Uploaded March 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
cursor.com/blog/third-era
Cursor Cloud Agents: Tested PRs, Demo Videos, Parallel Model Swarms, and the Future of Agentic Coding
swyx catches up with Jonas and Sam in the beautiful new Cursor office, recapping Cursor’s latest cloud agents launch and how giving agents full cloud VMs enables them to onboard repos, run code, and test changes end-to-end before returning a PR, often with a short demo video and optional live remote desktop/terminal access. We discuss how videos reduce review bottlenecks, when testing or bug reproduction is triggered (including /no-test and /repro), and examples spanning UI tweaks, backend error handling, and a bug where removed image attachments were still sent. The team highlights parallel agents and best-of model comparisons, experiments with multi-provider “council” synthesis, subagents, Datadog MCP–based diagnostics, transcript-based debugging/forking, and long-running “grind mode.” They predict wider “throughput” via swarms, rising spend per developer, cloud agents overtaking local agents, and new bottlenecks in review, CI/CD, and production pipelines.
00:00 Agentic Code Experiments
00:53 Why Cloud Agents Matter
02:08 Live Demo Tour
02:56 Testing Defaults and Controls
03:36 Videos and Remote Control
06:10 Meta Agents and More Demos
10:49 Bug Repro Workflow
32:02 Minimal Web UI Surfaces
32:40 Why No File Editor
34:35 Full Stack Hosting Debate
36:34 Model Choice and Auto Routing
38:34 Best Of N and Model Councils
41:41 Subagents for Context
Timestamps:
00:00 Agentic Code Experiments
00:54 Why Cloud Agents Matter
02:12 Live Demo Tour
03:01 Testing Defaults and Controls
03:43 Videos and Remote Control
06:28 Meta Agents and More Demos
11:21 Bug Repro Workflow
14:13 Slash Commands and Diagnostics
34:00 Minimal Web UI Surfaces
34:39 Why No File Editor
36:40 Full Stack Hosting Debate
38:49 Model Choice and Auto Routing
40:59 Best Of N and Model Councils
44:18 Subagents for Context
47:41 Grind Mode and Throughput
01:04:38 Cloud Agent Future and Memory
cursor.com/blog/third-era
Cursor Cloud Agents: Tested PRs, Demo Videos, Parallel Model Swarms, and the Future of Agentic Coding
swyx catches up with Jonas and Sam in the beautiful new Cursor office, recapping Cursor’s latest cloud agents launch and how giving agents full cloud VMs enables them to onboard repos, run code, and test changes end-to-end before returning a PR, often with a short demo video and optional live remote desktop/terminal access. We discuss how videos reduce review bottlenecks, when testing or bug reproduction is triggered (including /no-test and /repro), and examples spanning UI tweaks, backend error handling, and a bug where removed image attachments were still sent. The team highlights parallel agents and best-of model comparisons, experiments with multi-provider “council” synthesis, subagents, Datadog MCP–based diagnostics, transcript-based debugging/forking, and long-running “grind mode.” They predict wider “throughput” via swarms, rising spend per developer, cloud agents overtaking local agents, and new bottlenecks in review, CI/CD, and production pipelines.
00:00 Agentic Code Experiments
00:53 Why Cloud Agents Matter
02:08 Live Demo Tour
02:56 Testing Defaults and Controls
03:36 Videos and Remote Control
06:10 Meta Agents and More Demos
10:49 Bug Repro Workflow
32:02 Minimal Web UI Surfaces
32:40 Why No File Editor
34:35 Full Stack Hosting Debate
36:34 Model Choice and Auto Routing
38:34 Best Of N and Model Councils
41:41 Subagents for Context
Timestamps:
00:00 Agentic Code Experiments
00:54 Why Cloud Agents Matter
02:12 Live Demo Tour
03:01 Testing Defaults and Controls
03:43 Videos and Remote Control
06:28 Meta Agents and More Demos
11:21 Bug Repro Workflow
14:13 Slash Commands and Diagnostics
34:00 Minimal Web UI Surfaces
34:39 Why No File Editor
36:40 Full Stack Hosting Debate
38:49 Model Choice and Auto Routing
40:59 Best Of N and Model Councils
44:18 Subagents for Context
47:41 Grind Mode and Throughput
01:04:38 Cloud Agent Future and Memory
![[State of Context Engineering] Agentic RAG, Context Rot, MCP, Subagents — Nina Lopatina, Contextual
From neuroscience PhD research on reward learning and decision making to building the infrastructure for *context engineering at scale,* *Nina Lopatina* has spent the last year watching a brand-new category emerge from prototype to production—and now shes leading the charge to turn context engineering from a collection of design patterns into a *full-stack discipline* with benchmarks, tooling, and real-world deployment at enterprise scale. We caught up with Nina live at *NeurIPS 2025* (her fifth!) to dig into the state of context engineering heading into 2026: why this year felt like *six months compressed into a year* (the category only really took hold in mid-2024), how *agentic RAG is now the baseline* (query reformulation into subqueries improved performance so dramatically it became the new standard), why *context rot is cited in every blog* but industry benchmarks at real scale (100k+ documents, billions of tokens) are still rare, how *MCP is both a driver and a flaw* for context engineering (giant JSON tool definitions stuff the context window, but MCP servers unlock rapid prototyping before you optimize down to direct API calls), the rise of *sub-agents with turn limits and explicit constraints* (unlimited agency degrades performance and causes hallucinations), why *instruction-following re-rankers* are critical for scaling retrieval across massive databases (more recall up front, more precision in the final context window), how *benchmarks are being saturated faster than ever* (Claude Code just saturated a Princeton benchmark released in October, with solutions so good the gold dataset had errors), the *KV cache decision-making framework* for multi-turn agents (stuff that doesnt change goes up front, stuff that changes a lot goes at the bottom), why shes *embodied-evaling frontier models as a snowboarding coach* (training for a 25-lap mogul race over 3–4 months, and why she had to close the window and restart because the model lost training context), and her thesis that 2026 will be the year context engineering moves from *component-level innovation to full-system design patterns*—where the conversation shifts from how do I optimize my re-ranker to what does the end-to-end architecture look like for reasoning over billions of tokens in production?
