CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-02-01}

What do mice and fruit flies have in common? On the surface, you'd not think much, but geneticists have discovered that some of their genes are practically identical. Discoveries like this are often touted as proof of evolution because the similar genes supposedly show that mice and fruit flies are related.

But evolutionary scientists did not predict this. Genetics professor Sean Caroll confessed, "No biologist had even the foggiest notion that such similarities could exist between genes of such different animals."

According to evolutionists, mice and fruit flies last shared a common ancestor over six hundred million years ago, therefore any common genes they possessed should have been scrambled beyond recognition by almost countless generations of mutations.

Different animals share similar genes, not because they are related, but because they had a common designer who used a similar blueprint to build the animal kingdom and that was not very long ago either.

Related Articles:
Common Design points to common ancestry argument (http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-2-chapter-6-argument-common-design-points-to-common-ancestry)
Homologous Structures (http://creation.com/not-to-be-used-again-homologous-structures-and-the-presumption-of-originality-as-a-critical-value)
Saddle up the horse off to the batcave (http://creation.com/saddle-up-the-horse-its-off-to-the-bat-cave)

Related Products:
Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505)
If animals could talk (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-088)
What about arguments for Evolution Tract (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=00-1-525)

📺 How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle

Dave Flang ^{📤 8 years ago 2009-06-19}

GoodScienceForYou has replied to a comment on How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle:
The evidence completely conforms, all of it. The rise in genetically caused diseases are clear and the DNA supports that and ONLY that. You are in denial and have you ego attached to this crap. It owns you and so you will perpetuate this lie and keep on aiding in the extinction of humans out or your ignorance.
GoodScienceForYou has replied to a comment on How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle:
"You have neither and your conclusions are not supported by either field." My conclusions are from not needing to believe forced political dogma. But from a condition of freedom of thought. I am a living example that you can study all that you can from human knowledge and NOT be taken in by HEMG beliefs. I am one of the few objective observers of life on this planet. You'd do well to learn from me, but you are too embedded in ego & pride on this to get free. I pity that condition.

GoodScienceForYou has replied to a comment on How DNA Destroys Evolution by Mike Riddle:
What this comes down to is those who are destroying life on earth, the rich elitists who pay to have this **** taught in the universities, make huge money off it or it would not be taught.
The projection that academia is all about "science" is pure bull****. It is all about money, and those who support "evolution" support the continual suffering of humans caused by greed and fear. It is the most negative religion I have ever seen.
How did the triune god (mutations, survival, time) of evolution produce information?
From http://youtube.com/user/jesusLostChildren777

Mike Riddle - http://answersingenesis.org/events/bio.aspx?Speaker_ID=46

In the Beginning was Information or Chaos - http://youtube.com/watch?v=fmrU_SjUVno

Design and Logos in Biology: A. E. Wilder Smith - http://youtube.com/watch?v=8mf8JdmMOio

Mutations - Loss of Information (Evolution) - http://youtube.com/watch?v=IS6bkulymUY

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

📺 Top 10 FAILED Global Warming Predictions.mp4

Glenn Woods' Bold Republic Radio Show ^{📤 5 years ago 2012-06-16}

WEBSITE: http://boldrepublic.com/
FACEBOOK: http://facebook.com/pages/Bold-Republic/236048699827163
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/#!/BoldRepublic

📺 Signature in the Cell - Stephen C. Meyer, PhD

IDquest ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-01-29}

http://signatureinthecell.com - Seattle Art Museum, July 21, 2009 - Signture in the Cell Book Release Party for Stephen Meyer.

📺 Consummate proof of Darwinian evolution

mundo77 ^{📤 10 years ago 2007-11-11}

This is a small clip from the 7 part PBS Nova series on Darwinian evolution. http://pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/

Dr. Ed Lewis' research uncovers that single genes direct the entire body of all organisms in nearly the exact same way. So much so that genes can be interchanged between species (e.g. fruit fly and mouse) and control messages are still understood and render normal appendages and organs in the genetically transplanted specimen.

If there was any doubts as to human origins and our intrinsic relationship to all living things this video erases all of them with inescapable evidence.

📺 15 Questions for Evolutionists -- #1 How did life originate?

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-12-16}

CMI's '15 Questions for Evolutionists' flyer summarizes 15 major problems with evolution. Some evolutionists have attempted to answer the questions. In this episode Richard Fangrad and Calvin Smith discuss the question and the attempts to answer it.

Related content
• List of the 15 questions with supporting information (http://creation.com/15-questions)
• Responses to evolutionist's objections (http://creation.com/15-questions-responses-1)

📺 Four Winged Fruit Flies and Evolution

GreenSlugg ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-02-06}

Four winged fruit flies are common touted as a piece of "evidence" for Evolution, but what is it that textbooks are not telling you?

All images are either my original work, or public domain (government) images that are freely available for public use.

📺 10. The Devastation of Evolution - Chirality (Evolution is a "Catastrophic Failure")

PNN News and Ministry Network (www.ppsimmons.com) ^{📤 7 years ago 2010-08-17}

CLICK HERE! LISTEN LIVE! Streaming ONLINE "Freedom Fridays" with Carl Gallups 1330 WEBY AM - Northwest Florida's Talk Radio - HOME WEBSITE
http://hickoryhammockbaptist.org/radio

DR. McCOMB'S ENTIRE ARTICLE HERE
http://icr.org/article/evolution-hopes-you-dont-know-chemistry-problem-wi/

CREATION.COM
http://creation.com

📺 Tracing the nations back to Babel (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-12)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-30}

Extra-Biblical historical records testify to the ancient nations beginning as family units from Noah's descendants. This powerfully supports the Bible's history, especially the reality of the world's population 'restarting' after the Flood of Noah.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Creation Magazine LIVE! Season 2 Episode 4 (http://creation.com/cml2-04)
In the days of Peleg (http://creation.com/peleg)
Tower of Babel confirms linguistics (http://creation.com/babel-linguistics)
The 16 grandsons of Noah (http://creation.com/grandsons)
Chinese characters and Genesis (http://creation.com/characters)
Where are all the people? (http://creation.com/people)
Egyptian history and the Bible (http://creation.com/egypt)

Related Products:
Languages: The Bible vs Evolution (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-533)
Mitochondrial Eve and the Daughters of Noah (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-524)
Oracle Bones Speak (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-3-510)

📺 100 Reasons Why Evolution Is STUPID! - Kent Hovind Christian Creationist

Kerrigan Skelly ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-11-26}

A video of Kent Hovind from Creation Science Evangelism http://drdino.com giving us 100 reason why Evolution is Stupid! This is for your viewing pleasure only. No commenting on this video.

We don't agree with everything, when it comes to doctrine, with Dr. Hovind. More specifically, we don't agree with original sin, sinful nature and once saved, always saved. Here are some resources regarding those:

Sinful Nature/Original Sin- http://youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E6E7B09F38CAC680

OSAS- http://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA82B844ADDD6F34B

📺 Finding the Coelacanth | DinoFish

Nat Geo WILD ^{📤 6 years ago 2012-04-19}

A team of divers off the coast of South Africa comes face to face with a Coelacanth.
➡ Subscribe: http://bit.ly/NatGeoWILDSubscribe

About Nat Geo Wild:
Welcome to a place so wild, anything can happen. Nat Geo Wild is the network all about animals from National Geographic, where every story is an adventure and your imagination is allowed to run wild.

Get More Nat Geo Wild:
Official Site: http://bit.ly/NatGeoWILD
Facebook: http://bit.ly/NGWFacebook
Twitter: http://bit.ly/NGWTwitter
Instagram: http://bit.ly/NGWInstagram

Finding the Coelacanth | DinoFish
https://youtu.be/4jl_txxYQEA

Nat Geo Wild
https://youtube.com/user/NatGeoWild

📺 Evolutionary Predictions

AronRa ^{📤 3 years ago 2014-12-18}

http://patreon.com/aronra
This is the 6th in our series of classroom supplement videos. This is the high school lesson on falsifiable predictions in hypotheses. We focus on historical predictions made for and against Darwin's theory of evolution.

📺 Richard Dawkins: One Fact to Refute Creationism

FORA.tv ^{📤 8 years ago 2009-10-31}

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2009/10/07/Richard_Dawkins_The_Greatest_Show_on_Earth

Biologist Richard Dawkins identifies what he views is the single most compelling fact to refute Creationism -- but states that the real problem lies in convincing Creationists to listen to the evidence. "What they do is simply stick their fingers in their ears and say 'La la la,'" says Dawkins. "You cannot argue with a mind like that."

