DNA Dr. John Campbell 2024-05-03 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionallygivesendgo.com/GAVAZAn Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOsCase File Number: VID510/2023Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty LtdDr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexesThese complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the lawThe modRNA is genetic materialThe Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human bodyThe LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cellsBy moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injectionSo the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexesThe next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technologyThe Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their productsThe MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNAIn the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniquesSo the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfiedThis means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOsUnder the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licencePfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in AustraliaDealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOsNo Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injectionThis is not just an Australian GMO legal issueIn the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VIThe United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked atLike in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk AssessmentEven after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United KingdomThe MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO expertsBut both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 productsAnd because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Kyle in DC Dr. John Campbell 2024-05-02 | Update from Mr. Kyle WarnerCountermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) hrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-dataCICP Claims Compensatedhrsa.gov/cicp/cicp-data/table-4See More from Kyle Warner@ KyleWarnerMTB - Instagram@Kyle&April-RideMTB - YoutubeWebsite- Ridemtb.comBacklogged: Few cases finished after millions spent investigating COVID vaccine claimsnam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investigatetv.com%2F2024%2F04%2F29%2Fbacklogged-few-cases-finished-after-millions-spent-investigating-covid-vaccine-claims%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ckyle.warner%40react19.org%7C69b08b89172e462aa6ff08dc689b5950%7C86c0312f0b1a4847bfc05771f2d55fe2%7C0%7C0%7C638500263649928460%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7ap5jDY0r8hnQjaTh3xSrQFqBrFNDRsGPrOZ6SVI56M%3D&reserved=0
Accelerated arterial disease Dr. John Campbell 2024-05-01 | Professor Sherif Sultan, MB BCh MCh MD FRCSI DEVS FISVS FASA DMD FRCS/Vasc EBQS/Vasc FAARM FACS FEVBS PhD Professor of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery National University of IrelandChief of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery at The Galway Clinic Chairman of Western Vascular InstitutePresident of International Society for Vascular Surgery University Hospital Galway NUIG & The Galway Clinicacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:ea3bf115-1a02-4440-a153-6ec0149f258aacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:95fadfe1-88d4-4708-8729-ef38596cdceeacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:a4572ad8-0375-4aa7-a6a7-b9ad0a8d78caacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:8a9f87d0-e9a3-4af5-9675-d9dfe4f91e28acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:779ab225-f4bf-4757-a540-62e7036c3fefacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:893d701f-acd0-4f03-bba3-1a8e0ca8fc2e
Indemnity questioned Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-30 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionallygivesendgo.com/GAVAZAn Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOsCase File Number: VID510/2023Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty LtdDr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexesThese complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the lawThe modRNA is genetic materialThe Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human bodyThe LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cellsBy moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injectionSo the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexesThe next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technologyThe Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their productsThe MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNAIn the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniquesSo the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfiedThis means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOsUnder the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licencePfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in AustraliaDealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOsNo Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injectionThis is not just an Australian GMO legal issueIn the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VIThe United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked atLike in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk AssessmentEven after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United KingdomThe MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO expertsBut both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 productsAnd because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Booster issues in vascular surgery Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-29 | Professor Sherif Sultan, MB BCh MCh MD FRCSI DEVS FISVS FASA DMD FRCS/Vasc EBQS/Vasc FAARM FACS FEVBS PhD Professor of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery National University of IrelandChief of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery at The Galway Clinic Chairman of Western Vascular InstitutePresident of International Society for Vascular Surgery University Hospital Galway NUIG & The Galway Clinicacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:ea3bf115-1a02-4440-a153-6ec0149f258aacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:95fadfe1-88d4-4708-8729-ef38596cdceeacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:a4572ad8-0375-4aa7-a6a7-b9ad0a8d78caacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:8a9f87d0-e9a3-4af5-9675-d9dfe4f91e28acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:779ab225-f4bf-4757-a540-62e7036c3fefacrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:893d701f-acd0-4f03-bba3-1a8e0ca8fc2e
Official denial Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-26 | Direct link to TV Parliament site, parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252Direct link to Hansardhansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeathsLet me move to some of the questions that we must raise and answer today, openly and transparently, and with full access to ONS record-level data. I am not saying that that should be disclosed to all and sundry, but surely the Government cannot defend the position that they are not willing to release that information to interested clinicians and clinical academics as a minimum. Those are the people who need to interrogate the data. It is of little relevance to me—I do not have the means or academic ability to interpret it—but it is something that interested clinical academics should have access to.Let me move on to what we know about some of the issues surrounding mRNA technology. We know that it does not replicate locally, as we were assured it would do on launch. It metastasises to distant tissue, and replicates spike protein systemically distant from the site of administration. That is problematic for a number of reasons. According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood.Let me give a couple of examples. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is one of the principal causes of blood clot formation, which can cause stroke, pulmonary emboli, and other cardiac-related events including heart attacks, all of which can be life-limiting or fatal. Another antibody linked to theToggle showing location of Column 528spike protein exerts an effect on myelin, and is associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome and transverse myelitis, which is a swelling around the spinal cord. Professor Dalgleish believes that that constitutes medical negligence, because the facts are there for all to see. He contends that many deaths are as a direct result of unnecessary vaccination. Furthermore, he advises that there are a greater number of yellow cards in MHRA for covid vaccines than for all other vaccines recorded, and nothing has really been done.In a recent written answer to me, it was confirmed that the MHRA has received 489,004 spontaneous suspected adverse drug reaction reports relating to the covid-19 vaccine, up to and including 28 February this year. Across the United Kingdom, 2,734 of those reports were associated with a fatal outcome. Of course the true number is unknown—that is the nature of yellow card reporting, as only a fraction of adverse events are reported—and that is probably because of limited public awareness about some of the potential consequences and complications of vaccines, and the well-understood under-reporting of those adverse events. That is important, because the yellow card system is a key element of safe and effective clinical care. If things are not being evaluated properly, I can think of no greater betrayal of the MHRA’s clinical governance responsibility. I suggest that accountability for that must be swift and decisive. The rigorous assessment of these data is essential and must be actioned urgently. Will the Minister now engage with the MHRA and invite it to come to the House to explain the facts on these reports?Another issue, which arises from a further written question that I tabled, relates to the role of the MHRA. It has a crucial role—in fact, it is a statutory function—to provide post-marketing surveillance and to operate the yellow card system, but the Minister responded to my question about the assessment of the potential implications of the BMJ article “Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is ‘likely’ responsible for deaths of some elderly patients, Norwegian review finds” by stating:“The MHRA communicates safety advice based upon consideration of the totality of evidence from all relevant information sources, rather than the strengths and limitations of individual data sources.”Surely, a fundamental step in any meta-analysis of published data is to interrogate the robustness of those data and for the public to have confidence that that is happening.
