Uploaded May 2023 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
In examining the evidence of the Christian religion, it is essential to the discovery of truth that we bring to the investigation a mind freed, as far as possible, from existing prejudice, and open to conviction. There should be a readiness, on our part, to investigate with candor to follow the truth wherever it may lead us, and to submit, without reserve or objection, to all the teachings of this religion, if it be found to be of divine origin. "There is no other entrance," says Lord Bacon, "to the kingdom of man, which is founded in the sciences, than to the kingdom of heaven, into which no one can enter but in the character of a little child." The docility which true philosophy requires of her disciples is not a spirit of servility, or the surrender of the reason and judgment to whatsoever the teacher may inculcate; but it is a mind free from all pride of opinion, not hostile to the truth sought for, willing to pursue the inquiry, and impartiality to weigh the arguments and evidence, and to acquiesce in the judgment of right reason. The investigation, moreover, should be pursued with the serious earnestness which becomes the greatness of the subject--a subject fraught with such momentous consequences to man. It should be pursued as in the presence of God, and under the solemn sanctions created by a lively sense of his omniscience, and of our accountability to him for the right use of the faculties which he has bestowed.
In requiring this candor and simplicity of mind in those who would investigate the truth of our religion, Christianity demands nothing more than is readily conceded to every branch of human science. All these have their data, and their axioms; and Christianity, too, has her first principles, the admission of which is essential to any real progress in knowledge. "Christianity," says Bishop Wilson, "inscribes on the portal of her dominion 'Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall in nowise enter therein.' Christianity does not profess to convince the perverse and headstrong, to bring irresistible evidence to the daring and profane, to vanquish the proud scorner, and afford evidences from which the careless and perverse cannot possibly escape. This might go to destroy man's responsibility. All that Christianity professes, is to propose such evidences as may satisfy the meek, the tractable, the candid, the serious inquirer."
Proof Of God
Proof God is Real
Evidence that Demands a verdict .
In examining the evidence of the Christian religion, it is essential to the discovery of truth that we bring to the investigation a mind freed, as far as possible, from existing prejudice, and open to conviction. There should be a readiness, on our part, to investigate with candor to follow the truth wherever it may lead us, and to submit, without reserve or objection, to all the teachings of this religion, if it be found to be of divine origin. "There is no other entrance," says Lord Bacon, "to the kingdom of man, which is founded in the sciences, than to the kingdom of heaven, into which no one can enter but in the character of a little child." The docility which true philosophy requires of her disciples is not a spirit of servility, or the surrender of the reason and judgment to whatsoever the teacher may inculcate; but it is a mind free from all pride of opinion, not hostile to the truth sought for, willing to pursue the inquiry, and impartiality to weigh the arguments and evidence, and to acquiesce in the judgment of right reason. The investigation, moreover, should be pursued with the serious earnestness which becomes the greatness of the subject--a subject fraught with such momentous consequences to man. It should be pursued as in the presence of God, and under the solemn sanctions created by a lively sense of his omniscience, and of our accountability to him for the right use of the faculties which he has bestowed.
In requiring this candor and simplicity of mind in those who would investigate the truth of our religion, Christianity demands nothing more than is readily conceded to every branch of human science. All these have their data, and their axioms; and Christianity, too, has her first principles, the admission of which is essential to any real progress in knowledge. "Christianity," says Bishop Wilson, "inscribes on the portal of her dominion 'Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, shall in nowise enter therein.' Christianity does not profess to convince the perverse and headstrong, to bring irresistible evidence to the daring and profane, to vanquish the proud scorner, and afford evidences from which the careless and perverse cannot possibly escape. This might go to destroy man's responsibility. All that Christianity professes, is to propose such evidences as may satisfy the meek, the tractable, the candid, the serious inquirer."
Proof Of God
Proof God is Real
Evidence that Demands a verdict .
![STUNNING Discovery Leads HISTORIAN Away From Atheism
Recently, Justin Brierley interviewed Dr. Sarah Irving-Stonebreaker to discuss her journey from being a committed to atheist, to recanting her atheism and following Christ! This video features a discussion on how Science and Christianity support each other, and how Atheist ethics led Dr. Stone-Breaker away from atheism.
[Original: Historian: NEW ATHEISTS Made Me CHRISTIAN - Dr Sarah Irving-Stonebraker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27y627XH7VE]
[Justin Brierley Website, YT channel: https://justinbrierley.com/ , https://www.youtube.com/@justinbrierley ]
[Dr. Sarah Irving-Stonebreaker website: https://www.stonebraker.com.au/ ]
[The Freedom From Religion Schism/ Atheist Sarah Haider’s Article “Atheism Without Reason” https://newsletter.sarahhaider.com/p/atheism-without-reason]
..........................................................