-----

Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion created a storm of controversy over the question of God's existence. Now, in The Greatest Show on Earth, Dawkins presents a stunning counterattack against advocates of "Intelligent Design" that explains the evidence for evolution while keeping an eye trained on the absurdities of the creationist argument.

More than an argument of his own, it's a thrilling tour into our distant past and into the interstices of life on earth. Taking us through the case for evolution step-by-step, Dawkins looks at DNA, selective breeding, anatomical similarities, molecular family trees, geography, time, fossils, vestiges and imperfections, human evolution, and the formula for a strong scientific theory.

Dawkins' trademark wit and ferocity is joined by an infectious passion for the beauty and strangeness of the natural world, proving along the way that the mechanisms of the natural world are more miraculous -- a "greater show" -- than any creation story generated by any religion on earth. - Berkeley Arts and Letters

Richard Dawkins is a world-renowned evolutionary biologist and author. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society and, until recently, held the Charles Simonyi Chair of Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. His first book, The Selfish Gene, was an instant international bestseller, and has become an established classic work of modern evolutionary biology.

He is also the author of The Blind Watchmaker, River Out of Eden, Climbing Mount Improbable, Unweaving the Rainbow, A Devil's Chaplain, The Ancestor's Tale The God Delusion, and most recently, The Greatsest Show on Earth.

Professor Dawkins's awards have included the Silver Medal of the Zoological Society of London (1989), the Royal Society's Michael Faraday Award (1990), the Nakayama Prize for Achievement in Human Science (1990), The International Cosmos Prize (1997) and the Kistler Prize (2001).

He has Honorary Doctorates in both literature and science, and is a Fellow of the Royal Society.

📺 What Is the Evidence for Evolution Found in the Fossil Record? Richard Dawkins Speech (2009)

The Film Archives ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-05-20}

The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution is a 2009 book by British biologist Richard Dawkins, which was released on 3 September 2009 in the UK and on 22 September 2009 in the U.S. About the book: https://amazon.com/gp/product/1416594795/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1416594795&linkCode=as2&tag=tra0c7-20&linkId=856d1c6cf35dc57685c8370c8b024414

It sets out the evidence for biological evolution, and is Dawkins's 10th book, following his bestselling critique of religion The God Delusion (2006) and The Ancestor's Tale (2004), which traced human ancestry back to the dawn of life.

Richard Dawkins has written a number of books about evolution, beginning with his first two titles The Selfish Gene (1976) and The Extended Phenotype (1982). These were followed by three books which attempted to clarify some common misunderstandings about evolution. His recent documentary series The Genius of Charles Darwin looks at Darwin's life and some of the evidence for evolution. Despite these works and others, he felt that there was a 'missing link' in that he had never comprehensively addressed the evidence of common descent. Dawkins believed that opposition to evolution at the time of writing the book was as strong as ever, despite overwhelming and still growing evidence for the theory. He wrote the book in his final months as Charles Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science (Marcus du Sautoy now holds the position) and finished it in retirement. He thought that 2009, the bicentennial of Darwin's birth and 150th anniversary of his book On the Origin of Species, was the perfect time for such a work. Other authors have written similar books recently, such as Jerry Coyne's Why Evolution is True which Dawkins highly recommends.

The book is divided into 13 chapters spanning over 400 pages, and includes an appendix called "The History-Deniers" in the end material.
Only a Theory? (Nature of scientific theory and fallibility)
Dogs, Cows and Cabbages (Artificial Selection)
The Primrose Path to Macro-Evolution
Silence and Slow Time (Discusses the Age of the Earth and the Geological Time Scale)
Before Our Very Eyes (Examples of Evolution Observed)
Missing link? What do you mean, 'Missing'? (the fossil record)
Missing persons? Missing no longer (Human Evolution)
You did it yourself in nine months (a statement attributed to J. B. S. Haldane; discusses developmental biology)
The ark of the continents (biogeography and plate tectonics)
The tree of cousinship (the tree of life, homology and analogy)
History written all over us (vestigiality and unintelligent design)
Arms races and 'evolutionary theodicy' (coevolution and evolutionary arms races)
There is grandeur in this view of life (based on the final passage of On the Origin of Species)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Greatest_Show_on_Earth:_The_Evidence_for_Evolution

📺 Fly Genome Puzzles Evolutionary Scientists

Dave Flang ^{📤 7 years ago 2010-07-05}

DNA repair - http://creationwiki.org/DNA_repair

Vision
The compound eye of the fruit fly contains 760 unit eyes or ommatidia, and are one of the most advanced among insects. Each ommatidium contains 8 photoreceptor cells (R1-8), support cells, pigment cells, and a cornea. Wild-type flies have reddish pigment cells, which serve to absorb excess blue light so the fly isn't blinded by ambient light.

Each photoreceptor cell consists of two main sections, the cell body and the rhabdomere. The cell body contains the nucleus while the 100-μm-long rhabdomere is made up of toothbrush-like stacks of membrane called microvilli. Each microvillus is 1--2 μm in length and ~60 nm in diameter.[22] The membrane of the rhabdomere is packed with about 100 million rhodopsin molecules, the visual protein that absorbs light. The rest of the visual proteins are also tightly packed into the microvillar space, leaving little room for cytoplasm.

The photoreceptors in Drosophila express a variety of rhodopsin isoforms. The R1-R6 photoreceptor cells express Rhodopsin1 (Rh1) which absorbs blue light (480 nm). The R7 and R8 cells express a combination of either Rh3 or Rh4 which absorb UV light (345 nm and 375 nm), and Rh5 or Rh6 which absorb blue (437 nm) and green (508 nm) light respectively. Each rhodopsin molecule consists of an opsin protein covalently linked to a carotenoid chromophore, 11-cis-3-hydroxyretinal.[23]

As in vertebrate vision, visual transduction in invertebrates occurs via a G protein-coupled pathway. However, in vertebrates the G protein is transducin, while the G protein in invertebrates is Gq (dgq in Drosophila). When rhodopsin (Rh) absorbs a photon of light its chromophore, 11-cis-3-hydroxyretinal, is isomerized to all-trans-3-hydroxyretinal. Rh undergoes a conformational change into its active form, metarhodopsin. Metarhodopsin activates Gq, which in turn activates a phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) known as NorpA.[24]

PLCβ hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PIP2), a phospholipid found in the cell membrane, into soluble inositol triphosphate (IP3) and diacylgycerol (DAG), which stays in the cell membrane. DAG or a derivative of DAG causes a calcium selective ion channel known as TRP (transient receptor potential) to open and calcium and sodium flows into the cell. IP3 is thought to bind to IP3 receptors in the subrhabdomeric cisternae, an extension of the endoplasmic reticulum, and cause release of calcium, but this process doesn't seem to be essential for normal vision.[24]

Calcium binds to proteins such as calmodulin (CaM) and an eye-specific protein kinase C (PKC) known as InaC. These proteins interact with other proteins and have been shown to be necessary for shut off of the light response. In addition, proteins called arrestins bind metarhodopsin and prevent it from activating more Gq. A sodium-calcium exchanger known as CalX pumps the calcium out of the cell. It uses the inward sodium gradient to export calcium at a stoichiometry of 3 Na+/ 1 Ca++.[25]

TRP, InaC, and PLC form a signaling complex by binding a scaffolding protein called InaD. InaD contains five binding domains called PDZ domain proteins which specifically bind the C termini of target proteins. Disruption of the complex by mutations in either the PDZ domains or the target proteins reduces the efficiency of signaling. For example, disruption of the interaction between InaC, the protein kinase C, and InaD results in a delay in inactivation of the light response.

Unlike vertebrate metarhodopsin, invertebrate metarhodopsin can be converted back into rhodopsin by absorbing a photon of orange light (580 nm).

Approximately two-thirds of the Drosophila brain is dedicated to visual processing.[26] Although the spatial resolution of their vision is significantly worse than that of humans, their temporal resolution is approximately ten times better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drosophila_melanogaster

Where Does The Evidence Lead? - http://creationwiki.org/Where_Does_the_Evidence_Lead%3F

📺 How Evolution Is Scientific Part 2: Accurate Predictions

Shane Killian ^{📤 9 years ago 2009-01-19}

This is the second of a six-part series on the scientific basis for evolution, refuting lies from creationists.