Why RNA Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-25 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionallygivesendgo.com/GAVAZAn Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOsCase File Number: VID510/2023Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty LtdDr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexesThese complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the lawThe modRNA is genetic materialThe Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human bodyThe LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cellsBy moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injectionSo the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexesThe next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technologyThe Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their productsThe MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNAIn the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniquesSo the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfiedThis means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOsUnder the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licencePfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in AustraliaDealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOsNo Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injectionThis is not just an Australian GMO legal issueIn the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VIThe United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked atLike in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk AssessmentEven after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United KingdomThe MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO expertsBut both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 productsAnd because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Midazolam deaths Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-24 | Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemicresearchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_PandemicCitation: Wilson Sy (2024) Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Medical & Clinical Research, 9(2), 01-21. Macro-data during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (UK) are shown to have significant data anomalies and inconsistencies with existing explanations. England 2020UK spike in deaths, wrongly attributed to COVID-19 in April 2020, was not due to SARS-CoV-2 virus, which was largely absent, but was due to the widespread use of Midazolam injections,which were statistically very highly correlated (coefficient over 90 percent) with excess deaths in all regions of England during 2020. ImportantlyExcess deaths remained elevated following mass vaccination in 2021, but were statistically uncorrelated to COVID injections, while remaining significantly correlated to Midazolam injections.The widespread and persistent use of Midazolam in UK suggests a possible policy of systemic euthanasia. Unlike Australia, where assessing the statistical impact of COVID injections on excess deaths is relatively straightforward, UK excess deaths were closely associated with the use of Midazolam and other medical intervention. The UK iatrogenic pandemicCaused by euthanasia deaths from Midazolam and also, likely caused by COVID injections,researchgate.net/publication/374261986_Early_Indication_of_Long-Term_Impact_of_COVID_Injections but their relative impacts are difficult to measure from the data, due to causal proximity of euthanasia. Global investigations of COVID-19 epidemiology, based only on the relative impacts of COVID disease and vaccination, may be inaccurate, due to the neglect of significant confounding factors in some countries.
Genetically modified organisms Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-23 | Are the Covid-19 drugs produced by Pfizer and Moderna GMOs or genetically modified organisms?julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionallygivesendgo.com/GAVAZAn Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOsCase File Number: VID510/2023Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty LtdDr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.First, an Organism is: ‘any biological entity’ ‘capable of transferring genetic material’The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexesThese complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the lawThe modRNA is genetic materialThe Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human bodyThe LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cellsBy moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injectionSo the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexesThe next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is: an organism that has been modified by gene technologyThe Gene Technology part requires showing: any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their productsThe MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNAIn the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniquesSo the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfiedThis means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOsUnder the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licencePfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in AustraliaDealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOsNo Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injectionThis is not just an Australian GMO legal issueIn the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VIThe United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked atLike in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk AssessmentEven after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United KingdomThe MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO expertsBut both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 productsAnd because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
Excess deaths and data deficit Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-20 | Original video linkparliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252Hansard linkhansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2024-04-18/debates/9F01F787-D758-43D4-B8D1-4FA357EB3EED/Covid-19ResponseAndExcessDeathsWe know, by all the different measures, that many more people are dying now than were before the pandemic. In particular, the impact on people’s hearts, and increasingly younger people’s hearts, deserves attention. The British Heart Foundation reported last June that since the start of the pandemic, 100,000 more people have died than would have been expected. That is surely significant cause for us to take this question seriously.We know that there are adverse effects from the vaccination. Everybody acknowledges that; it is a question of the extent to which those effects have been manifested. I am afraid, is that the MHRA is significantly deficient in the way it operates. The Cumberlege report—this was referenced in the earlier debate—raised concerns about the way treatments are regulated and licensed that have not yet been addressed. I am afraid that through the covid episode many of the same concerns were manifested in relation to the vaccines.We now know that the MHRA knew about the effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine on blood clotting as early as February 2021, but issued a warning about that only some months later—in April, a month after other countries had suspended the AZ vaccine. The MHRA also knew about the prevalence of heart problems and myocarditis in February 2021 but did nothing about it until June that year. In the intervening time, millions of people were vaccinated without the knowledge that the MHRA had. As has been said, we found out recently that Pfizer misrepresented the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. There has been very little comeback against it for that, and no meaningful fine. As we heard, just a few thousands pounds were charged in expenses.The regulatory system that oversees the pharmaceutical companies is surely deeply conflicted, not least due to being partly funded by the pharmaceutical companies that it was set up to represent. It is significant and of concern that they have made so much money out of the vaccines, and so far do not appear to be making due recompense for some of the acknowledged harms— I am not talking about the wilder claims—that their vaccines have been responsible for. Will the Minister enlighten us on whether the indemnities against civil and Government action that the Government awarded to the vaccine manufacturers at the beginning of the production process still apply if it transpires that the companies misled the Government and the public about the safety and efficacy of their product?The inquiry has been mentioned. There are so many unanswered questions and apparent red flags that it surprises me that the media and Parliament are not more up in arms about excess deaths. I am surprised that more attention is not being paid to this question. The fact is that this scandal—if it is a scandal—suits no one in high places in our country. It is true that we have an inquiry, but as the hon. Member for Blackley and Broughton said, surely it is asking the wrong questions. It is very concerning that the module looking at the vaccination programme has been postponed. It strikes me that the inquiry is essentially asking the wrong questions; it is really just asking why we did not do more lockdowns quicker. That seems to be its prevailing question for the experts—not whether the whole response was the right one, and crucially, in the light of what we now know, whether the final response of a mass vaccination programme was as safe and effective as was claimed.We are rightly proud in this country of the effectiveness, speed and operation of the vaccine production and roll-out. It was a triumph of effective collaboration between Government and the private sector. The operation of the roll-out was a victory that all people can acknowledge, but it is not enough to say that the roll-out was done well. Was it done safely? Did it need to be done on the scale on which it was done? Particularly, did young people need to be vaccinated at all? We all remember Kate Bingham and others saying early on that the vaccine was only for the older population. These questions are increasingly being asked by the public and raised in the media.Let me conclude quickly with what I have been doing. I hope that we will get more answers from the Minister than I have had so far from the Government. On 17 April 2023—a year ago yesterday—I wrote privately to the Secretary of State, asking him for evidence that justified the Government’s assertion that there was no link between the vaccines and the excess deaths. I did that because I had so much correspondence from people raising that concern. I said:
