Uploaded July 2020 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This video is a reply to a video by Ben Shapiro who claims to "destroy Karl Marx" and fails to do that. Instead opting to name features of "Judeo-Christian values" and "Collectivist philosophy". I explain everything wrong with Ben's takes and explain the lack of connection between Marxism and collectivism.
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999YtE-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
Links:
Video I am replying to: youtube.com/watch?v=io1dTeyxdVo
Ben explaining Judeo-Christian Values: youtube.com/watch?v=RVD0xik-_FM
My first video: youtu.be/1QtUDEUz7PQ
Transcript:
Hello everybody. Today we are doing a reply video again, I just felt like needlessly attacking someone else and picking apart their arguments. And who better to make a video about than fax and logic man himself. Ben Shapiro. We are gonna have a look at his video titled “Ben Shapiro destroys Karl Marx in 60 seconds”. I thought about how to do this for some time. I decided to just show you his entire video here so there is no accusing me of taking things out of context. Interestingly this video was uploaded like that to Ben Shapiro’s own channel. Usually the “Ben Shapiro destroys X” videos are made by some fan with 50 subs and usually taken out of context. But apparently this is the intended experience uploaded by Ben Shapiro himself. So he clearly doesn’t think that we need to know the context to this. That being said here is his video:“This is the philosophy of collectivism. The philosophy that says that human beings suffer because the Judaeo-Christian system expects too much of us individually. Judeo-Christian philosophy expects us to struggle, to strive. Judeo-Christian philosophy demands that we do our best and that we act virtuously on the individual level so that we can feel secure without invading each other’s rights. The Judeo-Christian tradition says that with freedom comes responsibility. Collectivist philosophy however thinks differently. They expect us to give our individual striving up. No more striving no more struggle. All we have to do is trade our individual responsibility for the comfort of collective power. Collectivist philosophy points out that individual virtue isn't natural, it is a struggle and we can avoid that struggle by handing over all power to a nanny state. Judeo Christianity says you are free and therefore you must give. Collectivist philosophy says you are unfree and thus the state must take on your behalf.”Alright where do I begin. Maybe with the fact that he doesn’t mention Marx once. Pretty brave for a video which supposedly destroys Marx. The video is generally kind of lacking in argumentation. It’s just “Collectivism is this” and “Judeo Christian values is that”. Like, literally all sentences are either about collectivism or judeo-Christianity. Mentioning this is all he does. And that’s a problem because there isn’t a single argument in there.So, let’s have a look at what kinda things he says. According to Ben features of collectivist philosophy are: That it says humans suffer because the judeo-christian system expects too much. That it thinks differently from Judeo-Christianity. That it expects you to give up individual striving. That it wants no more striving or struggling. That we have to trade individual responsibility for collective power. Somehow. That it says that individual virtue isn’t natural and that a nanny state should do it. Also it says that you are unfree, apparently. And the one ben prefers, Judaeo-Christian says: That you need to struggle and strive. That it demands that we do our best and that we act virtuously. That we can feel secure without invading each other’s rights. It says that with freedom comes responsibility. And it says that you are free and that you must give. Something, idk what the video ends there. That’s a lot of assertions and we’ll have a closer look at those towards the end. For now let’s try to figure out what these assertions are supposed to tell us. I would argue he is trying to make collectivism look bad, and further I would say he pretty obviously thinks that Marxism is collectivism or at least collectivist. We can tell because Judeo-Christian philosophy is his favourite useless concept. I will make a video on Judaeo-Christian values eventually. Probably in the style of my video about basic economics. Tell me in the comments if you want to see that. So, from a Marx loving perspective I have to defend this half and discredit this one and then Marx is saved, right? No not really. Because Marxism barely has anything to do with collectivism. There is a connection but it’s very small.
This video is a reply to a video by Ben Shapiro who claims to "destroy Karl Marx" and fails to do that. Instead opting to name features of "Judeo-Christian values" and "Collectivist philosophy". I explain everything wrong with Ben's takes and explain the lack of connection between Marxism and collectivism.
Patreon: patreon.com/viki1999
Subreddit: reddit.com/r/viki1999
Twitter: twitter.com/Viki1999YtE-Mail Address: viki1999mail@gmail.com
Links:
Video I am replying to: youtube.com/watch?v=io1dTeyxdVo
Ben explaining Judeo-Christian Values: youtube.com/watch?v=RVD0xik-_FM
My first video: youtu.be/1QtUDEUz7PQ
Transcript:
Hello everybody. Today we are doing a reply video again, I just felt like needlessly attacking someone else and picking apart their arguments. And who better to make a video about than fax and logic man himself. Ben Shapiro. We are gonna have a look at his video titled “Ben Shapiro destroys Karl Marx in 60 seconds”. I thought about how to do this for some time. I decided to just show you his entire video here so there is no accusing me of taking things out of context. Interestingly this video was uploaded like that to Ben Shapiro’s own channel. Usually the “Ben Shapiro destroys X” videos are made by some fan with 50 subs and usually taken out of context. But apparently this is the intended experience uploaded by Ben Shapiro himself. So he clearly doesn’t think that we need to know the context to this. That being said here is his video:“This is the philosophy of collectivism. The philosophy that says that human beings suffer because the Judaeo-Christian system expects too much of us individually. Judeo-Christian philosophy expects us to struggle, to strive. Judeo-Christian philosophy demands that we do our best and that we act virtuously on the individual level so that we can feel secure without invading each other’s rights. The Judeo-Christian tradition says that with freedom comes responsibility. Collectivist philosophy however thinks differently. They expect us to give our individual striving up. No more striving no more struggle. All we have to do is trade our individual responsibility for the comfort of collective power. Collectivist philosophy points out that individual virtue isn't natural, it is a struggle and we can avoid that struggle by handing over all power to a nanny state. Judeo Christianity says you are free and therefore you must give. Collectivist philosophy says you are unfree and thus the state must take on your