Debate: Should Prosecutors Pursue Minor Crimes? Open to Debate 2026-09-28 | Debate: Should Prosecutors Pursue Minor Crimes?
Should Elite Universities Reinstate the SAT? Open to Debate 2024-05-03 | High school students have breathed a sigh of relief for the last couple of years as some colleges decided to make their applications test-optional during the COVID pandemic, meaning they did not need to submit their SAT or ACT scores. However, following recent research revealing that standardized test scores have substantive predictive power for academic success in college, top universities like Harvard, Yale, and Dartmouth have decided to require the tests again. But should it be reinstated at all? Those in favor of reinstating it say the SAT is a useful tool that ensures admitted students have demonstrated high cognitive abilities and aptitude and are ready for college coursework. They argue the SAT acts as a social equalizer by leveling the playing field for applicants who are part of a lower socioeconomic scale. Those against it argue that the test says it is a measure of student potential that favors the affluent and that admissions decisions should be based on a holistic, more inclusive review that considers a wide range of factors, from extracurricular activities to personal essays and recommendations. We debate the question: Should Elite Universities Reinstate the SAT? #opentodebate #debate #SAT #ACT #Harvard #collegestudents #universities #colleges #admissions #standardtesting #testscores #testbias #firstgen #commonapp #gendergap #eliteschools #affirmativeaction =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Debate on Putins Trustworthiness Open to Debate 2024-05-01 | Professor John Mearsheimer, Heather Conley, and Ambassador Paula Dobriansky discuss the feasibility of Ukraine's neutrality, the trustworthiness of Putin's intentions, and the complexities of regional diplomacy. We debate: Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine? Full debate video: youtu.be/rdtCyiKHtqE#opentodebate #debate #Russia #Ukraine #Congress #Putin #humanitarianassistance #military =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Debate Assessing Ukraines Battlefield Open to Debate 2024-04-30 | Ambassador Paula Dobriansky and Professor John Mearsheimer share contrasting viewpoints on Ukraine's military powers and the evolving dynamics of the conflict. Dobriansky highlights Ukraine's resilience and recent victories, and Mearsheimer argues that the balance of power is shifting in Russia's favor. We debate: Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine? Full debate video: youtu.be/rdtCyiKHtqE#opentodebate #debate #Russia #Ukraine #Congress #Putin #humanitarianassistance #military @cfr @GermanMarshallFund =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Putins Aggression and Ukraines Defense Strategy Open to Debate 2024-04-29 | Heather Conley raises concerns about Putin's relentless advance, prompting a critical question: How far will he go? Lt. Col. (Ret.) Daniel L. Davis counters, highlighting limitations to Putin's expansion, but emphasizes Ukraine's dire need for support. We debate: Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine? Full debate video: youtu.be/rdtCyiKHtqE#opentodebate #debate #Russia #Ukraine #Congress #Putin #humanitarianassistance #military @GermanMarshallFund @cfr =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Debating Ban the Box: The Impact on Job Opportunities Open to Debate 2024-04-26 | Beth Avery, Jennifer Doleac, and John Donvan examine the nuances of the “Ban the Box" movement and its impact on job opportunities for individuals with criminal records.Full debate: youtu.be/0887KNibSBI#opentodebate #debate #criminaljustice #criminalrecord #Employers #banthebox=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications? Open to Debate 2024-04-19 | 1 in 3 adults in the United States have a criminal record, which offers significant challenges to these individuals, including reentering the job market after incarceration. Over the years, there’s been a push for “Ban the Box” policies that call for removing questions asking about criminal history on job applications to give former offenders a fair chance by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process. Those who are against early screening argue that former offenders shouldn’t continue to be punished by the system, especially when it disproportionally affects minorities. It also prevents applicants from contributing and reintegrating into society and reducing dependency on social services. Those who disagree and say that screening a job applicant’s criminal history is important, argue that employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their business, employees, and customers and make informed hiring decisions. Without early screening, some recent studies show that employers might unconsciously resort to biased assumptions or stereotypes when evaluating candidates. With this context, we debate Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications? Arguing Yes: Beth Avery, Senior Staff Attorney at the National Employment Law Project Arguing No: Jennifer Doleac, Executive Vice President of Criminal Justice at Arnold Ventures Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates #opentodebate #debate #criminaljustice #criminalrecord #Employers #banthebox =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
The Power and Perils of Religion: Ethics, Happiness, and Politics Open to Debate 2024-04-18 | Annie Laurie Gaylor and Shadi Hamid delve into the intricate dynamics of religion, belief, and societal wellbeing. Gaylor emphasizes the potent influence of religious authority on believers, highlighting the paradoxical messages often found within holy texts. Meanwhile, Hamid underscores the social cohesion provided by religion and the potential consequences of its absence. Watch the full debate video: youtu.be/uaRfXGPFfLw#opentodebate #debate #embryoivf #religion #faith #secularworld #happiness #marriage #freethinker #ethics #God #afterlife #koran #islamwomen #muslims =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Is Religion Really the Cause of Violence? Open to Debate 2024-04-17 | Shadi Hamid and Annie Laurie Gaylor engage in a passionate discussion about the role of religion in violence throughout history. From Hitler's alleged religious affiliations to the secular ideologies of the 20th century, they dissect common misconceptions and shed light on the complexities of religious influence on conflict. Watch the full debate video: youtu.be/uaRfXGPFfLw#opentodebate #debate #embryoivf #religion #faith #secularworld #happiness #marriage #freethinker #ethics #God #afterlife #koran #islamwomen #muslims =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Examining the Impact of Religion on Civic Engagement Open to Debate 2024-04-16 | Shadi Hamid and Annie Laurie Gaylor delve into the relationship between religion and civic participation. With statistics and studies at hand, they analyze voting patterns, charitable giving, and community involvement among religious and non-religious populations. Watch the full debate video: youtu.be/uaRfXGPFfLw#opentodebate #debate #embryoivf #religion #faith #secularworld #happiness #marriage #freethinker #ethics #God #afterlife #koran #islamwomen #muslims =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine? Open to Debate 2024-04-12 | Since the beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the United States has provided more than $75 billion in aid to Ukraine, which has been directed toward military operations, economic support, and humanitarian assistance. As the war has gone on, members of Congress have questioned whether we have done enough to help the country and if continuing funding is sustainable. Those who want to continue funding Ukraine say the U.S. has a moral obligation to support the country in its time of need, it sustains alliances while serving strategic interests, and it demonstrates the U.S.’s support of democratic values and sovereignty. Those arguing it’s time to end the funding say that it diverts necessary resources that could go toward domestic and foreign priorities. They also question whether the funds are being used efficiently, whether the war is winnable, and whether providing military aid is genuinely contributing to a path toward peace. With this crucial background, we debate the question: Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine? Arguing Yes: John Mearsheimer, Political Science Professor at the University of Chicago and Daniel L. Davis, Retired Lieutenant Colonel, Senior Fellow and Military Expert at Defense Priorities Arguing No: Heather Conley, President of German Marshall Fund of the United States and Paula Dobriansky, Former Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs; Senior Fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs; Vice Chair, Atlantic Council Scowcroft Center for Strategy & Security Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates This debate was recorded live for an invite-only audience at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York City. @cfr partnership.#opentodebate #debate #Russia #Ukraine #Congress #humanitarianassistance #military =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Balancing Medication Risks and Long-Term Health Outcomes Open to Debate 2024-04-08 | Experts Julia Nordgren and Janna Gewirtz O'Brien tackle the complexities of prescribing medication for weight management in adolescents. Janna raises concerns about potential harm and the stigmatization of bodies, while Julia argues for proactive measures to prevent obesity-related health issues. Join the discussion and gain insights into the nuances of healthcare decision-making.Full debate video: youtube.com/watch?v=StCvdYgnbeE=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Equity in Weight Interventions Open to Debate 2024-04-05 | A discussion on healthcare equity and access with experts Julia Nordgren and Janna Gewirtz O'Brien. They delve into the challenges faced by adolescents from lower socioeconomic backgrounds in accessing weight management interventions. Julia shares insights into insurance barriers and the evolving landscape of treatment options, while Janna highlights structural inequities that drive obesity and impact access to healthcare resources.Full debate video: youtube.com/watch?v=StCvdYgnbeE=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Is Religion a Force for Good? Open to Debate 2024-04-05 | Religion has long shaped human civilization, from creating legal systems based on religious laws to inspiring countless works of art and foundational aspects of culture. Yet its influence can stem beyond this into other topics, such as politics, education, and global relations. Many have long wondered what religion’s net impact on society is and whether it’s good for us. Those who say it’s a force for good argue that religion offers a sense of identity and belonging, promotes altruism and charitable acts, and provides a moral compass that encourages personal growth and commitment to justice. Those who argue it is not a force for good say that religious beliefs are a source of historical and military conflict as well as discrimination. They also say that it can be used to justify the erosion of individual freedoms and can hinder social progress by upholding ideas that clash with modern values. With this context, we debate the question: Is Religion a Force for Good? Arguing Yes: Shadi Hamid, Columnist and Editorial Board Member of The Washington Post; Assistant Research Professor of Islamic Studies at Fuller Seminary Arguing No: Annie Laurie Gaylor, Co-Founder and Co-President of the Freedom from Religion Foundation #opentodebate #debate #embryoivf #religion #faith #secularworld #happiness #marriage #freethinker #ethics #God #afterlife #koran #islamwomen #muslims =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
The Nuances of BMI as a Health Marker Open to Debate 2024-04-04 | Julia Nordgren, Pediatric Lipid Specialist at Palo Alto Medical Foundation and Attending Physician at the Stanford Weight Clinic and Janna Gewirtz O'Brien, Pediatrician and Assistant Professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School dive into the complexities surrounding the use of Body Mass Index (BMI) as a measure of health. They discuss its limitations, its role in pediatric healthcare, and the implications of relying solely on #BMI for interventions.Full debate video: youtube.com/watch?v=StCvdYgnbeE=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Childhood Obesity Guidelines: Good Medicine or Too Extreme? Open to Debate 2024-03-29 | In 2023, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued groundbreaking guidelines to tackle childhood obesity, affecting over 14 million U.S. children and adolescents. These guidelines advocate for earlier, more aggressive interventions, including evaluating adolescents with severe obesity for bariatric surgery and the use of weight loss medications like Ozempic, alongside behavioral and lifestyle treatments. While some healthcare professionals hailed these measures, others expressed concern about whether it goes too far. Those who argue the guidelines are good medicine say that it is a step forward in recognizing obesity as a condition requiring a range of medical interventions and emphasize the importance