![Archeology Proves The Bible! [EVIDENCE FOR JESUS] @AspiringChristian](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_hAEPp65CzY/sddefault.jpg)
Uploaded September 2023 | Updated September 2026, 6 days ago
Roman authorities went to unbelievable lengths to hide the evidence for Christianity! A wide range of Archeological findings
reveal this and prove the Bible is absolutely true. Time and time again, we see archeological confirmation for The Bible. If you hear someone
call the Bible fairy tales, tell them to read a book and study!
I'm most active here. I also have an account on:
Http://www.x.com/MTPiano4Christ
Evidence for Jesus can be found at Josh.Org
I post here & on X @ x.com/MTPianoForChrist
Video Made using Power Director 365
Song used is one of the free to use songs provided with the software: According to Plan
Script Outline:
Does Archeology Confirm the accuracy of the New Testament? Did Rome try to crush Christianity? Did their efforts include hiding supporting evidence for
The New Testament Gospels & Letters. BUCKLE UP!
Of course, Rome did seek to crush Christianity. Emperor Nero had Peter and Paul put to death, the prior video and some of the Evidence That Demands a verdict episde gets into this.
The cover up didn't stop there. There's nothing the 1st and 2nd century
Roman authorities wouldn't do to try to stop The Gospel.
Romans so feared The Gospel that in AD 135 Emporor Hadrian had a Shrine
built in Bethlehem over the traditional location where Jesus was believed
to be born. Bethlehem, a little town of maybe a few hundred..
Bethlehem, a town nobody would care about or know for any reason...
Other than the fact that it is where the virgin birth of Our Lord
Jesus took place.
Some Scholars doubted the gospels account of Nazareth, and believed that
it didn't even exist during the time of Jesus. Yet a tomb inscription
has recently been found dated to the first century.
Speaking of scholars getting it wrong, and the Gospels getting it right,
we also have the burial of Jesus. Some scholars and anti-Christians
will say that criminals would not have been buried. Thus, Jesus
would not have been buried after his persecution and crucifixion.
Yet in 1968 the bones of a man Jehohana was discovered with ankles pierced
with a seven inch nail and traces of wood from an Olive tree.
Further, forensic evidence proved this man had been crucified in the first
century.
Again, anywhere were scholars dispute facts, methods, places... as time goes
on and further evidence from the period comes to light, we find support for
what The Gospels share.
Roman authorities went to unbelievable lengths to hide the evidence for Christianity! A wide range of Archeological findings
reveal this and prove the Bible is absolutely true. Time and time again, we see archeological confirmation for The Bible. If you hear someone
call the Bible fairy tales, tell them to read a book and study!
I'm most active here. I also have an account on:
Http://www.x.com/MTPiano4Christ
Evidence for Jesus can be found at Josh.Org
I post here & on X @ x.com/MTPianoForChrist
Video Made using Power Director 365
Song used is one of the free to use songs provided with the software: According to Plan
Script Outline:
Does Archeology Confirm the accuracy of the New Testament? Did Rome try to crush Christianity? Did their efforts include hiding supporting evidence for
The New Testament Gospels & Letters. BUCKLE UP!
Of course, Rome did seek to crush Christianity. Emperor Nero had Peter and Paul put to death, the prior video and some of the Evidence That Demands a verdict episde gets into this.
The cover up didn't stop there. There's nothing the 1st and 2nd century
Roman authorities wouldn't do to try to stop The Gospel.
Romans so feared The Gospel that in AD 135 Emporor Hadrian had a Shrine
built in Bethlehem over the traditional location where Jesus was believed
to be born. Bethlehem, a little town of maybe a few hundred..
Bethlehem, a town nobody would care about or know for any reason...
Other than the fact that it is where the virgin birth of Our Lord
Jesus took place.
Some Scholars doubted the gospels account of Nazareth, and believed that
it didn't even exist during the time of Jesus. Yet a tomb inscription
has recently been found dated to the first century.
Speaking of scholars getting it wrong, and the Gospels getting it right,
we also have the burial of Jesus. Some scholars and anti-Christians
will say that criminals would not have been buried. Thus, Jesus
would not have been buried after his persecution and crucifixion.
Yet in 1968 the bones of a man Jehohana was discovered with ankles pierced
with a seven inch nail and traces of wood from an Olive tree.
Further, forensic evidence proved this man had been crucified in the first
century.
