The 9/11 WarRoom
Tucker Carlsons Bombshell in The 9/11 Files Ep. 4: WTC 7 Videos Selectively Edited by Media & FBI !
updated
youtube.com/watch?v=h-UHpHezjdk
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1978068267219485158
rumble.com/v709tec-the-911-files-from-cover-up-to-conspiracy-ep-4.html
Tucker has also started a call for a new 9/11 Commission. You can sign it like we did and demand the truth about 9/11:
newcommissionnow.com
VIDEO: https://x.com/911Gene/status/1977231495807864871
=CORPORATE 9/11 NEWS==============
1.) Mamdani distances himself from Hasan Piker’s 9/11 comments at mayoral debate
jewishinsider.com/2025/10/zohran-mamdani-new-york-city-mayor-debate-hasan-piker-andrew-cuomo
Mamdani Condemns Hasan Piker For 'reprehensible' 9/11 Comment In Feisty Battle With Cuomo During Debate
VIDEO: yahoo.com/news/videos/mamdani-condemns-hasan-piker-reprehensible-002232534.html
=ALTERNATIVE 9/11 NEWS==============
From AE911Truth’s anniversary conference Dawn of the Truth: Andy Steele and Craig McKee sit down with comedian and podcaster Jimmy Dore
ae911truth.org/news/1090-jimmy-dore-on-censorship-conspiracy-and-building-7
Kristen Gasparini urges all to apply logic and common sense to wake up the sleeping global population — Reprint from Covert Action Magazine
richardgage911.org/chronicle-of-a-collapse-foretold-the-paradox-of-world-trade-center-7-and-the-9-11-narrative
For the list of podcasters/influencers to reach out to, please see:
HACKING THE PROPAGANDA SYSTEM, UNITING, AND CONQUERING POWER ABUSE
substack.com/home/post/p-172175983
Boston 9/11 Truth has a new website:
boston911truth.org
Paul Zarembka & Craig McKee on Boston 9/11 Truth 10/16/2025
rumble.com/v70f4o2-paul-zarembka-and-craig-mckee-on-boston-911-truth-10162025.htm
To see all their spotlight interviews go to:
Rumble.com/Boston911Truth
Join Boston 9/11 Truth this Thursday, Oct 23rd to discuss Tucker Carlson's Episode 4 in his series, The 9/11 Files. To get an invite, please email Sue Serpa at sueserpa@gmail.com.
Upcoming guests:
Oct 30 - Jon Cole to discuss his video The Last 30 Seconds
Nov 13 - Dan Noel
Nov 25 - Bob Runyon
Dec 11 - Mark Rossini
Jan 8 - Nelson Martins
===WHO WE ARE==============
The 9/11 WarRoom (911WarRoom.com) is a weekly open roundtable discussion hosted by Gene & Sandra focusing on 9/11 news, strategy and activism. Everyone is welcome to participate in the conversation or just listen in.
Time: Every given Sunday at 5PM ET
Join Zoom Meeting at
911WarRoom.com OR
us06web.zoom.us/j/84302602119?pwd=bkYrUHlmUmhERDhrb0VKcmdMMGpSQT09
Meeting ID: 843 0260 2119
Passcode: 911
One tap mobile
+13126266799,,84302602119#,,,,*911# US (Chicago)
+16469313860,,84302602119#,,,,*911# US
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 305 224 1968 US
+1 309 205 3325 US
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 360 209 5623 US
+1 386 347 5053 US
+1 507 473 4847 US
+1 564 217 2000 US
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 689 278 1000 US
+1 719 359 4580 US
+1 253 205 0468 US
Meeting ID: 843 0260 2119
Passcode: 911
Find your local number: us06web.zoom.us/u/kcwc74ihWm
Contact Us:
Gene & Sandra Laratonda
contact@911WarRoom.com
724.826.1001
=9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT PARTNERS===========
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth 911Firefighters.org
Richard Gage, AIA RichardGage911.org
International Center for 9/11 Justice IC911.org
The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry LCfor911.org or 911Lawyers.org
The Truth Action Project TruthActionProject.org
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth AE911Truth.org
The Congressman has asked Captain Angulo to assemble a 9/11 truth dream team, who has tasked RichardGage911 with preparing the evidence of the WTC explosive demolition, which we have assembled and will post soon at RichardGage911.org.
Erik Lawyer will assemble the best of the 9/11 truth-telling firefighters to present their evidence. The engineers over at AE911Truth will be handling the structural evidence. And we will also include the best of the decade-plus legal work of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.
This opportunity to bring the summary of evidence to Team Trump is just the beginning of our effort. It will require all of us to ensure that their review gets done and gets done right. We will all be needed to hold their feet to the fire.
Peer-reviewed research found explosive nanothermite in the World Trade Center dust, a high-tech, military-grade material capable of cutting through steel with precision. This discovery stands uncontested since 2009 and aligns with the evidence of controlled demolition.
As Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes said, “When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Explosive NanoThermite more powerful than known NanoThermite from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (a military lab) was found in the World Trade Center dust and stands uncontested in a peer-reviewed paper since 2009:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009 - Harrit, Jones, Ryan, Farrer
911Lawyers.org/nanothermite
The Unspeakable follows four families in their struggle to find the truth about the murder of their loved ones on September 11, 2001.
We believe this film has the power to open hearts and change minds in a way that no other 9/11 film has, so please do everything you can to share it widely.
ae911truth.org/news/786-the-unspeakable-is-here-watch-it-now-and-share-it-widely
The Academy of Thinkers likes to question things.
There may be different perspectives on the events of September 11, 2001, which are now referred to as “9/11”.
One possible perspective is that of an engineering scientist, Maximilian Ruppert, who had completed his doctorate the year before on the subject of "planned demolition of structures".
=================================
I would like to talk about my life. Back then I had a fresh doctorate in engineering on the subject of explosions, shelling and planning the demolition of buildings I should have known that it was fake, and in fact I knew. What we were being sold by the media, with two aircraft that collapsed two, later three towers, was absolute fake news. I still didn't take a stand, I didn't fight back or take a position as a scientist. On the contrary, it took me ten years to even talk about it. The media presence of this fake news was so vehement and so overwhelming that I could only say it retrospectively - that with the collapse of these three buildings, many people's entire world views had also been destroyed.
If something like this is possible to spread such a fake here, then what else is politically possible? And this question hurts, you can't just ignore it.
~Professor Maximilian Ruppert
===============================================
Original video: youtube.com/watch?v=-MEZSYaKBUQ&t=8s
Prof. Maximilian Ruppert's channel: youtube.com/@die-akademie-der-denker
Incendiaries, propellants, and explosives. Thermite is an incendiary. Nanothermite can be created to be something between a propellant and and explosive.
I asked that exact question to three of the scientists behind the peer-reviewed paper (two of which are Phd's), "...in your professional opinion can I call the red/grey chips explosives? Niels says its somewhere between a propellant and an explosive." Steven says an explosive. Kevin says an explosive.
I got the following responses:
Dr. Niels Harrit:
To me, the question you rise is semantic. In my opinion the old concepts have been blurred out. If you are making an address in the public domain, your use of words surely depends on the understanding among the audience and the time you have to lay out things. So for a one-liner, you can call them explosives (neither the things nor the audience).
Best
Niels
Dr. Steven Jones:
My understanding has not changed, so I would stand by my earlier statement.
Steven
Kevin Ryan:
Yes, nanothermite can be explosive.
The explosive nature of nanothermite | Dig Within
As some of you know, I've made nanothermite on a small scall and demonstrated for myself that it can do pressure-volume work.https://digwithin.net/2011/06/19/the-explosive-nature-of-nanothermite/
Nanothermite ignition - YouTubeyoutube.com/watch?v=MV3a-UXPNYU
Kevin
David Chandler:
I would not say I was deep into the analysis of nanothermite. I wasn't part of the original project. However, I am very conversant with the science in the nanothermite paper and I "get it" when Niels, Kevin, and Steven talk about the subtle distinctions between the various formulations of nanothermite. What Niels talks about is that I examined the propulsion of pieces of debris, in the North, and especially the South Towers, which Niels latched onto as visual vindication for the presence of nanothermite, in particular the voluminous production of white "smoke" ... aluminum oxide which is one of the end products of the reaction.
The distinction between an incendiary, an explosive, and a propellant is these involve reactions at different rates and under different conditions. The key characteristic of nanothermite by itself is the rapid release of thermal energy: it burns at very high temperature. Ordinary thermite is just as hot, but due to the particle sizes (smaller particles means more surface area of contact between the reactants) nanothermite burns faster. That by itself makes for a great, quick, high temperature cutter charge, but not an explosive. An explosive requires a suddenly expanding gas which can transmit a shock wave that can do the damage. So embedding the nanothermite with a polymer material that quickly vaporizes and expands is what creates the explosion. Kevin talks about needing something to do PV work. That means pressure-volume work.
In physics work is computed as (force) x (distance the force moves something). You can say you "do work on" something or you could say you "give energy" to the thing. Energy is transferred by doing work: they are both measured in the same units (foot-pounds or Newton-meters 😊 Joules)). (Newtons, like pounds, measure force. You can see both of these units for work arise from F x d.) Pressure is force per unit area, so Pressure x Volume would be N / m^2 x m^3 = N m. So pressure x volume produces work as well. An expanding gas does work (such as pushing on a piston in your car engine) by expanding under pressure.