of preventing health problems associated with obesity, such as diabetes, heart disease, and mental health issues. Those who argue that the guidelines are too extreme worry that these approaches could negatively impact children's mental health and body image, contributing to weight stigma and shame. They also question the safety of using weight-loss medications and surgery in children, saying that more research and caution are needed. With this context, we debate the question: Childhood Obesity Guidelines: Good Medicine or Too Extreme?Arguing "Good Medicine: Dr. Julia Nordgren, Pediatric Lipid Specialist at Palo Alto Medical Foundation; Attending Physician at the Stanford Weight Clinic Arguing "Too Extreme": Dr. Janna Gewirtz O'Brien, Pediatrician and Assistant Professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School #opentodebate #debate #obesity #Pediatrics #medical #pediatrician #diabetes #heartdisease #mentalhealth #BMI #children #drugs #pharmaceutical #ozempicweightloss #healthy #healthcare #bullying #food #weightbias #equityissue =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
A Story Book Dragon? Open to Debate 2024-03-25 | Full debate video: youtu.be/X8YpzXb6AJ4Taylor Swift achieved her billionaire status because of her talent, work ethic, and support from her fans. But some question whether any individual should be able to accumulate so much wealth. Those arguing they should point to philosopher Robert Nozick, who says if someone acquires wealth through just means, they are entitled to it. Those arguing “no” say that luck and systemic advantages often play a role, sometimes involving exploitation, and that billionaires have an outsized influence on policy. Now we debate: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Billionaire Status: Justified or Unjust? Open to Debate 2024-03-25 | Full debate video: youtu.be/X8YpzXb6AJ4Taylor Swift achieved her billionaire status because of her talent, work ethic, and support from her fans. But some question whether any individual should be able to accumulate so much wealth. Those arguing they should point to philosopher Robert Nozick, who says if someone acquires wealth through just means, they are entitled to it. Those arguing “no” say that luck and systemic advantages often play a role, sometimes involving exploitation, and that billionaires have an outsized influence on policy. Now we debate: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune? Open to Debate 2024-03-15 | Taylor Swift's billionaire status stands out among her financial peers from the business community who are often scrutinized for their extreme wealth. Swift became a self-made billionaire because of her unparalleled talent, relentless work ethic, and passionate support from millions of fans. If Swift's fortune is because of these factors, isn’t it a desirable and inspiring outcome? Those who agree would point to philosopher Robert Nozick, who says if someone acquires wealth through just means without violating others' rights, they are entitled to the rewards of their labor. However, philosophers with an opposing view are concerned about whether any individual, including Swift, should be able to amass such fortunes. To them, every billionaire created is a policy failure and they tend to prioritize equality of outcomes versus equality of opportunity. They question the fairness of a system that permits vast wealth accumulation and argue that luck and systemic advantages often play a role and in some cases, involve exploitation. With this background, we debate the question: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune? Arguing Yes: Jessica Flanigan, Political Philosopher and Chair in Ethics and Democratic Values at the University of Richmond Arguing No: Ingrid Robeyns, Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University's Ethics Institute; Author of "Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth" Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates #opentodebate #debate #taylorswift #swifties #billionaires #taxes #government #ethics #extremewealth #taylorswifterastour =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Parenthood, Policy, and the Gender Pay Gap Open to Debate 2024-03-12 | Watch the full debate: youtu.be/f4WNtwWYOxgWe ask: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?Arguing Yes: Kadie Ward Philp, Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario Arguing No: Allison Schrager, Pension Economist, Bloomberg Opinion Contributor & Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Guest Moderator: Nayeema Raza, a Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox#opentodebate #debate #womenshistorymonth #wagegap #wages #policymakers #genderwagegap #employers #jobskills #paygap #companysolution #internationalwomensday #remotework #workfromhome #pandemic #marketing #freemarket #technology #laborforce =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
The Future of Men in the Labor Market Open to Debate 2024-03-11 | Watch the full debate: youtu.be/f4WNtwWYOxgWe ask: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?Arguing Yes: Kadie Ward Philp, Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario Arguing No: Allison Schrager, Pension Economist, Bloomberg Opinion Contributor & Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Guest Moderator: Nayeema Raza, a Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox#opentodebate #debate #womenshistorymonth #wagegap #wages #policymakers #genderwagegap #employers #jobskills #paygap #companysolution #internationalwomensday #remotework #workfromhome #pandemic #marketing #freemarket #technology #laborforce =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
The Disparities in Hiring and Unpaid Labor Open to Debate 2024-03-11 | Watch the full debate: youtu.be/f4WNtwWYOxgWe ask: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?Arguing Yes: Kadie Ward Philp, Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario Arguing No: Allison Schrager, Pension Economist, Bloomberg Opinion Contributor & Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Guest Moderator: Nayeema Raza, a Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox#opentodebate #debate #womenshistorymonth #wagegap #wages #policymakers #genderwagegap #employers #jobskills #paygap #companysolution #internationalwomensday #remotework #workfromhome #pandemic #marketing #freemarket #technology #laborforce =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