There is now a companion book to this series: http://amazon.com/How-Evolution-Scientific-Shane-Killian/dp/0557219965/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1265484016&sr=8-1

This series is now available on DVD and Blu-Ray! The DVD contains full NTSC-resolution versions, and the Blu-Ray disc contains full 720p-resolution versions of all six videos, and includes English subtitles. It also includes other freely-available videos referenced in the series, including three from cdk007, a video I made about Piltdown Man, and the clip of students doing a rather stupid protest of evolution.

DVD: http://lulu.com/content/digital-video-disc/how-evolution-is-scientific---dvd/7179619

Blu-Ray: http://lulu.com/content/digital-video-disc/how-evolution-is-scientific---blu-ray/7163053

Here's the article I'm responding to:
http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/6155/

📺 Information and the origin of life - Did cells write their own software?

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-30}

What is something computers and humans have in common which constantly needs upgrading in computers but not in humans? The answer is software. You might not have realized that you have software but inside the nucleus of each of your cells a program is written in the form of three billion DNA letters.

Intelligent programmers write computer software but what about living things? Evolutionists tell us that the information in the first living cell just appeared by itself, with no intelligent input required. But is that possible? The answer is a resounding no.

Even one of Australia's best known scientists, Paul Davies, conceded that, "There is no know law of physics able to crate information from nothing." And perhaps that's why, in a New Scientist article, he lamented, "How did stupid atoms spontaneously write their own software? Nobody knows."

Related Articles:
Information, Science and Biology http://creation.com/information-science-and-biology
Information Theory Q&A's http://creation.com/information-theory-questions-and-answers
Is DNA Coded Information http://creation.com/dna-language-information

Related Products:
In the Beginning was Information http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-517
Without Excuse http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-577
Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag
Codes and Creation http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-559

📺 A look at future Human evolution, what we might look like and how we have already changed.

V101 Science ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-08-06}

The future of human beings
Homo sapiens, the name for you, myself and ever human being that exists on our planet, we evolved from Africa about 200,000 years ago and carried on evolving until we became what we are today.but are we still evolving? Well the earth is predicted to be around about 4.55 billion years old. So in the grand scale of things our species is still very young. other humanlike creatures where around long before us, the oldest humanoid fossil was dated back to 4.4 million years ago. But because we as a race have developed this modern world of technology ultimately to make our lives easier,has this stopped us from evolving further? Evolution is when genetic changes or adaptions occur when genes mutate and combine in different ways during reproduction. This is normally to help the species survive or reproduce more effectively and happens more frequently in a population. When these changes occur they become more common across the population giving an advantage to survive. So if the purpose of evolution to to survive and reproduce, do we need to evolve any more? Are we above natural selection? Well Human beings still have many reasons to evolve, some of these might be the abilities to be immune to certain modern viruses or the abilities to be immune to high cholesterol or heart disease. Our lives are constantly changing and our body's will adapt to some of these changes. One great example of modern evolution is the ability to digest Dairy. Originally humans could only digest there mothers milk due to a gene that would eventually shut down when the child was weaned off the milk. But when we started to domesticate animals such as cows, humans evolved to have tolerance for lactose. This is thought to of happened due to the nutrients that milk would carry giving those humans a natural advantage to survive. It is thought that this ability was still developing as early as 3000 years ago. So we are still evolving and scientists think we are doing it faster than ever before. In the last 10,000 years the pace of evolution has sped up 100 times. So what does this mean for the human race? Well other than drinking milk and resisting diseases better, scientists think we are also losing our wisdom teeth and surprising that our brains are getting smaller. The average volume of the human brain has decreased from 1500 cubic centimetres to 1,350 cubic centimetres in the last 30,000 years. Scientists are not sure why are brains are getting smaller although there are some theory's of it being more efficient as we evolve. But what will we look like in the future? Well let's start at the bottom.we have evolved over the years to have become less reliant on the need to climb and have favoured the ability to walk. So nature has been slowly shrinking our toes to the point where we can hardly hold a pen between them let alone a branch. Some Scientists believe that in the future we will not have our little toes as we only need to rely on out big toes for balance. Another theory is that we will be much taller. Over the last two centuries the average height of humans has increased by 10 centre meters. This is due to better nutrition available to us and being able to eat regularly.
But just because we could be taller doesn't mean that we will be stronger. Due to the increasing reliance on technology our muscles don't need to be as strong as they did. So the more our machines work for use the less we need to do resulting in a weaker race of humans. Over thousands of years humans have been slowly losing there hair. There are a number of different causes for this but one main reason is that human men are attracted to less hairy women. Meaning that women's body's could be a lot bolder in the future. Also the fact that we tend to wear clothes to keep us warm now has meant that there is no need for a big fluffy fur coat. But I think the strangest of all the changes that might happen to our bodies is our face. Scientists predict that in a few million years humans may have flat faces, big round eye and small noses. But by the time all of these changes have occurred, the future homo sapiens will look back at there ancestors and think we were the weird looking humans just like we do to our ancestors. So I think one thing that we all must remember from time to time is that we might be able fly thousands miles in a plane or perform extremely complicated operations. But at the end of the day Mother Nature is still looking out us. Mother Nature still has a part to play.

I hope you enjoyed this video and make sure you checkout some of my other stuff. Leave a comment if you have any ideas about what we will eventually evolve in to or if you just want to discuss this subject. Thanks for watching and il see you next time.

Music by -Kevin McLeod - brittle rille
(Incompetech)

📺 Stasis -- Another problem for evolution from the fossil record

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2012-11-05}

In nature documentaries and science text books, one often hears about creatures that arrived at their body plan very early in evolutionary history and have not made any real changes since that time, supposedly millions of years ago. These are called 'living fossils'—like the coelacanth and the Wollemi pine. This phenomenon is known as stasis, things staying pretty much the same. And it turns out that pretty much every animal in the entire fossil record appears suddenly and shows this same history of stasis. This was not predicted by evolution!

A more recent and radical theory called "Punctuated Equilibrium" recognises stasis in the fossil record, but requires belief in rapid massive leaps in evolution—an unsubstantiated 'just-so' story.

However, the physical evidence—sudden appearance and stasis in the fossil record—fits remarkably well with the biblical account of a recent creation followed by a devastating global flood, just as the bible describes in Genesis.

Related Articles:
Evolutionary Stasis (http://creation.com/evolutionary-stasis)
Punctuated Equilibrium: Come of age (http://creation.com/punctuated-equilibrium-come-of-age)

Related Products:
15 Questions for Evolutionists: Tract (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=00-1-542)
Clash over Origins: DVD (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-538)
Why it matters what you believe: Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-542)

📺 How natural selection supports a recent creation -- Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-02)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-01-29}

Natural selection is erroneously used as evidence for the evolution of people from a single cell. Actually, new discoveries involving natural selection support Biblical creation and powerfully refute evolution. This episode explains why the changes scientists observe will never lead to the evolution of one kind of animal into another, regardless of how much time is available.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
The evolution train's a-comin' (http://creation.com/the-evolution-trains-a-comin)
Muddy Waters—Clarifying the confusion about natural selection (http://creation.com/muddy-waters)
Speedy species surprise (http://creation.com/speedy-species-surprise)
Natural Selection Q&A page (http://creation.com/natural-selection-questions-and-answers)

Related Products:
Greatest Hoax on Earth? (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-555)
Dynamic Life DVD (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-520)
Creation magazine (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=90-3-001)

📺 Evidence For Creation Vs. Evidence For Evolution

Dream Spider ^{📤 7 years ago 2010-05-16}

Was life conjured up in its existing state by a god or did it change and diversify over time. I made this video to show the contrast of evidence there is supporting one side and how piss poor the arguments are for the other. Vanessa Mae's Toccata And Fugue In D Minor inspired me to make it all.

creation vs evolution is right creation is true creation is wrong creation is false evolution is right evolution is true evolution is wrong evolution is fake is a lie god created life evolved teach the controversy creation pwned pwn creation pwnage Vanessa Mae Toccata And Fugue In D Minor evolution fail creation fail god created man evidence against creation evidence for creation evidence for evolution evidence against evolution religion pwnage evolution creation debate

📺 Dr. Stephen Meyer - Genetics Proves Design and Disproves Evolution PT 1 of 2

NephilimFree ^{📤 6 years ago 2012-01-27}

Please check out my blog: http://nephilimfree.blogspot.com/
Stephen C. Meyer, Philosopher of Science, lectures evolutionists on how modern science has disproven evolutionism and proven Intelligent Design through genetics. Charles Darwin could not have known in 1857 what modern science would reveal.