We discuss:
* What Contextual does: *end-to-end platform for context engineering across domains* (code, legal, retail, e-commerce, support), with multimodal ingestion, hybrid search, re-rankers, and dynamic agents
* The *first instruction-following re-ranker* (launched March 2024): latency is the biggest complaint, but for dynamic agents (where latency is less sensitive), its a game-changer for reasoning over large databases
* Why *agentic RAG is now the baseline:* query reformulation into subqueries improved performance so dramatically it became the new standard (normal RAG is dead)
* The *context engineering hackathon* (Retail Universe, ~100k documents, PDFs/CSVs/logs): Ninas team used a dynamic agent with turn limits and explicit constraints to avoid infinite sub-agent loops
* *Context rot:* everyone cites it, but Anthropics work putting numbers on it (e.g., at 700k tokens in a 1M context window, retrieval drops to 30%) is what made it actionable
* *Sub-agents with turn limits:* unlimited agency degrades performance and causes hallucinations, so explicit constraints (turn limits, validation loops) are critical for scale
* The need for *industry benchmarks at real scale:* most benchmarks use toy datasets, but the Retail Universe hackathon dataset (100k+ documents, billions of tokens) is closer to production reality
* *KV cache decision-making:* stuff that doesnt change (system prompt, early turns) goes up front, stuff that changes a lot (recent turns, dynamic context) goes at the bottom—critical for multi-turn agents
* Why *intentional context compression* matters: models arent great at compaction yet, so Nina proactively limits turns (even in Cursor, she opens a new window mid-conversation to avoid context loss)
—
Nina Lopatina
* Contextual AI: https://contextual.ai
* X: https://x.com/ninalopatina
* LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/ninalopatina
00:00:00 Introduction: Nina Lopatina on Context Engineering at NeurIPS
00:04:34 The Death of Normal RAG: Rise of Agentic RAG and Query Reformulation
00:06:20 Sub-Agents and Turn Limits: Lessons from the Retail Universe Hackathon
00:09:07 Context Engineering in 2024: Design Patterns and the Prototyping Stage
00:10:17 Benchmarks and Scale: From Princeton HOW to Saturated Research Tasks
00:12:52 Context Rot, MCP, and Tool Selection Challenges
00:17:28 Prompt Optimization: Jeppa, ACE, and Evolutionary Approaches
00:19:42 KV Cache Strategy and Multi-Turn Agent Stability
00:22:30 Domain Generalization: Code, Legal, Retail, and Beyond
00:23:59 Predictions and Full System Design: The Future of Context Engineering [State of Context Engineering] Agentic RAG, Context Rot, MCP, Subagents — Nina Lopatina, Contextual](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/tSRqTerZrH8/mqdefault.jpg)





 and Isomorphic for example), it is starting to look like the appetite of Pharma for biotech tools has finally started to grow. Why the sudden interest?
Timestamps:
(0:00) The challenges of starting a biotech lab and generating data from scratch.
(0:55) Introduction of Ron Alfa and Dan Bear from Noetik.
(4:09) The complexity of cancer: Why curing cancer is a misleading concept and the need for new, multimodal data.
(8:24) Identifying therapeutically relevant cancer subtypes to improve clinical trial success rates.
(11:27) The importance of intentional, high-quality data generation in AI biotech.
(17:09) Lessons learned from Recursion Pharmaceuticals regarding batch effects and data design.
(20:14) Introduction to Noetiks core data modalities: Pathology (H&E), spatial transcriptomics, and genomic alterations.
(30:15) The philosophy of self-supervised learning and avoiding bias from electronic health records.
(36:01) Translating latent space embeddings and patient clusters into actionable insights for pharma.
(41:40) Using PerturbMap and in-vivo mouse models to validate human AI predictions.
(53:38) Technical deep dive: The Tario transformer-based model and auto-regressive training objectives.
(1:00:26) The GSK partnership: Licensing OctoVC and the shift toward platform-based biotech deals.
(1:13:55) Advice for small biotech AI startups: Scaling, data conviction, and lessons from scientific history. 🔬 Training Transformers to solve 95% failure rate of Cancer Trials — Ron Alfa & Daniel Bear, Noetik](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uqM8qjbLRHA/mqdefault.jpg)



