German Lourenço MejiaThis talk by Robert Brandom was given at Le Collège de France on 26 May 2009. http://www.college-de-france.fr/site/jacques-bouveresse/confernce_du_.htm
Robert Brandom's webpage at The University of Pittsburgh Department of Philosophy website http://www.pitt.edu/~brandom/multimedia.html#assorted
5:33 I - Introduction 11:06 II - First Distinction: From Labeling to Describing 22:40 III - Ingredient vs. Free-Standing Content: Semantically Separating Content from Force 40:00 IV - Simple versus Complex Predicates 50:51 V - Conclusion
How Analytic Philosophy has Failed Cognitive ScienceGerman Lourenço Mejia2014-12-28 | This talk by Robert Brandom was given at Le Collège de France on 26 May 2009. http://www.college-de-france.fr/site/jacques-bouveresse/confernce_du_.htm
Robert Brandom's webpage at The University of Pittsburgh Department of Philosophy website http://www.pitt.edu/~brandom/multimedia.html#assorted
5:33 I - Introduction 11:06 II - First Distinction: From Labeling to Describing 22:40 III - Ingredient vs. Free-Standing Content: Semantically Separating Content from Force 40:00 IV - Simple versus Complex Predicates 50:51 V - ConclusionPeter Hacker, David Chalmers, Susana Martinez-CondeGerman Lourenço Mejia2020-12-13 | We're talking about experience. People were referred to it in CV terms. You know, what's your experience? Tell us a bit about your experience. It can just refer to the things you've done. Uh, but we're going to be looking at it in a slightly more, I guess, philosophical way, you know, experiment, the nature of experience, what did it, what it is to experience things. How are we are in the world, uh, how we process experience, whether it remains mysterious or not. Whether we can subject all of experience too, scientific or philosophical methods or indeed, whether there'll be aspects of experience which will always allude our capacity to, to grasp it.deVries - Sellars Kant (day 3 talk 2)German Lourenço Mejia2020-09-01 | ...McDowell - Sellars Kant (day 3 talk 3)German Lourenço Mejia2020-09-01 | ...Tom Rockmore: Truth in Philosophy means that a Concept correspond to RealityGerman Lourenço Mejia2020-09-01 | This talk by Tom Rockmore was given at UFMG (Brazil) on 13 May 2015.
The II International Congress Hegel in Dialogue: “Hegel and McDowell” took place in Belo Horizonte and Ouro Preto, between 13th and 16th May 2015. http://www.mcdowellhegel.com/en/concept-of-the-conferenceJohn McDowell: What is the Phenomenology about?German Lourenço Mejia2015-05-17 | This talk by John McDowell was given at UFMG (Brazil) on 13 May 2015.
The II International Congress Hegel in Dialogue: “Hegel and McDowell” took place in Belo Horizonte and Ouro Preto, between 13th and 16th May 2015. http://www.mcdowellhegel.com/en/concept-of-the-conferenceStephen Houlgate: Hegel, McDowell and perceptual experienceGerman Lourenço Mejia2015-05-16 | This talk by Stephen Houlgate was given at UFMG (Brazil) on 14 May 2015.
The II International Congress Hegel in Dialogue: “Hegel and McDowell” took place in Belo Horizonte and Ouro Preto, between 13th and 16th May 2015. http://www.mcdowellhegel.com/en/concept-of-the-conferenceJames Conant on McDowells KantGerman Lourenço Mejia2014-10-26 | James Conant: John McDowell's Kant (Lecture in Bergen 19.9.2005)
This talk by James Conant was given at the Department of Philosophy, University of Bergen on 19 September 2005
Abstract This lecture will be devoted to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, and the primary commentator whose work will figure in the lecture is John McDowell.
Audio: James Conant, WAB, Wittgenstein Research Group at the University of Bergen (WFG). http://wab.uib.no/wab_contrib-audio-cj-kant05.page
James Conant's webpage at The University of Chicago Department of Philosophy website http://philosophy.uchicago.edu/faculty/conant.htmlBrandoms Kantian Lessons (Part 1 of 2)German Lourenço Mejia2014-07-09 | Kantian Lessons about Mind, Meaning, and Rationality (Part 1 of 2)
This talk by Robert Brandom was given at a workshop held at the Centre for Time at the Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney on 14 October 2005.