📺 Why Did God Use A Rib To Make Eve The regenerating regrowing amazing rib bone marrow stem cells DNA

Brad C ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-02-17}

I investigate why God chose a rib to make Eve versus the dust of the ground. I am just a common man with the goal of researching for proof that the Bible is a supernatural book. More videos to come soon! You can also watch my videos researching the worlds religions including Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Voodoo, Taoism, and Judaism. My goal was to see what parachute is on the back of the other religions. Mine is Christ and the Cross but what is going to save them at the end of the plane crash (death) which we all admit is coming one day.

Below is my template for leading Atheist/Agnostics to Christ....I encourage Christians out there to copy and paste this into any discussions you have with friends who may be in this category. Also be patient with them....they probably have reasons for why they are so filled with anger and hatred towards Christianity.....probably a controlling parent or hypocritical parent who claimed to be Christians and greatly destroyed their confidence. Now they are hurt and wounded so proceed with great caution and always remain calm. Fishing for Atheists/Ags is like Muskie fishing....you must be patient....may fish all day and never get a nibble.....but every one you reel in is a wall mounter! Also they are a cunning and aggressive fish.....they can even wound you as the fisherman as you attempt to reel them in! Have fun and maintain a steady confident approach. The good news is you have the GOODS below to help drive home your side of the argument! Good luck!

Rib Video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vZVfqvmnViM

Mark Of Tav (This wets the appetite for the longer one below)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Msk4EwxfmcE&t=13s

Symbolisms Of The Cross Video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kLFavrFDSyI

Checkmate To The Devil Psalms 22 (Smoking gun)
http://bradctv.com/go-lakers/

Some of you may be asking like a viewer (Joanie) "How could man come first when women have the Y chromosome and Man has the XY" Simple answer.....Thanks Joanie!

http://genesisandgenetics.org/2014/03/31/eves-dna/

BOOKS: Help support the channel just for looking! Thanks!

🌎 🐛🐟🐿🙊💨👨👩 ??? (Credit: Defensor)

Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions
https://amazon.com/gp/product/0310282926/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=rad777c-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=0310282926&linkId=1cfef7f776a22e3c0ba9b6c07f2b2c58

Cold-Case Christianity: A Homicide Detective Investigates the Claims of the Gospels (Book)
https://amazon.com/gp/product/1434704696/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=rad777c-20&camp=1789&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=1434704696&linkId=65453ea3182eaab3d6b76683daadb230

SOURCES:

Non Christian Sources (Some Medical/Science mixed with articles)

http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3489251/

http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16047208

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/How-humans-regenerate-ribs-decoded/articleshow/42486576.cms
https://books.google.com/books?id=Zu8bAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA616&lpg=PA616&dq=rib+regeneration+science+journal&source=bl&ots=FovXej2fcO&sig=3iayKKep6Z4eDZ0rml12jZ-cn78&hl=en&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjI-def0qvJAhVGOiYKHaGTAcEQ6AEIUjAH#v=onepage&q=rib%20regeneration%20science%20journal&f=false

http://scoliosis.org/resources/medicalupdates/ribthoracoplasty.php

http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1391839/

http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1391839/

http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24063169

http://medscape.com/viewarticle/574136_4

http://medscape.com/viewarticle/574136_4

https://news.usc.edu/68485/rib-regeneration-studied-in-mammals/

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-09-power-rib-tickling.html

Agnostic Input: Interesting short research done....I have more sources for him if needed than simply stories from rib surgery patients. But its worth noting he found it perplexing....that's the goal....to put a pebble in the shoe of the Agnostic/Atheist!

http://s8int.com/adamsrib.html

Christian Based Links:

http://creation.com/regenerating-ribs-adam-and-that-missing-rib

https://answersingenesis.org/human-body/the-amazing-regenerating-rib/

http://elperfecto.com/2011/08/21/regenerating-rib-flesh-of-my-flesh/

What Is Bone Marrow Transplantation?
http://telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10275996/The-body-parts-which-can-be-regrown-in-a-laboratory.html

Bone Marrow Transplantation Used To Regrow Organs?
http://telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/10275996/The-body-parts-which-can-be-regrown-in-a-laboratory.html

http://nydailynews.com/life-style/health/scientists-work-grow-organs-transplants-article-1.1374818

http://bbc.com/news/health-28887087

http://technologyreview.com/news/522576/manufacturing-organs/

http://stemcell.stanford.edu/research/adult_stem_cells.html

http://news.nationalpost.com/health/liver-transplant-patients-could-use-stem-cell-injection-to-regrow-organ-within-10-years-study

📺 5 Common Myths About Evolution | Mashable

Mashable ^{📤 3 years ago 2014-07-28}

There have been plenty of misconceptions on the web regarding evolution. To clear the confusion, we've debunked five of the most common myths.

Read more: http://mashable.com/2014/07/29/evolution-myths-debunked/

Check out more from Mashable's new DEBUNKED series: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2BtSmC24vyo&index=2&list=PLSKUhDnoJjYlUgaOUphtT80LKWFz3FtBK

Subscribe for more from Mashable: http://youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=mashable

Myth #1:
http://livescience.com/21491-what-is-a-scientific-theory-definition-of-theory.html
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#e2

Myth #2:
http://isciencemag.co.uk/blog/are-humans-still-evolving/
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a8

Myth #3:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#a4

Myth #4:
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/misconceptions_faq.php#e1

Myth #5:
http://pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/cat03.html

Music:
"The Owl Named Orion” by danosongs
https://soundcloud.com/danosongs/the-owl-named-orion-royalty

http://mashable.com
LIKE us on FACEBOOK: http://facebook.com/mashable.video
FOLLOW us on TWITTER: http://twitter.com/mashablevideo
FOLLOW us on TUMBLR: http://mashable.tumblr.com
FOLLOW our INSTAGRAM: http://instagram.com/mashable
JOIN our circle on GOOGLE PLUS: http://plus.google.com/+Mashable
Subscribe!: http://bit.ly/1ko5eNd

Mashable is the leading independent news site for all things tech, social media, and internet culture.
http://youtube.com/mashable

Photo Credits:
https://flic.kr/p/8Nyn7b
“birds 1” by ashraful kadir is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/ah63tj
“Fish” by LFBRewer is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/3iifBo
“Black Board, White Chalk” by sputnik is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/7SZESW
“#537 Handprint” by Mikael Miettinen is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/4ahq13
“Molecule display” by net_efekt is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/c1fSuU
“Army scientists energize battery research” by U.S. Army RDECOM is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/5bJTo2
“Dinosaurs in Great Hall_0173” by James Emery is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/8jD2fs
“Picadilly Circus” by mrdoubtfire is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/cPKSzU
“Crowd 04” by Bobo Boom is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/bWy1e3
“Until the Cows Come Home” by Marc Dalmulder is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/9zNQa
“Milk 2” by Andrew Magill is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/azmwAj
“Lizard 101” Adrian Scottow is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/9Viusx
“Proud Mother” by Rodney Campbell is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/9Agmni
“Herd of Zebras in Serengeti” is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/6M23Wi
“Elephant Easting Bamboo” by Robert W. Howington is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/9mxGAB
“Evolution of the Human” by T. Michael Keesey is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/c1fTJU
“Army scientists energize battery research” by U.S. Army RDECOM is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/o1ineV
“Corps biologists monitor bird nests near Brunswick Harbor” by U.S. Army Corps of Engineering is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/nDXMkr
"Große Essigfliege - Drosophila funebris ?” by “gbohne” is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/4a7n2U
“Bacteria solution” by Umberto Salvagnin is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/a2Ltvs
"Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteria” by NIAID is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/5EqxEo
“Antibiotics” by Sheep purple is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/a6EESw
“Squirrel Monkey” by Jacob Bøtter is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/8EeLSd
“Chimpanzee” by William Warby is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/c6yNu9
"Homo heidelbergenesis skull - front - Smithsonian Museum of Natural History - 2012-05-17” by Tim Evanson is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/8XPXa8
“Gorillas” by Safari Partners is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/29zXHS
"Family ... (SINGAPORE ZOO/CHIMPANZEE) IV” by Chi King is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/gabNc9
“Juvenile Bonobo” by Mark Dumont is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/8hNAWp
“Baby Face” by Praytino is licensed under CC BY 2.0

https://flic.kr/p/EVDCb
“Biodiversity” by Dan McKay is licensed under CC BY 2.0

📺 25 Famous Predictions That Were Proven To Be Horribly Wrong

list25 ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-03-13}

From nuclear energy to telephones almost every new technology had its detractors. These are 25 famous predictions that were proven to be horribly wrong.