The Unspoken Perk of Fatherhood Open to Debate 2024-03-11 | Watch the full debate: youtu.be/f4WNtwWYOxgWe ask: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?Arguing Yes: Kadie Ward Philp, Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario Arguing No: Allison Schrager, Pension Economist, Bloomberg Opinion Contributor & Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Guest Moderator: Nayeema Raza, a Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox#opentodebate #debate #womenshistorymonth #wagegap #wages #policymakers #genderwagegap #employers #jobskills #paygap #companysolution #internationalwomensday #remotework #workfromhome #pandemic #marketing #freemarket #technology #laborforce =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap? Kadie Ward Philp vs. Allison Schrager Open to Debate 2024-03-08 | American women are, on average, paid 84 cents for every dollar men make, according to the Department of Labor. This wage gap has persisted despite near-record rates of women’s participation in the labor market, with wage gaps even larger for women in minority populations, and it’s estimated that pay parity will not be achieved until 2052. Should policy interventions address these disparities, or is it more important to recognize and honor women's personal decisions and find another way to look at the gap Those in favor of fixing the gap see it as a point of fairness and equity that would bring economic benefits, such as enhanced family incomes and increased productivity, and say that new policies are needed urgently to dismantle systemic barriers stopping women from earning more. Those who aren’t in favor argue wage disparities reflect individual choices regarding career paths, work-life balance, and tenure, rather than systemic discrimination. They also point out that when adjusted for factors like job type, hours worked, and career breaks, the gap significantly narrows. Against this backdrop, we debate the question: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap? Arguing Yes: Kadie Ward Philp, Commissioner and Chief Administrative Officer of the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario Arguing No: Allison Schrager, Pension Economist, Bloomberg Opinion Contributor & Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute Guest Moderator: Nayeema Raza, a Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox#opentodebate #debate #womenshistorymonth #wagegap #wages #policymakers #genderwagegap #employers #jobskills #paygap #companysolution #internationalwomensday #remotework #workfromhome #pandemic #marketing #freemarket #technology #laborforce =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy? Open to Debate 2024-03-01 | In a high-stakes presidential election year, in partnership with the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Open to Debate is taking a look at more than a decade of the Citizens United Supreme Court case. The 2010 landmark decision that ruled the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofits, labor unions, and other associations, changed the landscape of political spending in the U.S. This gave rise to Super PACS and an increase in election campaign spending. Since then, there have been questions about whether the decision has harmed our democratic process. Those who support the decision argue it upholds free speech, allowing diverse voices in the political arena, and broadens the range of discourse by enabling groups to freely express their views and support candidates or policies. Those against it argue that it allows a disproportionate influence from corporations and special interest groups, and leaves the voices of ordinary citizens overshadowed by the financial resources of a few, eroding the principles of equality and fair representation. With this context, we debate the question: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy? Arguing Yes: Francesca Procaccini, Assistant Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School; Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Professor of Law at Stetson University Arguing No: Floyd Abrams, Senior Counsel at Cahill Gordon & Reindel; Eric Wang, Partner at The Gober Group, pro bono Senior Fellow at the Institute for Free Speech Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series. It was recorded live in person on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, at the Thorne Auditorium at @northwesternlaw in Chicago, Illinois. #opentodebate #debate #citizensunited #courtcase #SupremeCourt #freespeech =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Insights from History: Lessons from the Iran-Iraq War Open to Debate 2024-02-26 | Watch the full debate: youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVEIran’s regional role has changed post-October 7, but is Iran a bigger global threat than we think? In partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations, National Security Council and State Department veterans will debate in our Unresolved format Biden’s Iran diplomacy, Iran's use of proxies in the Middle East, its nuclear ambitions, and whether Iran now poses a threat to the global order. #opentodebate #debate #Iran #Gaza #Lebanon #Yemen #NationalSecurity #MiddleEast #Biden #Globalorder =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Bidens Iran Policy: Whats the Best Approach? Open to Debate 2024-02-26 | Watch the full debate: youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVEIran’s regional role has changed post-October 7, but is Iran a bigger global threat than we think? In partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations, National Security Council and State Department veterans will debate in our Unresolved format Biden’s Iran diplomacy, Iran's use of proxies in the Middle East, its nuclear ambitions, and whether Iran now poses a threat to the global order. #opentodebate #debate #Iran #Gaza #Lebanon #Yemen #NationalSecurity #MiddleEast #Biden #Globalorder =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
