The Last 30 Seconds physicsandreason 2024-09-28 | No study, investigation or expert ever explained the final collapse of the twin towers. They always ignore the last 30 seconds of the collapse. The FEMA/ASCE report, ignored the last 30 seconds. The massive NIST report, ignored the last 30 seconds, stopping their investigation at "collapse initiation".That’s because all gravity theories attempting to explain the collapse of the twin towers, are impossible.0:00 - The Construction0:41 - The Destruction02:45 - Confusing collapse theories05:29 - Official investigations09:48 - Nobody is responsible10:28 - Is it raining?11:15 - It’s about time!12:35 - It ain’t over! 15:32 - Phase 1 - The Visible Roof16:05 - The First Volume Destroyed16:44 - The Sagging Truss Theory18:57 - The Missing Jolt20:16 - The Key to Science.21:16 - Phase 2 - The Lateral Destruction24:13 - Phase 3 - The Standing Core26:24 - Out and Down!28:12 - Phase 4 - The Falling Core30:13 - It’s Difficult to Understand30:25 - Blowing off the Dust31:09 - The NIST Omission Report33:37 - They have to lie.34:00 - You will pay for it34:41 - The Emperor’s New Cloths34:59 - No Expert can explain it36:45 - Do you like freedom?
Where The Towers Went physicsandreason 2025-09-15 | An Evaluation of Dr. Judy Wood's Directed Energy Weapon Hypothesis00:00 Background01:15 A Big Beautiful Book02:00 Ignoring the Elephant04:06 Proof of Concept04:32 Hutchinson effects, cold fusion and electromagnetic interference 05:03 Tower Power05:30 Total Inequality07:36 Location, Location, Location09:08 It’s a Hole in one! (and two)11:18 Not good vibrations11:52 Magnetic attraction?12:37 Bombed Out14:19 Jumping to conclusions17:03 Blowing Smoke17:25 Rolled up carpets 18:10 Tissue Beams and Tortilla Chips18:58 All Lathered up19:52 The Penthouse fall20:17 The North Tower Antenna drop21:10 Squibs or squirts? 22:14 Dustification23:59 False Premise Fallacy24:24 The decline and fall of the tower spire25:30 Steel in Suspense26:01 Can Explosives Dustify?27:06 It’s fuming28:17 Watering things down29:03 Taking the heat off29:31 Unburned paper30:00 Toasted by explosives30:40 Just can’t grasp the concept.32:18 False Memory Syndrome 33:40 The Hidden Hurricane 35:17 Where did the towers go?
The Last 30 Seconds - Short physicsandreason 2024-10-02 | No investigation ever explained the actual collapse of the twin towers. They always ignore the last 30 seconds of the collapse. That’s because all gravity collapse theories for the twin towers, are impossible.
Impaled by The Spire: Why all Twin Tower Gravity Collapse Theories - are wrong. physicsandreason 2023-09-04 | The very existence of the Twin Tower core columns, or “Spire”, that stood for 15 seconds after the fall of the floors and roof, proves that the pancake theory as well as the pile driver theory of collapse is impossible. No gravity collapse theory addresses how the upper floors and roof fell through its inner core columns nor the final fall of the “Spire”.This is an abbreviated presentation. For the full presentation including a longer intro and Q&A’s, please see IC911.org for article and video entitled:‘Takaways’ with Jonathan Cole: How the North Tower spire disproves the official theory all by itself.
The Achilles’ heel of all WTC Gravity Collapse Theories physicsandreason 2023-02-08 | After years of study and millions of dollars, the Government stopped their Twin tower study just before collapse, but couldn’t explain the actual collapse. The planes, the fires and gravity alone did not cause the collapse. The “spire” or inner core columns is one reason why a fire induced gravity collapse is impossible. This is an excerpt from a presentation with Richard Gage, AIA. For the full presentation, go to RichardGage911 WTC and RichardGage911 Unleashed - 9/11: Scientific Method: Part 1 Motion w/Jon Cole, Civil Engineer.Research official links regarding the official 9/11 story of how the twin towers collapsed and see if the spire is explained or its collapse demonstrated. No official story for the collapse explained or can demonstrate how any gravity collapse theory can get through “the spire”.
9/11: The Decline and Fall of the Tower Spire physicsandreason 2023-02-07 | The official story never explained the fall of the Twin Tower inner core columns or “Spire”. This is an excerpt from a presentation with Richard Gage, AIA. For the full presentation go to, RichardGage911.org and RichardGage911 Unleashed - 9/11: Scientific Method: Part 1 Motion w/Jon Cole, Civil Engineer.Research official links regarding the official 9/11 story of how the twin towers collapsed and see if the fall of the “spire” highlighted in this video is explained. Decide for yourself if the official story for the collapse of the twin towers addressed the evidence presented, using the scientific method.
