White Horse
Scott Kelly gives us flying lessons...
updated 6 years ago
Does it appear that Richard Ayoade is struggling with this topic? Has he peered into the Flat Earth abyss and seen his own questions unanswered? He seems to stutter and come to a compelte halt when asked what he thinks of Flat Earthers... is he a closet Flat Earther?
As to be expected the mainstream broadcaster Channel Four and it's dancing puppet 'comedians' show themselves to be very low information and closed minded.
Observations. Go out and make your own!
A UFO. A Satellite? CGI?
I will revisit in other videos on the subject of SpaceX and particularly the Starman launch, but for now, here is a video comparison from a witness who filmed the launched from a couple of miles away.
I was always aware that nobody had filmed the side boosters taking off and landing before. So I was interested to find a video from an amateur astronomer on Youtube 'Astronomy Live' that did just that during the latest launch.
So what do we concede from this video? I will explore the conclusions in a later video, but for now, this shows that there is a very strong possibility that those rocket boosters took off and landed as claimed.
HOWEVER this does for me conclusively prove that the Earth is round, or that there is a Tesla Roadster on a journey towards Mars.
Original Astronomy Live video - shown on the right
youtube.com/watch?v=z5K7HKFkZ8o&
Original (hmmm) SpaceX video - shown on the left
youtube.com/watch?v=wbSwFU6tY1c
No copyright infringement intended, a bit of fun only.
Having studied the JFK Zapruda footage extensively over the years, particularly looking to see if either the driver or front passenger had delivered a shot at Kennedy, I was shocked to discover one day that the footage had appeared to have changed, and that there were now 2 extra people sat between the front and where JFK and Jackie were sat. This was utterly impossible and completely removes the possibility of anyone in the front seats shooting Kennedy. How could this be?
How many people do you remember in the JFK car... 4 or 6...?
I decided to buy one of these devices, albeit a very small cheap version, and test the theory that the stars could be a similar optical illusion seen on the underside of the firmament projected from underneath the 'Lens Earth' through the hole at the North Pole. This is exactly the same principle as the toy device, with the IMAGE and OBJECT swapping places. No 'projection technology' is needed, the light is naturally projected into the reflective surface.
This is a simple experiment that anyone can do in the days before the Full Moon. If you watch the relative positions of the Sun and Moon, the shadow of the Moon does not match where the Sun is located.
NASA has a difficult past history with rubber O Ring seals. Degraded rubber O rings were blamed for causing the Challenger disaster, and as a result it was recommended that O Ring seals use 3 rings rather than just 2.
Destin from 'Smarter Everyday' spoke to Don Petit on some of the details on the ISS Cupola, particularly the details on the rubber O Ring seals.
I claim no copyright on any clips used. Please see Destin's channel Smarter Every Day for the full video discussing the Cupola with Don Petit. Other clips all used for illustrative purposes.
This video is currently in a copyright dispute for my use of other people' clips for illustrative purposes.
In mind of a potential hole at the North Pole combining with features of Flat Earth like a dome/firmament and waters above and below, this device demonstrates the possible reason why we do not see stars in space. We apparently cannot see anything from the vast star field, like we see on a clear night from Earth, including the Milky Way, from a high altitude. Is this because at this altitude the optical illusion that projects the star field onto the sky will not work?
Are the stars, the luminaries, the wandering stars, the 'planets', comets, everything except the Sun and the Moon, contained in the 'Waters Below?'
Pt 2
_ _ _
"Virtual and real image" clips originally: Josep Homs Llach
youtube.com/watch?v=zNqXtzTcIqE
In mind of a potential hole at the North Pole combining with features of Flat Earth like a dome/firmament and waters above and below, this device demonstrates the possible reason why we do not see stars in space. We apparently cannot see anything from the vast star field, like we see on a clear night from Earth, including the Milky Way, from a high altitude. Is this because at this altitude the optical illusion that projects the star field onto the sky will not work?
Are the stars, the luminaries, the wandering stars, the 'planets', comets, everything except the Sun and the Moon, contained in the 'Waters Below?'
Pt 1
_ _ _
"Virtual and real image" clips originally: Josep Homs Llach
youtube.com/watch?v=zNqXtzTcIqE
The vast majority of the media approached the story as if the racial slur was true and discussed what Firmino's punishments should be, and further on how foreign players should be better educated as to how to behave in English football. The accusation was that Firmino had used the word "Negro" during a Portuguese tirade at Holgate in the immediate aftermath of the violent push into the crowd. Still, despite ZERO evidence, 'Kick It Out' campaign made a public statement on it.
However, very quickly it emerged that not only was there NO EVIDENCE of any racial slur, but that also Holgate had used 'homophobic' slurs in past tweets, all of which were deleted along with the account in the day or so following the match.
While the FA has yet to produce any findings, the 'internet' has rallied around Firmino. Many Portuguese lip readers providing what Firmino had said ('crazy mofo'), and the vast majority of people in the comments section wondering why no one was talking about taking any action against Holgate for the reckless push.