Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
The oldest protein scare is that eating more protein wears out your kidneys. Dr. Jordan Feigenbaum takes it apart with the actual evidence: what protein does to a healthy kidney, why an estimated GFR can make a muscular person look sick, what the landmark low-protein trials (MDRD, the 2020 Cochrane review) really found, and why in real kidney disease it's the red meat and the whole dietary pattern that track with harm more than the protein number. It ends on the muscle-and-lifting tradeoff most low-protein advice ignores.
This is the kidney segment from Episode 407, The Protein Scaries.
Chapters
00:00 What protein does to a healthy kidney
00:54 Why estimated GFR can mislead
01:41 Where the scare came from (Brenner, 1982)
02:12 Healthy kidneys under higher protein
04:19 Chronic kidney disease: does low protein help?
06:30 Diabetes, and it's really the dietary pattern
07:34 Red meat, not total protein (Time to Move On)
08:39 Lab surrogates vs. what patients feel
09:57 Why lifting matters on a restricted diet
11:32 The bottom line on kidneys
Resources:
Barbell Medicine coaching and templates: barbellmedicine.com
Plus podcast subscription: barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/plus-podcast-subscription
Barbell Medicine Premium: barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/barbell-medicine-premium
Signal (book pre-order): barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal
Our Protein Content:
barbellmedicine.com/blog/protein-and-weight-loss
barbellmedicine.com/blog/protein-on-ozempic
barbellmedicine.com/blog/barbell-medicine-protein-recommendations
Studies
Levine et al. Cell Metabolism 2014. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.006
Naghshi et al. BMJ 2020. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2412
Devries et al. J Nutr 2018. doi:10.1093/jn/nxy197
Antonio et al. J Nutr Metab 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/9104792
Knight et al. Ann Intern Med 2003. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-6-200303180-00009
Klahr et al. (MDRD). NEJM 1994. doi:10.1056/NEJM199403313301301
Hahn, Hodson & Fouque. Cochrane 2020. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001892.pub5
Obeid, Hiremath & Topf. Kidney360 2022. doi:10.34067/KID.0001002022
Lew et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016030248
Castaneda et al. Ann Intern Med 2001. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00008
Bauer et al. (PROT-AGE). JAMDA 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021
Fenton et al. Nutrition Journal 2011. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-41
Shams-White et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2017. doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.145110
Witard et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2013. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.055517
Macnaughton et al. Physiol Rep 2016. doi:10.14814/phy2.12893
Trommelen et al. Cell Reports Medicine 2023. doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101324
Wycherley et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2012. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.044321
Moore et al. JAMA Intern Med 2016. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548
Larsson et al. Cancer Med 2020. doi:10.1002/cam4.3345
Brenner, Meyer & Hostetter. NEJM 1982. doi:10.1056/NEJM198209093071104
Chan et al. PLoS One 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
Berryman et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2018. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy088
Morton et al. Br J Sports Med 2018. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608
The oldest protein scare is that eating more protein wears out your kidneys. Dr. Jordan Feigenbaum takes it apart with the actual evidence: what protein does to a healthy kidney, why an estimated GFR can make a muscular person look sick, what the landmark low-protein trials (MDRD, the 2020 Cochrane review) really found, and why in real kidney disease it's the red meat and the whole dietary pattern that track with harm more than the protein number. It ends on the muscle-and-lifting tradeoff most low-protein advice ignores.
This is the kidney segment from Episode 407, The Protein Scaries.
Chapters
00:00 What protein does to a healthy kidney
00:54 Why estimated GFR can mislead
01:41 Where the scare came from (Brenner, 1982)
02:12 Healthy kidneys under higher protein
04:19 Chronic kidney disease: does low protein help?