A Closer Look at Iran Diplomacy Open to Debate 2024-02-26 | Watch the full debate: youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVEIran’s regional role has changed post-October 7, but is Iran a bigger global threat than we think? In partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations, National Security Council and State Department veterans will debate in our Unresolved format Biden’s Iran diplomacy, Iran's use of proxies in the Middle East, its nuclear ambitions, and whether Iran now poses a threat to the global order. #opentodebate #debate #Iran #Gaza #Lebanon #Yemen #NationalSecurity #MiddleEast #Biden #Globalorder =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Unresolved: The Iran Threat Open to Debate 2024-02-17 | Post-October 7th, Iran's presence in the Middle East—and on the world stage—is growing stronger, many say, given its nuclear ambitions and its use of proxies in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen, most recently disrupting shipping in the Red Sea and the Suez Canal. Its regional dominance is expanding, but is it also emerging as a global threat as it aligns with other authoritarian regimes? In Open to Debate’s Unresolved format and in partnership with the Council on Foreign Relations, National Security Council and State Department veterans will debate Biden’s Iran diplomacy, the country's use of proxies in the Middle East, its nuclear ambitions, and whether Iran now poses a threat to the global order.This debate was recorded live on January 25, 2024, in Washington D.C. at the Council on Foreign Relations. @cfr Feature Debate Topics:Has Biden’s Iran Diplomacy Failed? Can Israel Live with a Nuclear Iran?Does Iran Pose a Threat to the Global Order? Experts:Michael Doran, Senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East at the Hudson Institute Barbara Slavin, Distinguished Fellow at the Stimson Center Ray Takeyh, Senior Fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations #opentodebate #debate #iran #gaza #lebanon #yemen #nationalsecurity #middleeast #biden #globalorder =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================
Esther Perel: Diffuse Conflict with Three Words Open to Debate 2024-02-09 | Listen to the full episode: youtu.be/7TS11SEKdqI?si=PQyYPhY34nklREhsCouples have arguments over many topics. However, it’s through resolving conflict that both people in the relationship feel heard and seen. Psychotherapist, relationship expert, and New York Times-bestselling author Esther Perel says conflict when navigated skillfully can lead to growth, resilience, and a stronger bond. In this conversation with John Donvan, Perel discusses her new online course, shares her experience working with different relationship types, strategies for transforming conflict into a constructive dialogue, and the importance of validating both sides’ perspectives. #opentodebate #debate #conflict #relationships =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Esther Perel: From Politics to Pastry Open to Debate 2024-02-09 | Listen to the full episode: youtu.be/7TS11SEKdqI?si=PQyYPhY34nklREhsCouples have arguments over many topics. However, it’s through resolving conflict that both people in the relationship feel heard and seen. Psychotherapist, relationship expert, and New York Times-bestselling author Esther Perel says conflict when navigated skillfully can lead to growth, resilience, and a stronger bond. In this conversation with John Donvan, Perel discusses her new online course, shares her experience working with different relationship types, strategies for transforming conflict into a constructive dialogue, and the importance of validating both sides’ perspectives. #opentodebate #debate #conflict #relationships =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
How to Resolve Conflict in Relationships: A Conversation with Esther Perel Open to Debate 2024-02-09 | Conflict is not reserved for politics or public policy — it also happens within relationships. Couples have arguments over what’s happening behind closed doors, their beliefs, and how to navigate the future together. However, it’s through resolving conflict that both people in the relationship feel heard and seen. Psychotherapist, relationship expert, and New York Times-bestselling author Esther Perel has spent her career offering insight and guidance to individuals and couples. She says conflict, when navigated skillfully, can lead to growth, resilience, and a stronger bond. In this conversation with host and moderator-in-chief John Donvan, Perel discusses her new “Turning Conflict into Connection” online course, shares her experience working with different relationship types, strategies anyone can use for transforming disagreement into a constructive dialogue, and the importance of validating both sides’ perspectives in any situation. #opentodebate #debate #conflict #relationships #EstherPerel #ConflictResolution =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate: Is the Republican Party’s Refusal to Raise Taxes Fiscally Irresponsible? Open to Debate 2024-02-02 | Whoever wins the 2024 election will soon face a critical decision about extending four trillion dollars in tax cuts expiring next year. Whether taxes will be raised, or cut is in question, against the backdrop of 34.1 trillion dollars in federal debt. For the past few decades, the Republican Party has embraced the belief that lower tax rates and less government spending boost the U.S. economy. However, there is disagreement among conservative thought leaders about the way forward on taxes for the Republican Party. Specifically, some argue that preferences for tax cuts ignore the looming deficit and that refusing to raise taxes further imbalances the federal budget. However, others continue to argue that our debt is caused by government overspending and will actually be helped by tax cuts and that these same cuts also help promote a flourishing economy. With this background, we debate the question: Is the Republican Party’s Refusal to Raise Taxes Fiscally Irresponsible? Arguing Yes: Oren Cass, Executive Director of American Compass Arguing No: David McIntosh, President of the Club for Growth Nayeema Raza, Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox, is the guest moderator#opentodebate #debate #principle #taxes #raisingtaxes #spending #policy #smallgovernment #biggovernement #governments #empiricalevidence #interestrates #inflation #taxcuts #taxrevenue #controlspending #balancedbudget #farmbills #debt #walmartshopper =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Unresolved Debate Clip: Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea? Open to Debate 2024-01-26 | Right now, climate engineers are working on new technologies, called solar geoengineering, that would reflect the sun’s rays away from Earth as a way to cool the planet. Those in favor argue it would be inexpensive and effective, and could buy us time to get carbon emissions down before the worst impacts of climate change. But others argue it would distract from the underlying issues of climate change and express concern about who would control such a powerful technology. So we debate: Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea?Watch the full debate: youtube.com/watch?v=jWi21U5PfnE=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate Clip: Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea? Ted Parson vs. Clive Hamilton Open to Debate 2024-01-26 | Right now, climate engineers are working on new technologies, called solar geoengineering, that would reflect the sun’s rays away from Earth as a way