https://twitter.com/list25
https://facebook.com/list25
http://list25.com

Check out the text version too! - http://list25.com/25-famous-predictions-that-were-proven-to-be-horribly-wrong/

Here's a preview:

"There is not the slightest indication that nuclear energy will ever be obtainable. It would mean that the atom would have to be shattered at will." -- Albert Einstein, 1932
"We don't like their sound, and guitar music is on the way out." -- Decca Recording Company on declining to sign the Beatles, 1962
"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." -- Western Union internal memo, 1876
"Reagan doesn't have that presidential look." -- United Artists executive after rejecting Reagan as lead in the 1964 film The Best Man
"Rail travel at high speed is not possible because passengers, unable to breathe, would die of asphyxia." -- Dr. Dionysius Lardner, 1830
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." -- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
"X-rays will prove to be a hoax." -- Lord Kelvin, President of the Royal Society, 1883
"Everyone acquainted with the subject will recognize it as a conspicuous failure." -- -Henry Morton, president of the Stevens Institute of Technology, on Edison's light bulb, 1880
"The horse is here to stay but the automobile is only a novelty—a fad." -- -The president of the Michigan Savings Bank advising Henry Ford's lawyer not to invest in the Ford Motor Co., 1903
"Television won't last because people will soon get tired of staring at a plywood box every night." -- -Darryl Zanuck, movie producer, 20th Century Fox, 1946
"No one will pay good money to get from Berlin to Potsdam in one hour when he can ride his horse there in one day for free." -- King William I of Prussia, on trains, 1864
"There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home." -- -Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), in a talk given to a 1977 World Future Society meeting in Boston
"If excessive smoking actually plays a role in the production of lung cancer, it seems to be a minor one." -- -W.C. Heuper, National Cancer Institute, 1954
"No, it will make war impossible." -- -Hiram Maxim, inventor of the machine gun, in response to the question "Will this gun not make war more terrible?" from Havelock Ellis, an English scientist, 1893
"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to no one in particular?" -- -Associates of David Sarnoff responding to the latter's call for investment in the radio in 1921
"There will never be a bigger plane built." -- - A Boeing engineer, after the first flight of the 247, a twin engine plane that holds ten people
"How, sir, would you make a ship sail against the wind and currents by lighting a bonfire under her deck? I pray you, excuse me, I have not the time to listen to such nonsense." — Napoleon Bonaparte, when told of Robert Fulton's steamboat, 1800s
"The idea that cavalry will be replaced by these iron coaches is absurd. It is little short of treasonous." — Comment of Aide-de-camp to Field Marshal Haig, at tank demonstration, 1916
"I must confess that my imagination refuses to see any sort of submarine doing anything but suffocating its crew and floundering at sea." — HG Wells, British novelist, in 1901
"The world potential market for copying machines is 5000 at most." — IBM, to the eventual founders of Xerox, saying the photocopier had no market large enough to justify production, 1959
"The Americans have need of the telephone, but we do not. We have plenty of messenger boys." — Sir William Preece, Chief Engineer, British Post Office, 1878
"It'll be gone by June." -- Variety Magazine on Rock n' Roll, 1955
"And for the tourist who really wants to get away from it all, safaris in Vietnam" -- -Newsweek, predicting popular holidays for the late 1960s.
"When the Paris Exhibition [of 1878] closes, electric light will close with it and no more will be heard of it." -- Oxford professor Erasmus Wilson
A rocket will never be able to leave the Earth's atmosphere." — New York Times, 1936

📺 Sean Carroll - Is Time Real?

Closer To Truth ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-10-15}

For more information and videos from Sean Carroll click here http://bit.ly/1BRsBIh

For more videos asking whether time is real click here http://bit.ly/1I8oDlz

To buy episodes and seasons of Closer To Truth click here http://bit.ly/1LUPlQS

What does it mean for time to be real? Is time the ultimate stage on which all events play? Some physicists and philosophers would say no, time is an illusion; time is not real. How can that be?

📺 Are there really glacial deposits in Flood rock?

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-01-23}

How could scratches in rock disprove the biblical flood? Well, scratches in rock, call striations, are sometimes caused by a glacier moving over bedrock, therefore, when scientists encounter striated rock, they often claim that a glacier caused it.

Striation occurs in the sedimentary rock that was laid down in Noah's Flood, evolutionary geologists claim this is evidences of multiple ancient ice ages, so they claim that Noah's year-long flood could not have laid down these rocks.

However, we now know that underwater landslides cause striations, similar to the ones caused by glaciers today. Furthermore, there are important differences between glacial deposits formed today and the alleged ancient ice ages. So don't let scratches in rock, scratch away your faith in God's word.

Related Articles:
The Ice Age http://creation.com/the-ice-age
Sedimentary Experiment http://creation.com/sedimentation-experiments-nature-finally-catches-up
Geology Q&A http://creation.com/geology-questions-and-answers

Related Products:
Ancient Ice Ages Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-3-089)
Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505)
The Ice Age DVD (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-612)

📺 11.2.2 Homologous Structures

braingenie ^{📤 6 years ago 2011-08-26}

http://braingenie.com/

📺 Sposa amata - Corale di Palmi

Mr7chi7 ^{📤 7 years ago 2011-01-28}

Canto tratto dal Cantico dei Cantici

📺 Why i believe in a young earth by ex-evolutionist Dr.Grady McMurtry Part 1

Arne Karlsen ^{📤 1 year ago 2016-05-15}

📺 Creationism and evolution tackled head-on in science lessons | Guardian Investigations

The Guardian ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-08}

Creationism and evolution tackled head-on in science lessons

Subscribe to the Guardian HERE: http://bitly.com/UvkFpD

Are some science teachers failing their pupils by not confronting creationist arguments when they come up during lessons on evolution? In this film presented by science journalist Dr Adam Rutherford made to mark the 150th anniversary of Darwin's Origin of Species in 2009 Prof Michael Reiss from the Institute of Education, University of London, said many science teachers felt uncomfortable talking about religion, but that refusing to engage with pupils who had creationist views would be counterproductive (a viewpoint that would later get him into trouble). Dr Jeremy Pritchard at the University of Birmingham, and London's Natural History Museum, explain how they are trying to redress the balance

Click here for full Guardian article:
http://theguardian.com/science/video/2014/jan/07/creationism-evolution-science-lessons-video

📺 Convergent Evolution

Shomu's Biology ^{📤 5 years ago 2012-12-31}

This evolutionary biology lecture explains about the convergent evolution. http://shomusbiology.com/
Download the study materials here-
http://shomusbiology.com/bio-materials.html
Remember Shomu’s Biology is created to spread the knowledge of life science and biology by sharing all this free biology lectures video and animation presented by Suman Bhattacharjee in YouTube. All these tutorials are brought to you for free. Please subscribe to our channel so that we can grow together. You can check for any of the following services from Shomu’s Biology-
Buy Shomu’s Biology lecture DVD set- shomusbiology.com/dvd-store
Shomu’s Biology assignment services – shomusbiology.com/assignment -help
Join Online coaching for CSIR NET exam – shomusbiology.com/net-coaching

We are social. Find us on different sites here-
Our Website – shomusbiology.com
Facebook page- https://facebook.com/ShomusBiology/
Twitter - https://twitter.com/shomusbiology
SlideShare- slideshare.net/shomusbiology
Google plus- https://plus.google.com/113648584982732129198
LinkedIn - https://linkedin.com/in/suman-bhattacharjee-2a051661
Youtube- https://youtube.com/user/TheFunsuman
Thank you for watching

Convergent evolution describes the acquisition of the same biological trait in unrelated lineages.

The wing is a classic example of convergent evolution in action. Flying insects, birds, and bats have all evolved the capacity of flight independently. They have "converged" on this useful trait.

