ITZOUTTHEREMr. Heseltine is a serving police officer in the United Kingdom. He is the creator of the PRUFOS Police Database which he maintains in an unofficial capacity. The database was launched publicly in January 2002 and caters to serving and retired officers who have been involved in British UFO police sightings.
Each year it publishes an annual report outlining the results of Gary's research conducted during the previous twelve months. When Gary began the database it had a half dozen police reports involving approximately 10 police officers. Now after ten years of research it contains over 430 reports dating back to 1901 involving over 940 police officers.
The database is divided into two separate categories -- on and off duty police sightings. Theses sighting reports derive from a number of sources, from officers themselves who contact PRUFOS, to historical newspaper archive reports, or official information reports released by the Ministry of Defence.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
UFO Detective Constable Gary Heseltine speech ,Citizens Hearing 2013ITZOUTTHERE2013-07-01 | Mr. Heseltine is a serving police officer in the United Kingdom. He is the creator of the PRUFOS Police Database which he maintains in an unofficial capacity. The database was launched publicly in January 2002 and caters to serving and retired officers who have been involved in British UFO police sightings.
Each year it publishes an annual report outlining the results of Gary's research conducted during the previous twelve months. When Gary began the database it had a half dozen police reports involving approximately 10 police officers. Now after ten years of research it contains over 430 reports dating back to 1901 involving over 940 police officers.
The database is divided into two separate categories -- on and off duty police sightings. Theses sighting reports derive from a number of sources, from officers themselves who contact PRUFOS, to historical newspaper archive reports, or official information reports released by the Ministry of Defence.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.ITZOUTTHERE Live StreamITZOUTTHERE2017-06-11 | ...JOHN HARRIS COMMON LAW UKITZOUTTHERE2014-03-01 | John Harris gives us his perspective on what's going on. He describes how we are economic slaves to a debt dependant system, notably achieved through the deception of the birth certificate and the creation of a legal fiction known as your 'PERSON'. It is this PERSON that the government then wields it's control upon. Although John points out that this arrangement only works when we consent.
Unfortunately inaction is taken as consent, hence we have unwittingly surrendered our inalienable rights through identifying with the PERSON. Remember you are a human being with god given rights, all you have to do is claim them.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.If you let one of them stand up to us, then they all might stand up!ITZOUTTHERE2013-12-11 | ...Journalist Duncan Campbell,Talks Widespread Surveillance and Secrecy by GCHQITZOUTTHERE2013-09-17 | http://www.duncancampbell.org
The extent to which GCHQ has tried to guard its secrets for decades was wonderfully illustrated nearly 30 years ago when a former codebreaker wrote about his work during the second world war.
Sir Peter Marychurch, then director of the government's eavesdropping centre, chastised Gordon Welchman, one of the brilliant group of intelligence officers at Bletchley Park, GCHQ's wartime predecessor, for referring to codebreaking successes.
Marychurch's intervention provoked a scathing attack from Sir Stuart Milner-Barry, one of Welchman's colleagues. "To suppose that the battles which we had to wage before the birth of the first electronic computer (which must seem to present-day cryptanalysts rather like fighting with bows and arrows) could be relevant to security now is just not credible," he said. To suggest that national security had been harmed was "absurd", Milner-Barry added.
Conventional spying may be the second oldest profession but signals intelligence has always been regarded in Whitehall as acutely sensitive. That is because of the growing emphasis on gathering information by intercepting communications from the air waves, cables, and satellites, and Britain's growing reliance on the resources of GCHQ's American partner, the National Security Agency, the .NSA
The relationship between the two agencies was laid bare in a 1994 staff manual which told GCHQ staff that the agency's contribution must be "of sufficient scale and of the right kind to make a continuation of the Sigint [signals intelligence] alliance worthwhile to our partners". It admitted: "This may entail on occasion the applying of UK resources to the meeting of US requirements."
The relationship was further exposed nine years later when Katharine Gun, a GCHQ employee, revealed a NSA request to bug the offices of allies in the UN Security Council before the decision to invade Iraq. She was arrested under the Official Secrets Act but the charges were dropped -- out of concern, it was believed, about a potential jury's sympathies and of what more might emerge in public about GCHQ's activities.
