Uploaded May 2009 | Updated September 2026, 4 hours ago
Original video by themaskedanalyst, who is a very insightful guy. As his username suggests, he provides analysis on various situations.
I strongly strongly recommend you subscribe!
youtube.com/user/themaskedanalyst
This is a response to the YourTubeAdvocate (known as 20) who posted a video entitled
Why videos were removed.
youtube.com/watch?v=0BDVd3QOgng
My correspondence with the YouTube copyright department. This is the worst example of corporate communication that I have ever seen.
themaskedanalyst.com/Correspondence%20with%20Youtube%20Legal.htm
My account was suspended for four months due to a totally bogus DMCA. I wrote to YouTube asking them to watch the video and this would PROVE that the DMCA was bogus. Watch the video starting around 2:35.
youtube.com/watch?v=ogf1QcbeUlU
Does the following video by YouTube partner Charles Trippy fall within Community Guidelines?
youtube.com/watch?v=KIe4FUVBWIk
Here is what the Guidelines say:
youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
YouTube is not a shock site. Don't post gross-out videos of accidents, dead bodies or similar things intended to shock or disgust.
Here is the video by dprjones exposing VenomFangX that was removed. Exactly why was he suspended for two weeks?
youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6pZJkVg
Here is YouTubes March 31, 2008 blog entry where they call YouTubes You Choose 08 platform the worlds largest town hall for political speech.
youtube.com/blog?entry=IRNhAzKFz_M
Here are links to the White Houses YouTube channel, as well as links to the main channels for the House and the Senate.
youtube.com/user/whitehouse
youtube.com/user/househub
youtube.com/senatehub
The following video is MUST WATCH material. You will see that members of Congress want their constituents to communicate to them through YouTube. How can you post a video response or comments to them if YouTube has suspended your account? Is this not a form of disenfranchisement?
youtube.com/watch?v=3p83pNZdmhQ
Tags:
YourTubeAdvocate false flagging suspension YouTube Whitehouse Senate House
Original video by themaskedanalyst, who is a very insightful guy. As his username suggests, he provides analysis on various situations.
I strongly strongly recommend you subscribe!
youtube.com/user/themaskedanalyst
This is a response to the YourTubeAdvocate (known as 20) who posted a video entitled
Why videos were removed.
youtube.com/watch?v=0BDVd3QOgng
My correspondence with the YouTube copyright department. This is the worst example of corporate communication that I have ever seen.
themaskedanalyst.com/Correspondence%20with%20Youtube%20Legal.htm
My account was suspended for four months due to a totally bogus DMCA. I wrote to YouTube asking them to watch the video and this would PROVE that the DMCA was bogus. Watch the video starting around 2:35.
youtube.com/watch?v=ogf1QcbeUlU
Does the following video by YouTube partner Charles Trippy fall within Community Guidelines?
youtube.com/watch?v=KIe4FUVBWIk
Here is what the Guidelines say:
youtube.com/t/community_guidelines
YouTube is not a shock site. Don't post gross-out videos of accidents, dead bodies or similar things intended to shock or disgust.
Here is the video by dprjones exposing VenomFangX that was removed. Exactly why was he suspended for two weeks?
youtube.com/watch?v=FG0V6pZJkVg
Here is YouTubes March 31, 2008 blog entry where they call YouTubes You Choose 08 platform the worlds largest town hall for political speech.
youtube.com/blog?entry=IRNhAzKFz_M
Here are links to the White Houses YouTube channel, as well as links to the main channels for the House and the Senate.
youtube.com/user/whitehouse
youtube.com/user/househub
youtube.com/senatehub
The following video is MUST WATCH material. You will see that members of Congress want their constituents to communicate to them through YouTube. How can you post a video response or comments to them if YouTube has suspended your account? Is this not a form of disenfranchisement?
youtube.com/watch?v=3p83pNZdmhQ
Tags:
YourTubeAdvocate false flagging suspension YouTube Whitehouse Senate House






![What Will the Creationists Do Next? (mirrored)
http://ncseweb.org/
Much thanks to the University of California for releasing this video, along with many others featured on uctelevision channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/uctelevision
Under the following Creative Commons license:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Eugenie C. Scott, Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc. explores how the failure of Intelligent Design to survive a legal test of its constitutionality led it to evolve new strategies which call for teaching the strengths and weaknesses of evolution or the critical analysis of evolution which are creationism in disguise. [4/2009] [Science] [Show ID: 16073] What Will the Creationists Do Next? (mirrored)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/m-LiWw3y8o4/mqdefault.jpg)



![Triumphs and Challenges for Modern Cosmology - James Peebles
mirror of a video posted by uctelevision:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFBLoGRSwpA
Join James Peebles, one of the worlds foremost cosmologists, as he explores the universe. Like fossils, thermal radiation carries information about the past, in this case the nature of the early universe. This information has confirmed ideas about the expanding universe, and it has presented us with new challenges. In particular, dark matter and dark energy. Series: UC Berkeley Graduate Council Lectures [2/2007] [Science] [Show ID: 12005]
I cannot find any licensing information for this clip, but it seems that UCs default policy falls within the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No derivatives license. I have good faith that reposting this video here for educational purposes is in accordance with the spirit of UCs broad intentions. I have written to uctelevision, and will be happy to remove this video at their request. Triumphs and Challenges for Modern Cosmology - James Peebles](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nDl80siQxQM/mqdefault.jpg)