The ancestors of both bats and birds were terrestrial quadrupeds, and each has independently evolved powered flight via adaptations of their forelimbs. Although both forelimb adaptations are superficially "wing-shaped," they are substantially dissimilar in construction. The bat wing is a membrane stretched across four extremely elongated fingers, while the airfoil of the bird wing is made of feathers, which are strongly attached to the forearm (the ulna) and the highly fused bones of the wrist and hand (the carpometacarpus), with only tiny remnants of two fingers remaining, each anchoring a single feather. (Both bats and birds have retained the thumb for specialized functions.) So, while the wings of bats and birds are functionally convergent, they are not anatomically convergent.

Traits arising through convergent evolution are termed analogous structures, in contrast to homologous structures, which have a common origin. Bat and pterosaur wings are an example of analogous structures, while the bat wing is homologous to human and other mammal forearms, sharing an ancestral state despite serving different functions. Similarity in species of different ancestry that is the result of convergent evolution is called homoplasy. The opposite of convergent evolution is divergent evolution, whereby related species evolve different traits. On a molecular level, this can happen due to random mutation unrelated to adaptive changes; see long branch attraction. Convergent evolution is similar to, but distinguishable from, the phenomena of parallel evolution. Parallel evolution occurs when two independent but similar species evolve in the same direction and thus independently acquire similar characteristics—for instance gliding frogs have evolved in parallel from multiple types of tree frog. Source of the article published in description is Wikipedia. I am sharing their material. © by original content developers of Wikipedia.
Link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

📺 Why does the evidence always point to evolution? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 3-05)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 4 years ago 2014-01-06}

The book of Romans says that the evidence of God's creation is 'clearly seen' by all and that people are 'without excuse' for their disbelief (Romans 1:20). If evidence for creation is that obvious, why then does it seem that public education and media almost always present evidence as pointing to an evolutionary conclusion?

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
The Importance of Evidence (http://creation.com/evidence)
Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias (http://creation.com/refutingch1)
Does Antibiotic Resistance provide evidence for evolution? (http://creation.com/does-the-acquisition-of-antibiotic-and-pesticide-resistance-provide-evidence-for-evolution)
Does Homology provided evidence of Evolution (http://creation.com/does-homology-provide-evidence-of-evolutionary-naturalism)

Related Products:
Refuting Evolution (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-110)
Refuting Evolution II (http://chttp://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-110)
Refuting Compromise (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-575)
By Design (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-524)

📺 Sickle Cell Anemia -- not evidence for evolution

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-03-06}

In some parts of Africa, it is actually an advantage to have mutated, oddly-shaped red blood cells.

This condition, known as sickle cell anemia, is usually a disadvantage, but, ironically, it can actually help protect someone from malarial infection because a sickled red blood cell is less appetizing for the malaria parasite.

Many people mistakenly view this sort of change as an example of evolution in action—because a mutation in DNA has made people better adapted to their environment.

But if microbes really did turn into mankind—which is what evolution teaches—this would require the addition of new DNA information to turn the relatively simple genome of a microbe into the vastly more complicated one of a person.

In the case of sickle cell anemia, the opposite has happened, because DNA information has been corrupted and lost, not gained, because the crippled blood cells are less able to transport oxygen.

Related Articles:
Sickle Cell Anemia doesn't prove evolution http://creation.com/sickle-cell-anemia-does-not-prove-evolution
Rats Another Case of Sickle cell anemia http://creation.com/rats-another-case-of-sickle-cell-anemia
A very beneficial mutation http://creation.com/ccr5delta32-a-very-beneficial-mutation
Exposing Evolutions Icon http://creation.com/exposing-evolutions-icon

Related Products:
Creatures do change, but it's not evolution DVD http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-601
The Mystery of our Declining Genes DVD http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=35-6-583

📺 The MSS - 1 April 2012 - Part 6 - blasphemy and the predictions of evolutionary theory.

TheMagicSandwichShow ^{📤 6 years ago 2012-04-03}

Part 1
Reflections on the Reason Rally, Eric Hovind and Ray Comfort.
http://youtu.be/tJSGCg0DnxQ

Part 2
Where to go from here?
http://youtu.be/JE6anpsD8O8

Part 3
What to teach the children?
http://youtu.be/AMinAznWJH4

Part 4
God proves the Bible. The Bible proves God.
http://youtu.be/d494RkUg9bM

Part 5
Do theists ever apologise?
http://youtu.be/tLORXHszjX0

Part 6
Blasphemy and the predictions of evolution
http://youtu.be/NM-A4sK7KfU

📺 T-rex red blood cells

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-03-05}

In the early nineties, researchers from Montana State University made a startling discovery. Inspecting a piece of T. rex bone under a microscope, they could hardly believe their eyes—they could see dinosaur red blood cells!
This discovery prompted lead scientist, Dr Mary Schweitzer, to say:
'It was exactly like looking at a slice of modern bone. But, of course, I couldn't believe it. I said to the lab technician: "The bones, after all, are 65 million years old. How could blood cells survive that long?"'
In a Discover magazine article, Dr Schweitzer explained further her surprise,
'If you take a blood sample and you stick it on a shelf, you have nothing recognizable in about a week. So why would there be anything left in dinosaurs?'
Such a response is understandable, considering that she thinks dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. But surely such data suggest it wasn't that long ago?

Related Articles:
Dinosaur tissue: still soft and stretchy (http://creation.com/still-soft-and-stretchy)
Dinosaur soft tissue and protein—even more confirmation! (http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue-and-protein-even-more-confirmation)
DNA and bone cells found in dinosaur bone (http://creation.com/dino-dna-bone-cells)
A fossil is a fossil is a fossil. Right? (http://creation.com/a-fossil-is-a-fossil-is-a-fossil-right)
Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really? (http://creation.com/dinosaur-bonesjust-how-old-are-they-really)

Related Products:
Dinosaur Challenges and Mysteries (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-582)
Untold Secrets of Planet Earth: Dire Dragons (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-581)

📺 Why "Global Warming" Failed & Why Climate Change is Real

Suspicious0bservers ^{📤 3 years ago 2014-05-12}

CLIMATE CHANGE IS VERY REAL - BUT THE OFFICIALS HAVE JEOPARDIZED OUR ABILITY TO PREPARE FOR THE FUTURE
Global warming models/predictions have been an abject failure for 20 years, and yet the IPCC claims ever-higher certainty?

How does this happen and what comes next?

All papers and charts are publicly available information, or you send us an email and we will forward the source/citation for any information. Most of the citations can already be found at the Links button at our website, under the Counterstrike Links.

Our Websites:
http://suspicious0bservers.org
http://ObservatoryProject.com

📺 How does genetics point to design? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 6-18)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 1 year ago 2016-12-03}

Gregor Mendel (father of genetics) and Charles Darwin (father of modern evolution) disagreed. Darwin claimed creatures could change into unlimited other creatures. Mendel's discoveries suggest otherwise. See which idea science supports.

Related Articles:
Genetic variability by design (https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j18_2/j18_2_98-104a.pdf)
DNA: marvellous messages or mostly mess? (http://creation.com/dna-marvellous-messages-or-mostly-mess)
Splicing and dicing the human genome (http://creation.com/splicing-and-dicing-the-human-genome)
Incredible Kinesin! (http://creation.com/incredible-kinesin)
New bacteria show 'wonder upon wonder' (http://creation.com/new-bacteria-show-wonder-upon-wonder)
Design in living organisms (motors: ATP synthase) (http://creation.com/design-in-living-organisms-motors-atp-synthase)

Related Products:
By Design (http://creation.com/s/10-2-524)
Unlocking the Mystery of Life DVD (http://creation.com/s/30-9-059)
God the Master Designer DVD (http://creation.com/s/30-9-610)
The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/s/10-2-505)
Creation magazine (free sample copy) (http://creation.com/free-mag)

📺 Radiocarbon found in Diamonds

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-03-06}

You've probably heard that, 'diamonds are a girl's best friend', but diamonds also teach us an important lesson about the age of the earth.

Diamonds are made of carbon. One rare type of carbon—known as carbon 14—is radioactive, which means that it breaks down over time. By measuring the amount of decay, scientists estimate how old something is. Some people think that carbon 14 dating proves things happened millions of years ago. But that is wrong, because carbon 14 decays so fast that something a million years old could not contain any carbon 14.

Geophysicist Dr John Baumgardner recently investigated the level of carbon 14 in diamonds. Many would've considered such research pointless, because the diamonds were supposedly over a billion years old, which meant all carbon 14 should've decayed. But the radiocarbon labs detected significant levels of carbon 14, which suggests the diamonds are much younger; only thousands of years.