A transcript can be found at
BRANDOM, Robert. "Kantian Lessons about Mind, Meaning, and Rationality". In: Analytic Kantianism. Philosophical Topics, Vol. 34, N. 1 & 2, 2006.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Part 2: youtube.com/watch?v=42oAsVjGuWI ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brandoms Kantian Lessons (Part 2 of 2)German Lourenço Mejia2014-07-09 | Kantian Lessons about Mind, Meaning, and Rationality (Part 2 of 2)
This talk by Robert Brandom was given at a workshop held at the Centre for Time at the Department of Philosophy, University of Sydney on 14 October 2005.
A transcript can be found at
BRANDOM, Robert. "Kantian Lessons about Mind, Meaning, and Rationality". In: Analytic Kantianism. Philosophical Topics, Vol. 34, N. 1 & 2, 2006.1. Humes Central Principles: Historical Background, and His Chief ArgumentGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-03 | First lecture on David Hume's Central Principles; focusing on the historical background and Hume's Chief Argument.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html2. Humes Central Principles: Overview, Theory of Ideas, and Faculty PsychologyGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-03 | Second lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html3. Humes Central Principles: Relations, and Forms of ArgumentGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Third lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html4. Humes Central Principles: Hume on InductionGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Fourth lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html5. Humes Central Principles: Hume on Causal NecessityGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Fifth lecture in Peter Millican's series on Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html6. Humes Central Principles: Hume on the External WorldGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Sixth lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html7. Humes Central Principles: Scepticism with Regard to Reason, the Soul and the SelfGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Seventh lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.html8. Humes Central Principles: Conclusion; Scepticism in the Treatise and the EnquiryGerman Lourenço Mejia2013-01-02 | Eighth and final lecture in Peter Millican's series on David Hume's Central Principles.
Hume's Treatise and his Enquiry Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92t/contents.html http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92e/contents.htmlThe Encheiridion of Epictetus (Part 1 of 4)German Lourenço Mejia2011-11-02 | "The Enchiridion by Epictetus" read by D.E. Wittkower.
featuring Yaroslav Komarovski (University of Nebraska-Lincoln)
Watch the entire symposium here: http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/event-mmsymp.php
============================== Introduction to Madhyamaka Buddhism ==============================
Arnold, D. "Madhyamaka Buddhism", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Dec 31, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/b-madhya/
Berger, B. "Nagarjuna", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 4, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/
Hayes, R. "Madhyamaka", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Nov 6, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/
Westerhoff, J. "Nagarjuna", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Feb 10, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nagarjuna/Madhyamaka: Jan WesterhoffGerman Lourenço Mejia2010-12-16 | from Madhyamaka & Methodology A Symposium on Buddhist Theory and Method
featuring Jan Westerhoff (University of Durham)
Watch the entire symposium here: http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/event-mmsymp.php
============================== Introduction to Madhyamaka Buddhism ==============================
Arnold, D. "Madhyamaka Buddhism", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Dec 31, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/b-madhya/
Berger, B. "Nagarjuna", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 4, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/
Hayes, R. "Madhyamaka", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Nov 6, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/
Westerhoff, J. "Nagarjuna", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Feb 10, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nagarjuna/
-----------
The Yuktisastika says:
50. The magnanimous have neither thesis nor contention. How can there be an opposing thesis to those who have no thesis?
51. By taking any standpoint whatsoever one is attacked by the twisting snakes of the klesas. But whose minds have no standpoint are not caught.
------------
"Over the past half-century the doctrine of Madhyamaka school, and in particular that of Nagarjuna, has been variously described as nihilism, monism, irrationalism, misology, agnosticism, scepticism, criticism, dialectic, mysticism, acosmism, absolutism, relativism, nominalism, and linguistic analysis with therapeutic value. With the exception of the first five which are hardly appropriate in any context and become quite misleading when taken in their usual senses, such descriptions no doubt correspond to some aspect of Madhyamaka thought."