GCHQ's cover was first blown in 1976 by an article, The Eavesdroppers, published by the London magazine, Time Out. Its contents came as a shock even to the spouses of GCHQ staff who had little idea of what their partners were up to. The article led to the arrest of journalists Crispin Aubrey and Duncan Campbell, and army signals corporal John Berry. Their prosecution, in what became known as the ABC trial, became a cause célèbre. The three received non-custodial sentences and Mark Hosenball, an American journalist at Time Out, was deported.
Widespread surveillance by GCHQ, and its increasingly close relationship with the NSA, typified by the US base at Menwith Hill on the North Yorkshire moors, continued to be reported. But GCHQ's role, eavesdropping, decoding and encoding communications, was not officially "avowed" until 1982.
It was triggered by a real spy, Geoffrey Prime. A GCHQ employee, Prime was first arrested on suspicion of molesting young girls. Only after his wife found spying equipment under the floorboards was he arrested for espionage. He was sentenced to 38 years in jail -- 35 for selling secrets, three for sex offences against children.
Although it consumed many more resources than MI5 and MI6, GCHQ remained largely under the public's radar. In 2003 it dropped all pretence of obscurity and moved its 4,500 (now more than 6,000) staff into a spectacular building, known as the doughnut, on the outskirts of Cheltenham.
The initials GCHQ which not so long ago could only be whispered, are now prominently displayed as a stop on route maps published by the local bus company. And they also feature prominently in headlines throughout the world.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair useProfessor David Nutt And Howard Marks discuss The Dangers Of DrugsITZOUTTHERE2013-09-14 | The Dangers Of Drugs & Drug Policy Reform November,2010
Drug laws amount to scientific censorship, says David Nutt
David Nutt, and fellow professors Leslie King and David Nichols, call for psychoactive drugs used in research to be exempt from severe restrictions. Photograph: Tim Ireland/PA International drug laws amount to scientific censorship, setting back key areas of research including medical treatments, according to a former government drug adviser.
In the journal Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Prof David Nutt, of Imperial College London, said UN conventions on drugs acted as some of the most scandalous examples of scientific censorship in modern times.
Along with another former government adviser, Leslie King, and Prof David Nichols, of the University of North Carolina, Nutt argued that psychoactive drugs used in research should be exempt from severe restrictions.
Nutt resigned as the chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs in November 2009 over the decision to reclassify cannabis as a Class B drug.
The possession of cannabis, ecstasy and psychedelics is regulated under national laws and international conventions dating back to the 1960s.
Nutt said: "The decision to outlaw these drugs was based on their perceived dangers, but in many cases the harms have been overstated and are actually less than many legal drugs such as alcohol.
"The laws have never been updated despite scientific advances and growing evidence that many of these drugs are relatively safe. And there appears to be no way for the international community to make such changes."
The paper argues that the illegal status of psychoactive drugs makes research into their mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic uses, for example in depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), difficult.
"This hindering of research and therapy is motivated by politics, not science. It's one of the most scandalous examples of scientific censorship in modern times," said Nutt.
"The ban on embryonic stem cell research by the Bush administration is the only possible contender, but that only affected the USA, not the whole world."
Nutt and his colleagues argued that the limitations of cannabis research had had a harmful impact on UK pharmaceutical productivity.
Although many of the psychoactive elements of the cannabis plant were discovered in the UK, he said, developing them into medications has been severely hampered by excessive regulation.
"If we adopted a more rational approach to drug regulation, it would empower researchers to make advances in the study of consciousness and brain mechanisms of psychosis, and could lead to major treatment innovations in areas such as depression and PTSD," Nutt added.
The call for reform has been endorsed by the British Neuroscience Association and the British Association for Psychopharmacology.