Outrageous excess deaths Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-18 | Direct link to TV Parliament site, parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/168f642a-5708-4b1a-9857-d8eacf475252That this House has considered the covid-19 pandemic response and trends in excess deaths; and calls on the covid-19 inquiry to move onto its module 4 investigation into vaccines and therapeutics as soon as possible.We are witnesses to the greatest medical scandal in this country in living memory, and possibly ever: the excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Its causes are complex, but the novel and untested medical treatment described as a covid vaccine is a large part of the problem. I have been called an anti-vaxxer, as if I have rejected those vaccines based on some ideology. I want to state clearly and unequivocally that I have not: in fact, I am double vaccinated and vaccine-harmed. Intelligent people must be able to tell when people are neither pro-vax nor anti-vax, but are against a product that does not work and causes enormous harm to a percentage of the people who take it.I am proud to be one of the few Members of Parliament with a science degree. It is a great shame that there are not more Members with a science background in this place; maybe if there were, there would be less reliance on Whips Office briefings and more independent research, and perhaps less group-think. I say to the House in all seriousness that this debate and others like it are going to be pored over by future generations, who will be genuinely agog that the evidence has been ignored for so long, that genuine concerns were disregarded, and that those raising them were gaslit, smeared and vilified.One does not need any science training at all to be horrified by officials deliberately hiding key data in this scandal, which is exactly what is going on. The Office for National Statistics used to release weekly data on deaths per 100,000 in vaccinated and unvaccinated populations—it no longer does so, and no one will explain why. The public have a right to that data. There have been calls from serious experts, whose requests I have amplified repeatedly in this House, for what is called record-level data to be anonymised and disclosed for analysis. That would allow meaningful analysis of deaths after vaccination, and settle once and for all the issue of whether those experimental treatments are responsible for the increase in excess deaths.Far more extensive and detailed data has already been released to the pharma companies from publicly funded bodies. Jenny Harries, head of the UK Health Security Agency, said that this anonymised, aggregate death by vaccination status data is “commercially sensitive” and should not be published. The public are being denied that data, which is unacceptable; yet again, data is hidden with impunity, just like in the Post Office scandal. Professor Harries has also endorsed a recent massive change to the calculation of the baseline population level used by the ONS to calculate excess deaths. It is now incredibly complex and opaque, and by sheer coincidence, it appears to show a massive excess of deaths in 2020 and 2021 and minimal excess deaths in 2023. Under theToggle showing location of Column 505old calculation method, tried and tested for decades, the excess death rate in 2023 was an astonishing 5%—long after the pandemic was over, at a time when we would expect a deficit in deaths because so many people had sadly died in previous years. Some 20,000 premature deaths in 2023 alone are now being airbrushed away through the new normal baseline.Shocking things happened during the pandemic response. In March 2020, the Government conducted a consultation exercise on whether people over a certain age or with certain disabilities should have “do not resuscitate” orders, known as DNRs, imposed upon them. A document summarising the proposals was circulated to doctors and hospitals; it was mistakenly treated as formal policy by a number of care homes and GPs up and down the country, who enacted it. At the same time, multiple hospitals introduced a policy that they would not admit patients with DNRs, because they thought that they would be overwhelmed. The result was that people died who did not need to die while nurses performed TikTok dances.
Good people Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-18 | Get your copy of Topher's book at:www.goodpeoplebreakbadlaws.comWatch the full Battleground Melbourne Documentary for FREE at:www.battlegroundmelbourne.comFollow Topher Field on all his social media platforms via:@topherfield on Youtube, Facebook, X, Instagram, Rumble, and more!Join Topher's email list via:www.topherfield.net
The Needles Secrets Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-17 | Direct links to Marc’s book and substackAmazon.com (USA)amazon.com/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8UK Amazonamazon.co.uk/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8Australia Amazonhttps://www.amazon.com.au/NEEDLES-SECRET-UNRAVELING-MYSTERY-REVOLUTION/dp/B0CYLSCMHN/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8The Bolus Theory Series on Substackcovidmythbuster.substack.comMy Bolus Theory websitemarcgirardot.com
Increases Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-17 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Helsinki Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-16 | Dr. Aseem Malhotra, direct link to expert testimony in Finlandcasecovidpass.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Dr-Aseem-Malhotra-testimony-before-Helsinki-District-Court-12-April-2024-in-Finland-MPXjVFzs8dE.mp3
Inflammation Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-16 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Essential cells Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-16 | Sorry, I re-uploaded this one in error, but if you are watching for the first time, thats good.
New treatment blocked Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-15 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Essential T cells Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-15 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Hunger for good science and medicine Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-14 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.)Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications.He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS.Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan.Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.
Japan data Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-13 | Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japancureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 ConclusionsStatistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination,rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer.Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination.Details of the paperNo significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses,and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022. During the COVID-19 pandemicExcess deaths including cancer have become a concern in JapanStudy aimed to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for different types of cancer in Japan changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022). Official statistics from Japan,used to compare observed annual and monthly AMRs,with predicted rates based on pre- pandemic (2010-2019) figuresIn 2020(first year of the pandemic)Significant deficit mortality for all causes, and no excess mortality for all cancers. In 2021Significant excess mortality of 2.1% for all causes,and 1.1% for all cancers. In 2022Excesses mortality, 9.6%2.1% for all cancersNumber of excess deaths 115,799Number of excess cancer deaths, 7,162Lung, colorectal, stomach, pancreatic, and liver cancerAccounted for 61% of deaths from all cancers. AMRs for the four cancers with the most deaths showed a decreasing trend until the first year of the pandemic in 2020, but the rate of decrease slowed in 2021 and 2022. Since February 2021, the mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccine has been available for emergency use,and is recommended for all aged six months and olderAs of March 202380% of the Japanese population had received first and second doses, 68% had received third dose, 45% had received fourth doseExcess deaths from causes other than COVID-19 have been reported in various countries, including deaths from cancer,and Japan is no exceptionJapan, good dataLarge population of 123 millionAvailability of official statistics80% accuracy rate of death certificates according to autopsy studiesVaccination rates by age group, the websites of the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare DiscussionAll cancer deaths: A statistically significant excess emerged in 2021 and increased further in 2022. In addition, significant excess monthly mortality was observed after August 2021, whereas mass vaccination of the general population began around April 2021. There were excess trends in cancer deaths across most age groups. The significant increases in mortalities for six specific cancer types were unlikely to be explained by a shortage of healthcare services.