Related Articles:
Diamonds a Creationist best friend http://creation.com/diamonds-a-creationists-best-friend
Diamonds Evidence of Explosive Geological Process http://creation.com/diamonds-evidence-of-explosive-geological-processes
Diamonds in Days http://creation.com/diamonds-in-days-actually-minutes
Radioactive dating anomalies http://creation.com/radioactive-dating-anomalies

Related Products:
The Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505
What about Carbon Dating Booklet http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=00-1-526
Cosmos Created and Young DVD http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-591
The Age of the Earth DVD http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-534

📺 How can a good God allow evil in the world? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 6-22)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 months ago 2017-10-25}

Explaining the origin of death and suffering is vitally important in defending Christianity, since many people use the existence of ‘evil’ as an excuse not to believe in God. Learn why a literal-historical Genesis account is vital in answering.

Related Articles:
Why would a loving God allow death and suffering? (http://creation.com/why-death-suffering)
How did bad things come about? (http://creation.com/images/pdfs/cabook/chapter6.pdf)
Why would a loving God allow suffering? (http://creation.com/why-would-a-loving-god-allow-suffering)
Is it God’s fault? (http://creation.com/is-it-gods-fault)

Related Products:
Beyond the Shadows: making sense of personal tragedy (http://creation.com/s/10-2-576)
Walking Through Shadows: A Testimony - How Genesis creation gives strength in personal tragedy (DVD) (http://creation.com/s/30-9-579)
Christianity for Skeptics (http://creation.com/s/10-2-585)
The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/s/10-2-505)
Creation magazine (free sample copy) (http://creation.com/free-mag)

📺 Scientific Evidence for a Young Earth

Truth In Genesis ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-02-13}

Here I will show scientific evidence that the earth is young, not old. In fact, it is only 6,000 years old just like the Bible says.

Complete KJV AUDIO BIBLE: (FREE with an Audible Free Trial)
http://amzn.to/2gDLXyx

Check Out Our Amazon Page:
https://amazon.com/shop/truthingenesis

TRUTH IN GENESIS BOOK:
http://amzn.to/2owR4r6

Subscribe for more videos: https://goo.gl/9SdQKw

Heaven or Hell? Are you 100% Sure? https://goo.gl/LWBTPs

Idiot Scientists (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/amIzcW

Creation Seminar by Dr. Kent Hovind: https://goo.gl/s7Hkvt

Revelation Series by Pastor Anderson: https://goo.gl/LTaHWE

After the Tribulation (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/tA7gmy

New World Order Bible Versions (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/RHkpIF

Marching to Zion (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/DlZAhS

The Truth About Birth Control (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/OlHREk

Marxist Lucifer King (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/h6KthS

Burn That Way After All (Full Movie): https://goo.gl/y1irg1

DISCLAIMER: The AMAZON links in this description are affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the links and make a transaction, I will receive a small commission. This helps to support the channel and allows us to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!

📺 Young-Earth Creationist Wins Lawsuit

CBC MEDIA ^{📤 1 year ago 2016-11-23}

Financial Settlement to Creationist Fired for Challenging Evolution.
The attorney did not state the exact amount he received but according to The College Fix, he said that it was "a substantial settlement representing about 15 times his annual part-time salary."
CSUN still maintained that Armitage had been fired due to a lack of funding and claimed that it only settled the case to avoid a costly legal battle. Reinach acknowledged that there was no admission of guilt in the settlement but he believed that the university would not pay a large amount if it did not think it would lose the case.
"The evidence was quite clear," he added. "The stated reasons for saying they fired him were simply not true. There were lies and contradictions abounding from several of the key witnesse," Reinach continued. He said evidence against the campus officials was seen in an email suggesting that Armitage could be eased out of the job by making his position full-time. "Not only did it not support the notion that there was budgetary concerns, but in fact suggested to the contrary," said Reinach

📺 Ken Ham & Young Earth Creationism is Destroying Christianity's Credibility

Evolution 2.0 ^{📤 2 years ago 2015-12-10}

This video is about the Evolution Debate.

Click here to get 3 free chapters - a Communication Engineer’s adventure through the creation-evolution divide:

http://cosmicfingerprints.com/?3-...

Ken Ham is an excellent marketer and salesperson for Young Earth Creationism.

I should know — much of my professional background is in marketing, working with some of the most talented marketers and sales people on the planet.

I got the chance to see Ken Ham live. He was speaking at a home schooling conference my wife and I attended.

And what I saw was masterful persuasion and manipulation of the audience’s emotions to get them to buy into his vision of Creationism.

There’s a big problem with this.

In order for Ham’s vision of where we came from to make sense, you have to throw out all modern, scientifically-verifiable understanding of life and the universe.

This kills the debate before it starts.

By refusing to acknowledge where the other side comes from — dismissing them whole cloth — you cannot have a productive conversation.

This kind of stubbornness leaves you stuck.
And, it destroys the credibility required to have a meaningful conversation.

When folks like Ham stand up and claim to speak for all Christians, we lose face in the debate.

The good news is, there’s another narrative that allows for God and evolution — religion and science — to coexist. One where all of modern science’s discoveries only support the mystery of God, not debunk it.

This video may give you a new perspective…

📺 The whites of their eyes - How Hollywood makes apes look human

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 months ago 2017-11-03}

Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a recent Hollywood movie that depicts a fictitious world ruled by advanced apes. Through cutting-edge computer graphics, producers have created apes that possess many humanlike qualities.
One of the techniques they’ve used to make the apes more humanlike is quite simple.
One of the distinctive features of human eyes is our white sclera. Apes, however, do not have whites in their eyes—their sclera is brown or black. This might sound like a subtle difference, but if an artist depicts an ape with a white sclera, they look much more human.
Indeed, this technique has been used for years to indoctrinate the public with alleged evolutionary ancestors. Soft tissues, like eyeballs, don’t fossilize. So when an artist draws an alleged ape-man ancestor with whites in its eyes—that’s purely based on speculation! National Geographic magazine has been using this trick for years.
Who knows how many people have been fooled by it?
To find out more from Creation Ministries International visit our website creation.com

Related Articles:
The whites of their eyes http://creation.com/ape-eye-whites
Making sense of ‘apeman’ claims https://creation.com/apeman
Did humans evolve from apes? https://creation.com/did-humans-evolve-from-apes

Related Products:
One Human Family: The Bible, science, race and culture http://creation.com/s/10-2-578
Evolution's Achilles' Heels http://creation.com/s/10-2-640
Creation Answers Book http://creation.com/s/10-2-505
Creation Magazine Subscription http://creation.com/mag

📺 The Christian response to aliens and UFOs (Creation Magazine LIVE! 7-07)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 3 weeks ago 2018-03-28}

Millions of people from all around the world have reported seeing what they think are aliens from outer space. How should Christians respond to these reports? The Bible provides direction for understanding aliens and UFOs.

Special Thanks:
Wendell Marinho - permission to use alien ship animation
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3sZ5HIjEscA

GeekJoan - permission to use microscopic life footage
https://youtube.com/watch?v=zoNQWg6T81M

Related Articles:
Did God create life on other planets? (https://creation.com/did-god-create-life-on-other-planets)
Are we alone, or is there life elsewhere in the universe? (https://creation.com/god-and-the-extraterrestrials)
Aliens in your bedroom (https://creation.com/aliens-in-your-bedroom)

Related Products:
Alien Intrusion (http://creation.com/s/10-2-566)
The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/s/10-2-505)
Christianity for Skeptics (http://creation.com/s/10-2-585)
Creation magazine (free sample copy) (http://creation.com/free-mag)

📺 Aliens and UFOs - Does the Bible explain these things? - Creation Magazine LIVE! (2-10)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-03-05}

How should Christians react to stories of strange lights in the sky and terrifying night time abductions? Aliens and UFOs and the Bible, on this week's episode.

The Creation Magazine LIVE! TV program is a ministry of Creation Ministries International. With offices in seven countries and more PhD scientists than any Christian organization this program features cutting edge science that supports the Bible delivered in a non-technical, visually-rich, discussion-based format.