The researchers are also seeking support from other academic organisations including the Royal Society, the Academy of Medical Sciences, the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Society for Biology.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair useIMAGINE FOR A MOMENT - THIS HAPPENING IN YOUR COUNTRYITZOUTTHERE2013-09-11 | Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it. John Lennon
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair useGeorge Carlin on your Rights and PrivilegesITZOUTTHERE2013-09-11 | George Carlin Now if you think you do have rights, one last assignment for you. Next time you're at the computer, get on the Internet, go to Wikipedia. When you get to Wikipedia, in the search field for Wikipedia, I want you to type in "Japanese Americans 1942″ and you'll find out all about your precious fucking rights, Okay? All right. You know about it. In 1942, there were 110,000 Japanese American citizens in good standing, law-abiding people who were thrown into internment camps simply because their parents were born in the wrong country. That's all they did wrong. They had no right to a lawyer, no right to a fair trial, no right to a jury of their peers no right to due process of any kind. The only right they had: "Right this way" into the internment camps! Just when these American citizens needed their rights the most, their government took them away! And rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country, is a bill of temporary privileges. And if you read the news even badly, you know that every year the list gets shorter and shorter. You see all, sooner or later. Sooner or later, the people in this country are going to realize the government does not give a fuck about them! The government doesn't care about you, or your children, or your rights, or your welfare or your safety. It simply does not give a fuck about you! It's interested in its own power. That's the only thing. Keeping it and expanding it wherever possible.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair useBankers and the Three Little PigsITZOUTTHERE2013-09-11 | Cannes Lion Award-Winning "Three Little Pigs advert"
This advert for the Guardian's open journalism, screened for the first time on 29 February 2012, imagines how we might cover the story of the three little pigs in print and online. Follow the story from the paper's front page headline, through a social media discussion and finally to an unexpected conclusion.
Described by Adweek as a "masterpiece of craft and storytelling".
Winner of 'Ad of the Year 2012' by BBH London.
Winner of 'Best Crafted Commercial' at the British Arrow Craft Awards.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.If we dont learn from our history what hope have we gotITZOUTTHERE2013-07-05 | Eagle Forum of California 2013 Conference
Kitty Werthmann is 87 years old and is President of the South Dakota Eagle Forum. Werthmann lived under Nazi rule through the war, and strongly feels the need to warn Americans about the horrors of socialism. Werthmann said that Adolf Hitler spoke just like an American politician. She says: When the people fear the government, that's tyranny, but when the government fears the people, that's Liberty! Sighting Switzerland's policy where citizens are required to own guns, Hitler did not attempt to invade the country and it has not been involved in a war for 600 years. Kitty advocates: 'Keep your guns. Keep your guns, and buy more guns! and stock up on ammo because: "What good is a gun without ammunition
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.gold market continues with the bear market deepeningITZOUTTHERE2013-07-01 | Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.John Harris Undermining DemocracyITZOUTTHERE2013-06-30 | Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.UK COMMON LAW,A LAWFUL REBELLION JOHN HARRIS (2009)ITZOUTTHERE2013-06-30 | John Harris gives us his perspective on what's going on. He describes how we are economic slaves to a debt dependant system, notably achieved through the deception of the birth certificate and the creation of a legal fiction known as your 'PERSON'. It is this PERSON that the government then wields it's control upon. Although John points out that this arrangement only works when we consent.
Unfortunately inaction is taken as consent, hence we have unwittingly surrendered our inalienable rights through identifying with the PERSON. Remember you are a human being with god given rights, all you have to do is claim them.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.J F K Media & Covert Secret SocietiesITZOUTTHERE2013-04-30 | Transcript link: http://pastebin.com/f65d4172a The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.Today no war has been declared and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of "clear and present danger," then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security--and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion. For the facts of the matter are that this nation's foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation's covert preparations to counter the enemy's covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.That question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration. Full credit goes to YouTuber KRISisLOST for the audio and script,American flag flying in the wind by Ken HowieWhistleblower Tony Farrell Media Cover Up and gang stalkingITZOUTTHERE2013-04-29 | THE STATE COVER UP OF THE ONGOING CASE OF MS SEVEN V GOSSAGE & NINE OTHERS Ms Charles Seven & Tony Farrell A Joint Report - March 2013 http://www.thefarrellreport.nethttp://www.truedemocracy.net/hj35/14a.html (TONY FARRELL) Tony Farrell was both a Principal Intelligence Analyst with South Yorkshire Police and a Senior Research Officer in the Home Office. He has a degree in Applied Statistics and Postgraduate Diplomas in Criminal Intelligence Analysis and Business Administration. In 2010, after an exemplary record in the police service for over 17 years, he found himself dismissed when he spoke the truth when tasked to assess the threat from terrorism. He refused to lie about his threat analysis and hand over a bogus threat assessment. He was unwilling to bear false witness. His employers, on sacking him said that it was a very sad occasion as his beliefs could be correct. They said he had made an enormous contribution to his force. He pursued unfair dismissal in an employment tribunal where it heads towards Strasbourg. Truth documentaries he has been involved with include= the satire "7/7 Kollerstrrom & Farrell are Dead". "Offensive - The Story of Tony Farrell" & the "Men of Truth, Men of Steel" series.