Again, anywhere were scholars dispute facts, methods, places... as time goes
on and further evidence from the period comes to light, we find support for
what The Gospels share.
![Archeology Proves The Bible! [EVIDENCE FOR JESUS]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_hAEPp65CzY/mqdefault.jpg "Archeology Proves The Bible! [EVIDENCE FOR JESUS]
Roman authorities went to unbelievable lengths to hide the evidence for Christianity! A wide range of Archeological findings
reveal this and prove the Bible is absolutely true. Time and time again, we see archeological confirmation for The Bible. If you hear someone
call the Bible fairy tales, tell them to read a book and study!
Im most active here. I also have an account on:
Http://www.x.com/MTPiano4Christ
Evidence for Jesus can be found at Josh.Org
I post here & on X @ x.com/MTPianoForChrist
Video Made using Power Director 365
Song used is one of the free to use songs provided with the software: According to Plan
Script Outline:
Does Archeology Confirm the accuracy of the New Testament? Did Rome try to crush Christianity? Did their efforts include hiding supporting evidence for
The New Testament Gospels & Letters. BUCKLE UP!
Of course, Rome did seek to crush Christianity. Emperor Nero had Peter and Paul put to death, the prior video and some of the Evidence That Demands a verdict episde gets into this.
The cover up didnt stop there. Theres nothing the 1st and 2nd century
Roman authorities wouldnt do to try to stop The Gospel.
Romans so feared The Gospel that in AD 135 Emporor Hadrian had a Shrine
built in Bethlehem over the traditional location where Jesus was believed
to be born. Bethlehem, a little town of maybe a few hundred..
Bethlehem, a town nobody would care about or know for any reason...
Other than the fact that it is where the virgin birth of Our Lord
Jesus took place.
Some Scholars doubted the gospels account of Nazareth, and believed that
it didnt even exist during the time of Jesus. Yet a tomb inscription
has recently been found dated to the first century.
Speaking of scholars getting it wrong, and the Gospels getting it right,
we also have the burial of Jesus. Some scholars and anti-Christians
will say that criminals would not have been buried. Thus, Jesus
would not have been buried after his persecution and crucifixion.
Yet in 1968 the bones of a man Jehohana was discovered with ankles pierced
with a seven inch nail and traces of wood from an Olive tree.
Further, forensic evidence proved this man had been crucified in the first
century.
Again, anywhere were scholars dispute facts, methods, places... as time goes
on and further evidence from the period comes to light, we find support for
what The Gospels share.")
![Proof Of Christ’s Virgin Birth: Debunking Atheist’s Mythic Pagan Parallels Argument [EVIDENCE]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/dEzgoHxqP9o/mqdefault.jpg "Proof Of Christ’s Virgin Birth: Debunking Atheist’s Mythic Pagan Parallels Argument [EVIDENCE]
6th Video in a Series on Evidence That Demands a Verdict. Playlist featuring full series is here:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfXZIXWsoEZTP2RLjd2PrpvLATJC59DS6
So far weve proven:
1. New Testament was written VERY early (within 60 years of Jesus Life)
2. There is more historical evidence for the existence of Jesus than Plato
3. The Resurrection of Jesus is well substantiated via the conversion of early Skeptics
4. Now we Prove that Virgin Birth of Christ was not taken from Krishna or any other pagan gods.
OG Source: https://seanmcdowell.org/item/evidence-that-demands-a-verdict
Atheist “Hitchens review of these supposed virgin birth stories was plagiarized from a book by an twentieth century British Secularist named Chapman Cohen, down to several misspellings of the pagan deities (“Catlicus should be “Coatlicue,” “Agdestris” should be “Agdistis” and “Devaka” should be “Devaki”
Not only is Christopher Hitchens spending eternity in Hell, but he misspelled the names of Gods he plagiarized being informed on while he was alive. Sad!
5th video in series on Evidence That Demands a Verdict. Subscribe for more
Christ is King
Proof of God
Evidence That Demands a Verdict by Dr. Sean McDowell , Dr. Josh McDowell
Proof Atheism is false.
Proof Christianity is True.
Proof Jesus is The Son of God.
Proof Jesus Resurrected.
Strong Arguments for Christianity!
OG Source: https://seanmcdowell.org/item/evidence-that-demands-a-verdict
The Covenant School, founded in 2001 as a ministry of Covenant Presbyterian Church")