behalf.”Alright where do I begin. Maybe with the fact that he doesn’t mention Marx once. Pretty brave for a video which supposedly destroys Marx. The video is generally kind of lacking in argumentation. It’s just “Collectivism is this” and “Judeo Christian values is that”. Like, literally all sentences are either about collectivism or judeo-Christianity. Mentioning this is all he does. And that’s a problem because there isn’t a single argument in there.So, let’s have a look at what kinda things he says. According to Ben features of collectivist philosophy are: That it says humans suffer because the judeo-christian system expects too much. That it thinks differently from Judeo-Christianity. That it expects you to give up individual striving. That it wants no more striving or struggling. That we have to trade individual responsibility for collective power. Somehow. That it says that individual virtue isn’t natural and that a nanny state should do it. Also it says that you are unfree, apparently. And the one ben prefers, Judaeo-Christian says: That you need to struggle and strive. That it demands that we do our best and that we act virtuously. That we can feel secure without invading each other’s rights. It says that with freedom comes responsibility. And it says that you are free and that you must give. Something, idk what the video ends there. That’s a lot of assertions and we’ll have a closer look at those towards the end. For now let’s try to figure out what these assertions are supposed to tell us. I would argue he is trying to make collectivism look bad, and further I would say he pretty obviously thinks that Marxism is collectivism or at least collectivist. We can tell because Judeo-Christian philosophy is his favourite useless concept. I will make a video on Judaeo-Christian values eventually. Probably in the style of my video about basic economics. Tell me in the comments if you want to see that. So, from a Marx loving perspective I have to defend this half and discredit this one and then Marx is saved, right? No not really. Because Marxism barely has anything to do with collectivism. There is a connection but it’s very small.







![The lies and conspiracy theories of The American Dream Film
This video is a correction and reply to the part-correct and part-conspiracy theory video titled The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation. I explain the needed nuance and show the conspiracy theories used in it.
Link to the original :
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExBE651_vOY
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Go0DLC1Thek
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Viki1999Yt
Trans script (Not all of it since youtube has a maximum description length):
Intro
The collapse of the American dream explained in animation.
It’s a video or rather a film released in January of 2010. I remember watching it at around 14 years old and going: “Oh well. That’s good to know.” Lately I watched it again and … I am afraid we are gonna have to talk about it because there is a lot of wrong stuff in this.
We are gonna go through the entire thing and say where it’s right, where it’s wrong and where is spreads antisemitic conspiracies from the 1850. Yea it has those. – Anyways. You’ve probably seen it. It has roughly 9 Million views and a 94% approval rating. It seems people are taking this seriously so let’s have a look at it.
The Story
The story follows a man named Pile who just moved into a new property. To buy it he took out a loan at the bank. Unfortunately he can’t pay back his mortgage and the bank forecloses his property…
This is supposed to resonate with the viewers. In 2008, during the mortgage crisis many people lost everything they had. Those people are supposed to identify with Pile. He wonders how this happened just as his friend named Hardman teleports next to him with a time machine, or I guess he time travels next to him?
Anyways Hardman tries to convince Pile, and by extension the audience of his… uhm… I am not gonna say conspiracy theory buuuut misinformed explanation of how things work. Okay yea it’s a conspiracy theory
Anyways Hardman shows that the bank that Borrowed Pile money did it to make [CENSORSHIP] of interest. To make more [CENSORSHIP] they offered more and more loans to people with worse and worse credit. To be able to make even more money they get money from the FED. The banks even divert to credit cards to give people the ability to loan even more money even more easily. So far there is nothing factually wrong here and it’s just a surface level explanation of the financial sector and the way the mortgage crisis began. Do not worry we’ll get into the conspiracies in a bit.
Anyways afterwards Pile asks Hardman where the FED get’s the money it gave to the banks. Hardman explains that they don’t give it to the banks they LOAN it to the banks and that more importantly, the FED just calls the Mint to print money. And on top of that the FED also loans money to the government which then has to raise the taxes on the people to pay off the interest which means that the people are paying that bank! And this is where we meet the first lie of the video.
Hardman says that it’s unconstitutional for the FED to control the printing of the money since it’s a private company. He says that it’s outrageous that a private company like that could call up the Mint to print money and then loan it to the government and demand that they pay interest on the money they just printed. And he is right! It would be outrageous if a private organisation made money that way. It WOULD be. If that was true. But… it isn’t.
The FED isn’t a private bank, it’s owned by the federal government of the united states. The chairman along with the 12 members of the board of directors are appointed directly by the president. On top of that all of the [CENSORSHIP] the FED makes goes directly to the department of treasury so the [CENSORSHIP] made off the interest the government has to pay goes to….the government.
Meaning that when Hardman says that the government uses taxes to pay interest to some private mastermind bank owner he is lying. Let’s continue with the video. After Pile says that he doesn’t see why it’s a big deal, much like you should now that you know that Hardman just made up a conspiracy and tried to convince us to believe it. Hardman just calls him ignorant.
They travel to the 10th century and witness the invention of money. Of course money is 6000 years older than that but looking at how they invent paper money and the printing press in the same scene I am gonna ignore the historical inaccuracies.
Hardman explains that money is just something used to make trade easier since everyone agrees that gold is valuable. Then they witness a banker inventing paper money. He stores peoples gold in his vault and gives them a piece of paper which says how much he owes them. He quickly get’s the idea to print more IOUs than he has gold which leads him getting fucking lynched…. Yea that was my reaction as well. The lies and conspiracy theories of The American Dream Film](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lWZWdAcBrn8/mqdefault.jpg)