A propellant also involves an expanding gas, but in this case the gas is thrown out in a particular direction by a rocket causing the rocket to be pushed in the opposite direction. You wouldn't propel a rocket with TNT because you don't want to blow up the rocket. You want to push more gently on it over an extended period of time. So it is a matter of how fast you want the energetic material to generate energy. Like the explosive, a rocket needs expanding gasses, not just the generation of high temperatures, but it's a matter of having a controlled burn rate. The thing about nanothermite that is even hyped in the literature by its manufacturers is that it is "tunable." It can be used as an incendiary, a propellant, or an explosive, depending on the formulation and the design of the device. So it is not a matter of nanothermite "being" a propellent or an explosive or an incendiary, it is a matter of how it is formulated and used.
--David Chandler
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source: The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31 - Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Jeff Farrer benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ… OR911Lawyers.org/nanothermite
The 47-story WTC 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11, 2001, collapsing rapidly and symmetrically into its footprint at 5:20 PM. Seven years later, investigators at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.
Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
Following the release of this report, AE911Truth and 10 family members of 9/11 victims submitted a formal request for correction to NIST’s report on WTC 7 based partially on the UAF findings. They are now suing NIST over the agency's evasive response to the request.
The US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit scheduled oral argument in the appeal in AE's Information Quality Act case v NIST this past September 8, 2023. We await the decision.
911WarRoom.com
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
Source: The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31 - Niels Harrit, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Jeff Farrer
benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7 OR
911Lawyers.org/nanothermite
Joining Gene and Sandra were Cayle Littlechief, Al Magaletta, Sean Nagel, Ed Brotherton, Myles Flaig, Ross Muir, Adam Fitzgerald, Ray Kraiijenhagen, Pavol Tvrdovsky, Deb Lee, Josef Princiotta, Jason Kelly and Roy McCoy.
We discussed the importance of clearly defining many things - the message, the avenue we wish to pursue, the end goal. We also covered fundraising (among others via a critical 9/11 Truth store offering everything from stickers to shirts to pamphlets to all relevant updated information across the various 9/11 organizations), and reaching out to the families of those who lost loved ones in the aftermath from 9/11-related illnesses and whose figures are at around 10,000 - and counting.
Ray reiterated the importance of looking at all the details the 9/11 images give us in terms of information and evidence.
Ed shared the clip of WAC at its height in 2006:
youtu.be/ZMiqPQdWvo4
Sandra shared her new song that Cayle made the video to:
youtube.com/watch?v=VB3Z3bhpSuA
Josef shared the info on how to attend his twice-daily 9/11 zoom, at 11:45 AM AKDT (chat meeting ID 716 8428 0007) and 5:45 PM AKDT (chat meeting ID 811 3359 1211). AKDT is 4 hours behind ET and 1 behind PT.
us02web.zoom.us/j/71684280007
No password required
Ross shared his hypothesis on how the towers may actually have been rigged for demolition ( http://911warroom.com/docs/rossmuir/BAKED.IN.THE.CAKEX.pdf ).
Attending the call with Gene and Sandra were: Alfred Magaletta, Susan Serpa, Josef Princiotta, Myles Flaig, Ray Kraiijenhagen, Cayle Littlechief, Ross Muir, Sean Nagel, Lawrence Fine, Ed Brotherton and Bette Smith.
Fmr. President Trump, hosting Saudi-backed LIV golf league, asked about 9/11 families protesting the event:
"Well, nobody's gotten to the bottom of 9/11, unfortunately, and they should have, as to the maniacs that did that horrible thing…"
Joining Gene and Sandra further were Myles Flaig, Trina Maria, Alfred Magaletta, Cayle Littlechief, Susan Serpa, Mike Zarzano, Lawrence Fine, Sean Nagel, Mikey Porazzo and Matt van Slyke.
Others who joined Gene and Sandra were David Cole, Adam Eisenberg, Ray Kraaijenhagen, Craig McKee, Lorraine Clark (briefly and indirectly), Ed Brotherton and Adam Ruff.
We discussed action items more in depth, encouraging everyone to run with what they are naturally comfortable with (Cayle takes his 9/11T message to protests and gatherings on other topics, Mikey makes a point of showing the collapse of WTC7 to at least 2 people per week and writes messages on his car, i.e.). It was suggested that maybe the time had come for a "Youth for 9/11 Truth" group.
Others joining Gene and Sandra were Myles Flaig, Al Magaletta, Susan Serpa, Lawrence Fine, Mike Zarzano, Ray Kraaijenhagen, and Sean Nagel.
Join the next roundtable discussion at 911WarRoom.com/zoom 5PM EST any given Sunday.
We also discussed 9/11 evidence and its relative importance in the pursuit of 9/11 Truth, with Ray Kraaijenhagen making points about the fireproofing, and Ed Brotherton asking if Niels Harrit's paper on nanothermite had been peer-reviewed (Niels and Steven Jones both confirmed post-call that it had been).
Additionally joining Gene and Sandra were Susan Serpa, Cayle Littlechief, Sean Nagel, Morgan Nowlen and Gary Systems.