WHO secrecy Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-12 | Interview with leading researcher James Roguski on the new international health regulations from the WHO.Follow James on Substack, substack.com/@jamesroguski
Pfizer is deeply sorry Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-11 | Pfizer, bringing discredit to pharmaceutical industrypmcpa.org.uk/media/cwvkqvyz/3741-case-report-28-march-2024.pdftelegraph.co.uk/news/2024/04/06/pfizer-breached-regulatory-code-five-times-watchdog-findsSenior executives used social media to promote an “unlicensed” Covid vaccine.Pfizer found to have breached the regulatory code five times,Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA)Pharmaceutical watchdog,relates to a complaint about a message posted on twitterNovember 2020 by senior Pfizer employees.COMPLAINT the complainant alleged that it turned out that such misbehaviour was even more widespread than they had thought, extended right to the top of their UK operation and was apparently continuing to this very day. PANEL RULING The Panel noted Pfizer’s submission that on further investigation into this complaint four other Pfizer UK colleagues, including another senior colleague in the UK organisation, had re-tweeted the same post. The Panel queried whether a social media platform, such as Twitter was the appropriate forum to share such information. The Panel noted the tweet contained limited information regarding the efficacy of the vaccine candidate with no safety information provided. On the balance of probabilities, it was likely that the Pfizer UK employee’s connections would include UK members of the public as well as UK health professionals. The Panel noted that the tweet clearly referred to the outcome of the Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine being developed to protect against COVID-19. The Panel noted that Clause 3.1 prohibited the promotion of a medicine prior to the grant of its marketing authorisation. They must not mislead either directly or by implication, by distortion, exaggeration or undue emphasis. Material must be sufficiently complete to enable the recipient to form their own opinion of the therapeutic value of the medicine. It must not be stated that a product has no adverse reactions, toxic hazards or risks of addiction or dependency. The Panel noted the tweet made no reference to adverse events and was therefore concerned that important safety information relating to the vaccine candidate was not provided and ruled a breach of Clause 7.9 of the 2019 Code as acknowledged by Pfizer. The Panel noted Pfizer stated that the senior employee whose re-tweet was the subject of this complaint had completed the social media training module in October 2019. Activity which was clearly outside of company policy had not been taken down or deleted.‘Unlicensed medicine proactively disseminated’“unlicensed medicine being proactively disseminated on Twitter to health professions and members of the public in the UK”.Pfizer UK spokesman“fully recognises and accepts the issues highlighted by this PMCPA ruling”, “deeply sorry”.Pfizer‘Accidental and unintentional’Sixth time Pfizer has been reprimanded by the regulator over its promotion of the Covid-19 vaccine.Ben Kingsley, UsForThem“It’s astonishing how many times Pfizer’s senior executives have been found guilty of serious regulatory offences – in this case including the most serious offence of all under the UK Code of Practice.“Yet the consequences for Pfizer and the individuals concerned continue to be derisory. This hopeless system of regulation for a multi-billion dollar life and death industry has become a sham, in dire need of reform.”
Trickle of truth Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-10 | The spike protein exhibits pathogenic characteristics https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart?fbclid=IwAR0_LO6qgqBlf-Of5kix-wpuAVmNDtk1tYm4LJyIx-Rvn3SeFbEDGo3bK0cMultiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression inMuscle tissueLymphatic systemCardiomyocytesOther cells after entry into the circulation.There is concern that COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to long COVID, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35084966The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae,after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines utilise a modified, stabilised prefusion spike protein that might share similar toxic effects with its viral counterpart.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38024037Not the natural UridineUracil is one of the four nucleobases in RNAAdenine, cytosine, guanineThe Critical Contribution of Pseudouridine to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccinesncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8600071Both consisted of N1-methyl-pseudouridine-modified mRNA encoding the SARS-COVID-19 Spike protein and were delivered with a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulationA possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of POTS has been demonstrated in a cohort of 284,592 COVID-19-vaccinated individualsPostural tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) is when your heart rate increases very quickly after getting up from sitting or lying down.nhs.uk/conditions/postural-tachycardia-syndromeRecipients of two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines display a class switch to IgG4 antibodies. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37243095Abnormally high levels of IgG4Might cause autoimmune diseasesPromote cancer growthAutoimmune myocarditisOther IgG 4-related diseasesThere are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations,relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns. Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA,and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required.Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID.Millions worldwide experience post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC or long COVID)Although the Australian Bureau of Statistics and other health agencies in Australia do not survey the prevalence of long COVID, it is estimated that it affects hundreds of thousandsLong COVID is a heterogeneous disease with variable cardiac, pulmonary, haematological and neurological involvementThere is no consensus on what causes lingering COVID-19 symptoms long after the acute infection has cleared.Often unable to secure a diagnosis, patients are wont to seek multiple serial medical opinions, frequently being told their condition is due to anxiety or post-pandemic mental issues.The median duration of long COVID symptoms is five months, but 10% of patients still experience symptoms at 12 months.Fatigue, shortness of breath and difficulty concentrating are reported at least up to two years after SARS-CoV-2 infection.It is still too early to say whether some individuals with long COVID might never recover.Long COVID patients present elevated inflammatory biomarkers,(eg interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α)Those subscribing to long COVID digital support groups report months of frustration at not being listened to, finding the health system woefully inadequate, with few primary or secondary care professionals knowing enough to offer much. The outcome for some of those experiencing long COVID is self-prescribed medication using over-the-counter remedies and dietary changes based on potentially conflicting or misleading online information.Some speak of a substantial proportion of their income being used in this way.In Australia, an estimated 240,000 of those with long COVID no longer work full time.Work absenteeism might significantly impact the nation’s economy, as in the UK.In the US, long COVID has been declared a national emergency.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36219031Reduced to working part time to cope with unwellness, those with long COVID commonly report having to wait a year or more before receiving a diagnosis.