Related Articles:
Did God create life on other planets? (http://creation.com/did-god-create-life-on-other-planets)
Aliens in your bedroom (http://creation.com/aliens-in-your-bedroom)
Lifting the veil on the UFO phenomenon (http://creation.com/lifting-the-veil-ufo-phenomenon)
Alien Life / UFO Questions and Answers page (http://creation.com/alien-life-ufo-questions-and-answers)

Related Products:
Alien Intrusion (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-566)
Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=10-2-505)

📺 Evidence Lawrence Krauss Misrepresents Alexander Vilenkin

firstcauseargument ^{📤 4 years ago 2013-09-25}

"I think you represented what I wrote about the BGV theorem in my papers and to you personally very accurately." - Alexander Vilenkin's e-mail to William Lane Craig, dated September 6, 2013

In their debate in Australia (2013), Lawrence Krauss accused William Lane Craig of misrepresenting Alexander Vilenkin and the BGV Theorem. To prove his point Krauss presented his private e-mail from Vilenkin. However, Craig noticed a number of ellipsis in the e-mail and wanted to know what Krauss deleted. Krauss said he deleted portions of the e-mail because they were "technical." Guess what? Vilenkin's uncensored e-mail to Krauss has been made public and it paints a different picture than the one Krauss presented. Here's the uncensored e-mail from Vilenkin to Krauss:

===========================

Hi Lawrence,

Any theorem is only as good as its assumptions. The BGV theorem says that if the universe is on average expanding along a given worldline, this worldline cannot be infinite to the past.

A possible loophole is that there might be an epoch of contraction prior to the expansion. Models of this sort have been discussed by Aguirre & Gratton and by Carroll & Chen. They had to assume though that the minimum of entropy was reached at the bounce and offered no mechanism to enforce this condition. It seems to me that it is essentially equivalent to a beginning.

On the other hand, Jaume Garriga and I are now exploring a picture of the multiverse where the BGV theorem may not apply. In bubbles of negative vacuum energy, expansion is followed by cocntraction, and it is usually assumed that this ends in a big crunch singularity. However, it is conceivable (and many people think likely) that singularities will be resolved in the theory of quantum gravity, so the internal collapse of the bubbles will be followed by an expansion. In this scenario, a typical worldline will go through a succession of expanding and contracting regions, and it is not at all clear that the BGV assumption (expansion on average) will be satisfied.

I suspect that the theorem can be extended to this case, maybe with some additional assumptions. But of course there is no such thing as absolute certainty in science, especially in matters like the creation of the universe. Note for example that the BGV theorem uses a classical picture of spacetime. In the regime where gravity becomes essentially quantum, we may not even know the right questions to ask.

Alex

===========================

William Lane Craig's reaction to this uncensored e-mail:

===========================

Whoa! That puts a very different face on the matter, doesn't it? Why didn't Krauss read the sentence, "It seems to me that it is essentially equivalent to a beginning"? Because it was too technical? Is this the transparency, honesty, and forthrightness that Krauss extols? (By the way, Vilenkin's criticism of these models is the same one that Vilenkin makes in his Cambridge paper: far from showing an eternal past, these models actually feature a universe with a common beginning point for two arrows of time.)

And why did Krauss delete Vilenkin's caveat that the BGV theorem can, in his estimation, be extended to cover the case of an expanding and contracting model such as Garriga and Vilenkin are exploring? And why delete the remark that such a model is usually assumed to be incorrect? It's evident that Vilenkin's email was selectively edited to give it the spin Krauss wanted.

===========================

Lawrence Krauss is in deep trouble for taking Vilenkin out of context like this. This proves Krauss is more interested in ideology than scientific evidence. This dishonesty shows he fails as a serious academic and leading thinker in physics and science. To read more on Lawrence Krauss' misuse of Alexander Vilenkin go here (this a must-read article!): http://reasonablefaith.org/honesty-transparency-full-disclosure-and-bgv-theorem

📺 Things to think about as a theistic evolutionist

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2012-06-13}

When CMI speakers are out speaking they are often challenged by fellow Christians that have become convinced of evolution and claim that God used evolution to create.
Richard and Calvin show what atheists and Bible sceptics say about this position (theistic evolution). Does adding millions of year of evolution to Genesis really help when sharing the Gospel? Watch and see!

Related content
• Some questions for theistic evolutionists and 'progressive creationists' (http://creation.com/some-questions-for-theistic-evolutionists)
• Response to the evolution appeasers (http://creation.com/response-to-the-evolution-appeasers-in-treasury-new-zealand)
• Did God create over billions of years? (http://creation.com/did-god-create-over-billions-of-years)
• Evolutionary syncretism: a critique of Biologos (http://creation.com/biologos-evolutionary-syncretism)
• Chamberlain and the Church (http://creation.com/chamberlain-and-the-church)
• The future: some issues for 'long age' Christians (http://creation.com/the-futuresome-issues-for-long-age-christians)
• A response to Tim Keller's 'Creation, Evolution and Christian Laypeople' (http://creation.com/timothy-keller-response)
• Churches celebrating the 'Year of Darwin' (http://creation.com/churches-celebrating-the-year-of-darwin)
• The horse and the tractor—Why God and evolution don't mix (http://creation.com/the-horse-and-the-tractor)

📺 Does the Bible contain scientific errors? (Creation Magazine LIVE! 6-19)

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 1 year ago 2016-12-03}

Does the Bible say pi equals 3? Does it mention unicorns as real animals? Does it say that insects have 4 legs? Skeptics answer yes, but are wrong, again!

Related Articles:
Do rabbits chew their cud? (http://creation.com/do-rabbits-chew-their-cud)
The Unicorn: The Bible does not refer to fantasy animals (http://creation.com/the-unicorn)
Science, history, and the Bible (http://creation.com/science-history-bible)
Does the Bible say pi equals 3.0? (http://creation.com/does-the-bible-say-pi-equals-3)

Related Products:
Christianity for Skeptics (http://creation.com/s/10-2-585)
The Creation Answers Book (http://creation.com/s/10-2-505)
Refuting Compromise (http://creation.com/s/10-2-575)
Creation magazine (free sample copy) (http://creation.com/free-mag)

📺 Parasitic DNA in the human genome?

CMIcreationstation ^{📤 5 years ago 2013-01-02}

Is the human genome full of parasites? This might seem like a ridiculous question but some researchers suggest that it is.
The human genome project revealed a large number of transposable elements. These DNA segments copy themselves and move around the genome. Some scientists claim they serve no function and have dismissed them as parasitic DNA. Some evolutionary scientists claim that similarities with chimps in these supposedly useless bits prove evolution.
But new research shows they have functions. One study revealed that transposable elements activate during embryo development in mice, to control gene expression. Another study revealed they activate in gene dense regions to control gene expression. They are not spread randomly throughout the genome as previously thought.
So DNA isn't full of parasites at all, but rather many sophisticated ways to control gene expression.

Related Articles:
Junk DNA Evolutionary Discards or God's tools? (http://creation.com/junk-dna-evolutionary-discards-or-gods-tools)
Large Scale Function for ERVs (endogenous retroviruses) (http://creation.com/large-scale-function-for-endogenous-retroviruses)
No Joy for Junkies (http://creation.com/no-joy-for-junkies)

Related Products:
How Evolution Hurts Science DVD (http://creation.com/store_redirect.php?sku=30-9-586)

📺 Evolutionary Development: Chicken Teeth - Crash Course Biology #17

CrashCourse ^{📤 5 years ago 2012-05-21}

Hank introduces us to the relatively new field of evolutionary developmental biology, which compares the developmental processes of different organisms to determine their ancestral relationship, and to discover how those processes evolved. Also fruit flies with eyes on their legs and chickens with teeth!

Crash Course Biology is now available on DVD! http://dft.ba/-8css

Like CrashCourse on Facebook: http://facebook.com/youtubecrashcourse
Follow CrashCourse on Twitter: http://twitter.com/thecrashcourse

References for this episode can be found in the Google document here:

Table of Contents
1) EVO/DEVO - 00:51
2) Developmental Regulatory Genes - 2:00
3) Gap Genes - 2:39
4) Homeobox / HOX Genes - 2:50
5) Messed-Up Experiment - 6:16
6) EVO/DEVO & Evolution - 7:26
a) Chickens with teeth - 8:14

evolutionary developmental biology, biology, evo-devo, evolution, animal, organism, genetics, science, crashcourse, developmental regulatory genes, gap genes, homeobox genes, hox genes, instructions, hierarchy, bill mcginnis, junk DNA, gene products, embryo, switzerland, fruit fly, scientist, mutation, gene expression, chicken, teeth Support CrashCourse on Subbable: http://subbable.com/crashcourse

📺 Evolution's Failed Predictions