(Ms Charles Seven) Seven is a creative inventor who worked in the entertainment industry for 30 years. She is the person behind the original concept of a long catalogue of TV programs such as "Strictly Come Dancing" & "You Are What You Eat." In 2003, she became a targeted victim of intellectual property theft and as she fought back and took her case to court against the criminals, she found the gang-stalking intensified into death threats. In 2005, she alerted the police about the plans to bomb London in advance. She knew of plans to blow up the underground. Her warnings were ignored. In 2006, in what the judge described as the best case he'd ever seen by a litigant in person, Seven won - Seven v Gossage & Nine Others. In an extra-ordinary twist, by 2008 her case was illegally closed down and covered up by Lord Justice Lawrence Collins. Ms Seven is a creative developer, talented musician, radio broadcaster, spokesperson for truth and has an interest in geo-politics. She continues to be gang-stalked to this very day.
THE STATE COVER UP OF THE CASE MS SEVEN V GOSSAGE AND NINE OTHERS A JOINT REPORT - MARCH 2013SEVEN & TONY FARRELL
A campaign of domestic terror of truly staggering proportions has been exposed. This is a stark example of within the entertainment and media industry extending into circles within the judiciary, the police service and parliament.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.ROBOTS BOSTON DYNAMICS DARPER LS3ITZOUTTHERE2013-04-29 | ABOUT THE LS3 - LEGGED SQUAD SUPPORT SYSTEMS
LS3 is a rough-terrain robot designed to go anywhere Marines and Soldiers go on foot, helping carry their load. Each LS3 carries up to 400 lbs of gear and enough fuel for a 20-mile mission lasting 24 hours. LS3 automatically follows its leader using computer vision, so it does not need a dedicated driver. It also travels to designated locations using terrain sensing and GPS. LS3 began a 2-year field testing phase in 2012. LS3 is funded by DARPA and the US Marine Corps.
Boston Dynamics has assembled an extraordinary team to develop the LS3, including engineers and scientists from Boston Dynamics, Carnegie Mellon, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Bell Helicopter, AAI Corporation and Woodward HRT.
ABOUT BOSTON DYNAMICS Boston Dynamics is an engineering company that specializes in building dynamic robots and software for human simulation. The company began as a spin-off from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where National Academy of Engineering member Marc Raibert and his colleagues first developed robots that ran and maneuvered like animals. They founded the company in 1992, and their ground-breaking work continues to inspire several of the company's activities. Today the company creates a variety of innovative robots, including BigDog, a quadruped robot for travel on rough-terrain, PETMAN, an anthropomorphic robot for testing equipment, RISE, a robot that climbs vertical surfaces, SquishBot, a shape-changing chemical robot that moves through tight space, and many others. The company also develops tools for human simulation. DI-Guy is a human simulation product used for simulation-based training, UAV training, law-enforcement training, mission-planning and many other applications. DI-Guy has become the defacto standard for human simulation as used in military applications; it is used by leading organizations world-wide, including all branches of the US Armed Forces. Digital Biomechanics is a physics-based human simulation product used to design and evaluate equipment used on the human body, such as backpacks, helmets, body armor and the like. Boston Dynamics has an extraordinary technical team of engineers and scientists. The team seamlessly combines advanced analytical thinking with boots-in-the-mud practicality. We pride ourselves in building machines that are both innovative and actually work.UK COMMON LAW,A LAWFUL REBELLIONITZOUTTHERE2013-04-28 | http://youtu.be/uBU1_GbZ8P0?list=UU6Ow4_4DQatgmnbymLtM1GQ without background music The video you are about to watch (and please watch all of it, it is very informative) details how our governments are not really what we think they are anymore. In fact, they are nothing more than corporations; not figuratively, but actually corporations.This makes sense when you think about it in relation to the Global Fascist Government that is being set up. For they would need to abolish the nation states in any legal manner they could, but they would also need to set up a governing body that extends beyond the limits of language and nationality, in order to accomplish that. So, like math is a universal language, the corporate model is a global one. If they are capable of setting up nations as corporations, then they will fit more neatly into their pyramid structure of control that is well on it's way to being created.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.European Union knowingly deceiving and betraying the British people into European ruleITZOUTTHERE2013-04-28 | In 1972, Edward Heath signed the European Communities (Common Market) Act knowingly and willfully deceiving and betraying the British people into European rule. His was an act of outright High Treason and his government thus became an unlawful assembly. Governments cannot bind successors. Though each successive government had the opportunity to rectify his treachery, none did. Each thus became an unlawful assembly also. In 1992, John Major signed the Maastricht Treaty knowingly and wilfully stripping Her Majesty of Her Sovereignty, Honour and Style and rendering her and her subjects mere "citizens" of Europe. His act was ultra vires and one of outright High Treason.