SUPPORT THE MISSION:
https://buymeacoffee.com/el23ft161l
Follow/Contact me on X:
Http://www.x.com/Converts4Christ
........................
Atheist Ethicist Peter Singer wrote “When the death of a disabled infant will lead to the birth of another infant with better prospects of a happy life, the total amount of happiness will be greater if the disabled inflant is killed” & that “There is a lack of any clear boundary between the newborn infant, who is clearly not a person in the ethically relvanet sense, and the young child, who is. In our book, “Should The Baby Live? My colleague Helga Kugse and I suggested that a period of 28 days after birth might be allowed before an infant is accepted as having the same right to life as others.
Reading these barbaric and cruel thoughts by atheist philosophers brings to mind something written by atheist blogger Sarah Haider, in her post “Atheism Without Reason” which she recounds an unfolding schism in the Freedom For Religion Foundation where all the real scientists and biologists are stepping down over a religious belief progressive atheists hold in redefining biological terms, In one of her closing paragraphs she wrote “I wonder if I have greatly overestimated human reason. In the past, I had mostly thought about the ceiling” that faith created – the ways in which religion hindered progress, scientific achievement and understanding. But now I think much more about the floor it creates. Perhaps without certain myths granding the power of the sacred to some fundamental truths (like the fact theat there are two sexes) we would drive away from reality altogether)
The same can be said of human dignity and human worth. Faith puts a absolute worth on human life. In atheism, there is no such worth, it’s all in relative utility, as atheist Peter Singer explained. STUNNING Discovery Leads HISTORIAN Away From Atheism](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pGXRYZOE8qw/mqdefault.jpg)


![FORMER Atheist’s STUNNING Take-down Of Arguments Against Christianity!
A Christian, who was once an atheist, and an atheist who was once a Christian were battling it out online recently on the Evidence for Christianity. While getting into the historical evidence for Christianity, it became clear that the atheist was playing a lot of games. Find out what those games were and how to address atheist arguments against Christianity. More to come!
Original post: https://x.com/darwintojesus/status/1889878936084959593
𝐃𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐓𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐬 𝐒𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲? 𝑹𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒔𝒕 𝒂𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒎𝒑𝒕𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔 𝒉𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚 Part One: 1/4 **My Initial Claim** 𝐇𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞: 1. Existence of Jesus: Multiple sources outside the Bible reference Jesus, including Roman historians (Tacitus, Suetonius), Jewish historians (Josephus), and other ancient writers (Pliny the Younger). ••••Logistrix’s Response•••• Tacitus Wrote in 116CE, nearly a century after Jesus’ death. He doesn’t actually mention Jesus by name, but does refer to Christians and refers to “Christ” as the origin of their name. He also mentions the method and approximate date of Jesus’ death. This can be used to show that Jesus the man lived and was Crucified. But does nothing to show that any of the supernatural claims of or about Jesus are true. **my response** If we were trying to prove that Julius Caesar did, in fact, cross the Rubicon, a necessary first step would be proving that Julius Caesar existed at all. One way to do that would be to cite sources that confirm key aspects of his life—such as his military leadership and political actions. While those sources may not explicitly mention the Rubicon crossing, they still provide crucial support for the broader historical claim. In the same way, one of the foundational claims of Christianity is that Jesus was crucified under Pontius Pilate. If Jesus never existed, and if there was no crucifixion, then Christianity is false—end of story. The evidence from Tacitus corroborates at least this key part of the story, and that’s precisely what it’s meant to do. Just as the camera showing the man entering his house is ONLY meant to establish that he was there at the correct time and therefore could have committed the murder, the evidence from Tacitus is only meant to establish key parts of Jesus’ story. But instead of engaging with this, Logistrix moved the goalpost. He admitted that Tacitus confirms Jesus’ existence and crucifixion, but then argued that it doesn’t prove any supernatural claims. That’s irrelevant because that wasn’t the point of citing Tacitus in the first place. Recall how I said in my introduction to this thread that the atheist will evaluate each individual piece of evidence as if it alone should prove the entire case? That’s exactly what just happened here. Even worse, he made a completely disingenuous point about Tacitus not mentioning Jesus by name. Tacitus explicitly refers to Christus, the leader of the Christians, saying: “Christus, from whom the name [Christian] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus.”(Annals 15.44) This is an unmistakable reference to Jesus Christ. The fact that Tacitus uses Christ instead of Jesus is completely irrelevant—just like if someone referred to me as ‘the husband of
@femturnedwife
instead of “Darwin to Jesus.” This would still obviously mean me. Conclusion: Tacitus is direct historical evidence that Jesus existed and was crucified. Logistrix’s argument about Tacitus not saying “Jesus” by name is pure nitpicking and completely irrelevant. He also misrepresented my argument by acting as if I were using Tacitus to prove the supernatural, which was never my claim. His response is worthless—he hasn’t refuted anything. He’s just dodged the argument, misrepresented my point, and fixated on a meaningless detail. The fact remains: Tacitus is external, non-Christian evidence confirming a core claim of Christianity. That’s evidence.