Power of the State Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-05 | ‘I should decide if my vulnerable adult son has a Covid vaccine – not a judge’Sarah’s instinct to protect Tom, a 24-year-old with complex medical conditions, could be overridden by one of Britain’s most powerful courtstelegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/parenting/children/covid-vaccine-health-risks-court-heart-vulnerable-son‘They should be proving to us that it’s safe, not me trying to prove it isn’t’‘All I’ve ever wanted to be is a great mother and to protect my son’Mum Sarah and son Tom (23 years / 18 months LD)Congenital heart conditionChromosomal condition, Partial Trisomy 13She dared to question whether the Covid-19 vaccine was safe for her vulnerable sonNearly three years, Court of ProtectionWhether the greater good – for Tom and society – will be served by him being injected(despite complex medical conditions)SarahClaims state being “heavy-handed”,insisting it knows better than a mother.Tom had all his childhood vaccines.Her fear about the vaccinemRNA suitable in multiple pathology?Dentists, needs antibiotics2021Tom contracted covid twice, recovered quickly.Sarah repeatedly asking medical professionals“I went to talk to my GP about my concerns,”“I explained that I was worried there was a possibility the vaccine could cause myocarditis or pericarditis”“At the end of our chat when I said I was concerned about Tom having the vaccine, the doctor simply said he needed to tick some boxes for the relevant “agencies”. I didn’t think any more of it.”A few days laterSocial worker unexpected visit. Then, a physiotherapistBoth questioned about why Tom had not yet had the vaccine.“I felt they should be proving to us that it’s safe, not me trying to prove it is not safe.”April 2021Court summons,signalling the beginning of a protracted and ongoing legal tussle with the state.Judge Burrowslegal “impasse”“on the advice given to clinicians by effectively the UK Government”Sarah“the risks posed by the vaccine were unclear and maybe significant.”Judge BurrowsTom was in an at-risk group,“the evidence is that vaccines do give protection against serious illness and death.”Whether Tom “may have made an altruistic decision to receive the vaccine to protect the community at large” “In other words: might Tom have behaved like a responsible citizen and considered the effect of his decision on other people had he made the decision for himself.”“it is in Tom’s best interest to receive the vaccine”Court battle is still ongoing.SarahCrowdfunding site – “Forced Vaccinations On Our Loved Ones” So far, those who believe mother knows best have raised more than £35,000.Sarah has spent £25,000 of her own life savings.ProfessorWorld expert in Trisomy 13, told the court the vaccine could pose a threat to Tom. If the court ultimately orders that Tom should be vaccinated, any attempt by his mother to prevent that happening could culminate in her being jailed or assets being seized. Sarah“‘He is currently a fit and well young man with no comorbidities and he takes no medications. “The injection could potentially injure or kill him. If he is given the vaccine, one of my greatest fears is that he cannot speak and express how he is feeling should he have an adverse reaction.“I have dedicated my whole life to overseeing his health and worked tirelessly with the medical community to develop intricate and personalised care regimes,”“It’s my care which has contributed to Tom living until he is 24, despite Trisomy 13 often resulting in a limited lifespan.“For the judge to believe that Tom would take it for the sake of others – the so-called altruistic view – denies the possibility that there is any risk at all to Tom. “I would think he’d protect his own life by not taking it.”“All I have ever wanted to be is a great mother and to protect my son. I believe that as his mother, I know what is best for him.”twitter.com/ClareCraigPath
Learning from the past on the Darwin trail Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-04 | Reflections on scientific history and the invaluable lessons the the present and future. Thanks to Professor and Mrs. Clancy for a remarkable trip.
Doctor advocates for her patients Dr. John Campbell 2024-04-04 | Dr. Melissa McCann is a general practitioner in Queensland, AustraliaCrowdfunding page- nomoresilenceau.com/campaigns/covid-vaccine-class-action-injuriesThe speech that caused all my Medical Board woes - rumble.com/v2bk5mw-dr-melissa-mccann-speech-covid-vaccines-and-effects-tour-sydney-australia-2.htmlA video summary of the class action claims- youtu.be/1i1RlGqKRlY?feature=sharedThe class action website including link to join – www.covidvaxclassaction.com.au
Global cancer concerns Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-29 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, mRNA Vaccines Must Be Banned Once and For Alldailysceptic.org/2023/10/01/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-allconservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-allAt the end of last year I reported that I was seeing melanoma patients who had been stable for years relapse after their first booster (their third injection). The number of my patients affected has been rising ever since.Other oncologists have contacted me from all over the world including from Australia and the U.S. After boostersThe consensus is that it is no longer confined to melanoma but that increased incidence of:After boostersLymphomas, a cancer of the lymphatic systemLeukaemias, a group of cancers that affect the bloodKidney cancersMy colorectal cancer colleagues report an epidemic of explosive cancers (those presenting with multiple metastatic spread in the liver and elsewhere). Those of us who knew from the beginning that the sequence of SARS-CoV-2 contained inserts which could not have possibly occurred naturally, and were similar to ones that had already been published from the Wuhan laboratoryThe ‘vaccine’ did not stay at the site of injection as promisedBatch-to-batch variabilityThese alarming concerns seem to have been brushed off by the regulators when they should have immediately begun investigating them in depth.Yellow Card and U.S. VAERS adverse event reports to be nothing to be worried about.DNA contaminationSo why are these cancers occurring?T cell suppression was my first likely explanation.However we must also now consider DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development, Reports that mRNA spike protein binds p53 and other cancer suppressor genes. To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence.No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.EurostatCirculatory diseases, cancer: 54% of all EU deaths in 2021https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20240325-2In 2021 there were 5.3 million deaths in the EUCirculatory diseases, 1.71 million (32% of all deaths). Cancer, 1.14 million (22%). Respiratory diseases (0.32 million; 6%)Diseases of the digestive system (0.21 million; 4%)Eurostat, Excess deaths 2022https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220916-1April, + 12%May, +7%June, +7%July, + 16%Eurostat, 2023https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20230616-3Excess mortality continuedEurostat, Jan 2024, + 3.6%In January 2024, the highest excess mortality rates were in the Netherlands (15.3 %), Denmark (11.5 %) and Germany (9.9 %).In January 2024, excess mortality continued to vary across the EU. Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Croatia, Luxembourg, Slovakia, Poland, Latvia and Czechia recorded no excess deaths.
The curious tale of hydroxychloroquine Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-28 | Lots of data available from c19hcq.org/meta.htmlGreat talk with Professor Robert Clancy on his latest publication on this well known drug.