No law can result from treasonous acts, much less unlawful assemblies. It is struck down by our Common Law. Every statute, EU treaty, diktat and influence since 1972 is consequently null and void. Britain has therefore never been part of the EU and our British law stands as it was before the 1972 Act. In consequence, those who affirm and uphold EU law, diktat or influence are openly treasonous and liable to prosecution.
Rex Poulton Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.BEAT THE MORTGAGE EVICTION BAILIFFS COMMON LAWITZOUTTHERE2013-04-27 | UPDATE - The live video footage was filmed on THU.31.MAY.2012 after which time purported high court bailiffs apparently criminally evicted occupants in breach of the Criminal Law Act 1977 section 6(1) and the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 section 1(2). In so far as the eviction was a criminal act, and the regulated mortgage contract a void nullity, possession was apparently retaken, the BARNET bailiffs apparently sacked, and the Bird registered proprietors were still registered at Land Registry a year on by FRI.31.MAY.2013. Somewhere along the bank's claim the Bird defendants were apparently denied access to appeal an apparent fraudulent duplicate possession order made in the BARNET county court district jurisdiction bound mortgage possession proceedings [County Courts Act 1984 section 1, 2(3), 3(1), 5(3) & 21(3)] and as such there appears to have been a fatal breach, for the bank & court, of ECHR article 6.A Short Story of Mans Fight for Liberty The Magna Carta.ITZOUTTHERE2013-04-24 | An experimental account of the historical growth of personal freedom and civil rights in Britain using prints, animated sequences, and re-enactment.
As an expert in the laundering of terrorist finance and funny money who has "handled billions of pounds of terrorist money", James claims he was asked by a leading FSA regulated institution to investigate a mysterious organisation that wanted to invest substantial sums into the UK's economic reconstruction.
This body, which he calls "Foundation X", apparently has huge reserves of gold bullion-backed funds. On some estimates, these funds amount to more than the entire gold bullion mined from the earth. With such great wealth, Foundation X is understandably secretive and only wishes to discuss the disbursement of its funds with a head of state or one of the "top six people in the world". So for 20 weeks, James investigated the foundation. He came to the conclusion that "Foundation X is completely genuine and sincere and that it directly wishes to make the United Kingdom one of the principal points that it will use to disseminate its extraordinarily great wealth into the world".
Having come to this conclusion, James wished to expedite this investment. So he secured a meeting for representatives of Foundation X with the leader of the House of Lords, Lord Strathclyde. This was held some weeks ago and was, at best, inconclusive. Since then, James has discussed Foundation X in detail with Treasury ministers and now believes the government is dragging its heels and missing a major opportunity to drive forward the UK economy.
Now, you might think this is all barmy. After all, mystery foundations with vast quantities of gold bullion-backed securities to invest in the British economy don't come along every day. It's tempting to think that James has been the victim of a particularly convincing Nigerian email scam.
But if it is madness, it is madness that has reached the highest levels of government.
After all, not only have members of Foundation X met with the leader of the House of Lords, the Treasury minister, Lord Sassoon, confirmed that he has been in "detailed discussions" on this subject with James, adding that the government "take seriously anyone who wants to invest in our economy".
So what on earth is going on? One thing is for sure.
The truth is out there.
article written by Hopi Sen Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.OPERATION TONY GILLANITZOUTTHERE2013-04-06 | a good reason why you shouldn't get drunk and fall asleep in the bus stop just a bit of fun one sunday afternoon