9/11 and the Scientific Method: Part 2 - Temperature physicsandreason 2022-12-15 | This is part 2 of a two-part webinar. For the original version please visit AE911Truth.org. Research mainstream links regarding the official 9/11 story of how the twin towers collapsed and compare with the evidence highlighted in this video. Decide for yourself if the official story for the collapse of the twin towers addressed the evidence presented, using the scientific method.00:00 - Introduction03:20 - NFPA 921 High Order Damage05:47 - Overwhelming Evidence of Explosions, Molten Steel and Iron-rich Spheres16:55 - The Problem with Molten Steel or Iron18:42 - NIST: No Responsibility; no Liability22:48 - NIST: No Molten steel!25:39 - Seven Unofficial Theories and the Official Non-theory27:34 - The Scientific Method29:41 - Molten Aluminum Experiments30:28 - What color is that metal?33:49 - The NIST molten aluminum - furniture theory39:15 - Superheated molten aluminum47:17 - The Mysterious Eutectic Steel Experiment48:45 - What is a Eutectic temperature?51:57 - The Mainstream Experts: The source of the sulfur was from gypsum wall board.56:55 - Everyone wanted an experiment!59:28 - Experimental Results: The source of the sulfur was not from the gypsum wall board.1:00:27 - The Great Thermate Debate1:03:58 - Mainstream Experts: Thermite can’t melt steel.1:09:27 - Experimental results: Thermite can melt steel.1:23:39 - Nano-thermite found in the dust1:27:16 - Experiments with Nano-thermite1:30:12 - The Mainstream Experts still can’t melt steel using thermite.1:32:45 - The Ground Zero Fires1:36:22 - Carbon Nanotubes in the dust and lungs of first responders.1:39:00 - Theory Comparisons1:39:28 - The media can’t fool practical people.1:39:52 - Conclusions1:42:20 - Resources
9/11 and the Scientific Method : Part 1 - Motion physicsandreason 2022-12-08 | This is Part 1 of a two-part webinar. For the original version please visit AE911Truth.org.Research the official links regarding the official 9/11 story of how the twin towers collapsed, and compare with the evidence highlighted in this video. Decide for yourself if the official story for the collapse of the twin towers addressed the evidence presented, using the scientific method.00:00 - Introduction03:19 - Tower Construction07:47 - Tower Destruction theories18:30 - The Official Collapse Theory28:34 - The Scientific Method31:28 - Observations and Measurements42:32 - Motion Experiments57:45 - The Entire Collapse1:15:10 - The Decline and Fall of the Tower Spire1:22:26 - Conclusions1:25:50 - Rebuttals1:30:22 - Theory Comparison1:32:46 - It was obvious the first day1:34:47 - Additional Resources
High Rise Fires: Structurally safe? ...or sudden death! physicsandreason 2017-08-15 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Fire induced progressive collapses are becoming more common. Firefighters around the world should avoid entering any high rise fires until this new phenomenon is clearly understood, and buildings subject to this phenomenon are identified.
9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion physicsandreason 2016-03-03 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story adequately addressed the issue using the scientific method. (see more)The direction and sequence of the primary forces to create the smooth motions observed in the towers destruction had to be "out and down". The official story is impossible because if it was “down then out” by gravity alone, there would have been impacts or jolts slowing or stopping the downward motion. The DIRECTION of acceleration for any two (or more) objects is INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale, and always in line with the applied net force. The SEQUENCE of forces acting on any two groups of accelerating objects is also INDEPENDENT of mass, material, size and scale. If one can mimic the motions observed on a large group of objects with a series of forces applied to any small group of objects, then then larger group of objects, regardless of its mass, material, size and scale will have the same sequence and direction of net forces as the smaller group.The motions of dissimilar small objects are used frequently to demonstrate the motions and forces acting on very large objects because the direction and sequence of net force on both are independent of mass, material, size and scale.For example, the direction of acceleration and therefore direction of net force acting on a bucket tied to a rope whirled around your head, is similar to the motion and direction of net force acting on our moon orbiting the earth. The direction of acceleration due to the net force acting on both the bucket and the moon are similar, even though the bucket is not a scaled model of our moon.No agency, no expert, no scientist, nobody has ever been able to make any real model demonstrating the forces necessary to mimic the smooth downward and outward accelerations observed during the twin towers fall using gravity and fire alone, because it's impossible.
For the Undying 9/11 MORONIC Replies physicsandreason 2016-02-11 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Jet Fuel can't melt steel beams.
9/11: The Devils in the details physicsandreason 2014-04-12 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issues using the scientific method. To find the truth, study the details.
9/11 Theories: Expert vs. Expert physicsandreason 2011-11-01 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Why can't the experts get their stories straight?
9/11 Experiments: Eliminate the Impossible physicsandreason 2011-01-31 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video then decide for yourself if the official story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Because when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate physicsandreason 2010-11-11 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue using the scientific method. Why couldn't the National Geographic (or BBC) experts melt steel with thermite? NOTE: THERMATE = Thermite + SULFUR(The FEMA report could not explain the source of the SULFUR ) Learn more: www.911speakout.org
9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST physicsandreason 2010-07-23 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story adequately addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Does NIST think Newton's laws are only suggestions?
9/11 Experiments: The Mysterious Eutectic Steel physicsandreason 2010-07-13 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Did rubble from the WTC really cause those eutectic formations ,as we were led to believe?
9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 2 of 2 physicsandreason 2010-06-15 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method.
9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition ~ Part 1 of 2 physicsandreason 2010-06-15 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method.
9/11 Experiments: The Arbitrator of Competing Hypotheses physicsandreason 2010-05-12 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issue outlined, using the scientific method. Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn't matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone "thinks". Nothing can fool the laws of physics.
Hitler knows what Nano-Thermite in the WTC dust means physicsandreason 2010-01-06 | YouTube posted a link to the official 9/11 story that you can use to contrast with the evidence highlighted in this video, then decide for yourself if their story addressed the issues outlined, using the scientific method. Even Hitler understands that physics trumps all propaganda, misinformation, "official explanations" and psudo-science.