Evidence based communication Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-25 | John talks with Professor Robert Clancy on the difficulties facing health care and health professionals in Australia and around the world.Direct link to Australian Medical Professionals Society, https://amps.redunion.com.au
Long term sickness, massive increase Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-21 | And excess deaths and changes in the causes of death.twitter.com/ABridgen/status/1769790511475212394The long term sick has risen by over 700,000 people since the spring of 2021, this coincides with the rollout of the experimental Covid 19 vaccine. hartgroup.org/rise-in-long-term-sicknessapp.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9
Post viral syndrome data Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-16 | Long covid seems to be the same as any other post viral syndromescimex.org/newsfeed/expert-reaction-long-covid-may-be-no-different-to-other-long-term-virus-effectsFrom: European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID 2024, Barcelona, Spain, 27-30 April).Queensland dataLong COVID ‘indistinguishable’ from other post-viral syndromes and other respiratory virus a year after infectionComparison with influenza and other respiratory illnesses Australia, Queensland,During Omicron waveNo evidence of worse post-viral symptoms or functional impairment a year after infection.Long COVID may have appeared to be a distinct and severe illness because of high numbers of COVID-19 cases.N= 5,112 adult symptomatic individuals(Fatigue, brain fog, cough, shortness of breath, change to smell and taste, dizziness, rapid or irregular heartbeat)PCRs conducted between 29 May and 25 June 2022PCR-confirmed infection for COVID-19 = 2,399PCR negative for COVID-19 = 2,713Influenza positive = 995Results collected, May and June 2023OverallStill reporting symptoms, 16% (834/5,112)Still reported moderate-to-severe functional impairment, 3.6% (184)Those still reporting any symptoms after a yearPost Covid No differencePost InfluenzaThose with moderate-to-severe functional limitations a year after diagnosisNone covid adults, 3%Covid positive adults, 4.1%Influenza positive adults, 3.4% bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/bmjph/1/1/e000060.full.pdfComparison at 12 weeks post infectionOngoing symptoms after covid, 21.4%Ongoing symptoms after influenza, 23%Moderate to severe functional impairment after covid, 4.1%Moderate to severe functional impairment after influenza, 4.4%Obvious question not addressed!!Presence of spike protein antibodiesDr John Gerrard, Queensland’s Chief Health OfficerThese findings underscore the importance of comparing post-COVID-19 outcomes with those following other respiratory infections, and of further research into post-viral syndromes.Furthermore, we believe it is time to stop using terms like ‘long COVID’. They wrongly imply there is something unique and exceptional about longer term symptoms associated with this virus. This terminology can cause unnecessary fearOther commentatorstheguardian.com/society/2024/mar/15/long-covid-symptoms-flu-coldhttps://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-16/queensland-chief-health-officer-long-covid/103594020https://www.9news.com.au/health/coronavirus-australia-queensland-health-study-long-covid/dede1234-d86f-4842-b6f9-975097dc7e62
Covid Inquiry appears fundamentally biased Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-14 | Covid Inquiry appears fundamentally biased, say scientists55 professors and academicscollateralglobal.org/article/an-open-letter-to-baroness-hallett-chair-of-the-uk-covid-inquirydailysceptic.org/2024/03/13/covid-inquiry-appears-fundamentally-biased-55-professors-and-academics-tell-baroness-halletttelegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/12/covid-inquiry-biased-say-scientistsAn open letter to Baroness Hallett, Chair of the UK Covid Inquiry The Inquiry must urgently address its apparent biases, assumptions, impartiality, & lack of evidence-based approach First, the Inquiry gives the impression of being fundamentally biased. there has been little opportunity for petitions to be brought by those who have suffered from the negative effects of pandemic policy decisions. This is preventing a more holistic assessment of impacts on population health and wellbeing. This lack of neutrality appears to have led to biased reasoning and predetermined conclusions, for example, to lockdown faster next time. Second, the Inquiry is taking key assumptions for grantedinstead of examining and critiquing them in light of the evidence. The consensus position in pre-2020 pandemic plans was that non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdown, had weak evidence of effectiveness, and were predicted to cause substantial harm to society, especially if used for prolonged periods. This informed the initial response to Covid in early 2020. Yet, the Inquiry assumes that these measures are effective and appropriate. As a result, it downplays the harms to society caused by two years of emergency infection control mandates. Third, the Inquiry lacks impartiality in the selection and questioning of expert witnesses. It has given preferential treatment to scientific advisers on SAGE,who have a vested interest in maintaining the justification for their policy recommendations. Very few scientists with an alternative position have been asked to testify, and the Inquiry has been confrontational rather than inquisitorial in its questioning of these views. The Inquiry has not seriously questioned the hypotheses and assumptions offered to government, especially from government appointed modelers, which were used to justify Covid policies. Neither has it seriously examined the social and economic costs of lockdown. It has also stuck to an agenda of UK exceptionalism failing to recognize the experience elsewhere in the world. Fourth, the format of the Inquiry is impeding investigation into the key scientific and policy questions. The Inquiry has adopted a legal format that prevents a systematic evaluation of the evidence by biomedical and social scientists on the harms of restrictions to the British public, the impact on Covid from policies such as mandatory NPIs, and the state of evidence for best practice. It is focused on who did or said what, rather than asking fundamental scientific questions. Yet investigating the interplay between harms, benefits, and best practice is critical to preparing for the next pandemic. The Inquiry, as currently functioning, appears unsuited to this task of national importance. Fifth, the Inquiry risks reducing public trustin the impartiality and independence of government accountability and oversight. Its size and cost (by some estimates £300-500 million) will make it the largest public Inquiry ever undertaken to date, and yet its shortcomings, if not addressed, risk compromising the credibility of future public inquiries. We believe the Inquiry has a significant and important mission and we would like to see it succeed. However, if it is to do so, these shortcomings need to be urgently addressed. The Inquiry must invite a much broader range of scientific experts with more critical viewpoints. It must also review the evidence on diverse topics so that it can be fully informed of relevant science and the economic and social cost of Covid policies to British society. We, the undersigned, believe this is an urgent national priority and fundamental to ensuring that future pandemic response is evidence- based and maximizes the health and well-being of all. We, the undersigned, are a group of UK public health scholars and academics in related disciplines, widely published in our fields, deeply concerned that the Covid Inquiry is not living up to its mission to evaluate the mistakes made during the pandemic, whether Covid measures were appropriate, and to prepare the country for the next pandemic.
Vit D research, definitive and significant Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-13 | Vitamin D supplementation has a protective effect, against the incidence of COVID-19 in RCT studies,OR 0.403, (95% IC 0.218, 0.747)In the RCTs performed on HCWs, the overall reduction in risk in the population supplemented with vitamin D was approximately 80%Against the incidence of COVID-19 in analytical studiesOR = 0.592, (95% IC 0.476–0.736)Against the incidence of COVID-19 ICU admissionOR 0.317, (95% IC 0.147–0.680). Our meta-analysis suggests a definitive and significant association between the protective role of vitamin D and COVID-19 incidence and ICU admission.Preventive Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk for COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysismdpi.com/2072-6643/16/5/679(28th Feb 2024)Vitamin D, crucial rolesBone homeostasis, muscle function, oncogenesis, immune response and metabolism. In the context of the COVID-19Numerous researchers have tried to determine the role vitamin D in the immune response to the virus. Systematic review and meta-analysis, 15th May 2023Preventive vitamin D supplementation, 16 publicationsN = 1,262,235 participants,A protective role inIncidence of COVID-19MortalityAdmission to intensive care units (ICUs). We calculated the Odds RatiosThe assessment of potential bias and the evaluation of study quality will be conducted independently by two researchers. Extra informationThe majority of the effects of vitamin D are mediated by the VDR, which promotes the expression of genes containing specific DNA sequences and is expressed in almost all nucleated cellsApproximately 3 percent of the human genome is under the control of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin DVitamin D has been observed to contribute to the synthesis of defensins, to be pivotal for enhancing the phagocytic activity,and to modulate the immune system response by regulating the inflammatory cascade
New and damning evidence Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-06 | To be reported to the UK police. Read the full letter here, twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1765289139677618585/photo/1
Harms to children Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-05 | This excellent scientific analysis of recent events continues in interview three of this series. Follow Dr. Craig on SubStack, drclarecraig.substack.comCOVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here:amazon.co.uk/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707For friends in the US get your copy here, amazon.com/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707Have you ever felt the covid story did not entirely add up? Expired contains multiple eye-opening revelations about covid with compelling evidence that provides a coherent, sober and clear explanation that better fits the data we have so far. Meticulous research by pathologist Dr Clare Craig sheds light on the largely overlooked evidence of airborne virus transmission, examining twelve related beliefs on spread, lockdowns, asymptomatic infections, and masks. In addition, Expired champions the importance of Western ethical principles, damaged by pandemic actions and calls for their restoration. The covid debate has proved incredibly polarising. One side believed every intervention was saving lives, while the other emphasised the harms caused. Biased modelling based on a worst-case scenario led to fearful assumptions presented as fact. By dint of sheer repetition these ‘facts’ became unquestionable. Those scientists who dared to question were proclaimed dangerous. Welcome to Cloud-Covid-Land.Let’s bring back nuance. It’s time to return to reality."