to cool the planet. Those in favor argue it would be inexpensive and effective, and could buy us time to get carbon emissions down before the worst impacts of climate change. But others argue it would distract from the underlying issues of climate change and express concern about who would control such a powerful technology. So we debate: Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea?Watch the full debate: youtube.com/watch?v=jWi21U5PfnE=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate: Is the American Dream in Decline? David Leonhardt vs. Michael Strain Open to Debate 2024-01-19 | The American Dream – the idea that anyone, regardless of where they were born or what class they were born into, can achieve success in the U.S. through hard work and determination – is under scrutiny. Compared to post-World War II where most people could create a comfortable lifestyle, the viability of homeownership and stable employment doesn’t seem attainable to younger Americans and immigrants, according to some economists and policymakers. Those who see a challenge say there’s a growing wealth gap between the richest and poorest people and that increasing healthcare, education, and housing costs create hardships for many. They also argue that the shift towards a more gig-based economy and the impact of automation and globalization on traditional jobs create uncertainty. Those who remain optimistic about a meritocratic path to success, say that compared to other countries, the U.S. still offers more opportunities for personal and financial growth and that new industries and technologies continually emerge, creating new pathways for advancement. Younger Americans also see different ways of achieving the American Dream than their parents, opening possibilities of a less rigid definition of the term in the future. Arguing Yes: David Leonhardt, Pulitzer Prize-winning Senior Writer for The New York Times and The Morning; Author of “Ours Was the Shining Future: The Story of the American Dream” Arguing No: Michael Strain, Political Economy Scholar and Director of Economic Policy Studies at American Enterprise Institute; Author of “The American Dream Is Not Dead: (But Populism Could Kill It)” Nayeema Raza, Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox, is the guest moderator. =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ==================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts on Conflict, War, and Debate Open to Debate 2024-01-12 | Debate is a form of conflict that is played out through words, arguments, civility, and the capability to exchange ideas with people we disagree with. But what happens when debate fails — and what leads leaders and countries to fall into conflict? In this conversation with Retired U.S. Army General David H. Petraeus and historian Lord Andrew Roberts, guest moderator Xenia Wickett speaks with them about their new book “Conflict: The Evolution of Warfare from 1945 to Ukraine,” which gives insight into the current state of global affairs. They also discuss how the wars in Ukraine, Israel, and Gaza fit in within military conflict’s evolution over the last century and the age of misinformation, the morality of conflict and what is considered a just war, and how civil debate and conflict are intertwined. Our Guests: General David H. Petraeus, U.S. Army Retired General; Chairman of the KKR Global Institute; Former CIA Director Andrew Roberts, Biographer, Historian, and Member of the U.K. Parliament Xenia Wickett, Geopolitical strategist and moderator at Wickett Advisory and Trustee of Transparency International UK, is the guest moderator=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate: Will AI Kill the Future of the Creative Arts? Jonathan Taplin vs. Rebecca Fiebrink Open to Debate 2024-01-11 | From AI-generated paintings to composing symphonies and writing scripts and novels, ChatGPT, DeepDream, DALL·E, and other types of AI are challenging how we see the human endeavor to express, innovate, and connect. Algorithms creating art is no longer science fiction— and some people worry they do it better. Will the human touch be obsolete? Those arguing “yes” say without knowledge of human emotions and experiences, any AI-created art will always lack depth and relatability. They are also concerned that with AI capable of producing art rapidly and at a potentially reduced cost, human artists might face economic challenges, with their works being undervalued or overshadowed. Those arguing “no” claim AI is another tool in an artist's toolkit, and it makes creating more accessible for artists who didn’t have traditional training. From there, AI will create new opportunities to express artistic talents in ways that we can’t yet imagine. With this context displayed on canvas, we debate: Will AI Kill the Future of the Creative Arts? Arguing Yes: Jonathan Taplin, Author; Director Emeritus of the Annenberg Innovation Lab at the University of Southern California Arguing No: Rebecca Fiebrink, Professor at the University of the Arts, London's Creative Computing Institute Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates #opentodebate #debate #art #ai #chatgpt #experience #photography #music #musician #records #hollywoodstrike #studio #screenplay #actors #actress #tiktokcreators #humanrights #jobs #editor #photoshop #monalisa #davinci @OpenAI @HoiChatGPT @tiktok-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Climate Change Debate Clip: Will the Future Be Abundant? Open to Debate 2024-01-08 | Today, humanity is thriving, but there are fears the good times will not last. Will tomorrow be better than today? Those arguing “yes” say people have better access to resources and technological advances are making us more prosperous. Those arguing “no” say there are widening socio-economic disparities, our globalized world is bound to collapse, and we’re not doing enough to fight climate change. Now we debate: Will the Future Be Abundant?Watch the full debate: youtu.be/plivyvhJ2WEArguing Yes: Peter Diamandis, Founder and Executive Chairman of the XPRIZE Foundation Arguing No: Peter Zeihan, Geopolitical Strategist #climatechange #earth #productivity #science #opentodebate #science #future-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Open to Debate Mock Trial: Is Trump Guilty in the January 6th Case? Lanny Davis vs Sara Azari Open to Debate 2024-01-05 | In a new “Mock Trial” debate format, Open to Debate will take on the most important legal questions of our time, with each episode focusing on a high-profile case unfolding in the public square. The new format translates the art of debate to a high-stakes courtroom case, giving listeners an opportunity to go beyond