..........................................................
SUPPORT THE MISSION:
https://buymeacoffee.com/el23ft161l
Follow/Contact me on X:
Http://www.x.com/Converts4Christ FORMER Atheist’s STUNNING Take-down Of Arguments Against Christianity!](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/poNeULgEPyo/mqdefault.jpg)

![This Is Amazing Grace Lyric Video[Instrumental Feat. Our Brilliant Lords Creation]
Christian Pianist(Me) Playing two contemporary worship songs on a Casio PSX3000 on June 22nd 2024. Included is beautfiful and breathtaking video of The Lords creation. Beautiful mountains and skies and more are included! Below are the full songs.
Instrumental prayer music,0.
This is Amazing Grace is originally by Jeremy Riddle & What a Beautiful Name it is.. originally by Hillsong Worship
Who breaks the power of sin and darkness?
Whose love is mighty and so much stronger?
The King of glory, the King above all kings
Who shakes the whole earth with holy thunder?
And leaves us breathless in awe and wonder?
The King of glory, the King above all kings
This is amazing grace
This is unfailing love
That You would take my place
That You would bear my cross
You laid down Your life
That I would be set free
Oh, Jesus, I sing for
All that Youve done for me
Who brings our chaos back into order?
Who makes the orphans a son and daughter?
The King of glory, the King of glory
Who rules the nations with truth and justice
Shines like the sun in all of its brilliance
The King of glory, the King above all kings
This is amazing grace
This is unfailing love
That You would take my place
That You would bear my cross
You laid down Your life
That I would be set free
Oh, Jesus, I sing for
All that Youve done for me
Worthy is the Lamb who was slain
Worthy is the King who conquered the grave
Worthy is the Lamb who was slain
Worthy is the King who conquered the grave
Worthy is the Lamb who was slain
Worthy is the King who conquered the grave
Worthy is the Lamb who was slain
Worthy, worthy, worthy
This is amazing grace
This is unfailing love
That You would take my place
That You would bear my cross
You laid down Your life
That I would be set free
Oh, Jesus, I sing for
All that Youve done for me
All that Youve done for me
You were the Word at the beginning
One with God the Lord Most High
Your hidden glory in creation
Now, revealed in You our Christ
What a beautiful Name it is, what a beautiful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King
What a beautiful Name it is, nothing compares to this
What a beautiful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
You didnt want heaven without us
So Jesus, You brought heaven down
My sin was great, Your love was greater
What could separate us now?
What a wonderful Name it is, what a wonderful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King
What a wonderful Name it is, nothing compares to this
What a wonderful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
What a wonderful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
How sweet is Your Name, Lord, how good You are)
We love to sing in Your Name, Lord, love to sing of who You are
Death could not hold You, the veil tore before You
You silenced the boast of sin and grave
The Heavens are roaring the praise of Your glory
For You are raised to life again
You have no rival, You have no equal
Now and forever, God, You reign
Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the Glory
Yours is the Name above all names
What a powerful Name it is, what a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King
What a powerful Name it is, nothing can stand against
What a powerful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
You have no rival, You have no equal
Now and forever, God, You reign
Yours is the Kingdom, Yours is the Glory
Yours is the Name above all names
What a powerful Name it is, what a powerful Name it is
The Name of Jesus Christ my King
What a powerful Name it is, nothing can stand against
What a powerful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
What a powerful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
What a powerful Name it is, the Name of Jesus
Im most active here. I also have an accounts on:
Http://www.x.com/MTPiano4Christ This Is Amazing Grace Lyric Video[Instrumental Feat. Our Brilliant Lords Creation]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qfioRmLQc_4/mqdefault.jpg)