Excess deaths, MPs request data Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-03 | Health Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’Tweet from Andrew Bridgen with the letter in fulltwitter.com/ABridgenHealth Secretary urged to release data that ‘may link Covid vaccine to excess deaths’MPs and peers criticise ‘wall of silence’telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/03/02/health-secretary-release-data-covid-vaccine-excess-deathsMPs and peers have accused the Health Secretary of withholding data that could link the Covid vaccine to excess deaths A cross-party group“growing public and professional concerns” UK’s rates of excess deaths since 2020Demand to be shown the underlying data for to support the Government’s assertion, “no evidence” linking excess deaths to the vaccines for Covid-19.21 MPs and peers“If those data do indeed exist, please share them; if thorough investigations have already ruled out such a link, please share the relevant reports,” “There is no place here for blind faith.”Written toHealth SecretaryDepartment of Health and Social Care (DHSC)Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)Potentially critical data, which maps the date of people’s Covid vaccine doses to the date of their deaths,have been released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into the public domain.Data should be released “on the same anonymised basis that it was shared with the pharmaceutical groups, and there seems to be no credible reason why that should not be done immediately”.“Questions about these trends, however, have to date been met by a relative wall of silence from your organisations and other public health officials.”A DHSC spokesman“We are committed to data transparency and publish a wide range of data on excess mortality. The datasets published are kept under constant review.”
Zero covid and smallpox Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-02 | This excellent scientific analysis of recent events continues in interview three of this series. Follow Dr. Craig on SubStack, drclarecraig.substack.comCOVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here:amazon.co.uk/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707For friends in the US get your copy here, amazon.com/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707Have you ever felt the covid story did not entirely add up? Expired contains multiple eye-opening revelations about covid with compelling evidence that provides a coherent, sober and clear explanation that better fits the data we have so far. Meticulous research by pathologist Dr Clare Craig sheds light on the largely overlooked evidence of airborne virus transmission, examining twelve related beliefs on spread, lockdowns, asymptomatic infections, and masks. In addition, Expired champions the importance of Western ethical principles, damaged by pandemic actions and calls for their restoration. The covid debate has proved incredibly polarising. One side believed every intervention was saving lives, while the other emphasised the harms caused. Biased modelling based on a worst-case scenario led to fearful assumptions presented as fact. By dint of sheer repetition these ‘facts’ became unquestionable. Those scientists who dared to question were proclaimed dangerous. Welcome to Cloud-Covid-Land.Let’s bring back nuance. It’s time to return to reality."
How much Vitamin D should I take? Dr. John Campbell 2024-03-01 | Consultant Physician, medical researcher and author, Dr David Grimes conducted much original research on the essential to life Vitamin D. Buy his inexpensive latest book here. yorkbookshop.com/health-and-personal-development/307-vitamin-d-deficiency-and-covid-19-its-central-role-in-a-world-pandemic.html2 minor corrections - 150nmol/L = 60ng/mL (not 80ng/mL as stated and at 2min 27secs) 57min 11 secs Calcifidiol appears in the BNF here:bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/calcifediol-monohydrate and medicinal form herebnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/calcifediol-monohydrate/medicinal-forms
Psychological themes Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-28 | Check this out, lighthousedeclaration.org/declarationRos Nealon-Cook, a psychologist from Australia, had her license suspended for sounding the alarm about the harms to children from government pandemic policy. Ros has joined forces with a number health professionals from around the world who were similarly censored and silenced. Together, they have created The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration to raise awareness about the widespread propaganda and censorship of expert scientific opinion. You can read and sign the declaration here: www.lighthousedeclaration.world – adding your signature will take less than a minute. In the coming months, the Lighthouse Declaration team will host a series of webinars and roundtables to further expand the conversation on these critical issues. Ros and the Lighthouse Declaration team, can be contacted through their social media channels or via the website: Twitter: @Lighthouse_DecTwitter: @rosalina_ncFacebook: LighthouseDeclarationInstagram: @lighthouse_dec
Vaccine regulator failed Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-27 | We feel compelled to conclude that the MHRA has indeed become an enabler for the pharmaceutical industry, with patient safety no longer being its primary concern.Medicines regulator failed to flag Covid vaccine side effects,and must be urgently investigated.All-party parliamentary group, (APPG) on Pandemic Response and Recovery,believe MHRA were aware of heart and clotting issues,in February 2021,but did not highlight the problems for several monthstelegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/27/mhra-covid-vaccine-side-effects-mps-all-party-parliamentarytelegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/05/esther-mcvey-covid-inquiry-lockdown-files-matt-hancock-baronessmedscape.co.uk/viewarticle/uk-medicines-regulator-serious-risk-patient-safety-2024a10003cd?ecd=wnl_ret_240220_mscpmrk-GB_daily_etid6322343&uac=188254MN&impID=6322343&sso=true\appgpandemic.org/news/mhra-letter-health-select-committeeWe write regarding serious concerns about the approach of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA),to patient safety and also problems in a system that, far from protecting patients, continues to put them at serious risk.Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic meshWe also believe that the MHRA is at the heart of these far wider endemic failings, and that those cited in this letter merely represent the tip of a sizeable iceberg of failure.The Yellow Card SchemeThe Yellow Card Scheme … is failing patients.Hospital admissions are caused or complicated by ADRs (16.5%), while analysis of in patient stays has shown that 15% of patients experience one or more ADRs, with half being either definitely or possibly avoidable.Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review Review, report First Do No Harm:We heard about a system that cannot be relied upon to identify promptly significant adverse outcomes arising from a medication or device,it is clear that there is gross under-reporting, and our complaints systems are both too complex and too diffuse to allow early signal detection.Under-reporting hinders the ability to detect signals and assign causation. The cost to patient safety of such an unreliable system can be measured in the needless fatalities, the considerable burden on the quality of life for survivors,and a £2.2 billion strain on NHS England alone.Only one in 12 patients are aware that they can report a suspected ADR. A 2006 systemic review pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16689555The rate of under-reporting of adverse events was, on average, 94% and possibly as high as 98%, meaning possibly only two in every 100 ADRs were reported to the MHRA. For example, a survey of UK pharmacists suggested they lack interest in, and do not promote, direct patient reporting. Only 19% of the respondents displayed a poster promoting the Yellow Card Scheme in their pharmacy. 