-- David Seyfort Ruegg, The literature of the Madhyamaka school of philosophy in India, Page 2
------------
The Mulamadhyamaka karika 24:10 says:
Without relying on conventions, the sublime meaning cannot be taught. Without understanding the sublime meaning, one will not attain nirvana.
------------
The Cittavajrastava says:
I bow to my own mind That dispels mind's ignorance By eliminating the mind-sprung web Through this very mind itself.
Sentient beings with their various inclinations Picture different kinds of gods, But our precious mind cannot be established As any other god than complete liberation.
------------Madhyamaka: Jay GarfieldGerman Lourenço Mejia2010-12-15 | from Madhyamaka & Methodology A Symposium on Buddhist Theory and Method
featuring Jay Garfield (Smith College)
Watch the entire symposium here: http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/event-mmsymp.php
============================== Introduction to Madhyamaka Buddhism ==============================
Arnold, D. "Madhyamaka Buddhism", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Dec 31, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/b-madhya/
Berger, B. "Nagarjuna", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 4, 2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu/nagarjun/
Hayes, R. "Madhyamaka", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Nov 6, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/
Westerhoff, J. "Nagarjuna", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Feb 10, 2010). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nagarjuna/
-----------
The Madhyamakavarata 1:2 says:
Compassion alone is first seed for the abundant harvest of buddhahood; Then water for its growth, And finally, what matures as a state of lasting enjoyment -- Therefore, first I praise compassion.
-----------
The Tarkajvala (Bhaviveka's The Flame of Reason) says:
The only way to understand that reason has limits is to use reason. For this reason, I say 'use reason above all else'.
-----------Stoic Ethics (Part 1 of 3)German Lourenço Mejia2010-11-15 | Excerpt from "Stoicism by George Stock: Chapter IV" read by Leon Mire.
Stoicism by St. George Stock This short book is part of the Philosophies Ancient and Modernseries, which attempts to make Western philosophy more accessible to the general public. http://www.archive.org/details/stoicism00stocuoft
NOTE: in this text, "paradox" is just a statement contrary to received opinion. See page 61: "by paradox is meant that which runs counter to general opinion"
================== Introduction to Stoicism ==================
STOCKDALE, J. B. On Stoicism: I- The Stoic Warrior's Triad. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/stoicism1.pdf
_______. On Stoicism: II- Master of My Fate. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/Stoicism2.pdf
_______. Coragem sob Fogo: Testando as Doutrinas de Epicteto num Laboratório Comportamento Humano. Tradução de Aldo Dinucci e Joelson Nascim. Arquivo PDF, 2009. http://books.google.com.br/books/download/Coragem_sob_Fogo_testando_as_doutrinas_d.pdf?id=_XpVHdTHaSgC&output=pdf&sig=ACfU3U2hspjg9mmN_0CGxalyBmK5fPyz3AStoic Ethics (Part 2 of 3)German Lourenço Mejia2010-11-14 | Excerpt from "Stoicism by George Stock: Chapter IV" read by Leon Mire.
Stoicism by St. George Stock This short book is part of the Philosophies Ancient and Modernseries, which attempts to make Western philosophy more accessible to the general public. http://www.archive.org/details/stoicism00stocuoft
NOTE: in this text, "paradox" is just a statement contrary to received opinion. See page 61: "by paradox is meant that which runs counter to general opinion"
================== Introduction to Stoicism ==================
STOCKDALE, J. B. On Stoicism: I- The Stoic Warrior's Triad. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/stoicism1.pdf
_______. On Stoicism: II- Master of My Fate. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/Stoicism2.pdf
_______. Coragem sob Fogo: Testando as Doutrinas de Epicteto num Laboratório Comportamento Humano. Tradução de Aldo Dinucci e Joelson Nascim. Arquivo PDF, 2009. http://books.google.com.br/books/download/Coragem_sob_Fogo_testando_as_doutrinas_d.pdf?id=_XpVHdTHaSgC&output=pdf&sig=ACfU3U2hspjg9mmN_0CGxalyBmK5fPyz3AStoic Ethics (Part 3 of 3)German Lourenço Mejia2010-11-14 | Excerpt from "Stoicism by George Stock: Chapter IV" read by Leon Mire.
