share my poem? 1:43:10 - Are you in college? 1:43:30 - Conceptualism or Platonism? 1:43:59 - Fav Bible character? 1:45:03 - Is the multiverse fallacious? 1:45:42 - How would you define evolution? 1:46:48 - Views on origins? 1:48:42 - How can one fit evolution with theism? 1:52:57 - PoR resources? 1:54:45 - Views on consciousness? 1:56:45 - Can you be happy if ECT is true? 1:58:51 - Can you accept Jesus after you die? 2:02:33 - Are miracles in other religions real? 2:05:39 - How long do videos take to make? 2:05:51 - Thoughts on MoR's companions in guilt arg? 2:07:17 - How does God enter time? 2:09:22 - What are the chances of God making the universe? 2:11:28 - Are infinities possible? 2:13:30 - How'd you get into PoR? 2:14:01 - Are you a Christian? 2:14:53 - When did I make this channel? 2:15:34 - Will you make a second channel? 2:16:04 - How long 'til you're an Idealist? 2:17:36 - Fav atheist? 2:19:27 - Will you stop using the awesome word "coolio"? 2:19:40 - Recommended channels? 2:24:36 - Is God a lazy/easy answer? 2:25:59 - Post/Pre/A millennialism? 2:26:47 - Play any videogames? 2:27:24 - Why hasn't SCCC mentioned Jesus? 2:28:28 - Fav arg against Jesus mythicism? 2:29:45 - Thoughts on Naturalism Next's critique of PHA? 2:31:02 - Theistic evolution or YEC? 2:32:15 - Intuition??? 2:34:44 - OutroREFUTING Birds dont exist, therefore Christianity is false (EXPOSED!!!) ft @MajestyofReasonApologetics Squared2023-04-02 | Original video: youtu.be/LgMY3-67uwk
Timestamps: 0:00 - I refute Majesty of Reason 1:00 - I refute Majesty of Reason again 5:39 - Majesty of Reason gets refuted 8:17 - Refutation of Majesty of Reason 10:59 - Majesty of Reason REFUTATION 12:46 - Majesty of Reason demolished (and refuted)