2023, analysis of anticoagulantspubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37269441Reporting of gastrointestinal bleedsNorth West of England Hospital Trust recorded 12,013 bleed-related emergency admissions. Of these, 1,058 were taking DOAC anticoagulants. Only six DOAC Yellow Card reports (0.56% of the possible) were made by the Trust during the period.Conflicts of Interest and TransparencyFrom FDA to MHRA: are drug regulators for hire?bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538The regulator-industry revolving doorProportion of covid-19 vaccine committee members that declared financial COIsUK, HMRA, 32%Australia, TGA, 50%March 2022, Dame June Raine, Chief Executive of the MHRAagency’s transition from “the watchdog to the enabler” does little to quell suspicions of conflicts and the implications for patient safety and cannot be overlooked.MHRA’s responses to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.Between 2008 and 2017, only 41% of requests were successful. Since 2019, the number of requests has seen a substantial increase from 609 to 1,609 in 2021, likely due to concerns about the regulation of Covid-19 vaccinations, with 76% of these requests answered outside the 20 working days statutory response time. Often exemptions were applied or vague or evasive responses were received.The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agencyfrom regulatory approval to post marketing pharmacovigilance the MHRA has a history of failing patientsThe MHRA does not attempt to assess or compare the safety of different vaccines, due to inadequate reporting in the system which prevents any analysis: MHRA “does not hold a process for the investigation and follow up of individual Yellow Card reports” MHRA only followed up some 54% of deaths reported in yellow cards as possibly linked to exposure to one of the Covid-19 vaccines. What conclusions are we to draw about the seeming unwillingness of a regulator, largely funded by those it regulates, to disclose data to the same public it professes to protect?
The 4 lighthouse declarations Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-26 | Check this out, lighthousedeclaration.org/declarationRos Nealon-Cook, a psychologist from Australia, had her license suspended for sounding the alarm about the harms to children from government pandemic policy. Ros has joined forces with a number health professionals from around the world who were similarly censored and silenced. Together, they have created The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration to raise awareness about the widespread propaganda and censorship of expert scientific opinion. You can read and sign the declaration here: www.lighthousedeclaration.world – adding your signature will take less than a minute. In the coming months, the Lighthouse Declaration team will host a series of webinars and roundtables to further expand the conversation on these critical issues. Ros and the Lighthouse Declaration team, can be contacted through their social media channels or via the website: Twitter: @Lighthouse_DecTwitter: @rosalina_ncFacebook: LighthouseDeclarationInstagram: @lighthouse_dec
Death of science and covid Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-26 | Professor Angus Dalgleish, physician, oncologist, pathologist, medical researcher and author. Get your copy of The Death of Science, https://gazellebookservices.co.uk/pro...Also by Professor Dalgleish, The Origin of the Virus: The hidden truths behind the microbe that killed millions of people, https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/185457106...
More harms and cruelty Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-25 | This excellent scientific analysis of recent events continues in interview three of this series. Follow Dr. Craig on SubStack, drclarecraig.substack.comCOVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here:amazon.co.uk/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707For friends in the US get your copy here, amazon.com/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707Have you ever felt the covid story did not entirely add up? Expired contains multiple eye-opening revelations about covid with compelling evidence that provides a coherent, sober and clear explanation that better fits the data we have so far. Meticulous research by pathologist Dr Clare Craig sheds light on the largely overlooked evidence of airborne virus transmission, examining twelve related beliefs on spread, lockdowns, asymptomatic infections, and masks. In addition, Expired champions the importance of Western ethical principles, damaged by pandemic actions and calls for their restoration. The covid debate has proved incredibly polarising. One side believed every intervention was saving lives, while the other emphasised the harms caused. Biased modelling based on a worst-case scenario led to fearful assumptions presented as fact. By dint of sheer repetition these ‘facts’ became unquestionable. Those scientists who dared to question were proclaimed dangerous. Welcome to Cloud-Covid-Land.Let’s bring back nuance. It’s time to return to reality."
John and Neil Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-24 | Original link to GB News live, Thanks to Neli Oliver as always.youtube.com/watch?v=8WX6YL9JnLw
Standing on the shoulders of giants Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-24 | A wide ranging discussion with Dutch journalist and author Nikko Norte.nikkonorte.comcavemancode.comnikkonorte.substack.comThis video was recorded late 2023.
Change in death stats Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-23 | Massive APPARENT reduction in excess deaths in 2023 as UK ONS change how they calculate excess deaths. ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/latestOECD, UKstats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676Excess deaths in 2022, 52,514 (9.26%)OECD, UK, weeks 1 – 44, 2023Excess deaths, 49,389 (9.44%)gov.uk/government/organisations/office-for-health-improvement-and-disparities/about/statisticsapp.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjoiYmUwNmFhMjYtNGZhYS00NDk2LWFlMTAtOTg0OGNhNmFiNGM0IiwidCI6ImVlNGUxNDk5LTRhMzUtNGIyZS1hZDQ3LTVmM2NmOWRlODY2NiIsImMiOjh9Early heart disease deaths rise to 14-year highbhf.org.uk/what-we-do/news-from-the-bhf/news-archive/2024/january/early-heart-disease-deaths-rise-to-14-year-high Over 100,000 excess deaths involving cardiovascular conditions in England since February 2020Heart and circulatory diseases cause around a quarter of all deaths in England – over 140,000 deaths each year or one death every four minutes.In 2022Over 39,000 people in England died prematurely of cardiovascular conditions,heart attacks, coronary heart disease and stroke,an average of 750 people each week. It is the highest annual total since 2008.
Vitamin D deficiency pandemic Dr. John Campbell 2024-02-22 | Professor David Anderson. Early vitamin D research doctor. Vitamin D and other topics, a fascinating wide ranging discussion with retired Consultant Physician and Professor of Endocrinology David Anderson. Download a free copy of VITAMIN D3 and the Great Biology Reset, by Professor David Anderson and Dr David Grimes.dgreatbiologyreset.com/#download