Stoicism by St. George Stock This short book is part of the Philosophies Ancient and Modernseries, which attempts to make Western philosophy more accessible to the general public. http://www.archive.org/details/stoicism00stocuoft
NOTE: in this text, "paradox" is just a statement contrary to received opinion. See page 61: "by paradox is meant that which runs counter to general opinion"
================== Introduction to Stoicism ==================
STOCKDALE, J. B. On Stoicism: I- The Stoic Warrior's Triad. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/stoicism1.pdf
_______. On Stoicism: II- Master of My Fate. PDF file, 1995. http://www.usna.edu/ethics/publications/documents/Stoicism2.pdf
_______. Coragem sob Fogo: Testando as Doutrinas de Epicteto num Laboratório Comportamento Humano. Tradução de Aldo Dinucci e Joelson Nascim. Arquivo PDF, 2009. http://books.google.com.br/books/download/Coragem_sob_Fogo_testando_as_doutrinas_d.pdf?id=_XpVHdTHaSgC&output=pdf&sig=ACfU3U2hspjg9mmN_0CGxalyBmK5fPyz3AProblema do Mal (The Riddle of Epicurus)German Lourenço Mejia2010-06-01 | *Problema do Mal (Epicuro)*
Deus anseia em acabar com o sofrimento mas não é capaz? Então não é onipotente. É capaz mas não o quer fazer? Então é malévolo. É capaz e quer fazê-lo? Então de onde surge o sofrimento? Não é capaz nem quer fazê-lo? Por que chamar-lhe Deus?
*The Riddle of Epicurus*
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
------------
Isaías 45:5-7
Eu sou Jeová; não há outro Deus. Dar-te-ei força e encaminhar-te-ei para a vitória ainda mesmo que não me conheças. Todo o mundo, de oriente ao ocidente, verificará que não há outro Deus. Eu sou Jeová, e não há outro Senhor para além de mim. Só eu sou Deus. Faço a luz e faço as trevas. Sou eu quem tem domínio sobre os bons como sobre os maus tempos. Eu, Jeová, sou quem faz estas coisas.
Isaiah 45:5-7
I am the LORD, and there is no other; apart from me there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not acknowledged me, so that from the rising of the sun to the place of its setting men may know there is none besides me. I am the LORD, and there is no other. I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things.
-----------
"Deus é o responsável por todas as coisas e ações." -- Sri Ramakrishna
"God is the Doer of all things." -- Sri Ramakrishna
----------
"Por favor, entenda que 'o melhor' não é 'o supremo'. Se você fala sobre Deus como o bem supremo, budistas não poderão concordar com você. Ao dizer que Deus é 'a coleção das coisas boas e perfeitas' ou 'a perfeição do que é bom' você está limitando Deus, a mais importante e grandiosa coisa do universo, a condições dualísticas. Budistas não podem aceitar isso." -- Buddhadasa
"Please understand that 'the best' is not the highest thing. If you talk about God as the supreme good, Buddhists won't be able to accept your words. To say that God, the highest thing in the universe, is the collection of everything good or the perfection of good is to limit God, The Supreme Thing, within dualistic conditions. Buddhists cannot accept this." --Buddhadasa
------------
"É um ato ímpio dizer algo sobre Deus que é falso ou impreciso. Em outras palavras, é uma blasfêmia mal interpretar sua natureza divina [por exemplo, dizer "Deus é amor" ou qualquer outra frase que torne Deus finito]. Fundamentalistas são os que mais cometem esse erro, eles vivem dizendo que uma coisa é a vontade de Deus e que seu oposto; não. Eles não deveriam dizer isso, pois Deus é infinito -- com certeza, por definição, Deus é sem limite algum. Você não pode dizer que a vontade de Deus é uma coisa e não outra. Pois isso seria blasfemar. "-- Dan Rowden
"Anything that is said about God which is false or inaccurate is blasphemous. In other words, anything which misrepresents the Divine Nature; that is to say, any statement which finitizes God [ -- such as "God is Love"]. The fundamentalists are particularly at fault in this matter, because they have a tendency to try and tell you what is and isn't the will of God. But if God is infinite - and God most certainly is infinite, by definition - then you cannot say that. You cannot say that one thing is the will of God and not another. It's just absolute blasphemy." -- Dan Rowden
----------
Amós 3:3-6
Acaso andarão dois juntos, se não estiverem de acordo? Bramirá o leão no bosque, sem que tenha presa? Fará ouvir a sua voz o leão novo no seu covil, se nada tiver apanhado? Cairá a ave no laço em terra, se não houver armadilha para ela? levantar-se-á da terra o laço, sem que tenha apanhado alguma coisa? Tocar-se-á a trombeta na cidade, e o povo não estremecerá? Sucederá qualquer mal à cidade, sem que o Senhor o tenha feito?
