Uploaded September 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Dermatologist Dr. Dray breaks down PRP vs PRF, including how these platelet-based treatments work, what the research shows for hair loss, facial rejuvenation, wrinkles, skin texture, and under-eye concerns, and whether they are actually worth the cost.
PRP, or platelet-rich plasma, and PRF, or platelet-rich fibrin, are increasingly popular cosmetic and hair loss treatments. PRF is often marketed as a newer or more advanced version of PRP, but does the evidence actually show that PRF is better?
In this video, Dr. Dray explains the differences between platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), why PRP is not a standardized treatment, and how preparation methods can affect the final product.
She also discusses the current evidence for:
• PRP for androgenetic alopecia and hair loss
• PRF for hair growth
• PRP for skin rejuvenation and anti-aging
• PRF for wrinkles, skin texture, and elasticity
• PRP and PRF for the under-eye area
• Whether PRF is actually better than PRP
• What to ask before spending money on PRP or PRF treatments
• How realistic the results are for hair loss and cosmetic rejuvenation
While there is legitimate research supporting potential benefits from PRP, particularly for androgenetic alopecia, the evidence for PRF is less mature. Research on both treatments for facial rejuvenation is also limited by small studies, differences in preparation methods, and a lack of standardized treatment protocols.
Dr. Dray also explains why a biologically plausible mechanism does not necessarily mean that a treatment is clinically superior, and why consumers should be cautious about marketing claims that PRF is automatically the "next generation" or a dramatically better alternative to PRP.
Chapters
0:00 Introduction
0:24 What Are PRP and PRF?
1:40 PRP Is Not One Thing
2:27 What Is PRF?
3:28 What Does PRP Actually Do?
4:16 PRP for Hair Loss
6:10 What About PRF for Hair Loss?
7:08 PRP and PRF for Skin Rejuvenation
8:19 What About Under the Eyes?
9:24 PRP vs PRF: Which Is Better?
10:24 Is PRP or PRF Worth the Money?
12:09 What to Ask Before Paying for PRP or PRF
12:54 Final Takeaway
Bottom line: PRP and PRF are not pure hype, but neither should be considered a miracle treatment. PRP currently has a more established evidence base for certain types of hair loss, while PRF is promising but still requires more research. For cosmetic skin rejuvenation, both treatments may offer benefits, but the evidence is not strong enough to say that one is universally superior.
As always, Dr. Dray recommends discussing hair loss and cosmetic treatment options with a qualified medical professional who can evaluate individual circumstances and set realistic expectations.
#PRP #PRF #HairLoss #HairGrowth #Dermatologist #SkinRejuvenation #Alopecia #AndrogeneticAlopecia #AntiAging #CosmeticDermatology #PRPvsPRF #PlateletRichPlasma #PlateletRichFibrin
FTC: This video is not sponsored. Links are commissionable, meaning I may earn commission from purchases made through links.
💜Shop my Amazon store https://o.bttn.io/0BwiPWFIZLG
💜Follow me on liketoknowit https://www.liketoknow.it/drdrayzday
💜Social media
Instagram @drdrayzday
Pinterest pinterest.com/drdrayzday
Facebook @DrDrayzDay
Twitter: @drdrayzday
Tiktok: @drdrayzday
Disclaimer: This video is not intended to provide diagnosis, treatment or medical advice. Content provided on this Youtube channel is for informational purposes only. Please consult with a physician or other healthcare professional regarding any medical or health related diagnosis or treatment options. Information on this Youtube channel should not be considered as a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional. The statements made about specific products throughout this video are not to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease.
Dermatologist Dr. Dray breaks down PRP vs PRF, including how these platelet-based treatments work, what the research shows for hair loss, facial rejuvenation, wrinkles, skin texture, and under-eye concerns, and whether they are actually worth the cost.
PRP, or platelet-rich plasma, and PRF, or platelet-rich fibrin, are increasingly popular cosmetic and hair loss treatments. PRF is often marketed as a newer or more advanced version of PRP, but does the evidence actually show that PRF is better?
In this video, Dr. Dray explains the differences between platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), why PRP is not a standardized treatment, and how preparation methods can affect the final product.
She also discusses the current evidence for:
• PRP for androgenetic alopecia and hair loss
• PRF for hair growth
• PRP for skin rejuvenation and anti-aging
• PRF for wrinkles, skin texture, and elasticity
• PRP and PRF for the under-eye area
• Whether PRF is actually better than PRP
• What to ask before spending money on PRP or PRF treatments
• How realistic the results are for hair loss and cosmetic rejuvenation
While there is legitimate research supporting potential benefits from PRP, particularly for androgenetic alopecia, the evidence for PRF is less mature. Research on both treatments for facial rejuvenation is also limited by small studies, differences in preparation methods, and a lack of standardized treatment protocols.
Dr. Dray also explains why a biologically plausible mechanism does not necessarily mean that a treatment is clinically superior, and why consumers should be cautious about marketing claims that PRF is automatically the "next generation" or a dramatically better alternative to PRP.
Chapters
0:00 Introduction
0:24 What Are PRP and PRF?
1:40 PRP Is Not One Thing
2:27 What Is PRF?
3:28 What Does PRP Actually Do?
4:16 PRP for Hair Loss
6:10 What About PRF for Hair Loss?
7:08 PRP and PRF for Skin Rejuvenation
8:19 What About Under the Eyes?
9:24 PRP vs PRF: Which Is Better?
10:24 Is PRP or PRF Worth the Money?
12:09 What to Ask Before Paying for PRP or PRF
12:54 Final Takeaway
Bottom line: PRP and PRF are not pure hype, but neither should be considered a miracle treatment. PRP currently has a more established evidence base for certain types of hair loss, while PRF is promising but still requires more research. For cosmetic skin rejuvenation, both treatments may offer benefits, but the evidence is not strong enough to say that one is universally superior.
As always, Dr. Dray recommends discussing hair loss and cosmetic treatment options with a qualified medical professional who can evaluate individual circumstances and set realistic expectations.
#PRP #PRF #HairLoss #HairGrowth #Dermatologist #SkinRejuvenation #Alopecia #AndrogeneticAlopecia #AntiAging #CosmeticDermatology #PRPvsPRF #PlateletRichPlasma #PlateletRichFibrin
FTC: This video is not sponsored. Links are commissionable, meaning I may earn commission from purchases made through links.
💜Shop my Amazon store https://o.bttn.io/0BwiPWFIZLG
💜Follow me on liketoknowit https://www.liketoknow.it/drdrayzday
💜Social media
Instagram @drdrayzday
Pinterest pinterest.com/drdrayzday
Facebook @DrDrayzDay
Twitter: @drdrayzday
Tiktok: @drdrayzday
Disclaimer: This video is not intended to provide diagnosis, treatment or medical advice. Content provided on this Youtube channel is for informational purposes only. Please consult with a physician or other healthcare professional regarding any medical or health related diagnosis or treatment options. Information on this Youtube channel should not be considered as a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional. The statements made about specific products throughout this video are not to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease.