the headlines and hear both sides appeal to the jury of public opinion. The first question to be debated in our new format—or, rather, tried— will be “Is Trump Guilty in the January 6th Case?” About the Trial After the 2020 election and until he left office, former President Trump discredited the election results and claimed there was election fraud leading to President Biden’s win. The January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol is tied to Trump’s claims. Trump has been federally indicted on four charges: “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States,” “Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding,” “Obstruction of and Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding,” and “Conspiracy Against Rights.” Those arguing Trump’s innocence say proof is needed that he had planned to commit a crime, that he was acting within the scope of his presidential duties, and he conducted himself under legal advice. Those arguing Trump is guilty say his actions showed criminal intent to defraud the United States, made false claims knowingly, and tried to deceive others into blocking the voting certification. How it works: In the Mock Trial format, you’ll hear a prosecutor and defense attorney present arguments that are likely to be heard at the actual trial. Each side will then engage directly on the evidence to prove whether or not the President is guilty of conspiracy to defraud the federal government function to collect, count, and certify the results of the 2020 presidential election. Esteemed legal experts will then be invited to cross-examine the panel for the jury to consider, as John Donvan moderates the case. Prosecutor: Lanny Davis, Attorney and Former Presidential Advisor Defense Attorney: Sara Azari, Criminal Defense Lawyer; Legal Analyst for NewsNation Judge's Chair: John Donvan, Moderator-In-Chief and Emmy award-winning journalist #opentodebate #debate #mocktrial #trump #january6hearings #presidency #elections #freespeech =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
John Donvan on being Open to Debate in 2024 Open to Debate 2024-01-04 | Dear all fans, followers and frequenters of Open to Debate:It's that time of year where I like to say to all of you: "thanks and..."Thanks for listening and watching, for liking and sharing, for supporting and believing. Believing in good argument, that is. So what's the "and..." part?Well, for that, click play on the video. Because that's where this message really gets fun. And personal. And meaningful.Happy holidays!John DonvanPlease consider supporting our mission and a balanced future. opentodebate.org/donate=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Special Episode: David Brooks on the Art of Seeing and Hearing Others Open to Debate 2023-12-29 | A special conversation episode with David Brooks and John Donvan.In a society that is becoming increasingly polarized, as evident in our national political discourse and the powerful and divisive reverberations from two wars, people feel disconnected and hesitant to engage with differing perspectives. How can we solve that issue, build deeper connections, and get to know someone better? New York Times columnist David Brooks says you must become good at understanding people both within and outside your circle, take time to see from their viewpoint, and help them feel seen and understood. John Donvan sits down with Brooks to discuss his new book “How to Know a Person: The Art of Seeing Others Deeply and Being Deeply Seen”, where Brooks discusses the art of “being seen” and provides a guide to fostering deeper connections in our homes, work, and daily lives. In line with Open to Debate’s belief that active listening and learning are required to mend our social fabric, Brooks offers a solution to a society in need of appreciating each other’s differences.=================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Preview Debate Clip - Will the Future Be Abundant? Peter Diamandis AI Bot vs. Peter Zeihan Open to Debate 2023-12-22 | Exclusive livestream debate: Will the Future Be Abundant? Watch the full debate: youtu.be/plivyvhJ2WEToday, humanity is thriving, but there are fears the good times will not last. Will tomorrow be better than today? Those arguing “yes” say people have better access to resources and technological advances are making us more prosperous. Those arguing “no” say there are widening socio-economic disparities, our globalized world is bound to collapse, and we’re not doing enough to fight climate change.Arguing Yes: Peter Diamandis, Founder and Executive Chairman of the XPRIZE Foundation Arguing No: Peter Zeihan, Geopolitical Strategist Xenia Wickett, Geopolitical strategist and moderator at Wickett Advisory and Trustee of Transparency International UK, is the guest moderator. #opentodebate #debate #abundance #deglobalization #resources #environment #agriculture # IndustrialRevolution #technology #ai =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate: Will the Future be Abundant? Peter Diamandis vs. Peter Zeihan Open to Debate 2023-12-22 | From the start of agriculture to the Industrial Revolution and beyond, humanity has changed and thrived at a level previously unseen in history. Some worry that the abundant present we live in now will change for the worse, due to environmental challenges and a shifting geopolitical landscape. Meanwhile, there is increased connectivity to resources and improved standards of living. Will tomorrow be better than today? Those who agree say that humanity is more prosperous than ever, mortality rates are dropping while living standards and access to resources are increasing, and we’re taking necessary steps to mitigate the beginning effects of climate change. Those who disagree point out that there are widening socio-economic disparities. They also say deglobalization will cause the collapse of consumption and global trade, and the environmental crisis is almost at the point of no return. With this background, we debate the question: Will the Future Be Abundant? Arguing Yes: Peter Diamandis, Founder and Executive Chairman of the XPRIZE Foundation Arguing No: Peter Zeihan, Geopolitical Strategist Xenia Wickett, Geopolitical strategist and moderator at Wickett Advisory and Trustee of Transparency International UK, is the guest moderator. #opentodebate #debate #abundance #deglobalization #resources #environment #agriculture # IndustrialRevolution #technology #ai @ZeihanonGeopolitics =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Sara Azari debates Lanny Davis. What do you make of the First Amendment argument? Open to Debate 2023-12-19 | Exclusive livestream premiere of our new "Mock Trial" debate format on the question, Is Trump Guilty in the January 6th Case? Full debate airs on Friday, January 5th.After the 2020 election, former President Trump discredited the election results. The January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol and Trump’s federal indictment on four charges are tied to his claims. The defense claims proof is needed he had planned to commit a crime and he conducted himself under legal advice. The prosecution argues his actions showed criminal intent to defraud the U.S. and was done knowingly.