Amos 3:3-6
Do two walk together unless they have agreed to do so? Does a lion roar in the thicket when he has no prey? Does he growl in his den when he has caught nothing? Does a bird fall into a trap on the ground where no snare has been set? Does a trap spring up from the earth when there is nothing to catch? When a trumpet sounds in a city, do not the people tremble? When disaster comes to a city, has not the LORD caused it?
----------
Lamentações 3:38
Porventura da boca do Altíssimo não sai tanto o mal como o bem?
Lamentations 3:38
Is it not from the mouth of the Most High that both calamities and good things come?Old and Young Women (Nietzsches Zarathustra)German Lourenço Mejia2010-05-07 | Excerpt from Michael Scott interpretation "Thus spoke Zarathustra".
Thus spake Zarathustra, A book for all and none, by Friedrich Nietzsche, translated by Thomas Common Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/n/nietzsche/friedrich/n67a/
==============================
Thus, the philosopher abhors marriage as well as what might persuade him into it—marriage is a barrier and a disaster along his route to the optimal. What great philosopher up to now has been married? Heraclitus, Plato, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibnitz, Kant, Schopenhauer—none of these got married. What's more, we cannot even imagine them married. A married philosopher belongs in a comedy, that's my principle. And Socrates, that exception, the malicious Socrates, it appears, ironically got married specifically to demonstrate this very principle. Every philosopher would speak as once Buddha spoke when someone told him of the birth of a son, "Rahula has been born to me. A shackle has been forged for me." (Rahula here means "a little demon"). To every "free spirit" there must come a reflective hour, provided that previously he has had one without thought, of the sort that once came to this same Buddha—"Life in a house," he thought to himself, "is narrow and confined, a polluted place. Freedom consists of abandoning the house"; "because he thought this way, he left the house." The ascetic ideal indicates so many bridges to independence that a philosopher cannot, without an inner rejoicing and applause, listen to the history of all those decisive people who one day said "No" to all lack of freedom and went off to some desert or other, even assuming that such people were merely strong donkeys and entirely opposite to a powerful spirit. So what, then, does the ascetic ideal mean as far as a philosopher is concerned? My answer is—you will have guessed it long ago—the philosopher smiles when he sees in it an optimal set of conditions for the loftiest and boldest spirituality—in so doing, he does not deny "existence"; rather that's how he affirms his existence and only his existence and does this perhaps to such a degree that he is not far from the wicked desire pereat mundus, fiat philosophia, fiat philosophus, fiam! [let the world perish, let philosophy exist, let the philosopher exist, let me exist!] .
-- Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of MoralsThe Apology of SocratesGerman Lourenço Mejia2010-04-04 | Excerpt from Michael Scott interpretation "The Apology of Socrates".
Plato, Apology, translated with an introduction by Benjamin Jowett
Courtesy of the University of Adelaide Library Electronic Texts Collection
http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71ap/