06:30 Diabetes, and it's really the dietary pattern
07:34 Red meat, not total protein (Time to Move On)
08:39 Lab surrogates vs. what patients feel
09:57 Why lifting matters on a restricted diet
11:32 The bottom line on kidneys
Resources:
Barbell Medicine coaching and templates: barbellmedicine.com
Plus podcast subscription: barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/plus-podcast-subscription
Barbell Medicine Premium: barbellmedicine.com/shop/subscriptions/barbell-medicine-premium
Signal (book pre-order): barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal
Our Protein Content:
barbellmedicine.com/blog/protein-and-weight-loss
barbellmedicine.com/blog/protein-on-ozempic
barbellmedicine.com/blog/barbell-medicine-protein-recommendations
Studies
Levine et al. Cell Metabolism 2014. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.006
Naghshi et al. BMJ 2020. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2412
Devries et al. J Nutr 2018. doi:10.1093/jn/nxy197
Antonio et al. J Nutr Metab 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/9104792
Knight et al. Ann Intern Med 2003. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-6-200303180-00009
Klahr et al. (MDRD). NEJM 1994. doi:10.1056/NEJM199403313301301
Hahn, Hodson & Fouque. Cochrane 2020. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001892.pub5
Obeid, Hiremath & Topf. Kidney360 2022. doi:10.34067/KID.0001002022
Lew et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2017. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016030248
Castaneda et al. Ann Intern Med 2001. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00008
Bauer et al. (PROT-AGE). JAMDA 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.05.021
Fenton et al. Nutrition Journal 2011. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-41
Shams-White et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2017. doi:10.3945/ajcn.116.145110
Witard et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2013. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.055517
Macnaughton et al. Physiol Rep 2016. doi:10.14814/phy2.12893
Trommelen et al. Cell Reports Medicine 2023. doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101324
Wycherley et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2012. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.044321
Moore et al. JAMA Intern Med 2016. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548
Larsson et al. Cancer Med 2020. doi:10.1002/cam4.3345
Brenner, Meyer & Hostetter. NEJM 1982. doi:10.1056/NEJM198209093071104
Chan et al. PLoS One 2011. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020456
Berryman et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2018. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy088
Morton et al. Br J Sports Med 2018. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608





![Do Running Shoes and Gait Analysis Prevent Injury?
If you are generally fit, have no performance goals, and run about 90 minutes a week, does a shoe matched to your foot shape lower your injury risk, or is comfortable enough? Does video gait analysis help? Jordan and Dr. Austin Baraki agree on the short answer: at that volume, training load management matters far more than gear.
We go through the evidence anyway. A 2024 study followed more than 7,400 recreational runners with Garmin watches for about 18 months; roughly 60% got hurt by around 600 miles, and the highest injury rates were in people running least often. Motion-control and arch-matched shoes did not reduce injuries in large military and half-marathon trials, softer cushioning looked modestly better in one study, and heel-to-toe drop made no difference, though switching abruptly to a flatter shoe can stress the Achilles and calf. Carbon-plated “super shoes” buy a few percent in running economy, which will not matter much at 90 minutes a week.
The practical version: pick shoes that are comfortable, rotate a couple of pairs, transition gradually if you change shoe type, and keep weekly mileage increases in the 20 to 30% range. Austin’s swimming-era analogy lands the point: a single session with a skilled coach to fix technique will usually beat anything you can buy. Full AMA episode and references linked below.
Resources:
Subscribe to BBM Plus for the full unabridged Direct Line: https://barbellmedicine.supercast.com/
Barbell Medicine coaching and templates: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/
Signal book pre-order: https://www.barbellmedicine.com/shop/learning/signal/
Abramson E. et al. 2024. Running-related injuries in recreational runners: a prospective cohort study using wearable trackers. Br J Sports Med [verify PMID]
Knapik J.J. et al. 2010. Injury reduction effectiveness of selecting running shoes based on plantar shape. J Strength Cond Res 24(3):685-697.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20145557/
Malisoux L. et al. 2016. Influence of the heel-to-toe drop of standard cushioned running shoes on injury risk in leisure-time runners: randomized trial. Am J Sports Med 44(11):2933-2940.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27474384/
Hoogkamer W. et al. 2018. A comparison of the energetic cost of running in marathon racing shoes (Vaporfly). Sports Med 48(4):1009-1019.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29143929/ Do Running Shoes and Gait Analysis Prevent Injury?](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hUaf_teTR9g/mqdefault.jpg)