-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate Q&A: Alexi McCammond, journalist, MSNBC contributor & opinion editor at The Washington Post. Open to Debate 2023-12-18 | The centrist group No Labels is planning a bipartisan nominating convention, leading to speculation that they may promote a third-party candidate for voters who don’t support Donald Trump or Joe Biden. Those who agree say a third-party ticket will affect the election by helping Trump get more votes and diluting opposition. Those who disagree say voters may like the third-party candidate better, reducing Trump’s chances. Now we debate: How Would A No Labels Presidential Candidate Change the Outcome in 2024?Watch the full debate here: youtu.be/iCgwnIemS3Y-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Live Debate Q&A: Shia Kapos reporter with POLITICO Open to Debate 2023-12-18 | The centrist group No Labels is planning a bipartisan nominating convention, leading to speculation that they may promote a third-party candidate for voters who don’t support Donald Trump or Joe Biden. Those who agree say a third-party ticket will affect the election by helping Trump get more votes and diluting opposition. Those who disagree say voters may like the third-party candidate better, reducing Trump’s chances. Now we debate: How Would A No Labels Presidential Candidate Change the Outcome in 2024?Watch the full debate here: youtu.be/iCgwnIemS3Y-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
2024 Presidential Election Debate: Could a No Labels ticket win? Should No Labels even be trying? Open to Debate 2023-12-18 | @nolabels is a non-profit founded 13 years ago to encourage elected officials from opposing parties to work together. A lot of its effort has centered on Congress. But now No Labels is preparing to go presidential in a big way, laying the groundwork to get a third presidential ticket up and running in order, they say, to give voters a choice between the two main parties, which they portray as captured by extremists.They have gained access to the ballot in 11 states so far, and they have raised close to 70 million dollars, so that is certainly a start worth taking seriously. Also worth taking seriously is the question, could a No Labels ticket even win? Another more controversial question is, should No Labels even be trying?Open to Debate Moderator-in-Chief - John DonvanWatch the full debate here: youtu.be/iCgwnIemS3Y-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Urgent Debate: Securing the Border | Jessica Vaughan vs. Kristie De Peña Open to Debate 2023-12-15 | In recent years, the U.S. has seen a surge in the number of migrants and asylum seekers at its borders, which has strained existing border security and immigration systems. The Secure the Border Act of 2023 aims to change immigration law by enforcing stricter controls and limitations on immigration, impacting asylum seekers, migrant children, employers, and individuals overstaying visas, among other provisions. It has passed in the GOP-led House, communicating its views on signature policy, but it has had little discussion in the Democrat-led Senate and the Biden administration has threatened to veto the act. Republican senators now also want to pair the bill with additional aid to Ukraine and other U.S. allies. Those who support the policies included in the act describe it as a necessary response to improve national security and will help modernize border security infrastructure. Those arguing against it are concerned about the humanitarian impact of stricter border controls, particularly on vulnerable populations, and question the high cost and effectiveness of physical barriers and increased enforcement. With this background, we debate the question: Should Congress Pass the Secure the Border Act? Arguing Yes: Jessica Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigration Studies Arguing No: Kristie De Peña, Senior Vice President for Policy and Director of Immigration Policy at Niskanen Center Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates #opentodebate #debate #migrant #bordersecurity #immigration #schooling #healthcare #legal #policies #Politics #courtcases #Democrats #Republicans #childadvocate #translators #legalimmigrants #illegalimmigrants =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Debate Video: How Would A No Labels Presidential Candidate Change the Outcome in 2024? Open to Debate 2023-12-01 | The centrist group No Labels is planning to host a bipartisan nominating convention in 2024. This is leading some people to speculate that they may promote a third-party candidate that better reflects the perspective of middle-of-the-line voters who don’t favor President Biden’s re-election bid or Donald Trump receiving the Republican nomination. Those who say it will help Trump argue the group doesn’t have enough influence to make lasting tangible change and worry that promoting a third-party unity ticket will give an unpopular candidate like Trump a lower threshold for votes that would’ve gone to Biden. Those who disagree say voters who are discontented with both major parties but particularly opposed to Trump, might turn out in support of the third-party candidate, indirectly reducing Trump's chances. With this context, we debate the question: “How Would A No Labels Presidential Candidate Change the Outcome in 2024?" Rahna Epting argues that the No Labels Party does not have a path to win the presidency. Ryan Clancy argues a No Labels unity presidential ticket has a viable path to win the White House in 2024. Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates.#opentodebate #debate #nolabels #moveon #politics #elections #2024election #presidency #polling @nolabels @MoveOnVideo =================================== Subscribe: youtube.com/@OpentoDebateOrg Official site: opentodebate.org Open to Debate Twitter: twitter.com/OpentoDebateOrg Open to Debate Facebook: facebook.com/BeOpentoDebate ===================================-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-Please watch: "Unresolved: The Iran Threat" youtube.com/watch?v=rdRcyieKBVE-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
