![Celeste Classic 2 any% in 1:21.967 [TAS] @lordsnek](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R-iYWynsyqY/maxresdefault.jpg)
Uploaded August 2022 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
The current tas tool is not really a good model of the game, it rounds numbers differently and there may be other syncing errors since ikuyo could not get the inputs to line up in the actual game. Still, this is the most accurate tas tool we have, and for the most part it's probably fairly accurate (most of this stuff works rta to my knowledge). This is the first ever sub 1:22 tas.
00:11.57 (346)
00:17.83 (187)
00:28.83 (329)
00:52.67 (714)
01:02.50 (294)
01:12.07 (286)
01:21.97 (296)
lol snek what a bad mod when are you going to play a REAL game????
The current tas tool is not really a good model of the game, it rounds numbers differently and there may be other syncing errors since ikuyo could not get the inputs to line up in the actual game. Still, this is the most accurate tas tool we have, and for the most part it's probably fairly accurate (most of this stuff works rta to my knowledge). This is the first ever sub 1:22 tas.
00:11.57 (346)
00:17.83 (187)
00:28.83 (329)
00:52.67 (714)
01:02.50 (294)
01:12.07 (286)
01:21.97 (296)
lol snek what a bad mod when are you going to play a REAL game????
![Celeste Classic 2 any% in 1:21.967 [TAS]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R-iYWynsyqY/mqdefault.jpg "Celeste Classic 2 any% in 1:21.967 [TAS]
The current tas tool is not really a good model of the game, it rounds numbers differently and there may be other syncing errors since ikuyo could not get the inputs to line up in the actual game. Still, this is the most accurate tas tool we have, and for the most part its probably fairly accurate (most of this stuff works rta to my knowledge). This is the first ever sub 1:22 tas.
00:11.57 (346)
00:17.83 (187)
00:28.83 (329)
00:52.67 (714)
01:02.50 (294)
01:12.07 (286)
01:21.97 (296)
lol snek what a bad mod when are you going to play a REAL game????")
